Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

North Korea General Discussion.

123578

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 198 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    I see I have annoyed you alot. I accept that what I said in a quote response to you re:pro-imperialists was very badly phrased, so I apologise for that.
    So, I actually didn’t mean you - I meant the other carry-on episode I was an onlooker to. —> that was my bad phrasing.
    I am 1,000% interested in Korea but you might not expect this question -
    Why are you interested in Korea?
    (...I will get to your main questions...)

    자본주의 사회의 정부는 자본가 계급의 문제를 관리하는 부자들의 위원회에 불과합니다 - James Connolly, 1915


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    It's a selective interpretation of Korean history, which comes with subscribing to the KNCA and their affiliated propagandists (one of whom keeps getting linked to). I've had a bit of interest in Korean history and culture for a good long while. In this case when I say Korean, I do actually mean the whole place, North and South.

    Interestingly, Korea shares some parallells with Ireland. Both being subject to invasion from local empires, both heavily impacted by the language & culture of those neighbours and ultimatly the modern Korean states find themselves partitioned North & South, much like Ireland. But the nature of that partition is where the comparison ends and it is also where we start to get this selective interpretation of history and the world as a whole.

    The North had the ultimate misfortune to be occupied by the Soviets after being liberated from decades of Japanese rule. That's how we get to where we are now. The South didn't actually fair all that much better at the time, they were poor and in the early post-war decades after the Korean War, Seoul was under a military dicatatorship. But that changed over time, and now we have a prosporous South Korea who's democracy is so robost that a corrupt President's attempt to steal power was thwarted by the democratic process itself. For whatever ills South Korea have (and no country is perfect, S.Korea have problems) they do actually deserve the title of "Democratic People's Republic"

    But speaking of Democratic People's Republics…and deserving that title…we come to North Korea. Very similar to East Germany in it's creation and operation, Pyongyang was both blessed by Moscow's sponsorship which helped them rebuild but at the same time somewhat cursed it. Add to this their failure to annex South Korea during the Korean War. The North Koreans and their supporters will do their level best to focus on how the US are imperialists and how the US have occupied the South, but there is no mention of how KPA troops streamed down the peninsula in an attempt to take all of Korea by force. They will do their best to not mention how they needed Stalin's permission to do this. They will try to not mention how the UN Counter-attack pushed them all the way to the Chinese border and almost certain defeat.

    They are conspicuous in their silence in mentioning how they were essentially saved by the Chinese and that the remainder of the Korean War was mostly between the UN and Chinese PLA (or PVA…since they were pretending to be legionares), with some token KPA units helping out.

    And so they exist at the pleasure of larger nations around them. This is what hurts the ego of the North Korean state. While their Southern neighbor moves on with life, the North clings onto the past while protesting like a spoilt child wanting sweets. "It isn't fair! The South are occupied by Imperalists!! We're big too!!! We are!". But their are not. Their Soviet sponsor is gone and now replaced by a Russia who operate on the rotten husk of what used to be there. The China that rescued them before is still there, but they merely tolorate them for now…not wanting to trigger a stream of refugees into their state.

    So they cherry-pick history to pretend that everying is fine…when the healthier option would be to address what is wrong. It's almost like putting a new coat of paint on a sunken battleship and then pretend that the water-damage underneath it all isn't there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,312 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I guess it's suits China to keep NK in check.

    This thread is dead. It's just being spammed with off topic posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Agreed. That boat is going to be stuck in drydock for the forseeable while they try to undo the water damage. Unless it sinks again or they scrap it there won't be much left to discuss.

    If a mod is reading, might be an idea to close the thread. Right now it's just turning into a channel for North Korean propaganda and the various rebuttals from everyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,559 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I don't get this desire to close a thread just because the original topic has outlived its existence and the thread has somewhat drifted? Is the internet running out of space or something?

    BTW, it's worth noting that there were no Kim portraits in shot. Very easy to hide what you don't want to be seen, or are told not to allow to be seen. Very easy to fool those who are only too willing to be fooled. Nobody who has not been in that room can assert with any confidence or credibility that there are no Kim portraits.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,009 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    On the original topic,

    Interesting video and not that long either. It discusses the influence Russia had in the building of those destroyers.

