Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1114411451147114911501309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭Cork29


    Burnley held Liverpool for 93 mins yesterday. Makes our result look a lot better.

    united will hoover up the points bar the top few teams



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    We could have been 3 up at Fulham before Yoro's deflected goal, Cunha hit the post, Leno made a super save vs Cunha and Bruno missed the peno. Yesterdays performance was on par with the efforts against Grimsby imo. Zero energy and lethargy across the team. RA is now skating very close to the edge and with Chelsea and Liverpool to play in the next 4 games, he will very likely be teetering after the trip to Anfield. As others have said, he is welded to his system but doesnt have the players required to maximise it. Any managers job is to get the best out of what he has and simply put, RA has not done that and it wont be allowed to continue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,938 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I thought we were good in the first half vs Fulham, they did very little against us.
    i thought we were good offensively vs Burnley in terms of possession and movement, but we struggled to convert our play into chances and goals.

    Even yesterday there are positives I could take, but yet again in both boxes we make mistake after mistake and are punished for it.

    I thought I understood what an Amorim team could look like, and how it could succeed. But nothing I am seeing from United looks like that. I don't see the defenders pressing into midfield to compact the pitch. I don't see him deploying the wbs as wingers to push overloads and runs behind.

    Im seeing a back 5, midfielders not fit for purpose and an isolated front line that doesn't gel.

    And I am fed up arguing that things can improve, that tweaks will see the system come together. I have zero issue with a 3atb formation. We can see elsewhere that it can work. But we aren't seeing the tweaks and adjustments we need to see here. Week after week it is the same issues, the same mistakes, the same players being caught out only to play again the next week and make the same mistakes.

    I have zero doubt Amorim will be in charge agaisnt Chelsea, and I have zero doubt we will play some nice football, see the players fail to execute good passing in the final third and leave free runners in on goal in another depressingly familiar loss.

    Is it the manager? Is it the players? Don't know, don't care. its all crap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,344 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Utd will not hoover up points against the other teams though

    The pattern shows that what is far more likely to happen is that the team plays OK/well for a period of the game but don't put the opposition to bed or take advantage to the level they should, the tide of the game will turn and then we end up either losing, dropping points or barely getting over the line.

    There are structural issues with the side that will always see us struggle once the opponent gets on top. Good teams (not great teams, just good teams) don't need to be on top for 90 min but they do make hay when they are on top in the game and they are difficult to break down when they aren't on top.

    We are incapable of both of those and will remain so as long as players like Bruno are paired in a midfield 2 and your goalkeeper wouldn't start for any other PL team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,875 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I could accept Amorim not getting the best out of players if the tactics somewhat worked but he literally tanks his own system playing a one man midfield. Not even Baleba would help in the slightest. Kante/Vidal/Essien would have been the only players who could have made a one man midfield functional.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Even if he irons out the main defensive issue in the system of players not knowing when to jump and when to hold position (which is a major issue which really needed to have been fixed by now), will this system bring us success in the PL? I keep coming back to the wingbacks. If you play with 3 CBs on the field, then surely the wingbacks just have to be a major creative outlet. But instead our wingbacks have worse creative stats that many fullbacks that play in a back 4! It just doesn't make sense to me that he thinks it's ok to play with wingbacks like Dorgu, Dalot and Mazaroui AS WELL as having 3 CBs on the field. I could see the system working an awful lot better if he had players like Trent, Hakimi, Mendes, Frimpong etc. but the ceiling of the system feels too low in the PL without those high quality specialist players for the wingback roles. I'm genuinely sick of relying on Dorgu, Dalot and Mazaroui to be an attacking threat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Every other manager that has played a 3 at the back system has adapted / changed it when it isn't working or due to the players. Nuno, Southgate, Conte, Tuchel, Xabi Alonso, anybody. Amorim? Nah



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,344 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    The thing is though, without the reality of the team finishing in 15th if another manager came in and finished 8th that too would have been seen as a failure.

    I don't believe there is any world where in Nov 2024 a manager can come in and get the side to finish outside the European spots (without winning another trophy) and it would be viewed as anything other than failure. You could do it now because the floor has once again been lowered at this club…

    Ruben has likely sealed his fate at this stage and it is largely due to his refusal to tweak midfield or elsewhere to compensate for the clear weaknesses that the team has. It's one thing to say we are going to play a system that has a back 3, wingbacks and a sole striker up front and it's another thing to pull your best attacking player deeper because the system doesn't work if you can't release players quickly from deep and the other midfielders at the club can't pass wind. Bruno doesn't understand and isn't nearly as effective in this role as he is further up the pitch.

    What got Ruben so much grace with fans was the promise of something better down the line, remove the problem players (which absolutely did need to happen), develop an identity, build towards something down the line. Similar with ETH is many ways. Fans bought into it because for so long these have been major issues at the club and they are things fans have felt needed to be sorted.

