Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1405406407408410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @bk The railway alignment from Waterford to Rosslare takes a fairly direct route, but that means it avoids all population centres in South Wexford. The total catchment is probably 4 to 5,000 people, most of that in Rosslare.

    New Ross is the only big town in South Wexford within Waterford's hinterland, but the line goes nowhere near it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Looking at the news of planning approval for DART+ North, why do I find so much on this thread about Rosslare?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Because the discussion moved to when DART+ South might have an RO submission, and “what to do with Rosslare trains” is relevant to that.

    Further discussion was off topic, of course, but this shouldn’t be a surprise to you…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 444 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Is 12tph between GCD and Bray even possible with the LC closures?

    I don't disagree that it is going to be difficult, I think that might even be the primary reason they have split D+S into the projects. But still, they would be some of the last LCs in the Dublin Commuter network and I assume are important for increase the frequency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,202 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    If it were me I'd just bring the barriers down and let them learn the hard way, get them to lobby for an underpass/bridge since they like lobbying so much



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 960 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    This * 1000

    Same with with the green lane at Dunville venue.

    Just keep increasing frequency to the point where the barriers are almost always down and the road is barely open.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Alright, who here is the Irish Times researcher?

    That report has been out for weeks at this stage, well over a month in fact, and they only got around to writing about it when it's brought up here 😂

    EDIT: Ah, I should say I'm not actually trying to find out, and don't actually care, but I just find it hilarious to imagine someone having to come in here and read Strassenwolfs latest epic around drumcondra 🤣😭. I mean, I enjoy this stuff, imagine finding it deathly boring and still needing to read it for your job

    Post edited by CatInABox on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭spillit67


    There’s another journalist who lifts loads of his ideas for stuff from here and Skyscrapercity. To be fair to him, it shows he’s at least engaged which is more than many other journalists who just want to report on the latest scandal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 444 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I don't disagree and I think some people are just going to need to learn to the hard way. However from reading over the D+N objections about increasing Howth frequency to 6tph, I don't think they are going to advocate for real solutions. I honestly think they would fight to reduce the service frequency because "the existing level of service is already fine and I don't want my LCs closing too often."



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There is already a design to close Merrion Gates by diverting Strand Road through the Merrion Church carpark using a bridge (but I think an underpass would be better).

    If that was built, the Sydney Parade could close - perhaps with a lot of complaints, but is not a lot of extra distance.

    The crossing at Serpentine Ave could be saved by raising the line by a few metres and putting the road under the line. A 5 metre clearance would be needed, and there is sufficient distance between Lansdowne and Sandymount to get the train up and down. It might require a bit of entrance closures for some properties.

    That just leaves Lansdowne and Sandymount. I am sure, with proper design, the locals would manage and the commuter traffic could take the train or bus.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Infini


    Honestly elevating the line all the way from Lansdowne to Serpentine would be the only way to get rid of the crossings while maintaining the majority of the road links but the only way to ultimately get anything done would be to override the NIMBY opposition by basically threatening to outright lock down all the crossings at Rush Hour if they keep outright refusing every attempt to remedy the situation.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Unfortunately, the timetable is clockface throughout the day. A possible workaround would be to close some of the crossings Monday to Friday 7 am to 7pm, but build the Merrion Gates replacement, and do the work on Serpentine Ave, so two crossings remain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Infini


    The crossings will have to be dealt with at some point one way or another as those 5 crossings would be the only one's left in the city center area itself. As for Bray to Greystones realistically they need to go big and widen the Tunnels to get a double track alignment into place to clear the bottleneck in that section. Either that or they Bore a shorter direct route through the mountain that meets the existing DART line at either end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 444 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Something I have just considered, there has been a lot of discussion on eliminating the Sandymount LCs, but how about the Bray LC? Would need to be closed as well?

    I think there would be enough alternative routes so to be fine for private vehicles or delivery vans, but for anything taller I think it could be a problem? The L14 specifically I am not sure about, I don't belive there is any other way to access to Strand Rd. Could they maybe lower the road at at Albert Ave to gain 4m of clearance and switch the L14 to single deckers? TFI actually shows that as the current routing, despite the bridge only having 3.1m clearance, which is too short for a single decker let alone the DDs DB use for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I know it’s off topic but just to make a point that at the moment, there is a single train on a Friday - the 16:10 - that does the Heuston to Waterford journey in exactly an hour and 40, stopping at only Carlow and Athy and getting into Waterford at 17:50. This is phenomenal and with huge linespeed improvements, new electric rolling stock, and better signaling, this itself can be significantly reduced.

    Wexford to Dublin via Waterford is not nearly as bad as it sounds and is actually incredibly feasible. The issues are that Wexford is not the only stop on the line and by no means the main destination, as well as the numerous restrictions on the line itself like the tramway in Wexford town, the Felthouse curve, and many more.

    It is clear that for DART South to work, Wexford trains can’t go into Dublin via the DSER. But it’s tricky to figure out an alternative that works best. Probably not a bad shout for another thread…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,052 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Yeah at the end of the day it's not rocket science, just costs money and it's even been done before at select locations there as the original route was inundated by the sea. A new tunnel or set of tunnels there some day will seem child's play compared to metrolink and DART Underground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 thosewhoknow


    I think it’d be politically challenging to justify ending services to Dublin on the DSER with so many commuter towns on the line. I’d imagine they should just reinstate one of the termini platforms at Pearse and look at getting a third track between there and GCD. It’d be cramped but if they could get the Luas extended to Bray then at least there wouldn’t be as much pressure on the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,465 ✭✭✭Consonata


    When they do extend the Luas to Bray, they really should build it with a view that it could be converted to Metro in future. If they do that then you would have 4 tracks of high speed rail north of Bray, avoiding the need to bulldoze expensive sections of the DSER north of Bray to add a third or 4th track to.

