Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1168816891691169316941950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,239 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭Randycove


    which is fine, until Israel says no. Then what?

    There is a reason UN peace keepers are soldiers not girl guides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,491 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Hamas and their allies like Islamic Jihad and others are continuing to fight effectively.

    https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/new-hamas-insurgency



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,379 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    The thousands of Palestinian hostages Israel holds?

    Those ones?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,592 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    That's a good article. It reminds me of an interview with someone from the armed wing of fatah that Sky News did many years ago. In the interview the Al- Aqsa member said he knew he was marked for death, and that it was only a matter of time before he was killed. He said his death didn't matter, that for everyone killed like him more would follow. He said the Israeli's enduring weakness is their belief that overwhelming force will solve their problems, when in reality it only leads to more problems that can only be solved through politics .

    Shin Bet caught up with him a few months after the interview .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    No opinion on ethnic cleansing and potential genocide? Or do you think that you're putting 'the left' in its place with your posts?



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,069 Mod ✭✭✭✭circadian


    While I don't disagree with being firm and potentially pushing a UN peacekeeping delegation to ensure aid gets through and international laws are adhered to, we need to remember that Israel is a nuclear armed state and is showing itself to be as unstable and fundamental as Iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,155 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    1000056225.jpg

    Ben Jennings, The Guardian



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Our neutrality doesn't stop us starting a war or joining anyone else in a war. It is an issue for our un membership, but thats not a problem for israel or russia, so we just call it a special peace keeping mission, and bombs away. Its not a constitutional matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,945 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    A display of utter arrogance -

    "A top US diplomat has triggered outrage and calls for an apology in Lebanon after telling a group of local journalists to “act civilised”.

    Tom Barrack, the United States ambassador to Turkiye and the special envoy for Syria, made the comments on Tuesday after meeting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in Beirut to discuss plans for the disarmament of Hezbollah."

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/27/us-envoy-prompts-outrage-in-lebanon-after-telling-media-to-act-civilised



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,254 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    The international community does not formally accept Israel is a nuclear armed state



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,592 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Of course it's utter baloney. They know a domestic audience would never fall for it but they are fine with trolling an external audience. Remember when they could send a drone through a building to finish off Sinwar, the point being in the 10- 15 minutes between the first and second strike they could have easily identified that they were press people. One of the journalists killed was quite prominent and one of her photos went around the world. I have no doubt it was a deliberate attack to silence critics documenting what's happening. You don't kill over 200 journalists by mistake.

    As that twitter account neatly summed it up the IDF fear cameras the most.

    Post edited by nacho libre on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,592 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    This is the crux of the issue. The exchange is a revealing insight into how many Americans who support Israel really see the other side. It also explains how they can wave away countless war crimes because in their minds these people are inferior ,therefore they don't deserve the same human rights as civilised folk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Am I missing something here? Seems some on here think Higgins is suggesting a UN military force to go attack Israel? Have I got that right?

    My understanding is that the proposal for UN intervention in Gaza would solely be to ensure humanitarian aid gets through. And presumably, a blue helmet force only - a la UNIFIL?

    Whilst UNIFIL peacekeepers are armed, it is only for self-defence purposes. I understand that in extreme circumstances, they can call on air support or heavier defensive options.

    So, I think that's the kind of force Higgins is, rightly, proposing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Ironic that a US citizen is asking them to be "civilised" when their own country complicit in perpetrating Genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭purplesnack


    He, and all the other usual suspects, were very quiet following the double bombing of the 'Hamas camera' at the hospital the other day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭Randycove


    which is fine and at the same time irrelevant, if Israel agrees. When they have agreed aid has poured through and several countries engaged in air drops as well. The UN are already in the ground in Gaza and apparently 6000 lorries were poised to ship aid in. The UN are already on the case which to me indicates that that is not what Higgins was referring to.

    So, what if they say no?



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,069 Mod ✭✭✭✭circadian


    That's arguably worse and more dangerous. I wouldn't trust them to not use a nuclear weapon of some sort if they felt they weren't getting their way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    You are aware that Israel is simply not letting those 6000 aid trucks in? And you're aware that they have demonstrably lied that there is no starvation/famine?

    If israel says no to what exactly? That the UN cannot access Gaza? Are you aware that Gaza is not Israel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭Randycove


    Israel aren’t letting UN aid trucks in to Gaza. They have effectively said no despite international pressure, including pressure from Antonio Guterres.
    how do we get them to change their mind?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,592 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Donnie is the only one that can. Remember when Reagan did it with Shamir? Ronnie threatened to halt all arms shipments unless Shamir stopped bombing Beirut. The call had the desired effect. Unfortunately Donnie isn't going to make that call to Bibi for various reasons. So we are just going to hear more empty words from European politicians who won't dare cross Donnie lest he imposed crippling tariffs on them in response to them taking decisive action against Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    I think people are mixing up what the UN is about as opposed to Nato!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,441 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    No, you're missing nothing. But some are playing silly buggers so they can have a pop at Higgins. It's just childish and stupid.

