Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Northern Ireland 2125?

15960626465188

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Back to thinly veiled threats, Downcow? You've woke up fiery this morning.

    The vast majority of reasonable people have no intention of trying to get rid of your history or culture.

    I think a lot ot Unionist insecurity around this stems from either conscious or subconscious acknowledgement or perhaps even guilt that this is what the British tried to do in Ireland and those in power in what became NI tried to do to the Irish (indeed, still do sometimes around the Irish language). Fortunately times have moved on in the rest of the world and apart from a few bitter types, no one would like to see that injustice visited upon you as some sort of twisted, 'now the shoe is on the other foot' revenge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    rather than spin and nonsense, maybe answer the question.
    what should England people and Westminster do if Cornwall sought either devolution or independence?

    Same question for shetlands ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    U don't even live in Great Britain-

    The brits have U down as a Add on-

    Brit passport says - Great Britain AND ( Northern ) Ireland-

    What's British about Our Wee Country- its U that wants to be separate but on your own terms- OWC-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    The vast majority of reasonable people have no intention of trying to get rid of your history or culture.

    What you must realise is that responding to entirely made up arguments to generate a 'win' for himself is par for the course.

    When no one engages in it, he'll declare, and I quote "Nationalist and Republicans run scarred from the discussion".

    It's about cheap shots and getting one up on, who he see's as, "the other side". Nothing remotely honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,265 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    you ok there?

    What that was about I am none the wiser.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I'll make a few points;

    1. I've nothing to do with Cornwall, England or the Shetlands, so I don't particularly care how they manage their own affairs.
    2. I've previously stated that I'm not opposed to devolution or federal solutions post-Unification should there be sufficient and democratic demand for such.
    3. In the event that Unification occurs, it will be because the majority both sides have voted for it. You'd be welcome to campaign for NI returning to the UK, but I personally don't envision you having much success
    4. If your masterplan is to continue partition in ever decreasing circles to maintain a Protestant majority, I'd note that is not one of the options provided in the GFA. It won't be one of the choices on the border poll so you'd likely have to start your campaign for that post-Unification. I look forward to seeing your attempts to sell a state that consists of just Co. Down and Antrim-Minus-Belfast and I'd be curious how it would be received by the rest of the UK, who would surely have a say in taking you back at that point too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,265 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Belligerent Unionism still has not gotten it’s head around the idea they need to convince.

    If you want another referendum you will have to do what pro-UIers are doing now.

    Convince the majority that voted for a UI that they made a mistake.

    I can tell you now if the plan is violence it will be added to the list of wrong side of history - strategic f*** ups, that has you where you are now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,265 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I agree with his statement ‘we are now entering the phase of a winnable border poll’.

    Question is, how long can the spirit and tone of the GFA be credibly resisted by supposed democrats? It’s a real test of the British here.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    apart from skipping the main question, i never suggested a sectarian headcount. If it was just about Protestant v catholic numbers then you would win a border poll in the morning, but thankfully many many catholics have thrown their lot behind NI.
    there will be no problem dealing with you after a UI poll as you are clearly open to options of devolution etc. francie thinks you are a rare breed, if he is correct then things will be very difficult.

    Of course I am engaging in this hypothetical discussion because many on here say unionists won’t. When we do discuss they, if we do not accept SF position, then they think we are on the wind up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    We have heard that on and off for 100 years. And of course ‘phase’ is entirely subject.
    we are also in the phase when the sun is going to stop burning 🙂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Violence would not be a good way forward. Through history we have not always needed to take up arms to achieve, but achieve we have. We have overcome worse - here are just a few examples:

    Our community has been written off endless times in history, yet every time we stood firm, evolved, and survived:

    1641 Rebellion – thousands massacred, yet our people survived when it looked like we’d be wiped out.

    Penal Laws – Presbyterians treated as second-class citizens, still we endured.

    Siege of Derry (1689) – starvation, bombardment, and we were told no hope. Yet “no surrender” and we held out.