    It also brings up some interesting points about the ships. they were built ridiculously fast, they are incredibly high in the water and no-one has ever seen them move under their own steam. So they might not have engines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I wouldn't be against a thread specifically for discussing North Korean shenanigans, much along the lines of what we've got over on the Russia thread. Or maybe just re-title this thread for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,312 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    We'll we aren't discussing that or the ship. We are being spammed and spam isn't engaging in discussing, just repeating indoctrination dogma over and over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,312 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Cheers. I'll watch that later. Hard to know if throwing people en masse at the problem can actually do what they claim to have achieved. It's improbable.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 57,803 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Done. Have renamed thread so it can just be a general discussion thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    RTE news has a piece there about dear leader opening a beachside resort

    I guess some piggies are more equal than others in the workers paradise



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,687 ✭✭✭rogber


    Quite the waterslide they've got going on there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    North Korea has been trying to get this kind of tourism going for a good while now. It's a handy way for them to get much needed hard cash into their coffers. They do still do the infamous micro-managed guided tours with government minders, but the finanical benefit of those is relativly limited. The bigger bucks comes from resort tourism like what they're trying at Wonsan.

    Since the 90's there had been attempts to do this. The Kumgang resort was built in the late 90's just north of the DMZ. It was mostly frequented by South Korean tourists and got a fairly decent number of visitors…..up until a North Korean soldier shot one of the tourists. So understandibly, that channel for tourism went away and the South Koreans were given a stark reminder of how a resort setup can't paper over the totallitarian state that's hosting it.

    Ever since, the North Koreans have had to content themselves with tourism from China and Russia. Russian in particular, since beyond North Korea their citizens are often restricted or just generally unwelcome in other parts of the world. So Russians wanting a sun holiday may end up going here.

    The Achillies Heel to all of this is that Russian spending power for this kind of thing is finite. The longer the Ukraine War drags on, the fewer Russians will have the means for this kind of holiday (or any holiday). Chinese tourism might tide them over, but Chinese tourists can go anywhere, and may have better options that Costa Del Kim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,559 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Wonder if they'll get around to finishing the Ryugyong Hotel

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I was reading in that Wiki you linked that the latest plan is turn part of it into a casino. All I can think is, «Who is that for?» Regular North Koreans don’t have the means to gamble, which means this is likely also for the Chinese / Russians. This is kind of what Macao is for, so I’m not certain Pyongyang is going to become a Vegas for BRICS nations.

    The Ryugyong is a colossal monument to hubris, and one of the best pieces of physical evidence to use when countering the nonsense narrative you’ll get from North Korean propaganda.

    It was started in the 80s, when they still enjoyed the sponsorship of the Soviet Union. They wanted to one-up the South Koreans with the tallest hotel in the world, but they never calculated on the end of the support they enjoyed from Moscow. They only got as far as the concrete shell when the fall of the Soviets and the subsequent famine in North Korea stopped the project for the guts of 15 years. «Juche» or the notion of «Self-reliance» was very publicly shown to be nothing more than a buzz word with this unfinished hulk of a building dominating the skyline of their capital. The crane at the top stood rusting into the 2000s as a reminder of this failure.

    In the end it was an Egyptian company who enclosed the building about 10 years ago and decked it with programmable LEDs. Now the building serves as a huge screen to show state messaging.

    However this is likely still an empty shell. European agencies had checked the interior at one point and deemed a lot of it to be compromised. Leaving a building like this exposed to the elements (and North Korean winter) for so many years may have left at lot it beyond repair.

    With the possible exception of some token installations, my guess is that this building will remain mostly a shell for the forseeable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    IMG_5954.jpeg

    Seems like a lot of fun to be fair

    Under his eye



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,854 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Id be terrified that if he got splashed from the water slide you'd be taken out back and shot.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    What was different is that East Germans or large parts of East Germany did have access to Western media, Western TV and certainly Western radio.

    I think North Koreans can't receive TV from the South as the South has the American TV norm. FM as well as AM radio from South Korea is apparently jammed? Not certain?

    I could never get the question answered if North Koreans are at least technically able ( under strong punishment of course) to listen to radio from South Korea? Like if FM is receivable there? Or is it really all jammed.

