Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1158915901592159415951853

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Give any examples, so?

    In my synopsis of the game I was critical of Crowley (justifiably), but was more critical of Ringrose, and also flagged Sheehan, O'Brien, Osborne as not really lighting it up. The bulk of my praise was for McCloskey.

    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,509 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    The over criticism of Crowley when he plays ok (not brilliant) is also beyond ridiculous if you ask me. Sure, he made a few errors and tried things that perhaps weren't on, but many players were sub par on Saturday and even the great Beauden Barrett fluffed a few kicks, one particularly badly (the dimensions of the pitch didn't help the kickers IMO).

    I'm guessing it's a push back to SP's dropping and the way he is lambasted from left right and centre for every small misdemeanour, which I don't agree with either. His form I believe is suffering at the moment because of it. Must we hammer these two young 10's every time they make mistakes until they're both devoid of any confidence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There have been some comments on Crowley that to me crossed the line into nonsense, but that's largely the same on most topics here.

    Most of the criticism of him has been justifiably fair IMO; he had a poor game on Saturday. He wasn't on his own, absolutely, but he was poor. I'm not saying he should be dropped (and don't think I've seen any other posts saying he should), but he certainly didn't bring his form from Croke Park with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Well I would look at the lineout/ruck work AND the number 13. They are not mutually exclusive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 689 ✭✭✭CONSI


    Selection for next game will be interesting, does he pick mainly the same side, injuries aside, and say to them, go win, improve and be ready for last two tougher tests, seems to have been Farrells MO in previous years. what good does resting an underbaked starting 15 do. Changing 10 again will only cause more moaning when it comes to SA game as to who should start, he said he's picked on form, that doesnt change losing to the AB's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Vinnie222


    I haven’t seen any pundits or match reports describe Crowley’s performance as poor. If you’ve seen something that specifically rates him that way, could you point it out? From what I’ve read, most analyses have mentioned that he wasn’t at his best but stopped well short of calling it a poor showing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think we'll see a second-string side, most of those who started in Chicago will drop to the bench or out completely. A long flight followed by a short turnaround isn't great player welfare. Maybe something like (assuming Beirne is out):

    McCarthy Kelleher Bealham

    Ryan Izuchukwu

    Ahern Doris Timoney

    Casey Prendergast

    Stockdale Aki/Henshaw Osborne TOB

    JOB

    I really hope we see Osborne in the centre, and hope we don't see Henshaw at 13. I think/hope he still has a lot to offer, but only at 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    That is the concern though really. The set-piece, mauling and rucks and our forwards play in general is what sets everything up for Ireland. This team, and most teams, are not capable of creating anything without it.

    The tight-five without Beirne (who Always plays 80 mins) is going to struggle against good test teams.

    My harsh assessment: Porter and Furlong are not what they once were and with respect to Paddy McCarthy, his best days will be ahead of him, and unfortunately for Bealham and Henderson, they are behind them.

    Boyle, McCarthy, Clarkson, Ahern need to be selected for Japan and Australia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,380 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Izzy is injured. Don't think he travelled, even.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    There may be some of that from certain posters but if you ( generally, not you specifically) are starting to see every post through provincial eyes then you will assume that's the case. If you put your Ireland cap on, Crowley was objectively not great at the weekend. Nothing to do with any other player or his club team, just didn't go great. There were some mitigating factors, quality of possession, quality of opposition, lack of previous opportunity etc. But really Jack won't be happy with how it went for him overall.

    That being said, moving on. I would select Jack again this weekend and ask him to deliver the coach's plan and fix a few of the errors and deliver a decent win. I would also be asking Sam to come in with the job done and close it out with a mature performance, no headlines just solid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Said it before and I will say it again, nienabaar getting the leinster gig has been the downfall of leinster and Irish rugby, attacking play, players skillset etc very bad now, ringrose is more of a battering ram now than a creative force he can be, thus issue allied to POC, goodman etc not being up to scratch either has caused us to decline unfortunately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Gaaah, forgot that. So, Ryan and Henderson the only options, assuming Ahern is there as a six? Edogbo on the bench?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    My team for the weekend would be something like this.

    mccarthy kelliher clarkeson ryan beirne baird conan doris jgp crowley lowe osbourne ringrose tob frawley

    boyle mccarthy bealham casey prendergast aherne prendergast hansen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    We should be very capable of handling Japan with Baird or Ahern in the second row I think. Would give a chance for Prendergast to come in at 6.

