Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1198199201203204217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I'm talkin about the big lads: Glenveagh, Gannon, Carin, O'Flynn, Ronan, Marlet, etc.
    They account for well over half of all property's built and as such, they effectively dictate the price of property.
    They have very full Koffers.

    We'll agree to disagree, I respect you opinion none the less.

    Back on topic.
    I still think a Modern air defence system would be a better option for us than Fighter planes.

    The other thing is that: "Are fighter planes going to exist the way they do now in 30 years time?"
    The most limiting factor on any fighter plane is the pilot, IE keeping the Pilot alive.

    Modern planes are capable of 9G turns, humans cannot take those kind of turns for long periods of time. I'd guess that the 7th gen of planes will be pilotless. This would be no Lifesupport systems, no requirement for a cockpit or glass, no ejection systems, etc. That would make the planes lighter and more manoverable and significantly cheaper to build.

    Ireland could look at setting up a defence industry, but you'd be going up against some serious players



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,998 ✭✭✭Conall Cernach


    The State's origins are counter revolutionary not revolutionary. The Free State armed forces were designed to be used to supress other Irish people rather than any outside force. Is it any wonder that Republicans in particular are historically wary of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Ah here, lets go back 100 years!!

    Maybe move with the times.

    Like the rest of the country has been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The issue with an air defence system as a stand alone only defence, is well, it’s a use it or not solution. Someone not responding or the Russians playing silly buggers, or a drug running plane like that one in the midlands a few years back (as if that’s the only one), then it’s either shoot them down or don’t, a fighter gives options. Ideally it shouldn’t be one of the other but an integrated combined system. Even then long range systems aren’t cheap, just look at what Denmark is paying for its SAMP/T purchase this week.


    As for what 7th gen fighters might look like in the future… it’s likely anyone posting here will be old and grey if not dead before that, we are only seeing the 6th gens entering prototype development now and they are likely to have 30-50 years of service, not too mention it’s getting to the point where even the US can fund 2 6th gen developments at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    So Niall in the Journal has an article about the attendance of DF/DOD at the couple of trade shows this year, and flags options from Sweden and South Korea for fighters and a French option as too expensive…

    So a variant of Gripen against a variant of the FA50 as the potential offers:

    There is a lot of talk amongst security sources about the possibility of purchasing jet fighters to act as an indigenous air policing capability. 

    It is understood that an internal report has been completed suggesting the possible acquisition of a small number of jets and that they would be based at Shannon Airport.

    It is believed, from multiple sources, that there are concerns in the Irish Air Corps base in Baldonnel that the State may miss an opportunity to make a cost effective purchase if they delay. It is understood that two potential manufacturers, from Sweden and Korea, are the most likely option as other options like a French aircraft are too expensive. 

    https://www.thejournal.ie/military-and-civil-servants-travel-to-major-arms-fair-to-examine-potential-defence-kit-purchases-6819119-Sep2025/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    What is the opportunity? Did some nation cancel an order? Have the south Aifrcan Airframes become available?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,365 ✭✭✭source


    I think he means the opportunity to get an order in before, or at the start of a massive ramp up in arms puchases across Europe. Leaving it too late would see us waiting a long time as order books get backed up, some might argue that time has already passed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I think these gripens might need more than a lick of paint at this stage.

    https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/only_two_out_of_26_gripen_fighters_airworthy_in_south_african_forces_how_could_this_happen-13962.html

    In the Journal Article is says action due on the 139 replacement.According to the magic plan replacement should start in 2026



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Brazil is seeing a considerable increase in costs and delays for it's Gripens:

    The Brazilian Air Force (FAB) is facing a silent crisis in its fighter jet modernisation programme. Constant delays in the FX-2 Programme, signed with Swedish manufacturer Saab in 2013, have already resulted in additional costs equivalent to the purchase of six more Gripen NG aircraft, even though Brazil will not receive them. The information was revealed during an official presentation at the Foreign Affairs and National Defence Committee (CRE) in the Federal Senate, according to the Aeroin portal.

