Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Who actually wants the Dublin Airport passenger cap abolished?

1246718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,701 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I'm not blakimg the greens. I support the green agenda in general... Ryan is a waster and if you were MOL, who's case would you be getting onto, to address the cap? Nobody wants to take responsibility, what a surprise...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭thenuisance


    I think the cap should stay where it is because I don't think either the airport infrastructure (including it's transport links and parking) or the city's tourist infrastructure is capable of taking an extra 8 million passenger journeys (4 million passengers) on top of the numbvers that they currently struggle to deal with. I'm interested in what the expected breakdown of the passengers in terms of their type (business, tourist, Irish residents) and ultimate destination (geographical and accomodation) - if I thought that these figures had been estimated and planning put in place to address the infrastructural requirements I might change my opinion.

    How many passengers were passing through the airport in 2007 when the current cap was put in place?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Glasgow Prestwick handles 500k passengers a year, the govt had to nationalise it because it was losing so much money and the only airline to fly out of it is Ryanair. All this despite the govt trying to prop it up by demanding all transatlantic flights had to use it (sound familiar?). It is a gigantic waste of space and money. In fact having two competing airports in Glasgow just meant that the actually useful Glasgow airport has never been properly invested in - but a big part of the problem is its location not allowing for expansion. Thanks to phenomenal foresight for the time, Dublin Airport does not have that problem.

    Paris Beauvais is similarly just a pointless Ryanair airport. Why in the name of god we would want to build one of those is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,130 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    That may be true, but despite that, Cork is experiencing growth, not Shannon.
    If Shannon was the airport of choice over Cork, or Dublin, there would be a demand. But there isn't.

    It does seem somewhere mis-planned to have two internationals so close to each other. With active regionals pretty close also.

    of course business goes for the most profitable (ie busiest) routes, thats not a revelation to anyone.

    but thats a flawed model from the perspective of building our society.

    if you just follow that model like a zombie we would end up with everything and everyone in one small impossibly congested core

    That's not how a business based on supply and demand works, or competition for that matter.

    I've no idea why you think busiest = most profitable. If everyone was flying solely out of Dublin, it would be hugely profitable for a single operator to operator out of Cork (or where ever). They'd have sole access to demand in the region.
    Claiming that following leads to a zombie filled core is clearly disproven by looking at any other countries air-infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,471 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,130 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    There' no proposal that includes the another 8m people across the current infrastructure.

    The two parts of the proposal are;

    • increased limit for current infrastructure to 36m, (supported by current passenger numbers, and an IATA assessment of capacity), and
    • Increase the limit to 40m via the massive upgrade of infrastructure, including external structure such as transport, services, etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,326 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,892 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is a significant difference between having a second infrastructural airport in Ireland population 5 million plus and 100 plus miles from Dublin airport and Glasgow population less than 700k.

    London population 9 million has 10 plus airports admittedly only about 5 are major airports. Beauvais is only one of about 6-8 smaller airports in Paris Orly and Charles de Gaule do most of the flights.

    What you are describing is apples and oranges.

    Cork is experiencing growth because it's has a larger population. However long-term Shannon is more accessible.

    Yes business goes for the most profitable option. However what is most profitable for business is not necessarily the best infrastructural option for the country. Yes MOL and Ryanair will huff and puff and we will not see as many flights as would access Dublin but we would see substantial growth over 5+ years.

    The Ideal senario is fast track the M20 and let business (as in air traffic) decide which it wants to use. But they will use one of them

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,677 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If all those airports serve different locations it's not as big an issue. Airports watching Dublin's success on routes and saying "I'll have some of that" is lazy and results in airlines regularly pulling out of such routes

    Take the bay area in California for example, they have 3 international airports less than 40 minutes from each other, and a 4th one about 80 miles away from SFO. You only hear about one, SFO, because the other 3 are catering to different routes and different markets. Why not try and get a Shannon-South Africa or Cork to Argentina. Link either of the 2 airports with Japan or find a small airport in Wisconsin or Oregon that an airline could do a deal with and avail of the Shannon pre-clearance



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm aware, I was responding to someone suggesting another Dublin airport - which is a truly awful idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I can see it now "Dublin-Baldonnel International airport" let Ryanair run all their flights out of there and pay for the Luas extension and N7 Bus corridor upgrades, into the city centre in about 20 mins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,566 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I'd assumed Weston would be the obvious choice but Baldonnell probably would be a better option

    It's worth saying that you don't actually need a lot of flights per day to have an impact. 10 flights a day with an average of 200 passengers per flight becomes 4000 passengers per day since each flight is an arrival and departure

    That's 1.4 million passengers per year. Doing that for 4 airports in Ireland (say Cork, Shannon, Waterford and Knock) would divert 5.6 million passengers away from Dublin Airport

    Even if the routes were seasonal you'd probably still be looking at 3 million passengers. I'm sure there's sufficient demand and capacity to service those additional flights if they were offered

    For comparison Dublin Airport handled an average of 760 flights per day in September

    Again, I'd just like to be clear that I'm not against the cap being lifted or even removed entirely once there is a plan in place to handle the additional traffic. I think removing it now fixes one problem for DAA and causes 5 more problems for everyone else

    I believe there's a whole range of options which should be considered and moving traffic away from Dublin (either by incentive or requirement) is one that should be high on the list