    Home Rule / 1921 – we resisted every attempt to drag us out of the UK, and when others chose to leave, we stayed.

    Northern Ireland’s creation – everyone said it wouldn’t last two shakes of a lambs tail - we are into our second century.

    The Troubles – decades of sectarian bombs and bullets from the IRA were meant to drive us out, but it just cemented us.

    Protocol/Brexit – once again we were told it would drive OWC into the hands of the ROI, but we’re pushing back and no evidence of movement in that direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,265 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I put it to you that your problem is you cannot see the incremental changes.

    For instance you still let slip the delusion that it is ‘your wee country’. Even the IFA that you think is a bargaining chip because you ‘own’ it. Despite all the lipservice to inclusiveness it gets the Never Never treatment too.

    Of course it isn’t and you will have to do what a majority wants, just as republicans are now doing because they agreed to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I didn't skip it, I answered it very directly. I don't have any interest in what England, Cornwall or The Shetlands would, could or should do.

    To expand, my lack of interest means I don't know enough to give any sort of reasonable answer beyond gut feeling, and given you're trying to make a point about potential devolution or repartition post Unification, I'd prefer you asked whatever you're hinting at directly, as I'd prefer my uninformed gut feeling answer wasn't taken as universally applicable one way or the other.

    Certainly some Catholics have thrown their lot in with NI and would be ardent Unionists, I'd warrant a substantial number don't want to upset the status quo and wouldn't necessarily be easily persuaded to another massive upheaval down the line to your New Northern Ireland 2.0 either.

    I've not suggested that you shouldn't engage in hypotheticals.....but I've challenged the likelihood of them per my own opinion. I've certainly never insisted you take a SF position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Republicans doing what a majority wants? Extremist republicans did not do what a majority wanted around the time of the last referendum, and you cannot see the wrong in that, and all the thousands of lives your (republicans) armed struggle costed, and all the property destroyed by your bombs, the economy and tourism wrecked in N.I. as was your aim etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    The vast vast majority of B-Specials or RUC or British army never shot at anybody or beat them up. Most did not engage in violence but resisted it.

    Where's the source for this?

    Surely it must be good for you to use the word "vast". Or are you exageratting….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    Lundy did Surrender-

    The Boyne was surrendered to the Irish in 1922-

    The Prodocol is up between ( Northern ) Ireland and England- nothing any unionist can do-

    The brit Penal laws were against the Catholic people and Presbyterians - the Prods loved them- they were not affected-

    Portadown Orange men sh1t themselves and will not walk home from drumcree church unless they have a police escort-

    Where is the Unionist balls-

    Without English help the Unionist would have been gone long ago-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Hundreds of thousands of people served in the security services in N.Ireland. I know you like to tar them all with the same brush, but can you show where hundreds of thousands of people were shot at / beaten up by the security services?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    The referendum in 1973 was just a ( Northern ) Ireland one-

    The GFA referendum one will have an all Ireland demantion to it-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    You made the statement; what's your source?

    It would be interesting to know how big or how small is "the Majority" or the "vast majority", because you are clearly pushing an agenda that you don't understand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    The helicopter that went down in the mull of kintyre in 1994 full of RUC special branch / M15 has a 100 year security stamp put on it by the brits- ( someone does not like the truth getting out-

    The families have asked for a full public inquiry-



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    @Francis McM do you need @blanch152 to white knight in and pardon you as well seeing as todays efforts are much quieter than yesterdays tantrums.

    Or are we ever going to see any of those sources that were "easy to find/ numerous / irrefutable"?

    Or is the weird logic of telling me to "back up someone else's statements" going to apply here as well?

    The best thing would be for poor FrancisMCM just accept we all know you've been talking through your arse as usual.

    "Nice UDR man I didn't give cheek to" suddenly trumps verified documentary evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Sadly, that is the key mentality around here.

    It is a mirror image of the thinking of British imperialists around 1900. The ones who thought the empire would live for ever, until it ran up against obstacles. It is supremely ironic that the good republicans vision of a united Ireland most closely resembles that deluded thinking.

