Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Who actually wants the Dublin Airport passenger cap abolished?

2456718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,432 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    So why are we all being punished by carbon taxes and told it’s an emergency and we’re all doomed if we don’t act fast.


    Yet let’s put more planes in the sky meaning more damage to the climate.


    Make it make sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 750 ✭✭✭kaahooters


    its nothing to do with residents.

    , the cap is there due to the transport limitations to dublin airport, so if they raise the cap, new roads need to be built, new busses need to be bought , more taxi licences need to be created for the airport, more hotelrooms. it wasnt implemented as a "f you ryaniar!". the DAA and airlines are asling for more watter to be poured in an overflowing cup. its nothing to do with residents.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,920 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    is there any actual data on passenger movements?

    in theory it'd be possible that passengers through an airport might only be inhabitants of the country, or only visitors.

    how many of them are (say) irish people taking a ryanair jolly to london for the day to go shopping?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,264 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    How is the "whole" country being held back?

    Its a false narrative that it only effects a few people. What is actually saying is everyone across the entire city and suburbs and further can go lump it, if they decide to move flight paths or run air craft all night.

    I'm not effected by the airport or near it. I've lived under flight paths before, even near Heathrow and some people just get used to it. Its off peak only a short drive for me.

    But I just don't get why people worship unrestricted airport expansion. Or why people think it's ok that the whole country has to drive to Dublin to go on holiday. I've sat on the M50 in gridlock at 1am. I just think it's crazy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,696 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    The airport already pay for this fir homes effected. "noise mitigation measures" ...



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,803 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Not sure where you're getting this from my question. My question was because @Idbatterim made up something which can easily be disproven.

    Firstly, the cap has not been found to be illegal.
    Secondly, the cap is related to Dublin Airport's planning permission as agreed by DAA & FCC. DAA have not sought to increase this via planning and instead threw a tantrum along with MOL and others. It is not in relation to green issues

    High Court: Dublin Airport passenger cap decision stayed | Irish Legal News

    But you're right: more flights = more unnecessary emissions which we should not be encouraging.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭CPTM


    It's not the emissions thing but the cost of it. Weve entered into an agreement and if we surpass a certain amount, we have to start paying. And the government won't be asking Ryanair for that, they'll be asking us for it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,920 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i've flown in and out of dusseldorf quite a few times. the aer lingus flight leaves there at about 9pm, and you don't want it being late - as departures after 10pm are verboten. thankfully it's only happened me once that the incoming flight ran late enough that they were worried about getting it turned around in time, so they diverted to cologne and we were bussed there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,526 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I think the cap should stay.in place. Ww have other options available to airlines but they do not want to take up these options as long as they think they can get the passenger cap lifted. Lots if spare capacity in Shannon especially

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 954 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    Maybe reduce the CAP, make it 25million.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,499 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    This is the part that I find frustrating, it isn't like FCC is against raising the cap. It's more that they want to see a plan in place for how the airport is going to handle the additional traffic

    Seems like a fairly reasonable request considering the size of the airport

    DAA on the other hand seem unwilling to engage and are throwing their weight behind a political solution

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,499 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    It's several towns, and the noise isn't my main concern. Although if DAA try to cancel the night time restrictions then it will be a concern

    The main issue I have is that DAA are selling a narrative that the passenger cap is the only thing holding Ireland back from an economic golden age when in reality it'll just benefit DAA and a few airlines

    The added jobs are a myth, there's already more jobs than workers in the country. The reason hotels and restaurants struggle to get staff is because the skilled workers can to do anything else and the people who will work there want a decent wage

    Dumping an extra 150,000 tourists into the mix won't solve anything, it'll just divide up a stretched labour pool even more

    I've no doubt more hotels will be built but that puts pressure on a construction industry which is itself struggling to keep up

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,959 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭somenergy


    Abolish Abolish more air routes to serve our diaspora and use it to its full potential environmental considerations are a false flag our taxes paid for it we are an island so move on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,827 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    They've been shifting to airports in the UK instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭blackbox


    Nobody will benefit from having passenger numbers capped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The thing about the emissions and aviation they are never stated as a relative thing.

    If I drive From Shannon to London what emissions come out of my car? If I hop on a plane of 300 people in Shannon and use public transport in London my emissions are going to be substantially lower, zero getting around London and 1/300th of the planes emissions

    If 300 people drove instead of flew it would be much worse for the climate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,499 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    The cap is 32 million so with a population of 5 million and assuming 2 holidays per year (which is 4 flights with outbound and return) that implies around 20 million pasengers are Irish people heading abroad

    Given the population isn't growing that fast and holidays are getting more expensive rather than cheaper, I guess the idea is that any excess capacity will be filled by more visitors

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,526 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Airlines will follow the business. As long as they think they can bully the government and local authorities to change the cap they will. If the decision is made no to change the cap they will look for a other solution.

    They may not add as many flight as fast but as they start to expand the business elsewhere momentum will grow. It's too easy to just fill planes out of Dublin. Generally all flight out if Shannon and Cork are full to capacity. But from the UK and from countries like Holland Germany etc the flight are about 20 minutes longer. This is a case of the tail trying to wag the dog

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,526 ✭✭✭positron


    Supply vs demand.

    If the demand exceeds the number of seats allowed, ticket prices go up (indirectly - as airlines will have to fly less routes, less seats). This is how the whole country ends up paying more for flying in and out of Dublin.

    The lost opportunities (perhaps Dublin could be a transit hub?), general business and development, tourism etc etc are of course the bigger items, but people seems to disagree on them - so I won't mention them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,499 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Isn't Ryanair in particular supposed to be the kings of using smaller airports to lower prices? Why doesn't that trick work for Ireland, can't routes be shifted to smaller cities?

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,526 ✭✭✭positron


    If there was a Wicklow airport or Drogheda airport.. I can not imagine how many more NIMBY groups that will give rise to. :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭Lillyfae


    The DAA has a stranglehold on the other airports in Ireland so you would have to ask them that imo



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,920 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    IIRC irish rail pay more for the fuel that powers their trains, than ryanair pay for the jet fuel that powers their planes - because the tax is higher on the train fuel.

    if i'm correct about that, it's ludicrous that fuel for public transport is taxed more heavily.

    if europe taxed jet fuel at the rate it should, perhaps that would take the pressure down on passenger numbers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,981 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    the cap is there due to the transport limitations to dublin airport, so if they raise the cap, new roads need to be built

    No it isn’t.
    and even if it was, the roads have in fact been upgraded in the last 2 decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,569 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    For dumping passengers and picking up more yes.

    But they need a certain amount of ports with hangar and maintenance space and I think Dublin is one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,691 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    You know there is more then one airport maybe start advertising them infrastructure or build another in the center of ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,869 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    But the majority of people live near Dublin.

    They forced flights to divert to Shannon for years , it didn’t work



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 750 ✭✭✭kaahooters


    100% is the issue, and the hearing in december that was suppose to be for the lifting on the cap was directly about this.

    "the roads have been upgraded", no they havent, the main point of ingress to and exit from the airport, from the M1 is constantly gridlocked in the morning, at lunch and in the evening, with traffic constantly stoped on the m1 as a result of it.

    right now theres a crash on the ingress road

    image.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,981 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Exactly. There’s no fundamental opposition to a larger airport, FCC literally proposed in their development plan.

    Submitting documents and evidence to support development is literally how a planning application works.
    DDA simply left it too late. Should have been submitted years ago.
    (they lodged a ln application in 2019 and withdrew due to Covid, idiotic)



Advertisement
Advertisement