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Lift the cap now and sort out the access after, otherwise we'll still be here in 2050 talking about the exact same thing…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,566 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Well maybe DAA should update their planning application that's been sitting there for something like 3 years after FCC requested more information

    No issues with the cap being increased today if there's an actual plan in place. It isn't like its being enforced anyway so what's the use

    I just don't think it'll be of the massive benefit to anyone except DAA and the airlines. I suppose the hotel owners would be happy since they can jack up the price of the few available rooms as well

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I reckon we can just add these things to the lists of investments in the country which haven't been made:

    1. Dublin Metro: 2001
    2. M50 by-pass link road: https://www.rte.ie/archives/2020/0624/1149330-eastern-bypass-for-dublin/
    3. Luas to Swords: 1990
    4. Rail link to airport: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1974-12-03/32/
    5. removal of airport passenger cap: 2007


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,277 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The "M50 by-pass link road" will never be built and this has nothing to do with budget or other usual infrastructure project delays.
    This project was abandoned back in 2021 for more sustainable alternatives.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Those "sustainable alternatives" have yet to materialise and the M50 is still choked up every day…



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,684 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    It bonkers that there are people who seem to think that the cap is necessary.

    • The cap relates to road traffic around the airport. It has nothing to do with the environment or anything else. Expecting it to stay in place for reasons other than its original purpose undermines the planning process.
    • We live on a poxy island. We have no rail connectivity anywhere internationally beyond Northern Ireland. You cant even get a train to Donegal let alone London.
    • Airports are not just about tourism. We live in a diverse society and people have family and friends in other countries.
    • International investment requires aviation links.
    • The passenger cap impacts consumer choice and stifles competition. It'sprobably in breach of EU consumer law. I can site plenty of examples where its cheaper to get a flight to the UK as a stopover then fly to another EU destination due to the lack of competition on direct routes from Ireland. For anyone flying the environmental flag, this is worse for the planet.
    • Ireland is already missing out on aviation investment because of the cap.

    We also need to stop pandering to clowns who complain about the airport who bought their house in its vicinity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,850 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    By diverting flights away from Dublin you would increase traffic, as most visitors would then need to travel on to Dublin.

    We seem to be forgetting that most people flying into Dublin, visit Dublin.

    If i fly into Dublin to watch a gig or visit friends or watch the soccer at the Aviva stadium and my only choice is to fly to Shannon, I'm not going to bother coming to Ireland at all.

    The airlines know this and thats why its Dublin or nothing for their routes.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,594 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    While you may be right that the cap relates to road traffic, it absolutely relates to the environment too (and other things of course)

    The problem with your arguments against the sustainability aspect (foreigners need to get home, we live on an island, etc) is that it's a bit like being on a hike, coming across a bear, and then saying "Well I need to get home so how else am I going to do it other than going this route and the bear can work things out for itself." It's a view with no real sense of proportion or understanding of what the bear is going to do to you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Lillyfae


    I don't really believe that. There are many mncs based outside of Dublin, look at Pharma and Biotech in Cork for example. Aer Lingus came up with some rubbish that they were scrapping the Cork AMS route due to demands elsewhere but it was snapped up by KLM and now the fares are 2/3 times the price.

    Tourists a lot of the time land in Dublin and go straight to the Ring of Kerry or the Cliffs of Moher, or want to do the Wild Atlantic Way. No tourist is coming in to go to a match in the Aviva or watch Garth Brooks at Croker. They're only going to Dublin because there's no other option. If they had the option of flying to another city in Ireland I'm almost certain they would be just as happy to have a weekend in Cork, Limerick or Galway. Dublin in itself isn't the attraction for tourists, it's Ireland.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,684 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    Bears often run away when you meet them on a hike.

    Are you saying the environment issues are just going to disappear of their own accord?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,850 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Plenty of tourists only visit Dublin.

    In 2017, 9 million tourists came to Ireland.

    6 million spent some or all of their time in Dublin.

    The longer stay tourists may well visit other parts of the country in the summer, but most UK/europe visitors come for a city break to Dublin and thats all they visit.

    Dublin tourism is 12 months a year and not seasonal like it is in the rest of the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    If Dublin airport cap stops the bear then the bear will just migrate to Manchester airport…



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,594 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Fine - wild, hungry bear. Or something that's going to cause more damage to you than you to it.

    If semantics is the retort you have then I think it's clear the point has been made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,067 ✭✭✭Paddigol




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Lillyfae


    I agree that plenty of tourists only visit Dublin but not because they don't want to visit the rest of the country but because it's the only place accessible to them. There are hardly any flights to Cork or Shannon or Knock or Farranfore and getting out of Dublin is both time and cost prohibitive- Ireland is a large country with poor public transport.

    How is Dublin 12 months a year and the rest of the country "seasonal"???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭csirl


    Some people seem to be living in the old days when most airlines were government owned flag carriers who could be told what routes/airports to serve.

    If there was customer demand to move routes from Dublin to Shannon or Cork, it would have already happened naturally.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,890 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    FCC have made the whole process political and broken, I'm sure the DAA has its own share of the blame, but blocking the destruction of the unused ramps was very spiteful of them.

    The cap is coming under the remit of the minister now and I'm sure the gobsh*tes in FCC will be howling about their self-inflicted stupidity.



Advertisement
Advertisement