Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Oasis Reunion. Its finally happening😱

1236237239241242252

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,039 ✭✭✭Fanirish


    and dynamic pricing wasn’t used on oasis tour in ireland or uk.
    they had set prices with non existent amounts at lowest price.

    It’s a nice boogeyman for oasis and their team but they asked for and got millions a night, only way to make that work is charging crazy prices to fans.

    Reality is it was a once in a generation reunion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,982 ✭✭✭delbertgrady


    I spoke to someone yesterday who - like me - had been on the Sunday night, and our experiences and responses were exactly the same. Superb show, great crowd. No negatives.


    I felt it was an utterly unique experience. Comparisons have been made here and elsewhere to acts as diverse as Bruce Springsteen, Taylor Swift and U2, in terms of the best stadium show (not to mention a bizarre, Oasis-bashing clickbait Irish Times article comparing them to - of all acts - Blackpink).

    Arguments ranging from lack of stage movement to lack of satellite stages have been made. It's not a debate worth having, as everyone will champion the act to whom they have the closest emotional connection, and as such, it becomes moot.


    But if one wanted to be objective, here's one litmus test: most shows will feature the inevitable songs off the new album, or deep cuts that lead to an exodus to the bar or toilet, as people take their opportunity to head out for a few minutes. There was very little of that on Sunday; so little movement as to be negligible. I've never seen a stadium show where the audience was so focused and so involved.

    Yes, it's as close to dream setlist as we could get, and yes, absence makes the heart grow fonder, and nobody wants to miss anything, but it's a point worth making. Here was a two hour stadium gig with no lulls. That's rare. It's almost unparalleled.


    I'd normally be up the front at big outdoor shows, but - taking what I could get - I was in the Upper Hogan on Sunday. Geographically, it was the furthest I've been away from the stage in years, but we were overlooking the stage, with a good view of the screens, so felt close to the action, and the excellent sound and joyous communal experience of the whole night really cemented it as a standout show.

    TL:DR version; Oasis Live '25 - Believe the hype.

    2026 Gigs and Events: An Evening with The Fast Show, Prima Facie, Stereolab (NCH), Foo Fighters, David Byrne (3Arena), Belle and Sebastian (x2), Kraftwerk, Paul Simon, David Byrne (St. Anne's Park), Keb' Mo', Metallica (x2), Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark, Embrace, Sigur Rós with the Ulster Orchestra, Crash Test Dummies, Gilbert O'Sullivan, Ben Folds, Jeff Tweedy, Nicko McBrain



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,300 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    As I said, two separate thing. Dynamic pricing is cüntish imo. But letting people choose to pay is fair.

    And I paid with dynamic pricing FWIW. Can't remember the exact number, was happy to pay it as I said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Yes Noels songs were outstanding.

    He still has a great voice, I always thought he was a much better singer than Liam to be honest.

    From Wembley this version but its magical.

    Another great thing about the gig and gigs in August is that it get darks earlier so the lighting, screen and atmosphere in general is so much enhanced.

    Too many gigs in Ireland in June, all up on top of each other and the evenings are too long, it takes from the enjoyment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    As my previous comments have stated, I paid €1000 for two tickets on TM and don't regret a second. It was a sensational gig.

    But you shouldn't have to pay €500.00 for a standing ticket to see any band. In my opinion, that's wrong (which I know, to a certain extent, makes me a hypocrite).

    If it continues, it will make concerts unaffordable and kill the bigger gig industry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000


    Nobody had to pay €500 to see Oasis.

    The argument that the biggest acts charging hundreds is making gigs unaffordable is laughable. Go on Ticketmaster right now and look at all the gigs taking place in Whelans, Grand Social, Button Factory etc. Certainly not unaffordable.

    I wish I could see Oasis for 20 quid too! If it continues it will be for a handful of acts who can charge these prices and it comes down to people paying the price for them, even though they know it’s extortionate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    I had to pay €500 if I wanted to see Oasis because they were the only tickets available to buy at the time.

    If you read my comment properly, you'll see that my opinion (which is not laughable but feel free to insult it if it makes you feel better) is that if the norm is that going to "bigger" gigs is going to cost €500 per ticket, many punters will find that unaffordable. I wasn't referring to gigs in Whelans etc.

    Was that too difficult to understand?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    actually couldn’t believe how many had merch on tbh. Just had shorts and a t shirt,’looked old and boring 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,440 ✭✭✭lukin


    That's a nonsensical comparison and you know it. You can't compare the cost of flights, hotels, TV's, phones etc. to the cost of a Ticketmaster concert ticket. Because the cost of flights, hotels, TV's, phones etc. increase according to the rate of inflation (mostly) but concert tickets do not. They have increased at twice or three times the rate of inflation.

