Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

14041424345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,906 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it's not only the minimal information, it's the half-assed way it's displayed. They show the "next station" for 5 seconds then switch to "mind the gap" as the train is actually pulling up to the platform, so if you missed the brief station display you're out of luck. Then most of the time between stations they just show the Dart logo.

    They should have the Destination and next station on screen at all times; they could also display the time to next station and names of the next 3 stations etc - all info that is already in the system without any upgrades needed.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    The original PIS on the 29000s was stable in the last few years, but the original one on the 8500s badly needed replacing. It was broken more often than it worked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Per Alstom https://www.alstom.com/press-releases-news/2025/2/alstom-completes-one-europes-largest-level-1-etcs-installation-ireland

    All equipment was configured, installed and tested in one year between October 2024 and November 2024. An IÉ 22000 Class – 22001 – was fitted out as the trial train. Safety was paramount throughout and the project completed without a lost time incident (LTI).

    The CRR certification for revenue operation is pending



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    There is no 'new' signalling system, nothing on the ground will change. The new control centre will have traffic management software which will provide accurate projections of train arrival and departure based on live conditions, e.g. it will factor in delays waiting at passing loops, non stop trains following a stopping train and so on. Any change made to the timetable will be immediately reflected



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,311 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I'm not sure why Irish Rail engineers and saying they are still working on the system, that it'll be finished next year, or why drivers are still testing it with the test set.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,243 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    This second part is good news. Many were closed down around 15 years ago, and replacing trainsets that had toilets with those that won't would have been a slap in the face for a lot of existing customers of the commuter network. It still won't deal with delays between stations and the lack of immediate toilet access that cars and buses won't provide on any part of that route, but it's a belated recognition of the inevitable problem that the Netherlands had to experience with its Sprinter replacement programme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭exiledawaynothere


    I wish they could. They are fantastic and very retro. I first steeped aboard one in 1984. Remember even the fold down seats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 107 ✭✭A1ACo


    Retro?! The real thing 😁. Here in a clip from The Commitments (1991) (from 0:31).

    Have to say that I remember the short-lived flip down seats beside the sliding doors too.. and that some people would sit on them even when the vestibule was crowded - hence they were removed!

    The Commitments (1991) - Destination Anywhere Scene



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,973 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The bureaucracy of Ireland continues to depress me.

    The trains need to be replaced, everyone knows this, and the trains will be replaced, everyone also knows this. Madness that they'll still delay a decision on this, despite the fact that everyone knows the outcome of the review.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,066 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    It won't make any difference to delivery. We've only received three of the 185 already on order so far. These will just be tacked on to the end of that order as part of the already agreed framework.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That I.T. link is behind a paywall: here is another:

    https://irishcycle.com/2025/07/10/order-for-dart-trains-approved-but-then-stalled-putting-rail-expansion-in-dublin-cork-and-limerick-at-risk-says-user-group/#

    It appears that the new National Development Plan now bsing drafted is the cause of the delay/review, so that any new DART fleet purchase can be incorporated into the plan.

    This is a perfect example of multipe bureaucracies tripping over one another and leading to totally lousy implementation and delivery.

    Post edited by Economics101 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,602 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    In the grand scheme of things, this delay won't affect the delivery timeline all that much. It would be tacked on to the already confirmed order book anyways, even if it was approved months ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Economics101


    You may well be right (I hope so). In that case the Irish Times piece is somewhat misleading (surpirse!). But the process outlined in the I.T. is revealing: it involves the NTA, The Dept of Transport, the Dept of Public Expenditure. The NDP was published last June, and now apparently they are getting around reviewing key elements of the NDP. I should have thought that reviews should preceed publication.

    Endless bureaucratin hamster-wheel in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Have just seen photos on other threads of the last 2750 being transported to Dublin. It’s an awful shame that they never took off in service, there are certain services that could have really benefited from a single car unit, midday services on the Nenagh and Tipperary branches could’ve been potentially run more feasibly with them.

