Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

199910001002100410051308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,406 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    I think it's just pouring rights at OT, so no sponsorship as such, and we probably make profit on ongoing sales too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭scottser


    In fairness to you, the 'filthy corporation' rabbit hole is a very, very deep one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Let's be honest, a well run club is never paying Marcus Rashford 300k a week. I'll always praise the work he did for the disadvantaged kids and the shots at the Tory government and he deserves all the credit in the world for that work. But FFR is right, he got drawn in or surrounded himself with the wrong crowd. He believed his own hype. It happens to people all the time but the difference is Rashford stopped working hard. He stopped putting in the effort. If you'd seen him live in his last 2 years at Utd I can't fathom how you wouldn't be stunned at the sight of him strolling around the pitch showing minimal effort. Thats all on him.

    And again as FFR said, The Rest is Football bit was total PR. Why do you think he went on there and not The Overlap with Neville, Carragher or Keane. So again you can agree with the message and nobody seems to dispute the club was a mess but his insistence that the transition hasn't begun is ridiculous. Ridding the club of Rashford and his ilk is the transition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    But this is kinda my point.
    The standards and accountability at United was non existent for much of his career - and he is a poorer professional for that. Maybe Fergie would have just kicked him out the door because maybe he doesn't react in the way we would have wanted - maybe he'd have been the same. Its not like Fergie fixed Morrison (as an extreme example maybe).

    I think United should always bear some culpability for how a player/person turns out, when they have been invested in the development of that player and person for so long. Obviously it isn't a case of United are 100% responsible, a player and person also has control over their personal environment and the impact that can have - but United cannot be held blameless either. United can't say they take pride in coaching people rather than just players, and then turn around and say 'nothing to do with us' if the person is found wanting.

    I also think United need to look at how they have reacted in situations. The world cup stands out as a point of criticism for United in this respect - i've read in the past there was industry/player surprise at how United didn't support Sancho and Rashford after the abuse they suffered following the WC, in direct comparison to how Arsenal DID with Saka. Maybe that talk is 100% wrong, but I can't know that it is or isn't; and i did feel at the time United didn't rally behind those two anywhere near the level they did with Rooney or Beckham in similar scenarios.

    I think the lack of winning mentality at the club for more than a decade has had a big impact on the players as well. When the club only care about 4th, when they don't care about winning any individual game or trophy, that will impact everything about the attitudes we then see. When we give out contracts to protect player value rather than reward performance, that will impact the player attitudes. When Phil Jones gets a 5 year contract on 120k+ that impacts people. Same with Smalling etc.

    We can 100% say Rashford should put in 100% every single day regardless, we can say that of every player - but we can't just ignore the impact of the club MASSIVELY rewarding failure and mediocrity on a yearly basis, imo. If you don't have to perform to protect your life and earnings… will you always perform? If the players around you are not performing but they get rewarded and kept… will that have an impact? And 100% you can include the contract Rashford got for 1 quality season as having that kind of negative impact on other players too.

    We can point to Bruno as an example of the professional we want regardless of all the crap around the club players.
    We can point to A LOT more players are not - and I think when you have more examples of failures and issues than anything positive, you should question the environment more so than the individuals for the most part.

    Rashford is both a victim, and a symptom of the failures of United for the last 10 years. I personally think it is fair to say he is both, rather that just say he is a big part of the reason United are where they are, which is what has been said.

    I think his attitude and performances in the 24/25 season in particular were utterly unacceptable and he had to be moved on. I just also think his performances and attitude from 23/24 and 24/25 was influenced by a decade of mismangement and broken promises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭scottser


    Both 'sides' can be correct in this matter. Rashford would be perfectly correct in what he says IF he was a consistent performer and a model professional for us but he wasn't. Granted, we didn't have a DOF and our scouting was led by the manager at the time but again, INEOS have been in there for a season and they have proven themselves to be far more proactive than in recent years. Instead of Rashford being on board and driving the transition as a senior player, he had probably his worst season ever. Is it any surprise then, as part of this new transition that players with his attitude and salary are being moved on? So while he may be correct in what he says, his lack of self-awareness as to how he has contributed to the mess we are in is the standout feature in all this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    That's a decent move for the kid. Likely will compete with Jayson Molumby for a place in the starting XI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,371 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    That would indicate we are confident a MF signing will get done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭fatherted1969


    The transition started with Rashford himself being shipped out the door. Pity he wasn't pressed more on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,776 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭fatherted1969


    There is plenty of examples of failed players under fergie who he shipped or never considered. Fergie looked further than the football pitch for the characters he wanted in the squad. He would have done exactly the same as RA. Beckham is possibly the only one who survived with his off field persona, eventually even he was moved even though his performances on field stayed good



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Nothing significant seems to be happening with Baleba as yet, but no real movement on alternatives either. Wharton at Palace being mentioned but if they're losing Eze & Guehi, are they going to let themselves be stripped altogether this late in the window?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think for most actions speak louder than words and Rashford's actions the last few years say more than any puff PR piece ever will.

