Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Talk 2

1252628303194

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    There was always cheaper stuff. You could buy ladas and fsos and Skodas in the late 80s, but they were rubbish. The problem is the cheap stuff now is pretty good as western companies rather foolishly never thought the Chinese would do more than churn out their own licensed products!

    Tesla “could” have used their prowess to push the game on even further, but didn’t. We are now seeing a late push into robotaxis and humanoids to shore up this epic case of mismanagement. I may be wrong, but I think I’m right!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Late push into robotaxis, you are making it up as you go along.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    No, abandoning the “m2” and the strange hurried robotaxi launch was only last year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Seriously old accounts there that predate even the introduction of the m3, not to mention to price cuts.

    https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-revenue-sees-surprise-rise-second-quarter-revenue-2024-07-23/

    FYI, gross profit probably grim. You do like to make stuff up…



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 6,552 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Mod: Don't attack other posters, if you've a problem with a post use the report feature, do not respond or bait on thread.

    OT posts removed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,777 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    You are not aware of Tesla's well published master plans then? The Roadster was there to put them on the map. The money from that was to make a luxury high end hand built car in smallish numbers. The money from that was for a mainstream car, the money from that was for the cash cow

    The money from the cash cow is for other stuff, not really for cars

    I like the idea of a cheap Tesla "Model 2" myself, but as others have rightly said, this is a race to the bottom that the Chinese will win, I don't think Tesla have much to win from such a car. And Musk has always said robotaxis are the future, not privately owned cars. I still struggle to accept that, or should I say come to terms with it. As I can't imagine myself not owning a car. I don't think that will ever happen (to me)

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    What did I make up? I know margins have dropped recently, the figures linked are up to 2021, the 3 was launched in 2017…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    The robot taxi concept was announced in 2016 Maidhc… oh dear.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,921 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Is robotaxi likely to get past legislators worldwide to make it profitable?

    I can see that being a long way off after the technology becomes better than humans



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    the smugness gets the better of you every time. The actual work on robotaxis seems to have only lately started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    the figures are mostly to 2019 and even if. There were to 2021 that’s almost half a decade ago… a long time in the ev landscape.

    As usual with these threads Cyrus… you are wrong.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Every Tesla with fsd is a robotaxi. They've effectively been working on robotaxi's from the start. Even those of us using autopilot are contributing to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I know the original plan was ok. I assume the bits about abandoning the company and hollowing out its resources to buy twitter, start doge, divert resources to xai, etc aren’t in the plan though!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭September1


    Chinese brands take some steps to separate China from car, they but European brands for example. I'm also not sure if CEOs would take exposed political roles. Meanwhile Tesla is closely intertwined with Elon and they showcased their cars in White House during second Trump presidency.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Didn't he also use many of his Tesla shares to buy twitter? I agree the distractions have not been welcomed by Tesla, with rhe exception of xAi which clearly has some cross over, as does SpaceX (Telsa motors are used in Starship for example).

    I'm going off headlines and haven't looked too much into because as I said, I just like rhe car and I'm not too interested in the noise that comes with it. But I believe his latest package comes with conditions that he focuses on getting Robotaxi's and Optimus over the line and simply because they cannot do it without him. In my opinion, he will be gone after that. This is the natural progression of a Ceo. There is a start, a middle and an end in their tenure which are planned out in advance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,906 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    All this talk of robot taxi etc , yet the company was exposed to be doing some very egregious acts with crash detection and auto pilot after the case it lost last week.

    https://electrek.co/2025/08/04/tesla-withheld-data-lied-misdirected-police-plaintiffs-avoid-blame-autopilot-crash/

    Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN‑bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.

    So they've programmed in self destruction of evidence. Also rumoured to knock off Autopilot when crash is imminent meaning the last flagged setting is that it was off so it avoids blame.

    This is worse than VW and their emissions gadgets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    I think that’s a bit ot a generalisation - you can’t just dismiss the opinions of people you disagree with.

    You should consider being more of a ‘free speech absolutist’ 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,536 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    I often wonder about the bit "cannot do it without him". For sure he's charismatic to a degree, and persuasive to a degree, but he doesn't appear to be a good leader and certainly doesn't seem any more qualified in the core subject matter of the company than the executive staff around him.

