Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Metrolink - Alternative Routes - See post one for restrictions.

167891012»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    Another well explained post.

    Thank you one and all, and excuse the defensiveness yesterday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    That's exactly where I'd have the next Metro line also.

    Tallaght to Clongriffin.

    In Copenhagen they added more lines so it's not pie in the sky to expect another one.

    By the time the Metrolink is complete, we'll have a bigger population than Denmark.

    As long as our economy remains relatively stable, anything is possible.

    I wonder if they had to choose between this new Metro line or Dart Underground, which would they choose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I would hope and like to think that they would choose DU, (and FourNorth - the two would probably be similarly priced to a second full length metro line, in fact maybe cheaper) as it provides the most return on investment, effectively separating the existing DART network (which essentially all hones in on Connolly) into two super high capacity and high frequent metro lines (Hazelhatch to Drogheda, and Maynooth/M3 to Bray/Greystones, intersecting at Pearse). However I would like to think that the more we build, the more we will realise that projects like these don’t necessarily need to be once-in-a-generation, and hopefully there won’t necessarily have to be a choice to made between projects (not on a generational time scale anyway)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The Dart U and 4N benefits more people but a new Metro line is maybe sexier.

    I wonder will they have another go at upgrading the Green Luas to Metro once Metrolink starts construction.

    I bet it could be done in a year with good planning which isn't too much of a disruption.

    I think people would accept that.

    In 10 years time, if the Metrolink, Dart+, Finglas Luas, M20 and Children's Hospital (that's a joke) are all completed, that frees up a lot of money and workers so maybe DU, 4N and additional Metro line are all possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Our tax revenue is so high, anything's possible really.

    Our total workforce is nearly 3 million people.

    In the 80s and 90s it was just over a million.

    On top of that there's the huge corporate tax revenue.

    We're decades behind where we should be in terms of infrastructure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The minimum is a second Metro Line. SW to NE, Crossing Metro somewhere around O’Connell St (or maybe further north), and DART Underground around Christchurch. That gives a classic triangle of interchanges in the city centre. I would prefer DART Underground to a metro along this routing, as it gives a much, much bigger bang for the buck.

    Beyond that it’s hard to see where another line could be put in. NW-SE viability is limited by Phoenix Park and the fact that Luas Green (South) and DART both serve the SE already. I think any other route will be a Luas service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    Personally speaking, I have resigned my ambitions on having acceptable public transport in Dublin in my lifetime in terms of first world class infrastructure. But the case still stand for another 4-5 routes after we are all dead and gone. I have no issue with northeast-southwest line next - it makes perfect sense to make that the second line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    In terms of cost how is the DART underground giving more bang for your buck than Metro and how do they differ? Excuse the ignorance and lack of research. I'll get to those reports bk listed above soon enough

    We need some sort of integrated design in 200-300 years time when the bloody 4-5 lines get built. Zig Zagging isn't a bad start. But the need to build an orbital around the city to connect all the outside areas up would make sense after that.

    Without out it you going into the city centre to get to somewhere half the distance away on the outskirts - say like Cherrywood to Tallaght? If a orbital was built you could get there easily.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭OisinCooke


    DART Underground (if done with FourNorth - which is quad tracking the Northern Line from Connolly to Clongriffin) will give a fully segregated railway line from Hazelhatch all the way to Drogheda essentially, where DARTs can be automated and run every 2.5 minutes theoretically. It is essentially another metro line. The East-West capacity of the line through the City Centre will also free up huge amounts of utility on the Luas Red Line for people looking to get from Heuston to the CC.

    By allowing all (or at least the vast vast majority of) Drogheda DARTs to to continue into the tunnel, you also free up huge capacity on the Loop Line between Connolly and Pearse, meaning that you can ramp up frequency of Maynooth/M3 to Bray/Greystones services too - effectively another metro line. It gives the biggest return on investment - effectively two metro lines - for what is essentially just a 5km section of rail tunnel... ish…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The bang for the buck is because investment in DART Underground multiples the usefulness of the existing DART lines.

    DART Underground involves about 6 km of tunnelling and the construction of four deep-level stations. It’s likely to cost about two-thirds of what MetroLink does (there are only four stations, but they will have to be mined). For that money you get a high-capacity rail link running straight through the city from Hazelhatch to the Northern line. Add in FourNorth (about €2 billion), and you get a 30 km (or 70km to Drogheda) line capable of automated operation in future, for less than the cost of a new 20 km Metro.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    Understandable cost-benefit logic applied here. However, the problem is not with the east coast and getting into the city from south and north corridors. The problem exists accessing the city from the other 95% of the countryside surrounding it.

    The existing transport is two non-DART rail lines to Connolly Hueston. Serving the whole countryside!!! Other than that you're on a bus. Getting a bus to work is a lottery whether you will be in and hour before or after 9am. They are also not ideal when waiting on a wet roadside in a suit getting splashed by cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The DART+ project has planning permission and is moving to tendering. There will be no “non-DART” commuter lines in about 5-6 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    Let me be clear - a line north-west of the Liffey serving the whole north-west area of Dublin and surrounding countryside, and a West Line serving the whole of Kildare, and south-west of Dublin and the countryside - is woefully inadequate. Two lines serving 90% of the surrounding land mass around Dublin is unacceptable.