    I'm doubtful Edogbo will be involved, not certain he's rejoining the squad coming off RTP, but I'd welcome his inclusion if he is there.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,951 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Can any of you explain the tactics NZ used to beat Ireland? Maybe a list of 3 main approaches they used?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Not calling up Soroka was a mistake, also where is Murray? Baffling the persistence with Henderson at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,509 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    I genuinely don't see how he was poor. A few errors yes, but not poor. The player ratings in most of the publications would back that up. 6/7 out of 10 across the board, which I would say is pretty decent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think he was poor. Not our worst player, as I've said, but he did very little well IMO.

    He put passes on the ground, kicks out on the full. He missed a very kickable penalty at a crucial time, and his kicking from hand was almost entirely poor - almost every contestable was too far. The clear out was poor on that holding on penalty he conceded, but I was screaming at the TV for him to kick that ball and not get himself isolated, it was a really poor and really costly decision.

    Our backline and our attack are being universally slated on here, so the notion that the 10 had a good game in that scenario doesn't make sense. Some of the backs were poor (Ringrose had an awful game), but McCloskey played well at 12 and broke the line any time he carried. I can literally only think of one occasion in the game where we looked fluid (an attack down the left hand side which ultimately led to the try by Furlong) where our attack looked cohesive.

    Plenty of Munster fans on here have said they think he was relatively poor too.

    What did he do well? What did he do to warrant a 7 out of 10 rating anywhere?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭almostover


    1. Target the lineout. S. Barrett going off early injured resulted in NZ's best lineout forward, Lord, coming on and dismantling our lineout. NZ seemed to read our calls easy and have a man up in front, or alongside, the Irish jumper very often.

    2. Target the ruck. Their no.13 made several turnovers. Savea poached some ball too. Beirne's sending off hurt our ability to poach but NZ clearly identified that our ruck resourcing and clear outs are poor and they made hay here.

    3. Move the point of contact and spread the ball wide. NZ scored with nice deft offloads in the tight exchanges and used that quick ball then to get wide where we defended the channel between TOB and Ringrose like schoolboys.

    And to be honest, they didn't have to be that good to beat us. Just somewhat efficient with their possession in our territory and have a decent platform in the set piece. They made plenty of errors too. We just made far too many and were the masters of our own downfall for the most part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I'm not concerned about beating Japan (they looked awful against SA), but I don't think either Baird or Ahern will end up in the second row long term so I'd rather see them at 6.

    I wonder could we see Prendergast at 7?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    He's following return to play protocols. They're probably being cautious with him given his injury history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    On that turnover before the try, the clearers never had chance. The way Crowley fell let the NZ 13 get onto the ball immediately, so Vdf and Aki had no shot at getting him off. Just an unfortunate sequence all around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I agree on Baird and Ahern, but I think their ability to move into the row will be a factor in them getting into match squads (same as Izuchukwu), and given the travel this week, Beirne's potential suspension, the A game tying up another few guys and Joe McCarthy's injury, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see either in there on Saturday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,094 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Why would they do that? It was a failed HIA, - his injury history consists of Achilles tear. Not connected in any way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He should have kicked the ball - I wouldn't mind, but those kind of chip and chase dinks are something he's really good at too, and it could have been pretty dangerous in that kind of broken field situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Look at the retreat from, in particular, AKi and Lowe vs where Holland came from , and that's your answer for why the clearers never had a chance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It was the hesitation that messed up the timing imo. Crowley looked like he was thinking about passing to VdF, then decided against and went to deck. That meant VdF was waiting to commit and the 13 was right on top of Crowley when he fell. A mess all around.



Advertisement
Advertisement