Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Hamas strike on Israel

1157915801582158415851673

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,142 ✭✭✭threeball


    You've show your colours on this thread. Not a shred of humanity in you and I have zero interest in anything you have to say. I expect most posters are of the same opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Why are infants dying of malnutrition then? Why are mothers unable to breastfeed their young due their own malnutrition? We all see the footage on the news, and hear the stories of the doctors trying to cope in this hell.

    I know an Irish doctor who has gone out there, very respected here, may have treated many people you know depending on where you live. Do you think he and many others on the news are lying about what is going on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,684 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    But Hamas…..

    "The World Health Organization has decried Israeli attacks on its staff residence and its main warehouse in the central Gaza city of Deir el-Balah.

    "WHO's staff residence in Deir el-Balah, Gaza, was attacked three times today as well as its main warehouse," the UN health agency's chief Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on X.

    "Israeli military entered the premises, forcing women and children to evacuate on foot toward Al-Mawasi (in southern Gaza) amid active conflict," he said, adding that "male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint".

    https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2025/0721/1524462-gaza-israel/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLsW5xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHopqFbDkdKDC7JOpgmU5gSK1WjtxYJLReeXHeWVdhYTi44ZmySWljIdcebmD_aem_eRXoyeUWDkSNrcoVTC5Ryw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I never said it's acceptable. Yes, I can concede that Israel has engaged in willful disregard for civilians that amounts to war crimes.

    But has there ever been a war without a war crimes?

    Closer to home, the Provos engaged in mass bombing campaigns of civilian areas, and would have been guilty of hundreds of war crimes over the course of the troubles. The men guilty of those crimes are free, walking the streets and are regarded as 'hero's' in some political circles. Indeed some who would call out Israel on its war crimes would defend the war crimes of the PIRA.

    But the tenner of my post is about the Middle East as a whole.

    Why are Hamas still fighting? They are done, finished as a political and military force. Yet their actions are resulting in more deaths, and for what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Because all countries are at the end of the day self interested.

    Are you proposing a pan Arab and Muslim alliance to attack Israel? Many of these countries hate each other more than Israel. E.g. Iran and Saudi Arabia.

    Never mind ethnic tensions within these countries themselves, e.g. Syria, Yemen, Lebanon.

    And lastly, within the Arab world, the Palestinians are not all that popular; in fact, they are disliked and hated by many. The Palestinians would have more sympathy among certain sections in Europe and Ireland than they would in places like Egypt or Saudi Arabia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,103 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    All of those IRA men who killed are regarded as convicted criminals and murderers in the eyes of the law - there is no ambiguity over this (this presumably is the destiny of the IDF - in future, it will be regarded as a terrorist army which carried out multiple war crimes).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I just dont think posters would go into the Russian-Ukraine war and disregard possible war crimes with the phrase, war crimes happen in war. I think if we suspect war crimes are happening now civilised countries should come out against the parties committing then rather than take a laissez-faire approach to the whole thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I heard on the radio today that everyone in Israel, the Arab world and Palestine agrees that Hamas is finished, but there is no agreement on who will run Gaza in its stead.

    No one seems to have much of an idea on that, especially the Palestinians.

    Its important, because we dont want to be here again in 5 years time with some Islamofacist right-wing group taking over the strip and beginning another futile war against Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,623 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I have pointed before to the example of the Emperor of Japan who put the welfare of his people ahead of the ambitions of his regime when he was losing a war. Hamas are the doing the opposite, putting their own ambitions ahead of the welfare of the Gazan people.

    That remains true, no matter how you view what the Israelis have or haven't done.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,540 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    This is the sickest post in this entire thread. Are you saying the mothers of the babies and children currently starving to death ate starving their children on purpose?

    Your views are monsterous

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Yet, they were all released regardless. Men who have dozens of deaths on their hands walking Irish streets. They don't really care what the law says, and I doubt those in the IDF of the Israeli cabinet say what some foreign court has to say either.

    Internationalism is dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Jordan took in a lot of Palestinians for humanitarian reasons and this was how they were awarded. Imagine Ireland took in those Palestinians instead and they pulled that stunt here. The free Palestine viewpoint would be a lot different they'd been seen as unionists were.

    "Black September (Arabic: أيلول الأسود, romanized: Aylūl al-ʾAswad), also known as the Jordanian Civil War,[9] was an armed conflict between Jordan, led by King Hussein, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), led by chairman Yasser Arafat. The main phase of the fighting took place between 16 and 27 September 1970, though certain aspects of the conflict continued until 17 July 1971."

    Leftist groups surprise surprise involved.

    The PLO's strength grew, and by early 1970, leftist groups within the PLO began calling for the overthrow of Jordan's Hashemite monarchy, leading to violent clashes in June 1970

    Fascinating reading this on Wikipedia.

    the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) seizing three civilian passenger flights and forcing their landing in the Jordanian city of Zarqa, where they took foreign nationals as hostages and blew up the planes in front of international press. Hussein saw this as the last straw and ordered the Jordanian Army to take action.[10]

    On 17 September 1970, the Jordanian Army surrounded cities with a significant PLO presence, including Amman and Irbid, and began targeting fedayeen posts that were operating from Palestinian refugee camps.