    The original contract provided for the delivery of 36 JAS-39E/F Gripen NG fighter jets by 2025, but after several amendments, the schedule was pushed back to 2032. This postponement resulted in a 12% increase in the total value of the initial agreement, according to documents presented by Air Force Lieutenant-Brigadier Walcyr Josué de Castilho Araújo, Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

    They were supposed to have them already. It took them 11 years to develop the manufacturing capability.

    Even if Ireland put in an order tomorrow, they are unlikely to be delivered within a decade.

    It seems weird that an F-35 is now cheaper than an F-16.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Depends entirely on what accounting tricks you are using, besides which the F35 development team are playing some mighty tricks at the moment that are going to screw plenty of users.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Yeah trying to get them airborne would be a nightmare, we’d be crazy to look at them. As for the helicopter, interesting that it says the tender is to start, I though G2G was meant to avoid the rendering process?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I remember reading an article on this forum several tears ago mentioning that Gripen and FA50 were best potential runners....not a lot of progress in the meantime…I wonder what a "small number" consists of? 6? 8?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Worrying is the "small number" , getting 6 or a similar figure is about as useful as getting none. The minimum would be the squadron equivelent to what the Czechs or Hungarians got a few years ago, which I think was 12 +2 two seaters.

    Unless they invest in a tanker, having 2 gripen pick up a bear in donegal is probably going to mean they have to peel away and RTB somehere west of Kerry.

    FA 50 would be even worse as a token gesture. The sad thing about this is that its obvious to anyone with half a brain that its the tokenist of token gestures, and to think they think that they'll get away with it, and other nations will say well done, and pat them on the back is pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    very on brand for the department/nation though. As I’ve said before in this thread if it’s some halfarsed bs to basically say “look we have jets” it would be far better not to do it and invest in something like proper MPA instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,260 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    It will have to be a twin for maritime safety, non American engines, support European industry - so Typhoon or Rafale

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    not really no, everyone from F16 users to F35 users are covering large distances with single engine and the article clearly states Rafale is out over costs, and Typhoon doesn’t get a mention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,260 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    Maybe I saw it here but the French can do some inventive finance arrangements ☺️

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    they can and have, just ask their export customers, but just like the EU funds we seem to be unwilling to even consider such arrangements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭mupper2


    The "small number" screams token, ie not enough, I'd rather3 more kitted out MPAs and 3-4 transports, C390 preferred.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Maybe we'll get one Jet, so that in years to come RTÉ Security Correspondents can refer in their reports to 'the Air Corps jet from Shannon' in the same way that they used to refer to 'the Air Corps helicopter from Baldonnell' whenever there was heavy snow, and at a time when we actually had 10 bloody helicopters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Watching this space with interest. Seems like the wee Italian M346 is ruled out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭sparky42


    see mupper, you aren’t thinking like the department. It’s a perfect purchase, it will piss off those who don’t want defence spending, it will piss off those that do, it will piss off the nations who want us to do even the bare minimum, it will piss of Finance and will achieve feck all…

    The department will be thrilled with themselves, might even give themselves a raise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Let's even get a small cohort or half decent jets in house.. and build on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭zone 1


    how is fighter jet going to put out fires do medical transport or bring minister to new york, how do they get this across to the public lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Emm. These tasks are done by other specialised aircraft designed and fit for purpose. At the moment the AC have a basic level of decent kit to do this. The new priority is to add additional capability to the force.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    What have you done with Jonny???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Newer FA 50 have BVR.

    But half the range of a Griphen.

    Then again you could have twice as many for the same price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    That would be the block 70 I think? Plenty of bang for your buck to be sure. As you pointed out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    We need them interceptors YESTERDAY. Jonny Russian is at on a daily basis practically this past week. Hope to Jaysus we can get the Irish Strike Force off the ground damned quick. No time to be lost now.



Advertisement
Advertisement