Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Good news everyone! The Boards.ie Subscription service is live. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1521522523524526

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,933 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Any Dublin City bus stopping outside Bray railway station goes to the Main Street - that’s not rocket science let’s be honest as there is nowhere else they can go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭thomasj


    The 45a runs from Bray DART station directly to Dun Laoghaire station as well doesn't it ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,933 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It does and would run close enough to Shankill, Killiney and Sandycove stations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The whole idea of a train is a service that runs at fixed times from a fixed location. If it is not going to do that then it needs to at least provide information, especially in July when there are a lot of tourists and people out of their regular itinerary.

    But at usual, the customer comes last.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭George White


    It runs just off Sandycove.

    They care more about timetables than passengers. Increasingly since Go Ahead gained a chunk.

    Also, the amount of bus drivers I've met who insist they don't care about their passengers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭john boye


    Is caring about timetables not basically caring about passengers too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭George White


    No, because passengers who are late will be delayed by the 'oh, we have to get the bus back on time' delays. Passengers don't get told when a bus is supposed to be at the destination by a certain time. We just hope it gets there as quick as possible.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    In reality in many places a bus does have a timetable that has intermediate times and a time that they are supposed to reach the terminus by. I've been travelling to Poland, Hungary and the UK in recent weeks and all buses there have.

    The idea that a bus should run from terminus to terminus as fast as possible is really an Irish phenomenon. We are one of the few countries in Europe and probably even the world where this was the case and thus people have got so use to such practice over so many years that they think it is good practice when in reality it provides a really poor service for those who do not get on near a terminus. But probably you are not one of those or you live on a very high frequency route where you can just turn up and go.

    People who are getting on at intermediate stops absolutely should have an idea of when they can expect a bus to come to their stop, rather than having to turn up at their bus stop randomly and hope that a bus will come when they think it will or have a working knowledge of Dublin Geography and traffic to work out how long a bus takes to get to them as the timetable only tells them that it left a terminus they've either never heard of and don't know where is or never been to at a time listed on a timetable poster.

    Fortunately the days of one set of passengers on a route saying damn you Jack, I'm alright to other people on the same route are slowly being brought to a close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭john boye


    How does bolting on ad-hoc diversions help to get the bus to its destination as quickly as possible?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I think one of the worst feelings is knowing you are going to be late for something because despite you being on time to the bus stop, the bus showed up early and you missed it.

    It is one of the reasons I hate the DB timetables. They are easy to read but the information they give isn't always useful. It also can make transfers a massive headache, especially if you are transfering from a high frequency service to a low frequency services. I am really hoping as BC continues to rollout that DB will consider changing their timetable format to more clearly show their timing points along the route, as well as interchange stops. I believe this is more or less what the GAI timetables show, and I think it is much more practical because of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    In other countries, private traffic has far less of an effect on buses. I was on an early morning bus last week, travelling between Drimnagh and O'Connell St on a relatively high-frequency route. The timetable gives the bus well over half an hour to do that part of the trip. Without school traffic, it could probably be done in fifteen minutes. There was no significant traffic at all. But the driver still had to adhere to the same old timetable. He drove at less than 20km/h up Suir Rd and even slower on the (empty) South Circular Rd, pulling in at every stop. In James' Hospital, he parked up for five minutes. Same again on James' St. Pressit box beeping every time he stopped, so he was obviously still running early, despite his efforts. I got off on Thomas St and walked the rest of the way. The bus never passed me, so it obviously drove at less than walking pace all the way. I regretted not driving.

    The NTA should've sorted the traffic out before implementing this rule. Either that or have a different timetable, depending on the day of the week, whether the schools are off, what the weather is like, etc. The sheer tediousness of the job nowadays, combined with the hassle of having to explain the issue to impatient passengers, has contributed significantly to the driver shortage. And the slowness of buses (artificially slow, in this case) has encouraged people to continue using their cars, get their licence ASAP, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,793 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    A lot of drivers, including me, have left due to the Pressit box and the reluctance to change it. That's one of very few reasons I didn't enjoy it day to day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The big problem with it is that if a bus is running early and has to hold time then runs to traffic the bus very quickly becomes late very easy to lose time in Dublin traffic.

