Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1524525527529530533

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I never noticed that the N8 was on the M50 for so long. At least it shouldn't take very long to get between J4 and J6, but distance wise it is still a long way to go without a single stop.

    I would be curious to see if the N8 is succesful would they consider adding some type of full Orbital M50 route(like an O50). Or maybe more dedicated infrastructure/busways for orbital M50 Routes so buses like the N8 can exit and enter the M50 much quicker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It could still be two of the Spine routes becoming a hybrid route at night deliver a 30 minute frequency on the core section of the spine.

    For example the 24 hour routes could be the F1 and a combined F2/F3 operating the F2 route southside but taking the current 40 route around Finglas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39 Arhanedus


    I'm confused at what this "disappointed in the route chosen" means - does this mean that only one of the F2/F3 is planned to operate at night? I was under the impression that all the spine routes were meant to be 24hr services, aside from variants like the C5/C6 which deviate from the daytime route to serve nearby areas that don't have any other service at night.

    Even if some of the F spine southside passes close to the other spines, I would've thought that people on the route would appreciate having a bus serve their street at night rather than having to walk from the D spine or A spine (which aren't even coming out until the following phases).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    No, there is no guarantee that all individual spine routes will be 24/7.

    As I posted above you might see a hybrid F2/F3 routing, along with the F1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,597 ✭✭✭VG31


    The N8 exiting the M50 at Charlestown would definitely make sense. It could then either continue the 24 route past the Dublin Airport Logistics Park or the 19/E2 route past IKEA.

    Both of those routes wouldn't add that much extra time while providing much better connectivity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    I'm not saying that the F1 isn't to be a night service, as I haven't seen information either way, but so far it looks like out of F2 and F3 only the former is to operate at night time.

    But as we are still around 2 months away from the announcement deadlines, some things may well change. However, judging from typical Dublin Bus practice and process, I have enough information to seriously doubt all three Fs gaining a night service, not to mention that everything E-Spine-focused south of UCD would get a nice fish slap to their face if they were to see Finglas get an f-20 at night while Stillorgan Road has a faux-f-30, and that's only for as long as the E1 and E2 are together.

    Exactly that – the user I referred to was hoping for the F3 rather than the F2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I know you’re not saying that about the F1, but my point is that while the word may be that the F2 will be 24/7 rather than the F3, there is nothing to stop that being a hybrid F2/F3 route at night.

    It would make far more sense for only one route (the F1) to stay on the Finglas Road for example at night and to send the other night route via the F3 route around Finglas South and then follow the F2 route via Finglas North to Charlestown.

    Time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,213 ✭✭✭trellheim


    I had to go back to the spine frequency tables and they do not state that routes will be 24 hour or not. Is there some reason they do/do not mention which is 24 hour or not ?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,561 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Most likely sensitivity with bus drivers having to work nights and rosters etc. Also they probably weren't certain which exact routes would become 24/7.

    I get the impression that the idea is at least 1 per major corridor, but if they can pull off doing extra, all the better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    They hadn't decided that routes would be operating 24/7 when the frequencies were published - that principle was only decided later, and the general view given by the NTA at an Oireachtas hearing was that each spine would see a 24/7 service. But they certainly didn’t specify each individual spine route.

    The full detail of what exactly will happen we don’t know, and won’t know till the pre-launch publicity happens.

    But internal bus company documents such as planned driver rosters etc do tend to get into the enthusiast domain and as such people can make educated guesses about what will happen.

    Hence the speculation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    A thought I've had about the 24h F-spine routes. There was some discussion here that the NTA/DB was planning on making the 80 a 24h route. I would personally be quite surprised if they prioritised making a non-spine radial 24h over the incoming F-spine routes.

    It wouldn't be bad if they did. A 24h route 80 would supplement the C spine and possibly allow the C5 and C6 to be replaced by late night C3 and C4 services. It also give additional capacity the 15 ahead of the A-spine launching, and the southern parts of the route are closer to the Green Line between Ranelagh and Dundrum. Also realistically the F-spine doesn't need 20 minute late night frequency. But again, I would still be a bit surprised if the 80 is made 24h but not all 3 F-spine routes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 Bec123


    I’m hoping the 71 will be launched with the F spine? Really need something more regular than the barely there 56a.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭AX636


    1000076931.jpg

    The 71 will be another time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,803 ✭✭✭jd


    I was looking around FB and there were some complaints the there would be a loss of connectivity between Charlestown and the southern part of the Ballymun Rd. At least one of the local pol activists is lobbying the NTA to have the 24 run Ballygall Rd East-Griffith Ave-Mobhi Road. Problem with that is Old Finglas Road/Glasnevin Hill/Bon Secours area would have its service reduced by half..

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,597 ✭✭✭VG31


    In addition, that Griffith Avenue - Mobhi Road route would be much slower with the traffic lights there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I can’t see that happening - people can still connect from Charlestown via the N6 onto the E1 & E2 and from Glasnevin North via the N4.

    You can’t compromise for every single direct connection lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭Fizzy Duck


    If they were to make a slight change, it would be better for the 23 to go to the Airport as the 24 will serve similar areas to the 19.

    15572.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 973 ✭✭✭whosedaddy?


    that would be matter of opinion. Some win and others loose. I would loose…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    How are the 34, 35, and 36 routed through CC?

    I am pretty sure they are two lines shown taking Parnell St and Gardiner St. However I have noticed on the map that there is a radial routed through Pearse St to College St (using the Pearse St Garda Station stop) and unless that is an error, I am not sure of any other route it could be? I pretty sure it's just an error, but if it isn't is it that it only southbound uses Gardiner St but northbound uses O'Connell St? If so I would be very confused as I think it would go against the improvements for buses going onto College St.

