Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

N8/N25/N40 - Dunkettle Interchange [open to traffic]

1144145146147149

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    No, my main issue is with the sh1t signage.

    I've just completed a 13,000km tour from Cork to Malaga in Spain, to Nordkapp in Norway, and back to Cork, which must qualify me to make an informed judgment on the signage at the JLT interchange versus other similar intersections.

    The most complicated 'spaghetti' type interchanges abroad have never left me in any doubt about my through route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭cantalach


    And I think it’s strange that some people here misrepresent what others write. You’ve portrayed my criticism of the dangerous driving as trying to “absolve” the bad signage. There are two prerequisites to almost all of the bad driving at the Dunkettle Interchange. The first is its sub-standard design, including the truly appalling signage. The second is drivers being self-centred muppets who display complete disregard for the safety of others.

    I believe in personal responsibility. This means being a grown-up and dealing with life’s minor inconveniences on one’s own without turning them into everyone else’s problems too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That wasn’t solely aimed at your post, and I do accept your point, but every time this topic comes up, there’s a flurry of “people should be paying attention” posts that place the blame on the drivers for not being able to work around the misleading instructions the signage is giving them.

    Right now, given how poorly the existing signs direct people, it’s impossible to tell what behaviour arises from self-centred muppetry and what is from a moment of panic caused by having been directed into the wrong place, and needing to get to the right one quickly.

    There’s no indication that this way of joining M8 is not the only way of joining the motorway, so someone who finds themselves in the left lane, then sees that blue sign is going to try to cross as quickly as they can, because as far as they know, that may be their only chance to get onto the motorway. Sometimes they’ll do that move safely, sometimes they won’t, but the fact is that they wouldn’t need to if the approach signage had guided them away from using the left lane in the first place. With correct signage, the chances of needing to dash across a lane of traffic are greatly reduced, and then we could safely blame most of those last-minute dashes on ignorant muppetry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Fully agree that the signage is appalling. But I hope we can also agree that the gantry signs on approach to the tunnel (see below) do at least give a strong hint that the right hand lane might, on balance, be a better bet than the left hand lane.

    It’s this lack of basic cop-on in some drivers that drives me nuts. I’m imagining the inner dialogue of some DKI virgins. “Hmm…beats me what might be meant by that M8 sign pointing right…I’ll stay over here on the left.” What utter lack of intuition does that require?

    IMG_3274.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Fly to Seattle via London, jump in a rental car, drive 270 km to Portland, and find your way from I-5 (S) to Route 26 (W). Then come back and tell me you’ve never been left in any doubt about your through road. No country has the monopoly on ambiguous signage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭Mrs Dempsey


    On the motorway around Bilboa heading towards France, on a motorcycle. Wet day, overtaking a truck, in the left lane (near the median) & realised that it was the exit lane for the city. Unusual, as expectation on the continent would be exiting on the right; it may have been poor signage or poor observation by me - can't say. However I out ruled a last minute kamikaze manoeuvre (motorcycle V truck 😱) & opted for an unscheduled & unwanted diversion into Bilboa.

    The converse of the right lane demerge. If I ever get back there I'll check the signage but I'm open to the possibility that it was my inattention that led me to assume that the lane I was in headed to France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    A right-side exit is such an unusual thing in a country that drives on the left that it needs a hell of a lot more than a hint..

    The signage is not fit for for purpose. There should be no suggestion at all that taking the left lane would be good for Dublin, but the current sign does just this by having "Dublin" span the two lanes. I posted a better design a year ago (posted again a page or two ago) that took me only an hour, still conforms to the signage manual, and doesn't set drivers up for a shock after they exit the tunnel... given that each sign costs well over €50k, you'd imagine they could have spent a bit of time to review what it was actually telling drivers to do...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    Interestingly enough this type of signage is used in Dublin as well at the N7/M50(N) outbound route. Just drove it today and was suprised because again it's not entirely clear to people who wouldn't be sure about the route. I do know where I'm going so I would always be in the right hand lane if I'm heading northbound.

    image.png

    And actually the sign above is the last notice you get until the road splits below. It really is bad design and worse unnecessary design.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭gooseman12


    The tunnel is a massive factor on the dunkettle implementation of this signage design.

    The fact that you're at least supposed to stay in lane means that you really need to be in the right lane for m8 before entering the tunnel.