    BTW, Higgins isn't the first to suggest such a thing and he isn't the first to mention Chapter 7 with regards to the UN charter either.

    The thing is, Michael D. Higgins isn't an idiot. He knows that there'll be resistance to some degree from Israel with regards to letting UN back into Gaza, especially after they've spent so much effort removing them so they can murder Palestinians out of sight. He also knows that there would probably have to be concessions toward Israel of some kind in order to attempt to put something into effect. But what Higgins is doing is highlighting the fact that the UN can, indeed, do SOMETHING and they aren't as impotent as they are making out. Whether that "something" can actually work is another matter.

    Higgins' comment comes across as more of a shot across the UN's bow more than anything else. Something akin to saying that future generations will look at this genocide and say you sat on your hands and simply let it happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Haaretz a bit quieter tonight after yesterdays "deep regrets for the the tragic mishap that occurred at the Nasser Hospital in Gaza" from alleged War Criminal #1 (at large).

    But, Settlers are settling, France and Italy continue to stick the boot in and alleged War Criminal #1 (at large) called out yet again for telling porkies.

    • A group of settlers attacked Palestinians and Israeli activists with clubs in the South Hebron Hills on Tuesday, wounding seven, four of whom were taken to the hospital, the activists told Haaretz. According to the activists, the settlers were grazing their sheep in privately owned Palestinian land near the village of Qawawis before the attack. Police were called, but soon left without interfering. About 20 minutes later, the settlers attacked them with pepper spray, stole a cellphone and camera, and smashed the solar panels and windows of homes and vehicles nearby.
    • French President Macron warned PM Netanyahu in a letter that Israel's plan to occupy Gaza City will only deepen the country's isolation and strengthen those who use Israel's actions in Gaza "as a pretext for antisemitism." Macron said "France cannot resign itself to see a friend like Israel descend into a spiral of violence which runs contrary to its history," adding that "nothing can justify" the humanitarian disaster in Gaza.
    • Italian PM Giorgia Meloni said in a speech that there have been "too many innocent victims" in Gaza, citing the "unjustifiable" killing of five journalists in Nasser Hospital on Monday as "an unacceptable attack on freedom of the press." Meloni reiterated Italy's support for Israel's right to self-defense following Hamas' assault on October 7, 2023, but stressed that "at the same time, we cannot remain silent now, in the face of a reaction that has gone beyond the principle of proportionality.''
    • "While Netanyahu and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer sold Trump an aggressive campaign to eliminate Hamas and bring about the end of the war, making the negotiations over a partial hostage deal superfluous, the Israeli military is telling its political overseers something completely different, sources in Washington confirmed to Haaretz… Netanyahu's marketing was too aggressive, as usual, and he promised Trump an unsustainable plan – defeating Hamas within just a few weeks" – Chaim Levinson


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,239 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    People are entitled to put forward their opinion on Higgins…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I think that poster accused me of "spouting a load of bollocks". The irony must be lost on them.

    I'm not familiar with Chapter 7 but what I've seen posted makes perfect sense. I've just posted yet more condemnations from States (Fr and It) - but words will do nothing. The UN has to get involved. If it doesn't, its a busted flush and utterly useless in the face of an entire population being wiped out - and its 2025, not 1945…

    Higgins highlighting that the UN can actually do something and that is commendable - but he's probably also tacitly pointing out that there must be reasons why no-one else is pointing it out. I've not heard of any other leader calling out Chapter 7. The elephant in the room.

    Higgins, and by extension, Ireland, can hold its hands up and clearly say that it has done as much as it can to prevent this Genocide. Others, not so much.

    I recall the vitriol on here when Ireland enjoined the SA case at the ICJ - I'd hope those posters are ashamed of themselves but I'd guess most are actually still full of hate and anger about it.

    Their absence after 691 days of slaughter by Israel is telling, isn't it?

    But there'll still be silly buggers spouting a load of bollocks I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,441 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    They are…even when their opinions are just shite talk so they can have a go at "tHe lEft".

    It doesn't make it any less childish and stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,239 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    In your opinion………maybe there are some who are not phased by flowery rhetoric and hand waving.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭dmcdona




Advertisement
Advertisement