    They then moved to Lebanon and caused untold. You can see why the Egyptians won't entertain them.

    Jordan allowed the fedayeen to relocate to Lebanon via Syria, where they later became involved in the Lebanese Civil War. The Palestinian Black September Organization was founded after the conflict to carry out attacks against Jordanian authorities in response to the fedayeen's expulsion; their most notable attack was the assassination of Jordanian prime minister Wasfi Tal in 1971, as he had commanded parts of the military operations against the fedayeen. The following year, the organization shifted its focus to attacking Israeli targets and carried out the Munich massacre against Israeli athletes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Well I guess if Israel does get it expel the Palestinians to other countries that will be a consideration. I wonder if israel will get away with that, hard to know, given how steadfast their supporters seem to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Indeed it is. Certainly not a "Hamas" supporter or one who would lie - so the likes of Danzy have no idea what they are talking about, or are intentionally lying. For what - I have no idea.

    It is f"ckin harrowing out there and we don't know the half of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Many examples of it. The Ukrainian heroes who held out in the Avostal plant in Mariupol for 80 days with civilians sheltering in the underground bunkers. They could have pulled a HAMAS and held out until the civilians starved but they did the right thing. Zelenski order the surrender after an admirable effort. All those alive at that point walked out and surrendered to the Russians. As much as I want Ukraine to win I was relieved that hopeless situation had ended.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭Suckler


    The difference being Japan had assurances on how the Americans would act post war and the framework that would allow them to exist.

    Also it was also in Americas interest to end the war in this manner as they faces the continued deaths should the fighting be drawn out. The situation in Gaza is in no way comparable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    True there was no threat of expulsion for the Japanse. Israel and United States being coy on this idea is pretty sickening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,450 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Good article by the Guardian showing the 'aid' system - condemned by 170 NGO's as 'designed to cause damage to people seeking aid':



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,623 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The US were seeking unconditional surrender. As @RoyalCelt has pointed out, it is one example of many.

    My point stands. Hamas are putting their own ambitions ahead of the welfare of their own people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Why are Hamas still fighting? They are done, finished as a political and military force

    I agree with the above - but given this, the obvious question here that you should be asking is why are Israel still fighting?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Yea there is a lot of bad blood between Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinians.

    It's like what I was on about earlier. Why are the Palestinian leadership so bad, so corrupt, and so inept in pursuing their aims and goals?

    This is not just a recent thing either. When a UN Delegation visited British Palestine in 1947, the Zionists put their best foot forward in welcoming them, lobbying them, and advocating for their cause. Think tidy towns, children signing songs, reading poetry, showing off their farms and other achievements…

    The Palestinian side at best ignored the delegation and at worst was hostile to them. On one occasion, when they visited a Palestinian village, they were met by locals who threw stones at them!!

    When will they learn?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Your point doesn't really stand as it (again conveniently) seeks to absolve Israel of their crimes.

    It's cherry picking a select element from one conflict and applying it as if it is the silver bullet in Gaza.

    Edit: Also for your comparison to be really applicable, it would be akin to permitting Hamas being given assurances they could remain in place post conflict. I don't think that's the best plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,623 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    My point does stand as it challenges the hivemind view that only Israel is to blame. Hamas have had many chances to surrender and end the war. They have consistently refused to do so, in contrast to many leaders over time who put their own fate behind the welfare of their people.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Would you care to tell us where this food for 2 million people is?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Probably eating all the food Danzy has said is available in Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭Suckler


    It doesn't 'challenge' it; it simply seeks to absolve Israel of their crimes/actions and paint the situation as a one sided problem.

    Surrender and then what? Religious fanatics with nothing to lose won't act in a reasonable manner. Similarly, the US saw how ferocious attritional fighting was going throughout the pacific and if forced to repeat the same on Japanese soil would have ended with runaway casualty rates. They sought a quick ending as it was also within their interest. The situation in Gaza is not comparable. You also conveniently forget that the hostages could've been returned in March yet Israel saw fit to break the agreement and allow it to rumble on.

    Edit: The use of the 'hivemind' jibe simply shows your willingness for a selective viewpoint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,290 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Probably because they remember what happened the previous times they tried that. End result would be Israel with more land for their settlements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,623 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are making assumptions about what will happen.

    What we do know is that the refusal of Hamas to surrender is giving Israel the excuse to keep on bombing. What makes it worse is that refusal by Hamas may be sufficient to allow Israel to avoid a charge of genocide before the ICJ.

    For the interests of their own people, Hamas must surrender. As I said already, that remains true, no matter how you view what the Israelis have or haven't done



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The Muslim brotherhood caused a lot of trouble in Egypt and they'd be very connected to HAMAS ideologically. HAMAS is effectively an Islamist group and Islamism is currently the biggest threat to Europe and the Western world.

    It's also the biggest threat in the middle east and it's why countries like Egypt, Jordan, Saudi etc take such a hard-line approach to it.



Advertisement