    My understanding is that BC is fixing the junction by routing all buses from D'Oiler St to CG, From Hawkins St to Townsend St, and from Pearse St to Tara St. Compared to the mess we have now it would completely remove all of the akward routings causing congestions, including routing buses from Pearse St to College St. I always assumed the 19 used the Pearse St-College St because of the last minute extension and it never being planned to go past Parnell Square, however I thought that it was going to be the exception and that the only other routes that would use it would maybe be terminating peak or express routes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Yes the 34, 35 and 36 will all use Gardiner Street too in both directions.

    So that’s the 22, 34, 35, 36, 57, 58, 73, 86, 87, 88 and 98 all using Gardiner Street.

    I suspect that the 19 may well switch to Gardiner Street when the A-Spine launches - it only uses the current route due to the last minute extension.

    The main determinants of the routings were:

    1) to avoid buses turning at O’Connell Bridge;

    2) to avoid conflicts at College Street; and

    3) to send spines via O’Connell Street and radials via Church Street or Gardiner Street (with the exception of the 85).

    The line at Pearse St Garda Station was for the 74 under the original plan - I suspect that it’s a mistake in the new map as obviously the 74 route changed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭stop


    Specifically one the line "The hospice operator says the opposite is true – in reality, those lands are the only lands it owns that could be developed in future."

    Google Maps Satellite view shows massive amounts of land at the back of their site, and presumably the small sliver at their entrance which the NTA are after; they don't want to lose as they might try to sell it for private accommodation (again?).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Ah okay thanks.

    I suspect that the 19 may well switch to Gardiner Street when the A-Spine launches - it only uses the current route due to the last minute extension.

    I hope so. The current route woud be weird to have after BC, using Gardiner St would make more sense as it would also follow the 22's routing to Merrion. Although I am starting to realise that as BC rollout continues, Gardiner St is going to need better bus priority. Between all the 11 routes you listed that is already 35 bph, and the 19 would make it 38 or 41 services depending on if it keeps the extra services.

    Separately I am also now wondering if the 48 will be extended from Parnell through Gardiner St to follow the 34, 35, and 36. Might make sense for similar reasons as the 19 (extending radials through CC) and only being 1 bph it hopefully wouldn't be too difficult. Also depending on if the 82 is routed to Ringsend(I am not sure if that is still the plan) it might be the only radial that doesn't really go through CC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    If 48 is to be extended, I think it should take over the 60's terminus of St John Rogerson's Quay, so that 60 can be extended to Dublin Port and replace current 53, now that tie-in with 58 is no longer planned. For 82 it depends on which garage will operate it. I note in last map it showed as terminating in Merrion Square, but these sorts of things seem to be very labile, so not sure either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    It will be interesting to see if any routes are re-routed to use the ringsend CBC to head towards Pigeon House using the new bridge over the Grand Canal, whenever that is completed. Plenty of routes will be able to take advantage of the improvements on the north quays, but no word on what will utilise the improvements on the south quays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The 82 might be one as it’s earmarked to terminate at the glass bottle factory in the medium term if not initially.

    The 48 absolutely should be extended south - Parnell Square is not a suitable terminus for buses from the northside. It would be via Gardiner Street if it was to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Unfortunately I don't think it would make much sense to send the 48 to Sir John Rogerson's Quay. The 48 is likely best extended to Burlington Rd to terminate with the 34 and 35, as it share its routing from Cabra Rd.

    The 60's routing is supposed to be temporary until the the Dodder Public Transport Bridge is created as a part of CBC Ringsend connecting Sir John Rogerson's Quay to East Link Road. At which point the C1 and C2 are going to be rerouted over the bridge and along the south quays, and the 60 will either be rerouted to the G-spine terminus or will loop using the Dodder PT bridge and the Tom Clarke Bridge. However, even in the interim the 60 is a better connection, as it connects Sir John Rogerson's Quay to the rest of the Quays and allows for better interchanges with most of the other spines than the 48 would.

    As for the port connection the current plan for the 53 is to renumber it to the 97. However I am hoping that it will also be extended from Talbot St to Heuston to allow for a direct Heuston-Dublin Port service. More generally I don't like Talbot St as a terminus or through road for buses, and somewhat by extension Abbey St as well. However that is separate to why I think the 53/97 should be extended to Heuston.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I believe the plan is for the C1 and C2 to be rerouted over the bridge, and be the primary south quays services. I also don't remember what the final plan for the 60 is but I think it was either going to follow the G-spine to its terminus or use the Tom Clarke Bridge to loop around to the south Quays.

    However like LXFlyer says, there could definetly be more services routed across it if the demand is there.

    I would also be curious to see if a "quays loop" route has any merit, even if just to relieve some pressure from the Red Line and the various spines using the Quays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,692 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    That idea sounds very like the old route 90 Hueston to IFSC service



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    Are there any changes due to the clondalkin phase, some of the routes show as Using the old nangor road to access clondalkin village which coming from northbound fonthill and from cherrywood estate is currently impossible. There is also a massive amount of construction and new roads built in clonburris which has no planned new services.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,035 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Aside from the 57 & 58 changes, nothing else has been put in the public domain.

    If a particular route is inaccessible then clearly there will have to be changes.

    The D-Spine isn’t likely to happen until March/April 2026 so plenty of time for them to come up with other ideas.



Advertisement