Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Metrolink - Alternative Routes - See post one for restrictions.

15678911»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Brightlights66


    I'm afraid I don't really follow you.

    It's very important to have interchanges between the metrolink and other rail services, e.g. DART. The point I am trying to make is that such interchanges would not need to happen at Glasnevin. They could, it appears, happen at Drumcondra, as envisaged by the metronorth plan for an interchange at that location, and a routing like that would have the added benefit that metrolink would serve a much higher local population than is available - or ever likely to be available - at Glasnevin.

    I would, of course, like a bit of tweaking to the earlier plan, to bring the metro station closer to the DART station.

    Tweaking to improve the efficiency of such an interchange is hardly 'crayonism', as alleged by the poster L1011. That plan was approved by ABP. And I can confirm to that poster that I do not live in the country and haven't done so for many years, though I would use a metro service between the airport and the city about 30 times a year (about 15 return journeys), and would have already done so hundreds of times, if Ireland had been able to stick to its original metro timetable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭Consonata


    It does not however provide an interchange for both railways as has been outlined to you numerous times, again and again and again. Glasnevin is as blank of a canvasas we are going to get (no offence to the Brian boru pub) for a significant interchange for the railways. If you so desperately want to get to Drumcondra from there, then simply hop on a Dart!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Brightlights66


    But it seems that the proposed rejigging of the current rail line layout through Glasnevin Junction will allow all those lines (PPT, Maynooth, Dunboyne) to use the current Drumcondra Station, which itself has ready access to both Connolly and Spencer Dock.

    So, as it stands, the plan is to remove the Sligo/Longford trains from a critical section and bring them into Heuston, and thus free up paths via Drumcondra's current station. You should then be feasibly able to run many more suburban trains through Drumcondra: so why build the metrolink through the underpopulated and distinctly unbusy Glasnevin, when you could achieve the same rail-metro interchange at a busier, more populated Drumcondra?

    Now, frankly, I am doubtful, and I would be very pleasantly surprised if Sligo trains are going into Heuston by 2040. I think there's a lot to be said, in the interim, for an underground station under Drumcondra Road, with access to the current Drumcondra Station and a clearly feasible and desirable future one on the Midland line, for interchange with both those lines, the proposed Balgriffin LUAS and, of course, all the buses that serve that area. Along with the much higher residential and population in Drumcondra - relative to Glasnevin Junction - this would be a nice way for metrolink to connect with all those rail lines and maximise its uptake of passengers. The residential and working population around Glasnevin is relatively very low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭Consonata


    No, the function of redoing the junction is to allow for better use of Spencer Dock station with its 8 platforms, which will be inaccessible to Drumcondra.

    If Dart+ Underground is built via Spencer Dock, it will also be inaccessible via Drumcondra.

    Drumcondra will be used only for services bound for Connolly onwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It has one line, therefore less capacity. So you’d be funnelling less passengers through the station and automatically making the tie in less appealing. And it can’t get to Spencer Dock station.

    Why is this so hard?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The 1969 Dublin Rail Study ran its proposed north-south underground line via Glasnevin.

    Metro North was the only proposal to ever suggest using Drumcondra station as a tie-in. Metro North was designed between 2002 and 2007. Who was the Taoiseach then? Where did he live?



Advertisement