    Also the NTA are insisting every trip is completed in full which is also madness there's plenty of routes where the bus could easily turn off a stop or two early if empty and no passengers would be discomoded but NTA insist every route runs to the last stop wasting diesel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,793 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    Yes very aware, one of my last journeys on the 15 I got a call to say I was two…TWO... Minutes ahead, so I asked him where I was and he replied 'Terenure Village' and I replied with 'and what's Terenure like at 5pm?'…he hung up, I was 16 minutes late by the time I hit Rathgar and he wouldn't regulate me 'Sure you've loads of running time left to get to Clongriffin' 🙃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,051 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I've been reading off Youtube this morning that 25 buses from GAI's fleet are undergoing maintenance at their depot in Ballymount. Their fleet of AX buses have now been drafted in to cover some of their scheduled services that were meant to be run by the buses that are now temporarily out of service in the depot. As this is on-going at the moment; I assume there would have been some cancellations in place on some of GAI's routes either before or over the weekend until the end of the maintenance period at Ballymount.

    Post edited by dublinman1990 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,933 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’m not sure what you’re on about - there were staff on hand at Bray railway station redirecting people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 GRUF


    Hospice operator launches High Court challenge to BusConnects corridor – The Irish Times

    The High Court has permitted the operator of a hospice to challenge An Coimisiún Pleanála’s approval for the proposed BusConnects corridor from Kimmage to Dublin city centre.

    The National Transport Authority’s (NTA) €4 billion BusConnects initiative seeks to transform bus services in Dublin through the construction of 12 new bus corridors, as well as the reorganisation of services on existing road infrastructure.

    Several of the proposed bus routes are the subject of judicial review proceedings.

    The challenge brought by Our Lady’s Hospice and Care Services DAC, which operates the facility of the same name in Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6W, arises from the NTA’s plans to build a 22-space car park on lands owned by the hospice.

    According to court documents, the car park is planned in circumstances where the proposed Kimmage-to-city-centre bus corridor − which An Coimisiún Pleanála approved in May − will result in the loss of 10 existing car parking spaces on Harold’s Cross Road.

    An Coimisiún Pleanála in May confirmed the NTA’s application for a compulsory purchase order of various lands, sought as part of the bus corridor’s development. The hospice’s lands, earmarked for the car park, are included in the compulsory purchase order.

    The hospice operator says it was planning to build accommodation units for its healthcare workers on the land subject to the compulsory purchase order.

    The hospice operator wants the court to quash An Coimisiún Pleanála’s decision granting permission to the NTA for the bus corridor. It also wants the court to quash the planning board’s approval of the compulsory purchase order.

    On Monday, Mr Justice David Holland gave permission to Oisín Collins SC, for the hospice operator and instructed by O’Connell & Clarke Solicitors LLP, to bring judicial review proceedings against An Coimisúin Pleanála. The NTA is a notice party to the proceedings.

    Making the application for permission, Mr Collins said having staff accommodation is now critical in the provision of medical services, an unfortunate reality of modern life.

    In a statement to the court, the hospice operator claims An Coimisiún Pleanála’s decision to grant permission for the bus corridor is invalid and unlawful, as the provision of additional car parking spaces encourages private car use.

    This is contrary to the policies and objectives of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028, and the National Planning Framework, the hospice operator claims.

    The hospice operator claims the NTA mistakenly identified the area subject to the compulsory purchase order as the location with “the least impact for the future development and operation of the hospice”.

    The hospice operator says the opposite is true – in reality, those lands are the only lands it owns that could be developed in future.

    Therefore, An Coimisiún Pleanála’s decision to grant permission for the bus corridor and related compulsory purchase order is invalid “by reasons of irrationality and error of fact”, the hospice operator claims.

    The hospice operator also claims the approval of the compulsory purchase order is invalid as it interferes with its constitutional property rights.

    The grant of permission and compulsory purchase order failed to have regard for statutory climate objectives, in accordance with the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015, the hospice operator further claims.

    Mr Justice Holland adjourned the case to the end of the month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 GRUF


    "The hospice operator wants the court to quash An Coimisiún Pleanála’s decision granting permission to the NTA for the bus corridor."

    "In a statement to the court, the hospice operator claims An Coimisiún Pleanála’s decision to grant permission for the bus corridor is invalid and unlawful, as the provision of additional car parking spaces encourages private car use."

