Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1579580582584585592

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,169 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    "I'm just stating the poll"

    No. You are misinterpreting the survey and Ukrainians. Your posts wander and twist constantly into pro-Putin points.

    Of course the Ukrainians want an end to the war. In the beginning of the war, when they were pushing Russia back, it's only natural many wanted that to continue. At this stage, with exhaustion setting in - many favour negotiations.

    I favour negotiations - but we all know that currently they don't exist. It's just a stage-play by Putin.

    Do a majority of Ukrainians favour this stage-play? No.

    As for your "pro-war" point - the Kremlin frames people who support the defense of Ukraine as pro-war. A twisted projection. You are doing the same. It's an instant red flag and give-away.

    Your posts aren't speaking for Ukrainians, they are misinterpreting or distorting or curating information (I suspect deliberately) only ever to act as a contrarian. Which is always (and I mean always) in favour of Putin's underlying talking points.

    The most common support of Putin here, by some stretch, is this "concerned" act about Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Sorry but you are framing it.

    Considering that Putin's demands are at minimum.

    • No NATO
    • Massively reduced and defanged Ukrainian army
    • No western troops as security guarantee
    • Russia gets Veto on security guarantee
    • No western weapon deliveries
    • Zelensky replaced
    • Sanctions dropped
    • Territories yet to be conquered simply handed over(Including the massively fortified lines in Donbass)
    • No war reparations or stolen children returned
    • Essentially : surrender and prepare to be invaded again soon.

    When you dig even a little past your shallow reading of 69% of Ukrainians want negotiations. The next logical question to ask is what would Ukrainians be prepared to accept as part of a good faith negotiation.

    And thankfully it seems that Ukrainians aren't as weak willed as you and the other Vatniks.

    Over 70% of Ukrainians reject Russian peace plan, support for US proposal remains divisive, poll shows

    So if you give the Ukrainians a choice of Surrender or Fight. Guess what they choose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,207 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth Randomer


    The UK Government has some guts left for all the Pacifist talk in Aras and uachtaran Dáil Éireann and on here.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/czd0z0grm9lt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    The Ukrainians when polled, given the choice between war and negotiations favour negotiations by a significant margin. Its bizarre to try repackage the Ukrainians rejection of the war option in the poll as secretly really being support for the war.

    The Ukrainians are likely far better informed about what negotiations with the Russians will entail than you are. And still 69% of them discounted the support for war to victory, and voiced support for those negotiations. And they will be very tough terms - much worse than what the Russians asked for in 2022, or 2015 or 2014. But the 69% of Ukrainians who support negotiations to end the war will already know that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,169 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Doubling down I see. Reread my post if you "don't get it", the points are very clear.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,169 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Again to give examples of the obvious

    "Really shocked at the latest poll, Zelensky has dropped down to 60% favourability. He's not doing well"

    "More gains from the Russians, it's a meatgrinder for those poor Ukrainians, why do people keep wanting them to fight to the death like this"

    "Why do countries keep shutting down Putin, why do they want to prolong the war, just go to the table instead of all this war lust"

    "More losses by Ukraine" x 100

    Naturally people support Ukraine, as such we focus on gains/positivity for Ukraine and setbacks for Russia. It comes from a good place.

    Someone who supports Putin focuses on the opposite, so they act contrarian about setbacks for Russia, and concern troll gains for Ukraine. Even if they attempt to hide it, or just stay in character to avoid attention from mods, their posts will systematically represent this.

    Again most people know this, it's obvious, but just to highlight it again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭brickster69


    How has the tank capacity disappeared when despite numerous video's by the Nato secretary and the supreme commander Cavolli clearly debunking claims that Russia has no tanks as they are outproducing all of Nato combined by 3 times in a year.

    Yet, the narrative still get's rolled out such as " We see them neutered - their tank capacity disappeared "

    Is it so difficult to grasp this is the case or should it be labelled as misinformation ?

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,193 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    They are also opening a manufacturing plant in Ukraine and just announced the world's most advanced explosive powders factory to be built in Bulgaria.

    Rheinmetall has now received its first important order from the Ukrainian government for the construction of an ammunition factory in the Ukraine, which was announced in February 2024, and marks the starting point for the realisation of the project. The order for the Duesseldorf-based technology group Rheinmetall covers the complete technical equipment of the factory through to commissioning. This involves a total value ranged in a low three-digit million euro range, which will be booked as incoming order at the start of the third quarter of 2024. It is foreseen to begin in short term and to be completed within a few years.


