Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Luas Finglas

13132333436

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The part of Finglas it goes through after Tolka valley Park is extremely deprived.

    I know East Finglas is fine really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,593 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Are there any plans for a P+R at Charlestown or even out past Charlestown that might alleviate some of the car traffic heading into the city in the morning by giving people the chance to park at Charlestown and use the LUAS into CC?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,308 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Park and ride has little impact on car traffic in cities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,593 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    How so?
    Surely a park and ride allows people who can drive to the P+R and then get the PT to their place of work/wherever they are going, instead of being stuck in a car in traffic no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,308 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The largest park n ride, red cow has 600 spaces. It's rarely totally full and the users usually stay parked there for the day. The vast majority are single occupant cars. The luas red line has a daily capacity in the region of 80,000 but this is regularly exceeded in practice. In short, park and ride contributes very few of the luas's actual passengers, less than many regular luas stops in fact, and it takes up land, a serious amount of land. If the land were developed into apartments instead it would generate a lot more luas users and reduce car journeys.

    The reasons why people tend not to bother with park and ride are: once people have paid tax, insurance, maintenance and fuel and are already in their car, they're not likely to pay a parking charge and a luas fare even if it saves a few mins. The real influence on whether or not to drive is a) having a car and legal ability to drive it and b) free work place parking



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,542 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    One thing I'm wondering did Bertie and his crew buy Charlestown 30 years ago the amount of crap built up there and going through a spot which has some of the worst Dublin bus services is completely over populated with apartments and one shopping centre with Dunnes being the anchor tenant.

    Where and how a Luas is going to go up that far from Broombridge there is definitely some very unscrupulous things going on the whole area has little to no room for street level based tracks being layed and if they go for something like the dundrum area up above type it's going to take 20 years to build.

    Somebody is making big big money from a service going to an area that really does not need it as much as a rail link to the airport or the dart to maynooth but as a person living in Finglas and using the transport almost daily I am dreading how much interruption such a needless service will cause.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,374 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I've worked in companies before where a decision was needed on something, and the usual modum operandum was to put the best and the brightest in a room, explain the problem, and the proposed solution, and then go round the table for a go or no-go from each person.

    "I received correspondence from An Coimisiún Pleanála during the week indicating that they require more time for a decision to be made. I presume with the Metrolink decided yesterday a decision should be given shortly."

    What exactly do they need the extra time for the decision to be made for? Have they got some guy in a room some where who is mulling it over in detail - for weeks on end??

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭Thunder87


    If I'm not mistaken every application, even mammoth ones like Metrolink has just one main inspector assigned and it's their job to review, compile and write up everything before presenting it to the board. So yes, it's likely one guy in a room typing up a tortuously in-depth and exhaustive report to make a best effort at covering every possible JR avenue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,593 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    ok but think of the person living in Ashbourne or slane etc travelling to the CC.
    Surely in that case a P+R is a good option for them especially if there was a toll introduced on the road on the CC side of the P+R to incentivise people to use PT?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,308 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    It would still be ineffective though because they'd already be in their car on their way to their free work place parking. If government policy changed and began taxing work place parking in cities and removing the glut of public spaces that might make park and ride effective. The effort is better spent ensuring seamless interchange with Ashbourne buses.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Metrolink ended up with two inspectors, but one of those was the main decision maker. It seems to be incredibly rare, and was probably done under pressure from the government to speed up the process.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The route is available to view online here. No real issues getting into the heart of the area there. Construction wise, it's fairly standard stuff there, won't be great for a few months, but then you've got an excellent tram service afterwards.

    The rest of your comment is a bit self defeating, no? I don't understand how "Some of the worst Dublin bus services", "Completely overpopulated with apartments" meshes with "An area that does not need it".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Post edited by p_haugh on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,089 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    great, now get Poolbeg and Bray extensions into planning!

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,292 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Now the question is - is it funded as part of the coming five year NDP from 2026 to 2030.

    We should find out in a matter of weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,697 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    €600m for 3.9km of tram line?

    Irish Times headline excitedly proclaiming it could be open in 6 years time. How is it even possible it would take 6 years?

    Sums it up really.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,788 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    This is 4km of line through unremarkable suburbia and it's costing almost three times per km the cost of Luas Cross City, and at 150 million per kilometre is just below the original 2018 per km cost for MetroLink.