    Metrolink tying in with the Coastal Dart north of Estuary and at Bray would solve a lot of the problems of North/South travel in the city imo



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    That just isn’t true at all.

    Dublin industrial and Broombridge industrial estate are just two ends of the same place, and Dublin Industrial Estate has a density of 200-250 units per hectare planned as part of its redevelopment.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/dublin/2025/08/23/homes-planned-for-dublin-industrial-estate-increase-by-40/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,583 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    nope you are incorrect.
    it would be a disimprovement and a slower journey and would crash usage numbers.
    of course we discussed this a plenty so you will already know this.
    it's ultimately very simple, the only service that can offer anything on this line is a direct one, and if not, then shut it down as hardly anyone is going to waste their time getting on a train at wexford and getting off at wherever to slum it on a dart all the way into the city, the numbers for such a service just aren't there.
    presumably of course money will be spent on upgrading the road network as an alternative or will it be left to struggle on, because that is the only other option and it is already beyond capacity with more capacity being expensive.

    it's an absolute howl to be honest that people who don't and never will use a service want to effectively run it down to closure to deliver something, which, removing that service ultimately, won't deliver anyway, because if the capacity isn't there to run a few diesels a day through to dublin it certainly won't be there to run a high frequency suburban service reliably.
    anyway like always i will be wasting my time but i'm board of a sunday so decided to drop in and correct a few things.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭Thunder87


    Any sort of coherent plan for that area is aspirational stuff anyway as it's all privately owned and will be developed piecemeal across probably several decades (just look at Sandyford, even after all this time half of it is still old industrial units), the realities of the market whenever various sites become available will determine what actually gets built



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,583 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    actually it would as they are needed whether there are rosslare trains or not, such benefits darts more then rosslare trains anyway by miles.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,583 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    as i mentioned back in the big thread that discussed this there is not going to be any depot or other facilities built on the line to service trains and the regimes would not be changed to suit the line either as the trains are used all over the country anyway.

    the reason limerick can work a little different with the 2800s for the mayo branch is that there is slack in the fleet and they are generally limerick based.

    i say generally as they do head for the cork suburban the odd time for various reasons.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,717 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I don't understand why DARTs need passing loops.

    Surely if they are running DARTs every 5 minutes, passing loops would only cause delays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,887 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    also where are you going to put them? The only place I can think of is between Shankill and Killiney.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,025 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Yes, they would allow "Express" DART services too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,052 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Express DART services are just a timetabling headache if you ask me. If you are going to do that then just make the Rosslare train a BEMU with some charging under the wires around Enniscorthy, tunnel through Bray head properly and run the Rosslare train as the "Express DART". In reality I don't think it's worth the hassle. Just tunnel through Bray head and extend the DART down to Gorey or wherever analogue to the extension north to Drogheda. Run "Inter city" BEMUs from Rosslare to Maynooth but as stopping services, following the DART schedule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Tunnelling under Bray Head seems like a needlessly expensive solution to deploy at the very edge of the network. Why not instead route the railway east of the head between Bray and Greystones? It’s still a new alignment, still really expensive, but far, far cheaper than a long tunnel and it would a allow a “Bray South” station to be added near Kilruddery to defray some of the costs. I know some tunnelling or cut and cover would be needed here too, but it’s still way cheaper than boring through a mountain



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,574 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Realistically neither boring under Bray Head or a new alignment east of Bray are going to pass a CBA.

    If you remove the passenger numbers from Wicklow (as it becomes a DART+) and Wexford (if routed via Waterford), then the remaining towns in between carry just 477 passengers a day total, all day, per the rail census.

    To put that in context, that is about the capacity of 1/3rd of a single DART! These are tiny numbers.

    No way such small numbers are going to justify a CBA for major investment. Any improvements to the line will have to be done in a manner that is pretty inventive and affordable.

    Obviously extending DART to Wicklow with BEMU's is a smart move, Wexford to Wateford makes a load of sense.

    Frankly just turning the remaining towns into a shuttle would mean a greatly improved service for these towns, with much greater frequency then they have today.

    Another possible option, is to use battery trains for the entire line, with topup fast chargers at stations along the way. Perhaps a version of the DART+ stock, but speced with a toilet, more seats and more comfortable seats. It could then continue into the Dublin area without needing a passenger change.

    I'm not saying there will never be a new line East of Bray (which I agree better then tunnelling), but realistically see that happening in the next 50+ years.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,574 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Another possible option, is to use battery trains for the entire line, with topup fast chargers at stations along the way. Perhaps a version of the DART+ stock, but speced with a toilet, more seats and more comfortable seats. It could then continue into the Dublin area without needing a passenger change.

    Actually developing this idea, Greystones to Enniscorthy is roughly 96km.

    This is an interesting number, in the UK this week, they broke the record for longest battery train journey on a single charge, 200 miles. Now that obviously was with best conditions, but real world performance they are aiming for 60 miles between charges. Well 60 miles is 96km!

    So perhaps with battery tech improving, you could just use BEMU's all the way to Enniscorthy, obviously spec'd for a longer journey and have them more semi stopping in Dublin. Obviously you would need at least two fast charges at statinos at either end, maybe a quick topup one in the middle. But it might be doable.



Advertisement