    Some of these things can't be done at the drop of a hat, it takes time to actually manufacture the specialist machinery and tools; they aren't off the shelf items, they are bespoke. I remember this being explained in reference to the slow pace of ammunition production increase in the US where it was said it literally took years to make the production equipment.

    So saying X should have been done is easy, but the reality is that 'should' is an impossibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,878 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    How's that elastic band snap in Pokrovsk Bricky?

    Has the fog lifted yet?

    Have the vultures left anything of your boys for fertiliser?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Extra question

    Why Russian meat using donkeys and scooters in their suicide dashes and not tanks @brickster69 boasting about

    Oh that’s right they are vapourware like Armata tanks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Well, that is for the Ukrainians to negotiate if they can.

    In my opinion, most of those demands only recognise the practical reality. They are things Ukraine can "concede" but which don't disadvantage Ukraine from its current position. NATO isn't going to fight for Ukraine - that's clear by now. And even Article 5 only promises undefined support - its not an obligation to go to war. Ukraine is bankrupt - it cant afford this massive army and expensive western weapons which are out of stock in any case. Western troops providing a security guarantee is a fantasy - only the UK/France talk about this, and their own military say its completely ridiculous given how limited their forces are. Zelensky would lose a free election anyway, he is finished whenever the war is.

    The Ukrainians cannot offer the Russians sanction relief. They are operated by the US and EU so its out of their power. Now the EU and US might offer concessions on sanctions to get the Russians to go easier on some of their demands, but that would require the EU picking up the phone and opening a discussion with Moscow. Which they still refuse to do.

    The territories part is the toughest for Ukraine to accept - no doubt about that. But if the Russians do take those places by force, then they will add more demands on top - almost certainly they will demand Odessa. The Russian offer in 2014 and 2015 seemed unacceptable then. The 2022 offer was worse. The 2025 terms are much worse than the 2022 terms.

    EDIT - I should add, I have absolutely no belief that the current Ukrainian government will ever negotiate. Under any circumstances, regardless of any opinion of the Ukrainian people. In my view, the most probable outcome remains a 1945 style imposition of terms on Ukraine, with Zelensky setting up some government in exile in London or Paris.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,961 ✭✭✭Rawr


    So the Russians are concerned about their weapons capacity now? Not surprising given the infrastucture getting damaged. Thank you for the insight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭brickster69


    I would imagine the 32 countries of Nato should be concerned by the fact that one country is outproducing them by 3 times. How is it possible, if these countries are really so worried about the Orcs storming through Poland you would imagine defence spending and capacity would of been increased massively by now.

    I don't think they really believe that myself.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭ElektroToad


    Whatever people think about this war from a moralistic point of view, the overall position is pretty clear when you cut through the political theatre and the propaganda pumped out by both sides:

    1. The US and the Western politicians are the ones most eager for the war to end. They are the ones pushing for "ceasefires" etc. Political and economic strain is clearly showing in these democracies.

    2. Ukraine is willing to cease the fighting, but at the same time they simply cannot agree to current Russian negotiation demands. It's politically impossible for Zelensky to accept (he would seen as be the man who "surrendered Ukraine" to Russia), and may actually put his and his family's lives in danger as there are still elements in Ukrainian society that would prefer to continue to fight and would view him as a traitor.

    3. Russia appears to be the least interested in negotiations and the most willing to continue the fight. This suggests that they (Putin?) believe the conflict is going in their favor and can weaken Ukraine further on the battlefield. Another reason that Russia isn't willing to seriously negotiate is that anything less than "victory" also means political (and potentially a physical) suicide for Putin. He threw in his soldiers over the border in 2022, much to the shock of most of upper echelons of Kremlin, so he cannot back down now. I think it's worth noting that before this open war broke out in 2022, Putin was starting to be seen as growing weak and politically vulnerable inside Russia, as he was approaching 70 and without a nominated successor… This war silenced the various powerplays that were happening among the elites.