    What on earth?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Will this extension put an end to short-running trams destined for Parnell Street given the expected uplift of an additional 60k passengers that it will bring?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,292 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well you could have a year’s delay if it is subject to a judicial review, then they have to go tender, and finally it will depend on when the funding is available from as dictated by the National Development Plan.

    The latter is the critical bit.

    You can’t start building until the funding is available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,292 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Presumably it will need more trams to deliver the full service over the line. I suspect that is part of the inflated cost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,697 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It's just a microcosm of the problem the country has delivering infrastructure.

    In practice one can somewhat explain why it might take that long to build such a small project but it shouldn't take anywhere near that.

    It should be that once it's granted planning shovels should be in the ground within 12 months.

    I think this one is more unlikely to be JRed just because of the area it's going through (just a statement of fact, not being bad about the area) but we need to make the bar for JRs much higher in the state or bite the bullet and end it completely for vital projects.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Read through the direction order from the board there, no conditions to speak of, but a few things that stuck out.

    There's a condition that the scheme follow the DMURS and cycle design manual, and explicitly say that they should reduce roads first, then cycle lanes, and finally pedestrian space. Could just be a catch all thing that they apply to all road permissions now, but it does come across as ACP not being super happy with some of the design around this.

    The parks department had asked for a stop in Tolka Valley park itself, and TII said that the catchment area did not justify the stop. ACP looked at it, and said that it should be designed so that a future stop could be added there. I think that both TII and the parks department are correct here, it just depends on how you're looking at it. Obviously there's no one living in the park that could use the service, but putting a stop there turns the park itself into an amenity that other stops along the line could use easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,664 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    600m Is beer money. Even if it's obscenely expensive for what we're getting. The politicians will want it to proceed ASAP, as we are aware and for a while every paper and citizen is now aware. They are achieving nothing, they get nothing done. They'll be eager as anything to sanction mickey mouse projects like this, it's the likes of Dublin metro with the price tag it has, let's see of there's appetite for that, if the financial tide turns, rather, when it turns...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Hypothetically, if they wanted to connect it to the Metro in Ballymun/Northwood, what route would it take?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    I honestly don't give a flying shite about cost....we need infrastructure AT ALL COSTS in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    It should just continue on up through St Margaret's road.

    Ridiculous this is not in the plan as St Margaret's roads is densely populated highly residential area with apartments and houses on both sides all the way up to IKEA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Would it just share the road with traffic?

    It's not very wide.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Interesting wrinkle on this:

    Finglas/Ballymun Core Corridor is currently with the government, waiting on final approval for the award of the construction contract. One of the things that they have tried to avoid is having two Corridors under construction next to each, so having the Luas next to a corridor is less than ideal.

    While the Luas is mostly off main roads, it does interact with the Corridor once, at the main road (whose name escapes me right now). It's going to be interesting to see how they sequence this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,517 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The issue with the Red Cow though is that it’s a busy interchange, such that you’re going through a big headache to get there.

    You’re referring to a variety of different issues with cars that aren’t all P&R related.

    The issue with P&R from what I can see is that in more dense areas it becomes a waste of space and drives more local traffic (which is an issue in itself). I’d say theoretically them being near the end of a line with meh density that it works, as you are funnelling people from less dense places into a P&R and local traffic isn’t significant. But as time goes on and you get more ToD, an area gets busier and the P&R is less effective land use and just drives local traffic. An example of this to me would be the Stillorgan/Sandyford Luas stops where the P&R were built when they were more at the edge of the urban area. Sandyford is now like a mini city but we have this car magnet in the form of a P&R there to ship people elsewhere.

    Ideally a P&R is a temporary thing until you can fully exploit the land for more dense development around a stop. You will have the density then closer by to get people to the mass transit stop through orbital bus routes and the likes. It’s hard though once a P&R facility is built to remove it. People do use them and enjoy them, even if they arguably lead to more costs than benefits. Really once the Carrickmines extension and P+R was built they should have halved the number of parking spaces in Sandyford at least, and in its place plopped a few hundred apartments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,664 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I agree, same as metrolink etc. They've such obscene budgets, i don't care about spending. Inflation etc in relation to these project's. 30 billion a year welfare budget next year, that gives context to the metrolink budget...



Advertisement