Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

19039049069089091851

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    There's a distinct possibility that Trump could bring in a general tariff on pharmaceuticals, but grant exemptions/rebates to companies that meet certain (vaguely-stated) criteria.

    He did this in his first term; he imposed heavy tariffs on China but US companies importing from China could apply for tariff exemptions on "public interest" grounds. In practice whether a company would get tariff exemptions was heavily influenced by how close the owners/controllers were to Trump; how much public support they gave him, his favoured Republican lapdogs, and his vile policies; how much the company or its owners donated to Trump or to Trumpy candidates; etc.

    If Trump is serious about using tariffs to bring pharmaceuticals manufacturing back to the US, he could operate a less blatantly corrupt version of this — impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals, but give companies an exemption for (say) four years if they have an approved plan for reshoring manufacturing, and they commence and carry through the construction/equipping/commissioning of the necessary US manufacturing capacity.

    Or, he could combine the two approaches — your company can get a tariff exemption either if you make and implement an agreed plan to relocate your manufacturing to the US or you pay a big enough bribe. This would raise a lot of money for Trump; the cost of building and operating pharma plants is huge, so even a very large bribe is likely to be the cheaper option for most companies, and therefore the one they will go for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,567 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Again, I'm not in x, but this info is from George Conway, so probably accurate. Can others confirm if it's not?

    1000012943.jpg 1000012944.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,318 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    and they commence and carry through the construction/equipping/commissioning of the necessary US manufacturing capacity

    The planning for that could easily take 4 years, and in the meantime they negotiate a temporary exemption 'in the public interest' or whatever garbage he will swallow. If they can get even 12 months he will be so tied up in the mid-terms he will not notice who is 'paying' tariffs and who is not. And a few 'donations' will distract/convince him. I would imagine major companies will have to appoint a team just to deal with running rings round Trump.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Exactly.. they'll string him along, spend a bit of money on planning ( and a whole lot more on lobbying) and just wait him out.

    Worst case, they take the tariff and just fully pass it on to the consumer.

    The vast majority of their products are 100% not optional for the consumer and they'll have to buy it. And that's when they get more of those "public interest exemptions".

    But, him announcing this right now is absolutely categorically an attempt to shift the narrative away from Epstein and his Governments responsibility for the failures relateded to the Texas floods.

    The death toll keeps rising and the number of people confirmed "missing" is repeatedly rising as well, so the final toll could be many multiples of the current number.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,134 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's unlikely Trump will put tarriffs on pharmaceuticals. The biggest purchaser of them in the US is the federal.goverment itself. The other large buyers are older people who may complain but will put up with the costs. It's highly likely that pharma will get an exemption from what looks like a minimum 10% tariff anyway.

    Listening to a radio broadcast yesterday it was interesting to hear an analyst say tgat it's unlikely that pharmaceutical plants will move back to the US in the medium term as the building costs are astronomical and as well DOGE and Trumps anti liberal universities has stripped research funding out of Fedral spending

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭McFly85


    What feels authentic about this is that not only does it ring true with Musks actions and agenda, MechaHitler is extremely cringeworthy and definitely sounds like something the 54 year old edgelord would find funny.

    So if it’s fake, it’s a good fake!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,318 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Even if pharma companies did move back to the US, China produces up to 50% of the world's APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients) and if there is a 200% tariff it will have a significant effect on prices of finished medicines. Trump probably thinks (if he thinks about it at all) that since the US also produces APIs they will be able to produce finished drugs, without taking account of the need for many different APIs.

    As has been pointed out though, you can't throw a pharma plant into an old disused factory and just get into production in weeks, all they have to do is make appropriate noises for a couple of years and he will lose interest.

    'Sorry Mr President, but your medication is no longer available, the factory has had to cut down on production because their warehousing has become overwhelmed by staff shortages due to deportations'.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    To be fair, the government collecting tariffs on their own purchases is ultimately a zero sum action. They pay it from one place and collect it in another.

    But you are correct , they aren't moving back not least because building and running the factories would be prohibitively expensive, but as other posters have pointed out, the ability to source all the component elements of the end product from inside the US is effectively impossible so the tariffs will still apply anyway.

    Post edited by Quin_Dub on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,104 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    If Trump is serious about using tariffs to bring pharmaceuticals manufacturing back to the US, he could operate a less blatantly corrupt version of this — impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals, but give companies an exemption for (say) four years if they have an approved plan for reshoring manufacturing, and they commence and carry through the construction/equipping/commissioning of the necessary US manufacturing capacity.

