Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish firefighter found guilty of rape in Boston!

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭brokenbad


    His guilt was evident the minute he tried to do a runner and fly home early only to be apprehended before the flight took off….similar to Armaghs Aidan Nugent who managed to flee the country before he was charged - but that's another story….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,682 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “That said, with inconclusive DNA I thought he may be found not guilty.”

    Testimony can be a very powerful piece of evidence in a trial -for both parties actually - DNA is often not present or the allegation is made some time after - hence no forensic evidence available

    -but all the additional small pieces of evidence such as his reaction to the rape allegation (define rape) and his question without knowing the details of the allegation (did she say I pined her down by her arms? (She did but he hadn’t been told that)) all contributed to the jury finding him guilty - in some ways, his own words convicted him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    It's been said a few times here, if he was innocent (and I acknowledge he has been found guilty), he’d be wise to get out of America quickly, just like he would in places such as North Korea, China, Singapore, or Saudi. The USA has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,600 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Oh i know that it was just a reply to the poster I replied to who said he would leave quickly. But I would say just because there is a treaty the person would not automatically be extradited



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,951 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    He isn't innocent though, he is guilty. That's why we he tried to leg it.

    He will be incarcerated because he deserves to be.

    There is no mystery or conspiracy to this one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Not sure if you actually read my post. I made it very clear that “I acknowledge he has been found guilty” precisely to avoid any confusion, even for those with the scantest regard for detail. That wording was included specifically to head off comments like yours. There’s no mystery or conspiracy in what I wrote; it’s simply pointing out that America is not a country you want to be under suspicion in, much like Saudi, China or indeed North Korea.

    • Clear messaging.
    • Straightforward language.
    • Nothing ambiguous.
    • No hidden agenda.
    • Just a plain fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,325 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    He waited around two hours for pice to arrive, they spoke to him and said he was free to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭CPTM


    Lots of people saying this but I don't really buy it. If he's free to go then he's free to stay and enjoy the parade. He obviously thought there was a chance that something would develop over the next couple of days.

    Is it a clever move by the police to put him on a flight risk list to be flagged in the airport, but at the same time tell him he's free to go?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,951 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    America is not a country you want to be under suspicion in, much like Saudi, China or indeed North Korea.

    No it isn't.

    Nor is it relevant.

    He was refused bail because he was rightly deemed a flight risk, exact same thing would happen here.

    He paid privately for his defence team. He wasn't handed some 2 Bob State Lawyer.

    He was found guilty based on the evidence and the facts of the case by a Jury of 12.

    Same thing that would happen here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    America is not a country you want to be under suspicion in, much like Saudi, China or indeed North Korea. It has mass incarceration and broken criminal legal system, it's incredibly easy to find yourself locked up in jail for little to nothing in the States, look at what happened to Brian O'Driscoll over a scuffle. He was very lucky.

    Again, I want to repeat that I acknowledge he has been found guilty and have done so from my first post on this subject.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,951 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    America is not a country you want to be under suspicion in

    Don't rape women so.

    In the countries you mentioned more than likely the victim would be arrested.

    He received 2 fair trials.

    He was found guilty.

    Justice worked perfectly, just like it would here.

    He 100% tried to abscond because he raped a women not because of some underlining fear of a perceived corrupt Massachusetts justice system.

    Weird hill to die on TBH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I don’t condone rape, I never said he was innocent of rape, and I’ve already said several times that I acknowledge he is guilty. What I take issue with is the suggestion that his guilt was somehow obvious because he returned home early. That assumption is flawed, anyone under suspicion in America, whether innocent or guilty, would be wise to leave the country quickly.

    The trial found him guilty. Not his absconding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Which countries do you want to be under suspicion in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Ireland for one! We have a very very soft judicial system with plenty of people out on bail that shouldn't be out on bail still committing crimes. We also have one of the lowest incarceration rates in Europe, let alone the world. Just look at some of the people out of prison now, Larry Murphy, Anton Mulder, Seamus Dunne, Brian Kearney etc…. That guy that killed his wife in Howth, Eamon Lillis walked out after five years to a fortune due to his wives property!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,310 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    I know people who've been arrested after being falsely identified.

    I know someone who was smashed about by a Garda with a baton (after being falsely identified) and then when went to make a complaint was essentially told in so many words that they'd be a marked man if they did. The Garda even threatened to keep an eye out for his folks car and would get the car clamped/impounded any time he saw it in town.

    I know people who've spent fortunes being tied up (quite unnecessarily) in the Irish legal system for years and it nearly breaking them.

    I've lived in America (and acted the absolute bollix at times) and traveled around quite a bit since. On our J1 we had the cops at the door at least once a week and no one got into trouble.

    Comparisons to North Korea are very silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,799 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,585 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,799 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Definitely ireland, our mitigating circumstances are amazing, if you play gaa you're home and dry



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,039 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    That's awful for those people. The USA incarcerates around 530 people per 100,000, while Ireland incarcerates about 90 per 100,000. Pro rata, America locks up roughly 6 times more people than Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭Fotish


    He had two trials but was found guilty once, maybe it shoukd go to another trial , best of three would be really fair.

    You have no idea why he tried to abscond ( as you put it ) , you are now twisting facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,682 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I guess any mitigation in this case will be small enough:

    First time offender

    Gainfully employed and with family

    Will be a long way from home/isolated so prison term will be tougher

    No additional violence outside of the rape itself (ie an aggravating factor)


    Not much really - looks like it’s a possible 5 year minimum term


    https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/areas-of-practice/new-york-criminal-lawyer/new-york-sex-crimes-lawyer/new-york-rape-lawyer/new-york-rape-in-the-first-degree-lawyer/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    If I was accused of rape in America I’d be gone to the airport too. That’s not absconding, that’s getting my ass to a place of relevant safety to deal with the accusation from there. It’s not a system you want it be caught up in. As someone quite rightly said, the US is no better than the Middle East or some Asian countries when it comes to transparency, justice or human rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭Fotish


    America is great country if you can afford expensive lawyers, just ask OJ Simpson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,682 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,571 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Am I reading this right? San Marino has one person in prison? 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭Lecter8319


    Sentencing is tomorrow, I fail to see much in the way of mitigation either apart from the obvious. No remorse, continous denial even in the face of strong evidence, attempt to flee, having the lady in question go through two trials, blatant lies on the stand. I dont think having a work history and being a family man goes as far in the states as it does here. If anything, his or his legal attempts to potray him as one may go against him and count as an aggravating factor.

    His legal team should really have advised him better. As soon as another male DNA profile was found on her genitals and Crosbie was the only other male who left and entered the room that night, they should have told him the game is up. Instead, it seems his lawyer went down a rabbit hole of transferable dna, how it might get in different places by mistake & previous errors made when it comes to whose Dna was found where. The DNA evidence along with all the other stuff was the final nail in the coffin & not the only thing the prosection had. If he was single, I think he would have admitted sexual activity took place by now but it seems he's trying to save what little is left of his marriage by talking nonsense & claiming he didnt even see her leaving the room that night.

    "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive"

    Im surprised the first trial didnt end in guilty but I believe additional information was provided at this trial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Hoboo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Yes. It seems to veer between 1 and 5, and usually just for pre-trial detention and minor crimes.

    I'd guess they have an agreement with Italy whereby anyone convicted of a serious crime meriting long incarceration ends up in an Italian prison and thus counted under the Italian figures.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,971 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    I'm not really understanding the 'it's awful for his family' type comments.

    I mean, I'm sure it is awful for them, but you could say that about any number of criminals.

    I don't recall the point being made in other threads about people found guilty of a horrible crime.



Advertisement