Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1236237238239240242»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,387 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    They could rally their members IF they deemed the government inaction to be worth same.

    It's as fluffy as it gets - the results should tell you that. Even a few of the posts on this thread - people don't seem to know what it is about or how it might apply to them.

    Absolute nonsense really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭DayInTheBog


    Have to agree. Had a post-grad qualification in IT and got a call centre job while people with no it background got IT. The only dept which looked at my qualifications was justice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,652 ✭✭✭bren2001


    "rally their members"….how? Considering Section 4.2.4: "No form of industrial action shall be taken by any party…."

    Couple that with Section 4.3.4 saying that if agreement can not be reached through direct negotiations then it goes to the WRC and then the Labour Court.

    Youre right, you are talking absolute nonsense.

    There's nothing fluffy about local bargaining. It's an agreed pot of money. The Union submits how it should be spent. It's used to settle different issues that the Union prioritizes. The fact the details are not clear yet doesn't make it "fluffy".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭rostalof


    Duplicate post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭rostalof


    What departments are hiring IT staff with no background in IT, that's a worrying trend? All ICT roles that are advertised seem to have qualification/and or experience requirements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭Daith


    Are we sure people aren't applying for general CO and EO positions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭chipfox


    what have any of these conversations got to do with public pay talks?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭Iggy1986


    Absolutely nothing, most civil service threads get derailed by people giving out about performance and unions. It’s exhausting.

    Back on topic. I’m hopeful that points will be removed for EO pay scales and removal of LSI. It would really benefit lower paid staff, especially in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,434 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Those are specialist competitions yeah, but they can take in from general panels too. You can't expect an IT graduate to work for a CO salary

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭chipfox


    i really think they'll stick to flat payroll %. that was what the original building momentum agreement was.

    the removal of points and LSIs and a flat 3.5% to LS2 rewards/punishes people based on random chance. especially post 2013 staff that will double jump increments thought maybe there is a good argument there for entry level staff retention

    but 3% is clean and easy and nobody is going to complain huge amount about that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,652 ✭✭✭bren2001


    they have already submitted a claim. It's not a flat 3%:

    It removes points on the scale, the LSI, and increases the maximum point.

    https://forsatradeunion.newsweaver.com/designtest/cgvk789bywh?a=6&p=65306900&t=30063858



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭chipfox


    i'll be honest i didn't calculate any of it i just presumed it was more than 3% and that flat amounts would be more fair and workable. especially since the top end of the scale are expecting 3.5%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭BhoyRayzor


    Surely there was agreement between the two on what 'local' in 'local bargaining clause' means and not a case where the union has come up with and submitted claims through this only for DEPER to come back and say 'eh no that's not actually what we meant by local…'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭granturismo


    When we voted on this pay agreement, it was made clear by the unions that local hadnt been defined. Up to May this year the government departments refused to agree with unions what local encompassed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 Moonshining


    Hi

    I know previously the higher scales did not get skips, as it was to cover new entrants who had 2 points added to the scale.

    Would the higher scales get the skips this time? It would mean if you were on point 9 standard scale you could get 2 skips to 11, but if you were on point 9 higher scale you would remain there, in that case it would be better staying on the standard scale you would be better off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭Always number 1


    They looked after new entrants a few years back by adding more points to the pay scales but also skipping a year at various points (think it was years 3 and 6 but I stand corrected)

    What annoys me (and caused me to leave my union) was that there was no collective bargaining for staff who came in before the embargo who are essentially being punished for being promoted. I started as a CO in 2005, embargo kicked in a few years later. By the time I had first chance for promotion, I was one point off the top of what was the old CO scale. When I got promoted to ASO (post 2013) I ended up gaining extra hours (under Croke Park agreement) and hit the top of the scale within 1 year. Whilst waiting the 3 required years for LSI, I got promoted to SO and once again hit the top the scale.

    It's ridiculous. Yes I'm lucky to have a permanent pensionable job but I feel that those who stuck it out in the crappy years are being forgotten about



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,434 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    SO has been abolished which leaves you much better off, you were in effect promoted again automatically.

    "Punished for being promoted" and then mentions Croke Park hours which everyone got. How were you being punished for being promoted?

    Post edited by Hotblack Desiato on

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭Always number 1


    SO hasn't been abolished in public service..

    Apologies, I meant Haddington Road agreement where new entrants or those promoted post 2013, had to do a 37 hour week compared to those in situ prior to that date who were doing a 35 hour week. This was only rescinded in a later agreement (name escapes me)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,434 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Okaaay… you still haven't told us what the problem is.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 burgerKev


    Public wages

    The pay packet going up

    Might try it myself

    See how I get on



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 194 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley




Advertisement