    That would be a fair way of incentivising a move of production while keeping the supply chain open in the short-medium term. Which is exactly why it'll never happen. If the tariffs ever fully bite, it'll only be a matter of time before Trump's friends start complaining that they're paying too much for their Ozempic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Whenever I see talk of Trump strategies regarding tariffs or even the potential grifts he might have behind them, I feel the urge to repeat my Quarterly PSA to the thread to remind everyone of a fundamental truth about Donnie.

    • He has no plan.
    • He has no strategy.
    • Donnie doesn't know what a Tariff is or how they are used.
    • Donnie doesn't care what happens to any US business apart from possibly his own.

    Everything and anything he does is in service of one thing, and one thing alone: His own damned self.

    Talking about tariffs makes him sound all grown up and Presidential…without having to do any of the homework involved. It is a threat that sounds impressive, but is toothless since he doesn't know how to practically do it, nor is he interested in the work needed to make it happen. Thus he TACOs. "Ooo…I'll Tariff you next time! Better be nice to me, or I'll tariff you!" Then he pushes it another 3 months and goes back down to Florida to spend the weekend cheating at golf. Rinse and repeat.

    Now he wants to be the Great Peacemaker. But again, that's all about his ego. We wants a Nobel, and so he'll cling onto any and every ceasefire he think he can steal credit for. That's going to continue until at least October when the actual winner is announced, after which he'll rant his head offand then maybe launch his own America Peace Prize, of which he'll award himself 15 of them.

    Nothing Donnie does is worthy of being compared to government work or any grade of political state-craft. He is a self-important blaggard who not only doesn't know how the branches of the US Government work (even after a term of doing this) and who isn't even interested in doing the work itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Its not fake

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/09/grok-ai-praised-hitler-antisemitism-x-ntwnfb

    Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence firm xAI has deleted “inappropriate” posts on X after the company’s chatbot, Grok, began praising Adolf Hitler, referring to itself as MechaHitler and making antisemitic comments in response to user queries.

    In some now-deleted posts, it referred to a person with a common Jewish surname as someone who was “celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids” in the Texas floods as “future fascists”.

    “Classic case of hate dressed as activism – and that surname? Every damn time, as they say,” the chatbot commented.

    In another post it said, “Hitler would have called it out and crushed it.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It seems that Karoline has taken note of what reporters and other media heads (Fox News Peter Doocy for one) are asking about the non-existent list and has copped on that it can be best to let others answer for themselves.

    “According to the report, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. So what happened to the Epstein client list that the attorney general said she had on her desk?” Doocy pressed White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, who insisted Bondi was speaking in generalities.

    “She was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork and relation to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, that’s what the attorney general was referring to, and I will let her speak for that,” she asserted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    dont care what 'positive' spin donnie and his merry band of gowls put on it,that there is a concentration camp…a good fart never mind a hurricane will spread it all over the everglades..

    yo! donnie vonredactedpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu,vic orban..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    With a degree of seriousness now, how would China react to an attempt by the U.S Govt to persuade Pharma Co's linked to the U.S to up stakes and fly home to the U.S with commercials interests China has invested in for the future commercial good of China?

    If one takes it for granted (easily enough if one sees Trump as NOT being as good a commerce genius as he claims) that it is some-one from within his chosen team who is promoting use of the tariffs threat, how far would China go to protect its own commercial pharma interests by nullifying the threat? Would it put a black on any transfer of any part of the U.S companies properties being removed from within China's national interests? It has a lot of its own nationals employed in its pharma industry and an increase in the jobless numbers, along with a cut in U.S. Dollar income, wouldn't be acceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    Ah yes half way through 2025 and we already reached FourthReichGPT stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,383 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I hate to split hairs but while you are correct to say that Trump does not have a plan beyond satisfying his short term impulses, the creatures he has surrounded himself with absolutely do. The Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society and the like will be doing Trump's long term strategic planning and thinking for him and they know full well what they're doing.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Deleted contents of post on reported Russian response to Trump angry words about Putin and Russia's killing of civilians on Kyiv and Ukraine as outdated based on an old Newsweek article.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Oh god yea, for sure. Donnie himself has no plan, but totally agree that the gouls around him certainly do.