    In short, this war continues until something gives, and we have no idea which side ends up blinking first



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,961 ✭✭✭Rawr


    So they Russians are very concerned. Gotcha, thanks for the confirmation again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,667 ✭✭✭Field east


    With regards to conditions to end the war or at least conditions to be met before a ceasefire is agreed to. Then what about the following Ukr demands for international peace and stability such as :-

    (1) that Ru hand over that part of Finland that it still occupies

    (2) That it vacates that part of Moldova that it occupies

    (3) that it vacates that part of Georgia that it confiscated

    (4) that Chechnya be allowed to become an independant state

    (5) that Ru hand over five of the Ru republics/oblasts that border Ukr

    In summary , is Ukr not as entitled to come up with it’s own list of ‘unachievable ‘ conditions as Putin has done. ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭yagan


    Would you consider it permissible that posters be placed in our public realm stating that Ukraine shouldn't exist and that its lands and people belong to Russia?

    Would you support the right of anyone to put up posters in train stations and billborads stating that Palestine and its people have no right to exist?

    To clarify, do you believe it's legal to take out public advertising online and in the physical realm in Ireland that argues for the genocide of nations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭Nermal


    I don't think either of those actions is against the law, and I'm happy that that's the case.

    You're the one who is hoping for prosecutions - under what law?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭brickster69


    I don't understand why these foreign companies insist on building weapons plants in a warzone, it is obvious they will just be taken out. It's obvious that Russia will have people on the lookout everywhere and no doubt people employed in these places. Probably far safer to set up in your own country and just send them.

    bay.jpg

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭yagan


    Inciting genocide.

    https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1973/act/28/enacted/en/print.html

    (4) A person charged with an offence of genocide or any attempt, conspiracy or incitement to commit genocide shall be tried by the Central Criminal Court.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    But how many actual tanks they have?

    If NATO has 15k tanks and make 1 a month, but Russia has only 3k left and making 3 a month.

    Who is in a better situation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Very nice!

    Anyway have you ever gotten around to admitting you were astoundingly wrong about the pokrovsk elastic band snapping?

    I mean its either that or you're spreading misinformation?

    You can't get away with your silly "fog of war" excuse anymore since you've been posting uncofirmed map reports from shady twitter users since then.

    So which is it? You're either wrong or a malicious disinformation spreader.

    Gwan ahead there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    "How is it possible, if these countries are really so worried about the Orcs storming through Poland you would imagine defence spending and capacity would of been increased massively by now."

    Poland are ramping up their army rapidly BECAUSE they are afraid Russia will invade



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Ludicrous. Posters in Ireland (or comments on Boards) are not going to encourage anyone to join the Russian military or the IDF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    There are posters only a few weeks ago inciting members to travel to Russia

    Where they have no issue erm “encouraging” people to be sent to the front, especially non ethnic White Russians



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭brickster69


    I don't know how many either side has, but Russia is replacing each year what they lose. They don't really use these armoured things much anymore from what i see. I think Ukraine's reports reflects that as well as the casualty numbers Ukraine provides going down.

    They have changed the way of doing things the last year or so. The huge use of these glide bombs have totally changed how they advance now and seem to be growing.

    Some guy posted the data of how effective they have been and the scale of attacks on defending positions before troops go in. He did a new one yesterday and he thinks it gives an indication on where the Russians will be planning to head next.

    I don't think he is a vatnik type but is starting to be called one by those who doubt what he is saying.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,636 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    And I'm sure if polled on the desire to have Putin die roaring from bloodloss after Donald Trump chokes and dismembers him, Ukrainian support for that outcome would be 100%.

    Sadly, while they can be polled on their desire for something, it's irrelevant when that thing isn't on the table.

    Russia's only involvement in "peace" talks to date has been to issue petulant demands that Ukraine surrender as a pre-condition for a ceasefire. That's simply not how diplomacy works. In almost every successfully negotiated peace in history, a ceasefire preceeds the negotiations. Putin has no interest in negotiations. He knows, as well as you or I do, that anything reasonable enough for Ukraine to accept means a bloody end for him along the lines always seen when dictators are toppled.

    You know all this already though. I'm not posting it for your behalf. You have no more interest in negotiations than your great hero Putin does. Your interest is clear: to spread Kremin propoganda and disinformation. Whether that's for profit, or out of some deluded notion that being pro-Russian lends some twisted "legitimacy" to your rabid hatred of America, I'm not so sure of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,169 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Jesus they're really coming out of the woodwork today, something must have them really riled up. Perhaps it's the kilometers long petrol queues in Russia..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    So we should see rapid advances any day now so by Russia right ?



Advertisement