    By the time you come out of the tunnel and actually see what the situation is, in most cases, it is too late to rectify without doing something dangerous.

    The sign before the tunnel should completely unambiguous, get in lane before the tunnel, left lane only for city centre-n20, right lane only for m8, both lanes n25



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    There was a time in the evenings (when there isnt even an incident) heading from the south ring to the Tunnell that the traffic would have you backed up beyond the kinsale roundabout flyover to kearys garage.


    Thankfully now that the €216 million has been spent that traffic on an average evening rush hour is only as far as Smyths toys.

    The next €600 million on the ringaskiddy road will undoubtedly improve this situation even more.

    Such exceptional bang for your buck.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,729 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    What do you expect from a design which was "what's the least we can get away with?". There should have been a second crossing here, proper widening of approach roads and suitable ramps. Not in Ireland. Second rate and second rate outcomes is what we are given.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    In all seriousness, second crossing yes, West of the city. Throw in a pedestrian&cycle tunnel at Dunkettle too while they're at it. If we're doing dream infrastructure…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,729 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Well, I'm right and you're wrong. So what do you think about that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    the Cost of the M28 hasn’t gotten to its inevitable BAM-Cost-overrun phase yet which will surely add an extra 30/40% onto the €450 million price tag.

    So those costs onto the Dunkettle works and we could have spent very close to €1 Billion and not any improvement to traffic on the south ring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Oh look! A spurious comparison with the NCH!

    M28 is being built by a different company to the NCH (BAM Civil Engineering is not BAM Buildings), and that company has a track record of delivering on time and on budget. The projects can't be compared either: TII is experienced in bringing road projects to completion on budget, but it is not the agency involved with NCH, NCH is not a road (you probably did notice that, in fairness, but this is the internet, and there’ll be someone…), and its delays and overruns are not down to the contractor alone.

    Finally, traffic has improved - you’re forgetting that at peak times the traffic used to completely stop on the tunnel approach from both directions, as Northbound traffic blocked access to Southbound. This doesn't happen anymore. That was the purpose of the interchange: to isolate each movement from the effects of peak-time flows on the others.

    Throughput at Dunkettle has increased massively, but the increase in congestion is because of a larger increase in the number of vehicles, and that's ultimately caused by housing supply near Cork City (i.e., there is none).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    If the traffic has improved why are the tailbacks the same distance?

    What has the throughout increase to? And what was it previously?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    No, it's not. Same owner, different company, with separate management. BAM is the overall holding company, but the two divisions are independently operated. BAM Civil used to be called Roadbridge; BAM Buildings is the company that used to be Rohcon.

    I already explained why the tailbacks are the same: there are a lot more cars on the road. If there was no new interchange, the situation would be much, much worse now. Traffic has increased 15% on the section of N40 just south of the tunnel in the last two years. The DKI project did not add capacity to any road; what it did do was de-couple traffic on the various movements to allow those roads to work closer to their capacity. Prior to this work, if a lot of traffic used the M8-N8 movement into Cork, then that blocked all of N25-N40 and N40-N25 and N40-N8. The flow is also smoother, with traffic rarely coming to a complete stop for minutes at a time, which is something it used to do regularly before.

    Really, the only fix for traffic here that will work is to build places to live that aren’t 30+ km away from people’s jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    where are you getting your figures from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I would never have assumed otherwise! You're always right of course kermit!

    Seriously though, there is some merit to the things you're saying. The throughput at the tunnel has reached capacity and we need to change some things. Obviously I of all people am not saying "roads are the only answer", but I do think we need the N40 North and it's going to be a huge battle to get traction on it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I believe that things have improved, because broken down flows on one arm of the interchange now no longer affect the opposing direction, whereas previously the roundabout used to cause stoppage in every direction.

    However, I don't really think it was the solution we needed most and I'm not sure whether it was great value for money. A lot of the traffic is still short/medium distance commuters, and that must surely be the priority.

    For someone living in Mahon/Douglas working in Little Island or Carrigtwohill there is still no viable alternative. For Glanmire/Carrigtwohill/mayfield/etc to Mahon/Douglas/Ringaskiddy the tunnel (driving) is still the best option. The Cork Metro Area Transport system is dysfunctional from a local-local perspective. CMATS isn't being implemented after already being too conservative in its brief really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    N40 North Ring, or rather M40, is a key to this. Unlike the South ring, it is planned as a true motorway bypass, to get long distance traffic from one side of Cork to the other; South Ring was forced into being both a distributor and a bypass, and so struggles to be either. The North Ring will take a good chunk of traffic off N8-N20 through Cork city, as well as off N40 South.