    But just like ETH it seems now his undoing will be his refusal to adapt to what he is seeing week to week on the pitch.

    To be fair, I do think man for man the squad is better than it was in Nov 2024 but the failure to address the main problems areas correctly over the summer is a failure from the top down ONCE AGAIN!

    How we come out of nearly every summer with similar issues I'll never understand



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,344 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I don't think even prime Kante could do the role to be honest. It's too much to request of 1 man.

    I do think if Ruben is willing to slightly tweak his setup though that there might be some slight hope yet.

    If we setup the midfield to be closer in setup to what you would see in a 4231 setup we would IMO look far better.

    We do have attacking players who can attack space from wide i.e the half space in between the opposition CB and full-backs. We have 1 young striker on the books.

    Something like this :

    ————————-GK———————-

    ——--Yoro———Deligt——-Shaw—-

    Dalot————————————Dorgu

    ———-Casemiro——-Mainoo————

    ———————-Bruno———————-

    ——-Mbeumo————-Cunha———-

    Amad, Zirkzee, Sesko can supplement the attack.

    Mount and Zirkzee can back up Bruno.

    Urgate can backup Casemiro.

    Mazraoui, Maguire, Haven and Martinez can backup the CBs.

    We are light in backups for :

    Dalot (I guess Amad can go out there still at a push). I don't think this suits Mazraoui at all.


    Mainoo - no other midfielder at the club is similar in profile and Urgate and Casemiro together lacks creativity. Maybe Mount at a push again? Although I don't like it.

    Goal Keeper is obviously still a massive issue.

    But that to me anyway looks a far far better balanced side and it keeps close enough to RA setup that we aren't compromising anything down the line from his "system".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Too many square pegs pushed into round holes.

    Bruno is a 10 and has consistently produced for us in that role. But now is being asked to perform the duties of a Defensive Midfielder, in a 2 man midfield. Its just nonsensical to pursue this.

    Yesterday we had Maz and Dorgu, neither of whom are natural WBs asked to fulfil that role again.

    They don't have the natural confidence to play aggressively high up the pitch and I honestly don't think they have the quality anyway to deliver into the box from such positions either. On other days it will be Dalot playing in that position - with the same limitations.

    We simply don't have the squad to play and apply this method. That much is clear. And our relegation form since last November shows it.

    The squad may not be brilliant……but there is enough there employing a 4-3-3, to get us competing at least for a Europa League place.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    He was hired to play like Ajax and he was given money to buy players, it was a terrible thing to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    8th got Ten Hag sacked, and with the players available it should have been viewed as failure. Don't forget though that most fans were ready for change and perfectly happy to accept a period of mediocrity as long as they could see building blocks being laid.

    A solid 8th with evidence of at least some players thriving in the new system, with the toxic players being sold, with good results here and there, I fully believe that fans would have understood that.

    Instead we got a year of gaslighting, with no evidence of improvement but a lot of fans convinced that it must be happening behind the scenes somewhere.

    Here is a scary thought. When Amorim joined, the squad of players were in no way suited to his system of play, it suited basically nobody.

    Today, coming up on a year later, it still doesn't. Still the vast majority of players available don't suit it.

    The whole thing is a farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,780 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Some reports that Amorim still has the backing of the club 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    here's the opening to the opening goal. yesterday i blamed bruno (he still should have done this) for not tracking the foden run, but a mistake occurs before this.

    right now ugarte is cutting off the passing lane to doku. you could argue he should be behind doku. i presume amorim wants ugarte on the front foot so correct position.

    the issue is there is also a pass to foden so ugarte kinda makes a balls of it and gets stuck in no mans land.

    however, should sesko shift across to cut off the foden passing lane? or should bruno/1 of the 10's be there?

    Screenshot 2025-09-15 112108.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    looking at last years table, 3 - 7 lost the following amount of games: 9, 9, 12, 10, 11.

    maybe we are tracking to lose about that amount, so 3 - 7 still a possibility.

    brentford and burnley games now key - must win IMO. chelsea if we could get a point maybe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,267 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    Shaw, please stop playing Shaw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭GolfPar


    Based on the same fixtures last year (substitute Burnley for one of the relegated teams who we beat) we're 6 points worse off for the same fixtures so far.

    To be honest I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel. A combination of the manager, players and hierarchy has lead to this. Delighted to see Hojlund score after 14 minutes into his Napoli career. United in its current guise and system is a graveyard for strikers. We are already seeing the signs of the same with Sesko.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭kyleman


    Hojlund came to us as a very ambitious young striker who always gave his all but should never have been our no 1 striker who was never rested.

    He left with his head held high and I’m also delighted for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I think Hojlund is the first player in history to have the excuse of having been given too many opportunities as the reason why he didn't succeed. It's a genius narrative (encouraged by his own comments). Phenomenal PR.