    However…the nitwit isn't particularly good at following other people's plans either. They'll do what they can with whatever leeway Donnie has given them, but if any of the plans ever required active help from him…then they are kind of stuck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Reminds me a bit of the line from the Simpsons movie…

    "I was elected to lead, not to read".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,383 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    That's the beauty part though. He just has to sign whatever they put under his nose. That's it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,567 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I didn't know how to link thread posts properly, so forgive the link, but I was trying to find this clip and use it the other day, but have just come across it again and it's a doozy

    https://www.threads.com/@theskinny81/post/DL3zn-siP8C?xmt=AQF0HBpCiZi7sn4x7XF797Xq0VZ2yOpKmACKnvR0YgZMFQ

    More sketchy Epstein behaviour from Trump

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,127 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think it is fairly clear there are competing factions all attempting to do that though. It is why his policies veer from incoherency to outright contradictory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,383 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It was like that in his first term as well. He does that with his businesses. Heck, he encourages it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That's one of the things that Trump will do regardless as he's his own man, which, alongside making most other people seem to be responsible adults and much more preferable to be president, means he will screw up (to an uncertain degree) the best laid plans of those behind him and the 2025 Plan.

    His reactions (that being what they are) to what others do and say put even a few of his own team in a good light, even if it's only because they are keeping their mouths zippered (like Rubio) to protect their own individual GOP career prospects. Rubio's foreign travel efforts are doing him no harm in Trumps eyes while distancing him from Washington's gaffes as Trump is given first place in broadcasting them as wins for him.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    There's also the risk of them making him look/feel stupid.

    Take Hegseth (I think it was actually one of the Heritage foundation goons that works for him) stopping Arms shipments to Ukraine using the excuse of "stockpile levels" without telling Trump.

    He then looks like a tool because he wasn't aware and he was out there saying that they were going to increase shipments.

    He does NOT like that and will now probably increase shipments even more to look "powerful" now.

    So while he'll generally just sign what he's given , if he thinks you are stealing his thunder or making him look bad he will react very very badly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    First off, I don't have much reason to trust the Daily Mail to publish an unbiased story about Trump, without a tendency to have it show him in a good light or to provide a distraction from the troubles bothering him so I don't know why the items in the following D/Mail story remained unpublished until the present.

    There's a 4 hours-old story, by Elena Salvoni, in the Daily Mail that Trump told a 2024 private meeting of donors that during his first term he told Putin that if Russia (Putin) invaded Ukraine, he (Trump) would bomb the (expletive) out of Moscow an audio tape appears to reveal. According to the D/Mail, a recording of a gathering during a 2024 fundraiser seemingly shows the now-President stating that Russia would have never invaded Ukraine in 2022 had he been in office.

    Apparently in reference to his first term, Trump said: 'With Putin I said, "If you go into Ukraine, I’m going to bomb the [expletive] out of Moscow. I'm telling you I have no choice."' He then claimed Putin responded: '"I don't believe you, no way"... and I said "way".'

    Later in the conversation, Trump can also be heard claiming that he issued a similar threat to China 's President Xi Jinping if he chose to invade Taiwan. 'I said the same thing to them, I said "if you go into Taiwan I'm going to bomb the [expletive] out of Beijing ". 'He thought I was crazy. He said "Beijing! You can't even bomb [inaudible]." I said, I have no choice. He believed me 10 per cent... and we never had a problem.'

    According to the D/Mail story, the remarks have been uncovered in a series of audio tapes made while Trump was on the campaign trail at fundraisers in New York and Florida. The recordings were obtained by journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf, who shared audio of the conversation with CNN. Details of some of the exchanges have been published in their new book called 2024. The White House was contacted for comment regarding the published audio and claims. The D/Mail story has no mention of a response from the White House in its story.

    President Trump last night ripped into Putin, accusing him of 'bull[expletive]' in negotiations to end war with Ukraine. 'We get a lot of bull[expletive] thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump told reporters during his Cabinet meeting. Following on from the Trump statement last night about Putin, Russia continued its night-time blitz on Ukraine's cities unabated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Does anyone have a stand-alone source as to how many U.S Pharma Co's have subsidiary production plants in Oz? Apparently Oz is one of the countries which Trump has threatened with a 200% tariff on Pharma exports into the U.S.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    It came from a CNN investigation

    Daily Mail are just regurgitating the story



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,350 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    And meanwhile, members of the US Armed forces are goosestepping though parks in LA with zero protestors in front of them. Sickening stuff.



Advertisement
Advertisement