    I can’t see any plan for another road tunnel making sense - it’s really expensive, and it won’t fix the things in the long term, but with M40 North Ring in place, traffic with no business in Cork can avoid it easily, which would allow the existing N8 and N20 within the new orbital road (and possibly the city end of N27 South Link) to be reconfigured as urban distributor roads, with dedicated bus and cycle lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    ultimately so.

    By the time M28 is completed the capacity of the South ring won’t have increased and 1 Billion or so will have been spent and it’s only benefit is to make breakdowns flow better?

    If the increases in traffic volume as reported above are true then both projects are already Redundant because they never future proofed the roads and are already past capacity.

    If you had taken that money and increased the capacity of the bottle neck at the tunnel and done nothing else the entire south ring would have been better off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Do you actually use this road? The biggest bottleneck on South Ring is the Douglas viaduct - this section of narrow-lane 2+2 road is what causes the tailbacks west of Kinsale Road. Also, everyone here is familiar with these projects to know that you’re pulling that cost of “a billion euro” out of your rear end. Dunkettle came to €216 million and N28 will cost €456 million, for the motorway and all of the other works connected with the scheme. If you think the two of them add up to a billion, lend me a hundred quid, and I’ll happily give you back €67…

    Road contracts from TII are effectively fixed price these days. The contractor agrees to do the work within the agreed timeframe, and if everything is correct at the end, they get the agreed amount. End of story; what it actually cost the contractor doesn‘t come into it. On the other side of that, once the contract is signed, TII will never request a change to the works. Both of these factors keep road projects on budget.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    use it everyday.


    the bottleneck in douglas is far from the only one.
    nobody every sat in their car the far side of little island waiting to go through the tunnel because of not having a hard shoulder by douglas.

    Do you work for TII or BAM or someone like that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    under budget…


    it’s was costing €100 million in 2019

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/infrastructure-agency-defends-use-of-contract-for-dunkettle-interchange-1.3972391

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30934891.html

    Finals cost €215 million.

    Let’s see how the final figure of the M28 looks before declaring it a success at €460 million, or €41 million per km - (European average is €6 - €12mlion)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    That bottleneck is the tunnel itself though, aside from Kermit's suggestion above there's not a lot can be done about that.

    We do need the DKI project and the M28 project, the problem is a lack of progress on parallel sustainable projects. Roads projects are still needed but improvements are quickly being undermined. That doesn't really mean we shouldn't do the roads projects, and it's kinda frustrating that we're always talking about "either or".

    I'm kind of pleased the DKI wasn't a "silver bullet" if I'm honest, because many people are now finally talking about more holistic solutions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    the problem I see is we are wayyyy over spending on projects and not the right ones either



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Grand, you accept that the tunnel isn’t the only bottleneck on this road. So, when traffic is backed up west of the Kinsale Road interchange, do you imagine that this is mainly due to the tunnel, seven kilometres ahead of you, or to the constrained road at Douglas less than one km down the road? I know which one it is, because I also use this road.

    I’ll grant you that queues at Mahon Point are due to the tunnel (actually, last-minute lane-changes at the northern exit due to bad signage have a serious impact too), but those jams are never as bad as the ones approaching Douglas, and the traffic is never stopped all the way from the tunnel back to Kinsale Road.

    You’re never going to be able to drive at the speed limit all the way through during the morning and evening peaks. That's not how roads are provisioned. There will always be delays when everyone else wants to use the road too. That’s part of the reason why more lanes don’t work.

    Of course I don’t bloody work for TII or BAM - I don’t even work in civil engineering. Like most posters here, I’m just interested; I have actually worked in the area of traffic management and road use charging in the past, but not here in Ireland. But I’ve been following the developments of the road network in this country long enough to know about both of them, and to know what is - and is not - their fault. I’m not sticking up for them, just correcting the assumptions you made about how projects are delivered and how much they really cost: the price of M28 is a fixed quantity.

    If you still think more lanes in the tunnel is the answer, come up with an idea of where you’d put them, how you’d tie them into the existing road, and give an estimate of how much that’d all cost. Then we’ll talk about what else could be done with the same money to fix the problems.



Advertisement