    Also kudos to him for scoring a goal in Serie A by rolling a CB in a way that would never be allowed in the PL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    To be fair the current brains trust seem worse than Woodward, Dicky Arnold and co. Berrada and Wilcox are just as responsible for the mess as anyone



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    You're not wrong there. They've basically got every major decision totally wrong in the last 16 months.

    When the trapdoor inevitably opens and RA exits the stage, I'm actually dreading what Ineos will come up with next. Hope tells me they might learn from their mistakes, and get a manager with proven PL experience this time, like Iraola.

    But it's more likely they have someone else from left-field in mind as their Plan B.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I just don't see him being sacked yet unless INEOS have identified a new permanent manager that can start immediately. If you don't have that, then you are obviously looking at an Interim. But the purpose of an Interim is usually just to 'steady the ship' and detoxify a dressing room. We're not at a point where that's needed atm. The players haven't downed tools for Amorim and the dressing room doesn't seem to be toxic. No chance they will get rid now unless they are really sold on someone like Iraola to come in on a permanent basis. The most likely course of action is that Amorim stays until the end of the season and will be replaced in an orderly fashion. Only two things can change this:

    1. The teams completely falls apart and enters an irreversible downward spiral (we're nowhere near this point yet although it can transpire quite quickly)

    2. INEOS are totally sold on a replacement that's available to start immediately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,938 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    and do they have the funds to get a replacement, and the couple of players they would need?

    Xavi is available, for example. I'm not sold on him AT ALL, but lets say you did get him in tomorrow. Do we have the funds to get the couple of midfielders he will need in January? (But, tbf, I think Amorim needs those players too)

    We've been told we have funds for january but I think if you were to get a new manager in the pressure to actually prove that would be greater.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    They are absolutely at the "Steady the ship" stage, Amorims 31 game record is 17th place ffs.

    I swear this place has lost its marbles.

    United need to sign any of the dozens of managers who would take that squad, play the formation that most suits it, start winning games again and coast to the top 8 finish that allows them more time to fix the finances behind the scenes.

    One Payoff and minimal transfers needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    I don't see him getting sacked yet. It's still early days in the season.

    But… by November if the same trajectory continues, an exit does feel inevitable. He's made it crystal clear he's not going to change his method. And the squad simply doesn't have the players to implement what he wants to do.

    CM and GK both still have huge question marks/shortcomings and we basically have only one player (Amad) who can competently perform the WB role.

    When we are hovering around the relegation zone again, a third of the way through the season - something will have to give imo.

    They may even go the caretaker manager route at the point (eg. Ole is available) and wait til the Summer to make the next permanent appointment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    We have a bunch of players trying to enact a fairly rigid looking playing style, with a massive set of rules as to who does what, when, who goes where, who passes where…..but then you have a captain in the middle of the pitch who does as he pleases largely and then the coaches mood and emotions are like sharks teeth with the peaks and troughs and is he happy and telling all his innermost thoughts to the press gang or is he depressed and quitting or what is going on?

    This does not intuitively make sense.

    And when you look at how we play, it kind of adds up, there is no conviction in how we play, we are neither here nor there, 2 good passes, one terrible one….constant brain farts in defense.

    I think essentially the players are just confused.

    Simplify and solidify the whole thing and things improve dramatically. Hopefully the new keeper helps with solidity, anyone else notice a little change in tone once Bayindir nearly lost control of that back pass early on yesterday…..all out panic permeates the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,209 ✭✭✭KH25


    I just cannot understand the insistence on playing Bruno in CM. It’s obvious to everyone that he hasn’t got the discipline or defensive ability for that role. He needs to be further up the pitch. He’s not the only problem, but for me it’s the most obvious one that Amorim just seems to ignore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    The level of performance in the first 4 PL games was much higher than the average PL performance last season.

    Last season had different attackers and a strong focus on Europa League after a very bad first 5 months between ETH and Amorim. I'm not going to just combine two totally different contexts together and pretend they're a continuous season because they're not.

    Looking at this season in context, we are absolutely not at the 'steady the ship' stage yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    If a new manager played 4-3-3, does midfield not become less of an issue than it is right now? Isn't the CM profile required to play in a two not a big issue in and of itself that would be somewhat alleviated if we played with 3 midfielders?

    Bruno/Mount + Mainoo + Ugarte/Casemiro shouldn't be too bad in a 4-3-3. It didn't work under ETH but had some crazy tactical ideas, it doesn't mean it can't work reasonably well under a different 4-3-3 manager. I do of course acknowledge the need to upgrade in that area but I don't a combination of the above 3 is inevitably going to be out of their depth in the PL if they have the right system around them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭kyleman


    Amorim is so likeable he has been given a huge grace period with most of the supporters.

    Unfortunately whatever coaching is going on behind the scenes is not working.

    Not one player has improved over his tenure.

    Last season Bruno improved dramatically as the season went on and rightly won player of the season and Amad certainly improved and was not far behind Bruno.

    Both were removed from their respective positions and it could be easily argued that they are now amongst the worst players on this team.



Advertisement