    I have said it before, and I will say it again, if you want a peaceful united Ireland, it has to acknowledge the right to exist of Northern Ireland, it has to recognise the value and importance of the British identity on this island, and these aspects need to be incorporated into the very fabric of a united Ireland, one that is federal at least, or confederal.

    Anything else, such as the false equivalence of everyone being equal, as peddled by the deluded, just isn't going to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Come on Francie, Colin Harvey is one of the patsies on the Ireland's Future campaign, the one with no credibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    What sort of weird misunderstanding is this?

    The fact that there are two referenda means that the republicans have two opportunities to lose.

    If there was just a referendum in the North, you would only have one to win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I don't doubt that you and downcow can't see the incremental changes, but they are happening.

    My children have come across many Northern Irish people in rUK, France, Spain, US etc., who when asked are they Irish, say no, they are Northern Irish. It is cross-community, it is growing, but those who cling to the trappings of British flags, British traditions do not see this change, neither do the wrap the green flag round me brigade.

    The future of Northern Ireland is in the hands of those who will best protect the Northern Irish identity. That argument will be won by whichever of the two extreme traditions learns to compromise first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    As a Republican it is up to all the people of Ireland- as it should be-

    Not just 6 counties- but the 32-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Downcow, in most of those examples, there was the backing of the British Government/Army so the claim about no violence is not true. After 1641, it was Cromwell who came to the rescue and there was most definitely violence.Likewise Siege of Derry was part of a war, Penal laws were your "own" people and lots did leave in that time-frame. Troubles, British Army brought in etc, etc. What happens if there is no longer the backing of the British for you. I don't mean that in an ominous sense, just what are the options if a UI were to happen and Britain walks away?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    I am inferring from this that you belive if there is a UI you think someone should come up with a new gerrymandered boundary line for NI that gives unionism an advantage?

    Again that breaks the GFA. There is more nationlists living in belfast city now than unionists. Should belfast city stay out of new northern Ireland etc or just shaft the nationlists who committed to the GFA and throw them in a new NI. Nomatter what line you draw it will have nationlists left init and they will correctly argue that they are being shafted onece again.

    I think you're actually the one being naive thinking that london would even facilitate a new gerrymandered NI. I cant imagine any labour politians backing it and even the majority of conservatives who you consider your allies would say man up you lost. They would all know the trouble it would cause and how it ethically breaks the GFA.

    When i said both dublin and london should give a clear message that a BP result will be respected and implemented. It obviously implies nomore gerrymandering. But again both dublin and london should confirm that no more gerrymandering will take place if there is a UI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,315 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I would look at that evidence in a different way:

    1. If the Brits with GCHQ, MI5, 6, Uncle Tom Cobley and an enemy well past its sell-by date couldn’t stop their financial centre being attacked, what earthly hope would we have?
    2. Come to think of it, why would they help us? A very big favour to ask or grant. A few drones and some advice might be all we’d get.

    From the little I know of this matter, I imagine the chance of serious trouble up there post-UI is very small already and diminishing all the time but how much risk could we take given our utter lack of preparation for it? We’re not Finland or even Norway. We don’t have an army.

    And another thing - if what’s left of PSNI couldn’t handle the problem, don’t even think about calling AGS to sort things. You’ll have a blue flu on your hands pronto. I love the guards but they’re not a horse for that course.

    Post edited by Ardillaun on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,315 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    If this next post sounds like I’m contradicting myself, well, I contain multitudes. It’s a subject I change my mind on a lot. There’s a logic to UI. It makes sense. We’re a big island but it’s still a small enough territory and our basic problems are the same. For example, I’d like to see the battle lines drawn in a different way on ecological issues like the algal blooms that blight many of our waterways, esp. Lough Neagh. So far there has been a conspiracy by both governments to look the other way as our rivers and lakes are poisoned. Imagine if an activist like Feargal Sharkey was given a bigger role, North and South, to combat this scourge? We would need many more confidence-building measures of this sort to show that working together is the way to go.



Advertisement
Advertisement