    There's no justification for it. I was getting fed up with the general admission ticket prices increasing but the dynamic pricing was the final straw for me. It's a point of principle. I could have afforded to pay 600 euro for a ticket, I would have had to live like a monk or a couple of months afterwards though. But on a point of principle I wouldn't do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭Gus Ivey


    Deleted



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,039 ✭✭✭Fanirish


    for years concert tickets/tours were underpriced.
    Bands were being supported by major label advances derived from cd sales. They directly funded bands tours including support slots.
    once cd revenue disappeared ticket prices took years to correct themselves to a more realistic level. Even now most bands lose money on tours, some scrap by with merch income and alot of international known band members have day jobs.

    the costs to tour have grown enormously in the post covid era. Plenty of articles on this topic.

    Also using the example of the biggest reunion tour in last twenty years which was set out for exact purpose of extracting as much cash as possible is not fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭FazyLucker


    But the point is that rate of inflation doesn't decide the cost of tickets.

    Supply and demand does.

    I'd say a lot of people splurged this time as a once off event and justified it to themselves on the basis of "well, its been 16+ years, or first time ever, etc". A good chunk of those, while thinking it was worth every penny, are unlikely to fork out another €500 next year. Yes there's another cohort who missed out who will.

    Yes it probably means that tickets for the biggest gigs are going to be inflated, but if I had paid €500, I'd have done it on the basis that I'm probably not going to do this again for 3-5 years.

    Plenty of people probably didn't drink for months in advance of it. I heard of 1 person who gave up smoking and justified it to himself that way.

    I'm very much live and let live but I thought nothing about paying €200 and given I've a fairly lax social life at this stage it was worth it.

    All any of us want when we put our hand in our pocket is value for money. Everybody got that on Saturday and Sunday night. That's all anyone can ask for and expects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000


    You mean you chose to pay €500 then. You could have turned off the computer at that point and not bought them.

    I didn’t mean to insult, it simply is a laughable statement. There is a handful of acts who could charge these prices €500 for a ticket. It is absolutely not the norm. However you can’t complain about big acts charging more when you shelled out all that for Oasis. Like any business what do you expect them to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 551 ✭✭✭argentum


    If you felt that paying whatever you paid to see them and really enjoyed it then fair play to you. It's your money so do what you want with it and feck the begrudgers.

    I paid 2500 to see U2 in The Sphere and it was worth every penny

    You'll have memories to last a lifetime as most can still remember the gigs in 95,96 and 97



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,778 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    That's a nonsensical comparison and you know it. You can't compare the cost of flights, hotels, TV's, phones etc. to the cost of a Ticketmaster concert ticket.

    I don't think it is a nonsensical comparison.

    My point was that people are willing to spend thousands going to matches. And ONLY matches (Not taking in sights etc while there). People are willing to spend hundreds. Maybe thousands to go to concerts. THEY feel like it's worth it. And THAT's what's important.

    You saw the ticket prices. Made your calculations and decided it wasn't worth it for you. And that is just a valid opinion as those who deemed it WAS worth it to them.

    This was NOT worth the cost to you. 100% valid opinion to you. Not an opinion I share but that's OK.

    This WAS worth the cost to me. 100% valid opinion to me. Not an opinion you share but that's OK.

    My point is also that you can't take it with you and enjoy yourself.

    That Live Laugh Love "philosophy" makes my toes curl and my face implode with cringe when I see it written on a wall or something but yer a long time dead so do something. I spent years not doing that and I regret it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭left_hander


    The thing is that I think everyone knew they were going to witness something special and they weren't disappointed.

    People had seen the other gigs and thought they were in for a belter of an evening. As a result, I don't think there was anything like the normal levels of drunkeness and people didn't want to miss it running in and out of the Jack's. And the crowd all got in way ahead of Oasis arriving on stage and were treated to two hours of magic.

    As above said above value for money is the only thing people expect and everybody got it. It must be the most universally acclaimed concert in history. I feel privileged to have been there and money, well there's no point being the richest person in the graveyard.

    I don't work for less than I'm worth. Nor do any of you. Why should Oasis?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    Of course I chose to and, as a comment above stated, it was a one-off choice because of the reunion aspect and because I wanted my son to see Oasis live.

    Would I pay that again to see them? No. I would probably go to €200.00 max.