    Whether this is a government, planning, whatever type of problem, it needs to be fixed otherwise Dublin will become inaccessible to a large portion of the population. All that area, needs to be freed up for development land to solve the housing crisis.

    Those two lines and DART+ operating on those two lines, while welcome, are insufficient to serve the whole countryside and the growth which will potentially happen there.

    We are crawling forward in seeing changes but at least they are coming at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You have not told us what you think is deficient, only that it’s “woefully inadquate”. So what’s missing? What would you propose to fix that lack? How much would you think it would cost? These are things we can talk about. Complaining that things aren’t great is tedious, and it’s a topic that’s well served on the various Politics boards anyway: these forums are for discussion of solutions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    All of this would be solvable if we could buy land and lay tracks on several routes, inside the city, or around the city, above ground.

    Is that a realistic goal? To buy up land with houses already on it and lay tracks on that land?

    What would the cost be of doing above ground DART lines along the N11+N1, through Finglas or along the southside of the Liffey?

    Would it be possible or is the land too developed? I am guessing buying the property and laying tracks on it would be substantially cheaper than metro?

    By how much?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,242 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    CPOing swathes of existing residential for overground rail would not be politically or financially viable - it would not be cheaper than tunnelling in the long run, if even immediately.

    Not only would the CPO costs be immense, the service - and road - diversion required would be astoundingly expensive.

    There's a reason you don't hear of this being done in democracies, generally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The phrase “the wrong side of the tracks” exists for a reason. A surface railway makes it extremely hard to move from one side of it to the other. This can create ghettos of poor connectivity: directly against the primary purpose of urban transportation.

    Underground is the only way to build extensive rail in a city… and still have a city that’s worth living in afterward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 The Venus Project


    I suppose the aim is to raise awareness of commuters plight on a forum where there is substantial eyeballs on it.

    I am also aware that going overboard is disrespectful to the people that work in transport in the city and don't wish to step over that line which I don't believe I have done.

    I am frustrated commuter and apologies to anyone working on solving these problems, it's good to vent where people are in a place to listen and take action on these concerns.

    Post edited by The Venus Project on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    To clarify things:

    DART - metro like heavy rail currently sharing alignment with the intercity railway network (DART+/4North/DART Underground/Stopping Wexford Services at Wicklow/Greystones are all aimed at separating it into its own independent network) - it likely wouldn't be desirable to open any more full 'DART' lines (except to extend the existing M3 spur up to Navan) beyond the current plans and DART Underground. New lines are best designed from the ground up to be modern and not have to compromise to fit into a victorian railway network and 70s electrification scheme (we are trying to de-complicate DART movement to increase capacity, not add new lines/junctions etc to increase complexity)

    Metro - assume any future metro will follow the design of the current one or better (fully automated and independent of any other line for simplicity of operation, built to interchange with other services)

    Luas - surface/Underground/aboveground light rail that can travel directly on streets, but doesn't have to.

    N11 is a very good candidate for light rail, big wide road that can easily be reduced in width and lines put in for its length, with a comparatively small expenditure you could segregate it at junctions and have stations at existing overbridges. It would be quite like a number of American systems, which isn't ideal, but it's a very handy natural space for one.

    Doing the same as Metro, what benefits do you gain? Automated running and higher frequency, but you also multiply the cost by a lot, you now have to dig a tunnel from the city centre to at least Donnybrook, take a lit more of the actual N11 and have to segregate every junction, and you won't be able to deviate from the N11 corridor itself without a tunnel or flyover.

    With the luas option, you could occasionally come off the core N11 completely to serve a particular suburb in a more useful way. You still get most of the speed benefits of the N11 corridor while adding greater flexibility of where it can serve, and capacity on this route likely isn't as critical as its fairly transit dense between the DART, Green Line and this service.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,052 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    There's a fallacy with your complaint here, that public transport networks should serve a "landmass". When creating a public transport network, the choice is between coverage versus service. We could put in more rail lines, but realistically, who are we going to be serving with those lines? Where are the large population centres that aren't going to be served with current plans? Would we be better off increasing services on the current lines instead of spending money on creating new lines? These are all the choices that have gone into the creation of the current plans for Dublin and Ireland, with hard data to back up every choice made.

    The result is that the plans are actually quite good. I know that people can get frustrated with the Irish State sometimes, and everyone here thinks that things are progressing so slowly, but they have a good set of plans, and they are moving forward with them. If Metrolink, the Dart+ projects, Dart+ Tunnel, and the All Ireland Rail Review* plan, are finished Dublin, and indeed Ireland, will have a very good rail network.

    *So, the rail review is a great document, but contains a lot of projects that are, in my opinion, never going to happen. If even half of it got done, I'd be very impressed, but it is good to have an aspirational plan out there.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement