Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

Thinking back to the time the little girl was attacked outside her school in Dublin. The media coverage and public outrage were very different then to what we saw then.

Her mother a nurse, some people don't want an Indian nurse looking after them, bonkers stuff altogether!

Chances are that neither attacker will see any jail time, the judges will hand out nice lenient sentences and the cops won't bother keeping an eye out anymore. Why would they when the judges, the justice minister and the commissioner are all just acting cowboys

The problem is the cowboys, not the Indians

According to the link on the Tusla thing, there was no was GDPR details on it. It says the children are anonymised in the reports so if this is true & anonymization means transforming personal data into a form where individuals are no longer identifiable and cannot be re-identified, then why delete the files?

I thought you were actually going to make a serious point there, but instead you come out with this crap?

So there you have it, a 'DEI push for a more representative police force' ended up with a bunch of Asian men and women in the police force and social work sphere who were themselves complicit in the abuse or worked to cover up for the abusers in an effort to protect 'their communities' reputation.

Instead of attempting to promote your own agenda, why not review the data that's actually available on the number of police officers in the UK accused, and convicted of sexual offences involving children?

Dozens of police officers across the UK have been convicted of crimes including rape, sexual assault and sex offences against children in the three years since the murder of Sarah Everard, new data shows.

Officers have also been convicted of assault, possession of indecent images, harassment and controlling and coercive behaviour since 3 March 2021 - the day Ms Everard was abducted, a Sky News investigation has found.

Just 19 forces out of 48 provided details of officers convicted of crimes - with one alleged victim of abuse by a policeman saying the figures are likely to be "just scratching the surface".

Data released by the 19 forces under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act shows that in the three years since Ms Everard's killing, at least 119 officers have been convicted of crimes.

The actual number is likely to be much higher as most forces - including the Met Police - did not provide details of officers' convictions.

At least 16 officers were convicted of assault or battery. Nine were convicted of rape or sexual assault, with one also convicted of attempted rape, the forces revealed.

https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-of-police-officers-convicted-of-crimes-including-rape-and-sexual-assault-since-sarah-everards-murder-13086063

The article explains exactly why three of the four reports which were attached to the Judges correspondence were deleted:

Confirming that the files have been deleted, the department said: “Following consideration of the department’s statutory responsibilities in relation to data protection, the department formed the view that it did not have a legal basis to process the personal data contained in three of those four reports, and those reports were subsequently deleted from the department’s records.

“The department must discharge its statutory responsibilities under data-protection legislation in relation to the processing of personal information. While the department could not process three of the reports which were attached to the judge’s correspondence, the substantive issues to which the reports related were set out in the correspondence itself.”

That's why I suggested the Judge could have re-submitted his correspondence with the personal data redacted.

Importing more to what we have already

Sheesh, I'm not doing this again. It's very simple -

• Data which you dismissed as dodgy was sourced from the UK Governments own task force which was set up to commission a report on sex crimes involving children in the UK.

• You claimed that we all know who the majority of the perpetrators involved in grooming gangs are, to which I countered that we do not, as the data in the report suggested that though the majority (42%) were young white men, Asians were over-represented at 14%, and the data was based upon small and incomplete data sets. You're choosing to focus on that 14%.

• Then conorhal posted the article about 5 police officers in the UK accused of sex crimes involving children and attempted to attribute that to DEI policies by way of suggesting that it was DEI policies are responsible for enabling child sex abusers to gain positions of authority where they could abuse children and protect their own communities. The article doesn't mention anything about the perpetrators ethnicity.

• When I posted the article about 119 police officers in 3 years convicted of sex crimes (four were convicted of sex crimes involving children), you pointed out the 9 that were convicted of rape or sexual assault, and told me to get real. There was no suggestion whatsoever that the article was intended to prove there were no Muslim grooming gangs in the UK. It was to suggest that conorhal should review the actual data which is available (which the article points out is only scratching the surface) on the perpetrators of sex crimes within the police force in the UK. There are Muslim grooming gangs in the UK, and they should be treated in exactly the same way as anyone who is found guilty of committing sex crimes involving children are treated. Their ethnicity, their nationality, and even their names, are irrelevant, unless one wishes to use the issue of child sexual abuse as a political football to promote their own agenda against whomever or whatever group it is they wish to portray as being a threat to society.

Mod Edit: Warned for discussion of matters before the courts

Well rebutted 👍

Mod edit: Warned for blatant homophobic posting - breach of site rules

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/man-walked-in-on-woman-while-she-was-in-bathroom-and-raped-her-in-bathtub-1788628.html

No coverage RTE or any of the “Broadsheets” of this

Quite odd given the very serious nature of the crime. I wonder why

FYI "Jaundiced eye" is used to describe a view influenced by negativity, bitterness, envy, or prejudice.

Hopefully this does put the Indian community at ease.