    As Tesla started and became a success before him, I think they would be fine without him and let a new generation of CEO step into the role - one with less polarising views and more unifying & strategic nous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Building cars in China is really no different to the 90’s when all the worlds best cars started to come from Korean and Japan. We had a 1986 Datsun cherry that was years ahead of the rest by having a 10 year anti rust guarantee and an electronic choke!

    I don’t particularly mind where the cars come from, as long as they are reliable, good value, and can still be easily serviced when 15 years old.

    VW have made cars in China since 1985 btw



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've had autopilot disengage on me. Car ahead of me was taking the same exit off the M11 and unexpectedly come to a standstill on the off ramp. I was a safe distance behind, but autopilot was not slowing down as we approached and as I got closer it just completely disengaged.

    I'm still not sure if this was a bug. Obviously disengaging causes the car to brake, maybe it was intentional? The point at which it disengaged could not be described as right before a crash. It disengaged with time for the car to stop. I didn't even need to use the brake pedal.

    I have to admit, I did initially think it was disengaging in preparation for an imminent crash, but because it felt like that doesn't necessarily mean that was what it was doing. I'd love.to hear peoples thought on reason why it might have.disengaged like this.

    I have to add though, as the driver I was very much alert and ready to take action. I was never going to crash.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think the part they can't do without him os transition away from an EV company to an autonomous vehicle company. Plus Optimus.

    Maybe can't is the wrong word. It's more like won't do it if he's not around. Whatever.company Tesla is at the time he leaves, is the company it will be for.decades to come. I mention the start, middle and end of a ceo tenure. This is musks end game, but really he's basically creating a new company with a different product. He is unique in that his end game is a whole start, middle and end wrapped into one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Tesla would be a better car company without Elon. That has been true for some time now.

    However 1- the other products (of varying levels of nonsense) would stop and thats a problem because 2 -the share price has years of exponential growth already baked in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    its an opinion the same as any other, you disagree that people are influenced in this way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    you are really clutching now maidhc, as usual you are misinformed and incorrect.

    As i have pointed out to you a) teslas strategy around robotaxis was announced in 2016 to suggest work began 'lately' is just plain stupid and misinformed and b) i stated that for a period tesla had higher margins than anyone else, i then presented a chart that illustrates that, you dont like the time period (despite it not being what you stated it is)

    You can engage in good faith or continue to troll, ill do my usual ignore you for a bit and then bite and we can do the merry dance again. And dont talk to me about smug.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 toolshead


    I agree. In general, Elon was a good CEO for the company. However, his antics this last year have made his name toxic. His association with Tesla have made the brand toxic, reducing the numbers sold. He absconded from his role as CEO to play around in politics, and this also affected the company. Now he is somewhat back at the helm, but it is hard to see how the brand can recover from the damage he has done. He has annoyed all the left-leaners in countries around the world. Now he has annoyed the Right in the US with his public falling out with Trump. The company would be better off with a complete rebranding, and someone else being the face of it.

    Im not sure how this could be done. Maybe they could split the company, with Elon giving up his seat as CEO in Automotive-Tesla and lead the other tesla projects instead. But I don't believe his ego will let him give that up, let alone share power with someone else in Tesla. He has a history of being unable to share power, as we saw with Trump, the original founders of Tesla, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,150 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    has anyone claimed that? your article again reaffirms that the push for robotaxis isnt a recent one regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,777 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    "It's all about pumping the share price"? I don't see how. Yes you could get away with that once, but if your promise doesn't come good, the share price will come down by at least the same amount. And you will lose your credibility the next time you make a promise and the market won't respond (much) to it

    My take is that Musk simply is ridiculously optimistic. Quite likely linked to Asperger's syndrome, which he says he has

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭JOL1


    That's fair comment, few would argue about his optimism in terms of timescales but it is a stretch to believe that the comments are made to pump share price. That implies that the market is dumb enough to swallow anything time and time again which clearly is not the case. Tesla shares are traded in volumes and active amongst institutional and retail clients. Everytime they trade, to buy or sell it is expressing "their view" with real money and to presume they are stupid and swallow everything that Mr Musk says is simply not credible.



Advertisement
Advertisement