Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

N8/N25/N40 - Dunkettle Interchange [open to traffic]

1144145146147148150»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Two questions. How many cars use the N40 as a through road (e.g. M8 Michelstown to N22 Macroom via N40). Likewise, how many cars on the N40 start and end their journey using the N40, without going further west than Ballincollig or further east than the tunnel?

    I do seriously question how many cars will be taken off the N40 South once the N40 North is done. The only real benefit would be W-NE (i.e. N22-M8) and E-NW (i.e. N25-M20). If you’re going from Ovens to Little Island, it’s still easier to go on the N40 South, and you’ll need to use the N40 regardless to get to the N27, N28 or N71.

    As I keep saying, so long as the N40 South goes through the southside of the city with multiple exits, as opposed to around the city like the N40 North will, the N40 South will always primarily be a distributor and not a bypass. An Outer South Ring (N25 Little Island - N28 Ringaskiddy - N27 Airport - N71 Viaduct - N22 Ballincollig) is badly needed. Outside of the N25-N28 bit, it should all be relatively simple terrain and greenfield. Avoids the tunnel, connects all industrial areas, has connections to all national roads, and most importantly, would not be attractive as a distributor road. Through zoning and limiting junctions, a protected corridor could be built along the route to prevent another N40 South situation

    Another benefit of the Outer Ring is the removal of the need to widen J9 Bloomfield through J7 South Douglas Road, which I can’t see being possible without serious egg breaking



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Southern outer ring is probably not going to be on the agenda in our lifetime.

    N/M40 North is needed for the minority of longer distance traffic. And we unfortunately have many of our "distance" resources based on the N40. Think of traffic from Fermoy to CUH/Bons/UCC/Apple/Airport it will be valuable. More importantly still it's needed for M20 traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    N40 North is definitely needed, M20 being constructed or otherwise. My issue is more that I don’t think it will take enough cars off the N40 South to make much of a difference to usage levels

    But that’s just me guessing, I could be wrong and the modelling could say otherwise



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I’ve already told you I use that road everyday.


    when travelling east it’s bumper to bumper from smyths toys to the tunnel, just like it was before a quarter of a billion was spent on it.

    The narrowing at douglas is an issue, but it doesn’t ease after that either most days, the level of traffic continues past the Carrigaline turn and as many cars leave as join at the Mahon junction, if not more.

    Driving west the area between the Mahon on ramp and Carrigaline turn off is a massive accident spot due to the amount of lane changing taking place.

    What’s basically happened for that money is nothing other than window dressing, and nobody will ever convince me it was money well spent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think you're right.
    I believe if we improve the N40 South to any further degree then the additional capacity will just be used up by commuters. I believe for the N40 South the only option now is removing commuters: better options are needed (faster, cheaper, more convenient, more comfortable). But extricating people from cars will extremely difficult.

    I'd be in favour of N/M40 North and maybe some kind of backwards multi-point tolling (short distance users high cost, true long distance commuters no cost). Try and cut the Douglas-area usage by all means possible while providing capacity elsewhere basically.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    In the interim, the Southern Distributor should act as a local outer ring, but City Council plans are to run it along R610-R609-R851-N27-new road to R641. Should it happen, it will just repeat the mistakes made with the N40. However, any widening of the R610 will be near impossible, with some (new and old) houses built right up to the road border. The Fingerpost is already a huge bottleneck that will just get worse once it’s converted to a signalised junction (even though a signalised junction is necessary for bus priority). The R609-R851 link bridge has already been shut down as part of Bus Connects, and will bring any SDR plans to a complete halt. The SDR needs to be R610-Monastery Road-Garryduff Road-Sciart Cross-Elm Hill-new road-R641. In tandem with the opening of the SDR and Leghanamore Road upgrade, the N40 Douglas and Togher exits and on ramps could be closed. That will already help reducing N40 traffic without introducing the (in my eyes) necessary Outer South Ring



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭Frostybrew


    North ring road is needed. However, the main solution to this issue is a comprehensive Cork metropolitan area wide public transport solution. The DKI and N40 bottlenecks are caused by commuters that could and should be using public transport, if it existed. While the CACR will have some impact, an extended rail based rapid transit system is needed. I don't see this happening, as the local political will and general public world view will not support it.

    The LUAS proposal and bus connects, even if implemented, will be inadequate; as there is far too much pandering to the motor lobby, NIMBYs, and other vested interests. Cork is no longer a small city, yet it retains a small city worldview when it comes to transportation, and this is perhaps the biggest obstacle to solving these types of issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    You're right. We need a step-change in delivery of "non-car" transport solutions in Cork. We are going in the right direction but progress is slow and that progress is being matched by car/roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭confidentjosh


    Not sure if this is the correct place for this but it does directly impact on the Dunkettle junction as it seems to include a proposed upgrade to the existing Dunkettle roundabout. Mods, feel free to put this somewhere else if necessary.

    Has anyone else heard about this? Nothing on the POCs main website I noticed.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=855814143799911&set=a.187090127338986



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,258 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Spotted that today and it does indeed warrant a new thread as its still technically the N8!



  • Advertisement
Advertisement