    While it seems that there is validity to the hospices claims about the land being taken for CPO, the fact they are going after the entire corridor as unlawful is ridiculous. I don't understand this incessant need to take everything to JR and destroy the entire project over 22 car parking spaces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,790 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I assume they can only challenge the granting of permission, which was for the whole corridor.

    some of the environmental arguments are dubious; they're just throwing as many objections as they can in the hope that one of them sticks.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,911 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, it's unfortunate, a JR will place the entire plan in jeopardy rather than just the one part of it in question. Railway orders are different, in that it's done section by section, which is a much better set up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,265 ✭✭✭Daith


    Sorry, why are the NTA building car park spaces? Is this to replaces ones "lost" by the corridor.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,485 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I was under the impression that the latest legislation relating to JR's allows a JR to overturn just part of the planning application and not the whole application.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,911 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, you made me go look it up.

    It's actually quite sensible overall, and I'd even agree with the one element that makes it easier to file a JR.

    You currently have to ask for leave to file a JR, which can take a while in itself. This step has now been removed, you can file without needing to ask permission. This makes sense as the barrier to filing was so low that nearly everything went through anyway.

    Then there's restrictions on adding new grounds to cases, to stop people throwing stuff at the wall if they suddenly think that their original case might be no good.

    It also allows the courts to direct any relevant body to correct any issue, which can remove the grounds for the JR. This should, in theory, result in every JR "failing" in the traditional sense, unless the problem is so large that it can't be amended.

    All told, it's a very good change, and should come into effect later this year. Too bad that it won't be live for any of the BusConnects cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Overall I am not too worried about this JR, and I have a feeling that the NTA was being at least a bit strategic about this. By adding the car park it did make it very likely for the Hospice operator to file a JR, but at the same time it made it much less likely for any individual/resident to file a JR (and appears no individuals did). I believe the NTA may have been banking on a business being much more open to an out of court settlement, as correct me if I am wrong but that is generally the case.

    Especially looking over the operator's PC submission I am hoping that they will be open to a settlement. Generally speaking I have noticed is that individuals and residents' associations tend to have very whiny and "scattergun" submissions. Just about any case they believe they can make, they complain about and this ranges from things that could actually effect them, to some random items on the opposite side of the scheme, to some complaint related to the UN. The Hospice's submission on the hand is solely related to the car park, how it effects development plans, and how it effects the company's best interest. Which while I still disagree with them filing a JR, I understand that they may just trying be trying to protect their best interests rather than pure NIMBYism.

    Of couse the fact that there is a JR at all is incredibly frustrating, as it does mean that more than half the schemes (7/12) have had a JR filed. But at the very least it hopefully won't put the Kimmage scheme in danger.

    More generally on the topic of BC JRs, I believe we are suppose to get a decision for the Clongriffin JR by the 22nd of July (at least I believe that is what S 46.4 means on the High Court Website?). How that goes may have a domino effect for the rest of the JRs. I am hoping that if the JR fails, others may choose to withdraw their JRs to save the court expenses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,138 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Finglas area councilors are now talking about the F spine in 'September or October' so we must still be a go, which is positive news.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭rx8


    The unofficial date is 28th of September.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,138 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Of the three F buses the F3 might make most sense to make 24hr since it covers the most territory but is less direct. The 24 giving a proper airport connection is great too. It's barmy that up until recently Finglas residents would have to get a bus to town amd change to get the airport even though they can mostly see the runway from their upstairs windows. Realistically the message was drive or get a taxi (and pay 30 quid for the 4km journey), hopefully that'll change.

    I'm Still hoping that the N8 will get off the M50 and stop at Chalrlestown when it's launched, having so much motorway running for a city bus is silly, nobody can access the motorway on foot. And the present proposed route doesn't allow for much connection it's basically an express Blanch to airport route as is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    My understanding of the current plans is that F2+F3+L89 should be one bill in Harristown. While there are night duties planned in that bill, I think @cgcsb will be disappointed in the route chosen.

    (I think the southside had a lot to do with that choice, the F3 terminates around the corner from half of the D-Spine, while the F2 goes exactly halfway between the Ds and As.)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I am really hoping that like the other previous spines all 3 routes will be 24h. Has there been any indication so far that not all 3 would be 24h?



Advertisement