    IMG_2802.jpeg IMG_2801.jpeg IMG_2803.jpeg

    Stadler have recently unveiled a new hydrogen powered single-car ‘bubble unit,’ the RS Zero which actually could be a great way to feel achieve decarbonisation on these branch lines while also accommodating potentially lower passenger numbers. The trains look like they have a larger capacity than the 2750s would’ve had too so could be actually quite feasible for the branch lines. Thoughts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    wasn’t one of the issues with the 2750s reliably triggering crossing equipment? Or was that just a temporary thing?

    As for this yoke - my instinct is that hydrogen is Rail’s version of AI: lots of people trying to wish usefulness into existence. One wonders if EU grant aid assisted in creating this fella. I would rather extend the DART OHLE some or all the way from Greystones to Wicklow than spend a Euro on hydrogen.

    Similarly, I don’t buy the usefulness of buying specialized vehicles or fuel infrastructure for the branch lines when you could transform the usefulness of them by spending a few million on automatic level crossings (so that for example you could catch a train from Clonmel in either direction of a Sunday)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    2750’s and indeed all DMU types north and south have TCA’s fitted so have no issue triggering track circuits

    2750’s did venture out alone, but reliability was the concern so 2 car was the standard so you could drag yourself home



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The issue with Hydrogen is cost and the expense of the infrastructure related to it.

    Bus Eireann have three hydrogen powered buses, but they have turned out to be far more expensive to fuel then their Diesel models, 2 to 3 times the cost. But apparently at times they have struggled to even get suitable hydrogen supplies for them.

    The NTA don't seem to be in any rush to get any more beyond the initial 3, while they are buying lots of Electric buses.

    Interestingly I was watching a video yesterday about how in the UK they broke the world record for longest journey by an electric train on a single charge, 200 miles. Of course that was perfect conditions, etc. they are aiming for normal journeys to be 60 miles between charges. They have a system where they can super fast charge in just 3 minutes at stations along the way so the route length can be much further.

    Given the relatively short distances in Ireland and the speed with which battery tech is improving, I feel like we could just end up with battery trains on the branch lines. Perhaps with fast charging at stations along the way.

    The learnings from the DART+ BEMU's will likely play into any such future decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭PlatformNine


    The RS Zero is something I have been very interested in (although I prefer the battery versions, like the posts above I am not a fan of hydrogen tech) and I think it is has a lot of potential. However I do question how much use it could get on our network, as there aren't many places they could be used, even post AISRR.

    You suggested Waterford-LJ and Nenagh branch services. But Waterford-LJ is going to become an important link between Waterford and Cork and Limerick so it really needs proper sets for capacity. There is rumblings going around that they are already working to make it a 2-hourly service, although I am not sure if there is already sets ready or if they are waiting for a set to be freed because of D+. However that will hopefully start to show what the real demand on the line could look like. Limerick-Nenagh (not -Ballybrophy) is planned to become a more frequent commuter service so it should use whatever they order to replace the 2800s in the LSMA.

    Where I think they could make more sense is for Ballina shuttle services and Limerick-Ballybrophy, the former is actually what they are primarily intended for (short branch line services). But then there is the question, is the handful of sets needed to maintian a decent frequency worth the trouble? Or are they better of with a more standardised fleet using 2800s or 22Ks (and their replacements) for the services, even if it is a bit overkill?

    Otherwise the only other way I could see these making sense is if more branch lines started to be brought back. There are a good few towns that in the next 10-20 years may become big enough to warrant branch lines being built/rebuilt, some lines that come to my mind include Edenderry-Enfield, Loughrea-Attymon, Carrickmacross-Dundalk, and Ardee-Dunleer. However that then becomes more of a debate about whether or not branch lines should be brought back, rather than about the practicality of something like the RS Zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,593 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    loughrea has a road built on part of the branch i believe so that's likely out, think ardee might have the same problem.
    unless anyone knows better?
    the station in loughrea was and maybe still is, a cattle mart but as issues go that is small fry if there was a way to reinstate that branch.
    enfield edenderry could be a good shout actually but i can't see it happening though it should.
    the mayo branch would require more then a single car and i think limerick ballybroaphy if they can make it more usible will end up requiring more then a 2 car.
    for the most part i can't see any uses for single car units unless we provide late night services right across the country which i can't see happening, would be great don't get me wrong but it won't happen in my life time bar the suburbans and perhapse dublin cork and dublin belfast.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,857 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The N65 from Loughrea to the M6 and the N33 to Ardee are nearly entirely on the route of the old rail alignments. Flat land that probably hadn't been sold off makes a good base to start from for a road.

