Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

Options
1245246248250251520

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,133 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Maybe. If they're politics and current affairs minded. That is, that they aren't staying at home just because they can't be arsed, but rather because they feel they aren't represented well enough by any of the 3 already nominated.

    I feel myself from working elections for 30 years, that that number isn't huge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,327 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Yeah she has mass + confession in the morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,506 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I thought exactly the same when I saw it. If the DUP are really anti HH. It is should be a reason to vote for her.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,321 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Irish democracy is hanging in the balance. We'll need a few changes made if only 3 make the ballot. Reduce the numbers needed to 10 or 15 and 3 county councils. The bar is currently set too high.

    I'm on the verge of a site ban. Please don't rage bait me, I'm easily triggered especially late at night!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,438 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    image.png



    Well, that will go down well with the SF supporters who are always justifying IRA violence as a means to an end.

    No doubt spinning will start in 3,2,1…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,133 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Something that neither the presidency nor Iona can give him.

    If only we had Knighthoods 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,327 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Well he would never be forced into anything by some "community activists" in Belfast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,435 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    It’s Connolly who is goosed ,I’m afraid…way too many incidents requiring backtracking

    The vist to Syria with Wallace and Daly….the support for O’Doherty…. The reference to Hamas….the debacle on Morning Ireland …..

    This kind of person should never be let near the so called ‘highest office in the land’.

    Would be a total disaster in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,206 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Maybe this is the final term for Lowry so he could defy the government,

    If he was in puckish contrarian mood maybe. But this guy has been at the heart of the action for 30+ years, wouldn't strike me as the sort to a great buzz from being "the man who got Maria Steen on the ballot." Plus him being on wife no. 2, I doubt he has much personal investment in her socially conservative agenda…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,506 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    This is what it is about Connolly why didn’t she lead with that stronger statements like this? Maybe then she could use the “fabric” lines?
    The woman seems very earnest etc. But seems very low on cop on. Or effective subtitles and phrasing.
    Yet on the definition of genocide she is very precise on the legal definition!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,902 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    It's ironically sections of the media manufacturing an "incident" on the O'Doherty nomination 7 years ago because of aspects of her character that weren't known at the time that has many of the Independents too fearful to back Steen today because who knows what'll come out about the murky Iona Institute and its funding by the time the next election rolls around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,276 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Fortunately you don't get to make that decision!



  • Administrators Posts: 56,606 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Firstly, O'Doherty's character was known when Connolly nominated her. She was already a looper then. Suggesting anything else is just false.

    Trying to suggest that Connolly didn't know she was nominating a looper is like the people who nominate Steen today claiming in 7 years that they didn't know she's a Iona-type. It is not credible.

    Steen's character is also known. It is this character that is causing her problems. She isn't struggling because of where the money comes from, she is struggling because her views on many major issues are not aligned with the overwhelming majority of the public.



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    He'll do what his constituents want, he tends to get that right.

    He doesn't give 2 you know what's about her 'Socially Conservative Agenda'. That wouldn't enter his thinking. Whatever will make him popular with his voters, that's all concerns him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So while Hamas are part of the fabric of Palestinian society, the PIRA were never justified in what they did!! That juxtaposition will go down well in Belfast. Lucky for her that the boys up there don't have a vote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,206 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Do we think he'll be running again the next GE? He's about 70 I believe. If not I'd say his main priority will be keeping the government show on the road and maintaining his own position at the heart of it, so he would have to have a good reason to do anything that would get him even a bit the wrong side of Harris and Martin…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,276 ✭✭✭MFPM


    It's like reading the same Stephen Collins article on loop in this thread...dreadful stuff.

    Connolly said nothing wrong last night, she could have formulated it better and she should know that the centrist media are awaiting every opportunity to tarnish her.

    Some of the commentary today is laughable, it's like this country never went through post conflict processes and resolutions. Connolly was spot on in critiquing Starmer too.

    Anyway, interesting if Steen makes it, I always think it's good for the Catholic reactionaries to have a platform to illustrate their decline in influence and power. She hasn't a snowballs chance of winning but she'll try tap into the result of the family referendums to garner some support. I wonder if she'll play the race/migrant card to win support too. I think she'll be the only candidate standing on a platform of women having too many rights!!!

    If she makes the 20 nominations or even falls two short it's interesting to note that some of the early posts in this thread were dismissive of those of use who argued there was a route to a nomination here.

    Lastly, back to Connolly - she was disingenuously hammered here for facilitating Gemma O'Doherty getting on the ballot paper previously, though not supporting her. Yet, Harkin etc are 'facilitating' Steen and not 'supporting' her...I hope some of the posters who articulated that nonsense will be consistent now...not holding my breath.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,902 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    That was certainly not the public discourse on O'Doherty at the time and a broad range of Independents including Michael Fitzmaurice and Sean Canney were also willing to nominate her. Are they the kind of individuals you would expect to nominate a publicly accepted "looper"?



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    Whatever he does won't be because of her 'socially conservative agenda'. That's laughable, it's so far down his priorities.

    If enough of his constituents canvass him to vote for Steen he may well do so. He has a history of breaking rank. I don't think Harris and MM have the balls to renege on any promises made to him. They'd be threatening the government also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, Harkin and the Healy-Raes are wrong to support Steen, but I think, like Connolly and Gemma, they actually share a lot of common ground.

    As for Connolly, the last 24 hours have been a car crash, no amount of spinning can change that. For sure, you think everything she said is right and correct, but she lost a lot of other people who didn't think like you do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,432 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I did my due diligence on that nomination and you are correct, the jury was very much out on Gemma at the time, and she had a reputation as a good journalist at one time.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,606 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Anyone nominating Steen is supporting Steen, any other idea is nonsense.

    Similarly, Connolly nominating O'Doherty was support of O'Doherty. Anything suggestion to the contrary is nonsense.

    "I am nominating this person to be President of Ireland, but please don't vote for them because even though I am nominating them I don't support them at all".

    The mind truly boggles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I won't support anything Michael Lowry supports. He shouldn't be anywhere near politics with his history..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,256 ✭✭✭eire4


    She has my vote as things stand at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,206 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


     For sure, you think everything she said is right and correct, but she lost a lot of other people who didn't think like you do.

    Yep this stuff is liking firing up her base but rendering her more and more toxic to the cehtre ground, even the leftish end of it who she needs to have any chance…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,276 ✭✭✭MFPM




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Loyal to himself and of course Dinny. Not to his country or to his office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,432 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You are nominating in the knowledge that the people have the final say or the actual say on who becomes president.

    It's not a difficult concept to grasp.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,606 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I am saying anyone suggesting a nomination is not support is talking absolute rubbish.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    We saw the reaction of the Social Democrats and of Alan Kelly, if they have doubts about the things that she says, why should the public vote for her to speak for us.



Advertisement
Advertisement