Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Navan Rail Line

11819202224

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,329 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    People need to calm down, with Sligo trains going to Heuston, there's enough capacity for trains every 10 minutes to both Navan and Maynooth. The Navan line will cross a lot more open countryside than maynooth line does so I'd wager more trains will be allocated to maynooth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I agree with what has been so far that the western branches aren't really that comparable to the Northern line branches.

    The M3 line could be made a shuttle service in the short term if the demand is there for extra services on either line, but when the Navan line opens that just wont be feasible.

    The Maynooth line can't be made into a shuttle either, as L1011 has a very good point about the usage. During last year's census Maynooth alone had close to the same ridership as the whole Howth branch, and during the two years before that Maynooth actually exceeded Howth branch patronage. Additionally depending on where the depot is placed the DART may go as far as Kilcock, and after D+ there are plans to add another station or two to the line.

    Additionally I think one of the reasons they haven't made M3 services shuttle services as a part of D+ is that there isn't terminal capacity on the Maynooth line for 10tph. Sure it might be possible to turn M3-Clonsilla into a shuttle service (and ideally increase frequency to 6tph like Howth shuttles) but then where would the 4tph otherwise terminating on the line go? Having all 10tph terminating at Maynooth may cause congestion or might just not be possible. And I don't believe either of the Leixlip stations have sidings or the space to add sidings to allow them to terminate there. They would have to be sent to Kilcock, and maybe if the DART is extended to Kilcock as a part of the D+ depot that will become an option, but at least at the time plans were first made that would not have been possible.

    Looking more in the long term there are also a few other things to consider. A big problem with the Northern line is that the Howth branch would likely have to made into a shuttle service anyways when the Northern line is four-tracked. It would be far too difficult to cross a four-tracked line without killing capacity or causing massive congestion. Additionally an advantage the western line has is that because of the limited development around Clonsilla station, it could be possible to create a fly-over junction. This would practically eliminate congestion from the two lines merging, and would completely remove Clonsilla Jnc as a bottleneck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭PH0NER


    The M3 line is already just a shuttle to Clonsilla most of the day and all weekend, though. I wish it were an all-day direct service. I can't imagine it would continue to be a shuttle if it were extended to Navan.

    From the D+ West thread, the M3 branch after the D+ upgrade will allegedly have 4 direct trains to city centre per hour all day (see here)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,538 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Maynooth and Leixlip are very big towns. Their railway service is never going to be a shuttle.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I use Dunboyne station, and I honestly wouldn't mind having a shuttle to Clonsilla, so long as that shuttle arrives every 10 minutes or so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 47 thosewhoknow


    The timeline for the RO is now 2027. Not a surprise but disappointing nonetheless considering this might delay the already unbelievable opening date of 2036.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭OisinCooke


    When are we likely to see emerging preferred route consultation…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,329 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Apparently in Q1 2026.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    To quote Del Amitri, 'The needle returns to the start of the song and we all sing along like before'…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,476 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,329 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The business case is likely to find that it is indeed worth the money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,429 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,041 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Surely the most blatantly obvious train project in the country. I couldn't believe it when I heard Navan wasn't connected to the Dublin commuter network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    With the ending of Tara trains, I wouldn't be surprised to see the alternative route via Drogheda getting abandoned over the next few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    It has a motorway.

    Bus will be cheaper and faster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    It will cost nearly a billion and run at a loss.

    It will have no real benefit to Navan.

    It has a motorway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    That attitude is what gave us the NX bus service and it’s not good enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The NX is cheaper, quicker, more frequent.

    Plus it uses existing infrastructure like the big motorway that was built.

    The only benefit I see is that it might spur house building along it, particularly near the stops closer to the city center.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,041 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I'm not trolling.

    It's a reasonable opinion.

    Has a cost benefit analysis been done?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    having a motor way is not an argument against rail, using road as an argument was discredited as any sort of an argument decades ago.
    the bus is not faster between navan and dublin and even with road upgrades which would be more expensive then rail that will remain the case.
    as for cheaper, it will be for a user in terms of fares but that is meaningless really as that does not remove the need for rail either and there is also the need to dent car traffic.
    navan and so on is beyond bus being able to be the only method of transport able to handle the demand no matter how much capacity you throw at it now and the increasing costs of road maintenence mean road transport has to be cut.
    it's over, rail is needed and is going to have to happen, and it is going to have to be pushed hard for with no let up.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    a billion would be at the very very high end of the costs, essentially it's a figure pulled out of one's backside to try and justify being against the reopening of the line, it is not going to work as an argument for you or anyone.
    all railways run at a loss, thats not an argument either, if you want it to be otherwise then you have to have london and south east england style fares and even then with reduced demand you are back to square one again and for what.
    of course it will have a benefit to navan, they won't have to be relying on a beyond over-subscribed bus service that can have no more done for it as throwing more capacity will mean a situation where we have buses with nowhere to go because there are so many of them.
    and again, it has a motor way is not an argument against rail, that was discredited back in the 1960s.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it's actually not a reasonable opinion, it's a bunch of discredited and outdated arguments that have been proven wrong decades ago.

    arguments that have held back our whole public transport system for decades whether it be bus or rail or anything else.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,515 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    To be fair the project has to meet the minimum requirements laid down in government spending policy, its has to meet the bar. We need to get past that first.

    Navan is not cheap, it was 480 million back almost 20 years ago, so it would be getting close to the billion at this stage. There is little demand along the route except at Navan itself, if you deviate to find more passengers you increase cost and increase journey time from Navan so reduce demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,200 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Yep, don’t think it’s a done deal.


    It’s about 30km from the end of the line at M3 Parkway to Navan with very little in the way of revenue generation along the way.

    I’d be very interested to know how it could actually pass a CBA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I don't think so either.

    It's just one big town.

    If there was more towns further along the line or between it and Dublin, then it might be worth it.

    It doesn't really even benefit Navan.

    The only thing is if it continues to grow in population it could be 40,000+ in 20 years, so it's almost a small city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,041 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    9th biggest city/town and the biggest with no train station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 164 ✭✭The Mathematician


    Surely we should be thinking about buliding new towns along the line as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,531 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Spend further billions to justify spending a billion on a rail line! It would be cheaper and more beneficial in every way to deviate to serve Dunshaughlin. The old alignment is gone, 90% will have to be bought back and it literally has to be rebuilt from scratch. Trying to reopen the Victorian route is going to end in failure.



Advertisement