    Rathkeale Bypass also uses the rail alignment but that's definitely not likely to ever reopen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,593 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    thanks, that's what i thought but wasn't 100% sure.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭PlatformNine


    The N33 and N65 may have been built on the original alignments, but that has also somewhat protected them. While they couldn't be rebuilt direcly on the orignal line, it would be easier to build the track to the side of the road than having to design around buildings encroaching the alignment. It would be more expensive than if the alignment was still owned by IE/CIE, such has been a massive debate with Claremorris-Collooney and the potential greenway. However if the alignments are no longer owned by IE or CIE I think a CPO for the alignment would be needed anyways. A quick glance at google maps shown that the Edenderry-Enfield and Carrickmacross-Dundalk alignments have been encroached by buildings, so make of that what you will.

    Of the lines I listed I think Edenderry would be the most likely to be built considering its size, proximity to Dublin, and that the 120 is already a heavily used service (more generally I believe many of the GAI outer commuters are reaching capacity). Also from a brief look at timetables I think it would have the most time to save with a train service.

    When I wrote that I completely forgot to consider passenger numbers from Castleconnel, Birdhill, and Nenagh, I only looked at Cloughjordan and Roscrea. I am not sure why I did that, as realistically they would be a part of the Limerick-Nenagh service. For example if Nenagh had 30-minute frequency commuter service, every fourth service would be extended to Ballybrophy for a 2-hourly service.

    I also don't disagree about Ballina services, it really shouldn't have a single car unit, although with current ridership they could get away with it. During last year's census there were 274 passengers at Manulla Jnc, which averages to 15 passengers across the 18 services (9 in each direction). I am not sure what the heaviest loadings would look like, I would think closer to 30 passengers, which while still enough for a 1-car unit to handle, would not leave much room for improvement. My hope would be that by the time they actually do need to replace the 2800s, the ridership on the branch will be high enough to warrant having a 3-car ICR or equivalent. As assuming whatever replaced the 2800s in the LSMA ( and possibly GMA) is an EMU for commuter services, it might be tedious to get one to Ballina.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭BestWestern


    Limerick to Galway urgently needs more carriages. On my last four evening journeys ex limerick, it was overcrowded with little standing space left. Once the colleges go back, this is going to get worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,857 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Absolutely nothing can come available until probably next summer when there might be some cascading of 29ks from Drogheda to Docklands and Maynooth and release 22ks.

    I think there's only four or so sets in use doing those services at peak too. Unless they take some 22ks off Hazelhatch and use actually more suitable 29ks until electrification.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,574 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Does it also need more frequency? As 5 trains per day seems poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,593 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Ie won't use 29s on HH only services unfortunately, unlesss perhapse the NTA interveen and force them to do so which they should but won't.
    if a sufficient amount became freed up they would be perfect for it as in reality it's a medium speed outer suburban and the ICR is wasted and horifically inefficient on it.
    but yep not going to happen unfortunately.
    electrification or BMUfication is the best option to solve the problem now and that's a way off for the kildare line i think?

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I'd say the reason why IE aren't using 29000s on the PPT services is because Heuston drivers haven't been trained on them for a long time. That should be easily fixable though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,593 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    agreed but there aren't enough of them anyway currently even if they were willing to train heuston drivers on them.

    had the 2700s remained in service down in limerick then perhapse the 2800s might have been able to cover it or at least a sufficient amount of them to warrent training drivers at heuston on them but hay, we are where we are.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Should be plenty of them released once the Drogheda DART services begin next year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,857 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The longer we wait to even see the new planning app for the D+ Depot, the more chance that some ridiculous stuff has to be done to keep services at workable capacities.

    Initial use of the 29ks from Drogheda services, after they've had any outstanding work done (floors, PIS, the bicycle area conversion, any other deferred maintenance etc) is presumably going to be reinforcing any peak time 4 car 29k services on Maynooth, and subbing in the various peak time 22k services on Maynooth and Docklands.

    That wouldn't use up everything released from Drogheda surely?



Advertisement