    I've seen U2 (mentioned in several posts) in 1985, 1987, 1989 and several times since then, the last being 2010 ish. Would I pay €200 to see them now? No. Will I pay it to see any artist? Yes, I'd pay a lot to see The Smiths. Once.

    My point is about the norm. If an average of €300 is the norm to see the bigger artists, then that will rule a lot of people out of the equation.

    In the last year, I've been to see Pulp, Paul Weller, New Order and, ironically, Liam Gallagher in the Point last August (€80.00 per ticket) and Irish artists like The Stunning.

    Last weekend was a one-off in pricing for the reasons outlined. But it was worth it as a one-off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,645 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    I don't know why you keep saying this. There was absolutely dynamic pricing involved.

    They moved the goalposts afterwards and said that they advertised prices and most tickets sold were at the higer end of these advertised prices.

    The prices advertised were

    €94.05 - €261.75

    If what they were saying was true, then the max people would have paid was €261.75. I paid twice that and a lot of people paid more.

    We've discussed this before and you've ignored it and repeated the same stuff. I'm sure you'll ignore this again and i'm not really sure why.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Yes I forgot Denis was attached, still think Oasis would do a cracking Bond theme



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,778 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Ya think? I honestly can't see it.

    Now I wanna hear Muse do a crazy OTT Bond theme :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,039 ✭✭✭Fanirish


    go and read the Uk watchdog says clearly that dynamic was not used. What happened was there was barely any tickets assigned to “normal” prices, tons were assigned as “platinum tickets” before the tickets went on sale. The ticket prices didn’t fluctuate during the sales, people were only getting offered the insane platinum prices cause that was the only tickets in the system inventories.

    There is legitimate complaints that oasis falsely advertised the normal prices as the defacto prices when in reality it was the “plantium” price range that nearly everyone encountered.

    It’s the same as promoters saying “tickets from €50” when the €50 is 5 seats in the entire building



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,645 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Yes, because goalposts were moved afterwards. They completely stopped using the term "DYnamic Pricing" because of it.

    The ticket I got was not a Platinum Ticket but an "In Demand" standing ticket. Price changed based on demand.

    If a price changes based on demand, THAT is dynamc pricing no matter what label you want to put on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,372 ✭✭✭ConcertKing


    Sure he is a spoofer that defends Ticketmaster at all cost!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    And what were the 415 euro "in demand " standing tickets? You have got this arseways. Forget about it we all had a good time , hopefully it won't be used again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭FazyLucker


    I think this is the point.

    I saw Saturday for €180, would I have paid €500 for this one? Yes.

    Will I pay €500 the next time they arrive here? No. I've seen them this time, was desperate to see them, got lucky with the ticket.

    But would I pay €180 next time? Sign me up. Worth every cent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Bands were being supported by major label advances derived from cd sales. They directly funded bands tours including support slots. Once cd revenue disappeared ticket prices took years to correct themselves to a more realistic level.

    That was at least twenty years ago.

    Even now most bands lose money on tours, some scrap by with merch income and alot of international known band members have day jobs.

    Small bands perhaps but not any major acts, certainly not Oasis.

    The costs to tour have grown enormously in the post covid era. Plenty of articles on this topic

    They have grown but nowhere near the extent near the percentage increase in ticket prices.

    Its largely an excuse to justify greed, and push Livenations agenda of trying to bring EU ticket prices in line with the US.

    Oasis could have not used dynamic pricing and still grossed 400m for this years tour.

    Thats plenty of money, the band would probably get half that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    It's all about people's personal and financial tolerance which is being tested to the limits by promoters and participating bands

    I paid €187 face value on Saturday afternoon after a year of being despondent not getting a ticket initially, would I have paid €500 on Saturday afternoon? No. After the Saturday night gig that I thought was 9.5/10 incredible would I still have paid €500? No.

    A year ago I felt €150 on average for a ticket was expected for these gigs, personally €200 would have been my extreme limit but that's just me and my personal financial tolerance, we're all financial numbers to the promoters and with all of these shows sold out one way or the other they and the bands win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭Styles12


    I have been at many gigs including Taylor last summer and I can hand on heart say that nothing will come close to Oasis in Croke Park on Sunday night it was something special.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    It started with Springsteen a few years back when he hiked his prices way up, Springsteen took the flak but people paid it.

    Then Miss Swift came along and charged 200+ for tickets and people paid it.

    The barrier was broken, people became conditioned to these prices and promoters could see that people were willing to pay alot more that they previously would.

    Now every tom dick and harry is trying to charge 100 euro whilst the big acts keep charging more and more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 422 ✭✭sh89000




Advertisement
Advertisement