    And blaming the club for Rashford turning out this way just seems an bad excuse considering how McTominay has turned out from the same era. Rashford could have decided to try and be part of a solution, to keep his own standard high and try to drag others up to it, like Bruno has throughout his time here. Instead Rashford just gave up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Wharton is a very good player but would he suit being paired with Bruno and long term Mainoo? I can't say I've watched him enough but going off Carl Anka's comments recently he's better paired in a United midfield with a Ugarte rather than a Bruno.

    Maybe you persist with Wharton + Bruno on the short term but then you've got to look long term with regards Mainoo. Unless Big Jim spends a few quid buying tickets for the euro millions. Spend that +£200M on Wharton and Baleba to fix your midfield 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Yeah West Brom are a solid Championship team. They wouldn't be tipped as a team who'll be battling for the league but they should be there challenging for the play offs.

    Will be interesting to see how he gets on there and how they fit him into their midfield. Could be battling Molumby for a spot or they could be looking at pairing both players together. Would give you serious energy and work rate in midfield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    If Rashford breaks through in 2000 the main difference would be that he would have 250 odd less Man Utd appearances.

    I don't buy this nonsense that he was a victim of his environment. He was a large part of that environment.

    Multiple managers have had issues.

    He's sitting in an interview now telling us he understands perfectly well that things were not right at OT but it's all finger pointing as usual.

    We aren't talking about a 12 year old here. He's a 27 year old man. The responsibility for his career and his actions are with him and him alone.

    The content of what he is saying has truth to it but he's leaving out that he and other players were a massive part of the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,269 ✭✭✭paulbok


    I'd guess the third one will be announced tomorrow, Coke 1m, Sokin 4m a year? So the third, will that be for the training ground and/or training kit? The Tezos training kit deal was for 24m a year, the Aon deal back in 2013 was for 15m a year, so I'd guess 55/60m a year for both?

    "£70m in sponsorship deals over the last five months". Presumably that included other brands than the three this week?

    Nice wedge of cash, but how much is brand new and how much is just a replacement for previous sponsors. So if those deals are replacements for existing ones worth, say 50m, it's "only" an extra 20m a year. Though with no active training sponsors, the bulk is likely to be new, so Baleba money 🤑



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    There are rumours it could be Apple, because Ratcliffe specifically name dropped both Coca Cola and Apple during the Carrington speech.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Again you only have to look at scot mct who came through the same time as rashford, way less natural talent then rashford but have his all every time he was on the pitch and probably in training too given ever manager seemed to have good things to say about him, arguably played out of position for a good deal of his united career but never complained, took his move and left without drama and has improved to the point where he is winning titles aboard and personal accolades. Same environment but a different attitude



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,406 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Jaysus the size of Zirks in the second pic here - makes Leon look tiny 😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 32,453 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    image.png

    A lot has to do with the depth perception in that picture I think



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Jeez Zirkzee looks like a new man in that picture compared to last season. Was he a stone or two overweight when he joined the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    can;t see it being Apple.
    They've not got involved in sponsoring almost anything else that I can think off. I get where the rumour is coming from, but I think it has to be a bit of a reach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED


    I agree. There were rumours that they would bid for streaming rights of the PL in the U.K back in 2023. They currently stream MLS games. Just last month they bid for the rights to stream F1. Premier League streaming rights is something that they could get into down the line - and if they do it wouldn’t make sense for them to also be a sponsor of Man United at the same time. It’s not something they typically do - they’re very protective of their brand, and it would be odd for them to put their name on an organisation they don’t control.

    It doesn’t really matter who the sponsor is as long as the money is right.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,762 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    Would Snapdragon not be a rival brand anyway? They partner with Microsoft and power some of their hardware, that is why co-pilot is on United cup shirts.

    Can't imagine they would leave it open to United to partner with Apple or someone like Intel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Makes me think of videos floating around years ago showing the likes of Pogba and Lingard in the dressing room acting like a bunch of little kids.

    Rashford lacked focus for large parts of his career as did the other two mentioned above. They were millionaire kids first and footballers second. They were made for life and had no drive to improve themselves which was absolute poison for the club and it's taken a long time to root it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,776 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭Quags


    Same website that broke Baleba to Brigton is saying deal agreed with United for €112m



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I'm taking it as fact.

    YEEEESSSSSS. BALEBA! 21 INCOMING!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot




Advertisement