    East Germany tried some jamming in the 50ies and 60ies but soon gave up, as it was too complicated. East Germans gotten a good idea what life was like in the West, at least what kind of luxuries one had, the likes they could never get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    One of the projects Trump cancelled was the radio service into North Korea, there is also a massive usb stick trade with Korean movies tv etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,329 ✭✭✭amacca


    Was just thinking something similar

    Maybe an awkward splash landing would be deemed un north-korean too!

    Maybe these are admin staff that made miatakes and there's only a half an inch of water in the pool



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Yes, I've also heard about this USB stick trade, with South Korean movies, TV series, etc…

    However I've always been wondering if South Korean FM Radio signals make it into North Korea, or if they are all jammed. It's hard to find out, as travellers to North Korea aren't permitted any electronics, also no smartphones, etc…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Now we know why that destroyer was so quick to sink



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Russian ships don't sink….they get upgraded to submarines for enhanced glory.

    Reminds me of this video. This YouTuber covers mostly war history and the Russian Navy, and is pretty funny. He released this video very shortly after the ship flung itself sideways into the water:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 198 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    The most important thing here IMO is an omission:

    Kim Il Sung founded the Anti-Japanese People’s Guerrilla Army (AJPGA), the first revolutionary armed force of the Korean people, in Xiaoshahe, Antu County, China, on 25th April 1932,

    Xiaoshahe.jpeg

    thereby launching the armed struggle against the Japanese imperialists. AJPGA was soon after renamed to Korean People's Revolutionary Army.
    They started off with no weapons (like most liberation organisations) so they had to capture them from the enemy and make their own.

    They fought the Japanese occupation forces in North East China and Korea for 13 years & 4 months – and with experience gained, denied large liberated area zones from the Japanese.Unlike other scattered Korean resistance - they were not crushed or defeated (despite the universally known savagery of Japan in that era);

    also the larger battles held down and wore down 100s of thousands of Japanese forces so, this was large theatre, full scale war – typically involving large scale Japanese punitive actions countered by circling-KPRA-counter-harassment. Hell on Earth for everyone involved - like all war.

    Why did you leave this out of your detailed mid-century summary?

    Add to this their failure to annex South Korea during the Korean War

    The legitimacy of the US presence in Korea is the same as the legitimacy of the English ruling class occupation of Ireland going back to 1169 – ie. there is ----> NONE <----

    Their presence rests on the barrel of the gun and absolutely nothing else. Its the exact same as Japan’s illegitimacy in occupying Korea 1910-1945; and all the others globally past & present.

    One of the early things the US military government in Korea did in its “occupation zone” in Dec 1945 was violently crush the town & city committees that had organically sprung up across the entirety of Korea in August 1945; those were basically embryonic, natural Korean self-rule;
    USAMGIK later replaced those committees with its own (US) structures which became the so-called ROK (in US imperial theory).

    As well as the ‘temporary’ arbitrary division of Korea clearly being illegitimate, this is just one of many reasons why the ROK was and still is seen as a US puppet state!

    So Korea can try to eject the invader but Korea cannot try to annex Korea – that makes no sense.

    They are conspicuous in their silence in mentioning how they were essentially saved by the Chinese

    I don’t know of a single credible person or entity from the DPRK or anywhere else who denies the PLA were instrumental in driving the imperialists back to their jump off line; all are hugely grateful for China’s vital assistance. Both allies knew at the time - the US strategic objective was China, as it still is today.
    Empires are as predictable (at the strategic level) as night following day.

    자본주의 사회의 정부는 자본가 계급의 문제를 관리하는 부자들의 위원회에 불과합니다 - James Connolly, 1915


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 198 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    It was the Soviets who blocked free elections and a unified country.

    The Soviets never entered below the 38th parallel and left the North in 1947. The US has at least 30,000 soldiers on Korean soil as of July 2025. Can you provide something to back this up?

    자본주의 사회의 정부는 자본가 계급의 문제를 관리하는 부자들의 위원회에 불과합니다 - James Connolly, 1915


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 198 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    Re: the Ryugyong mixed-use building: yes, it had been a derelict eyesore. The 2008 decision was to not demolish and instead at least make it look nice.
    I think it is now a stunning looking building on the skyline (regardless of its original design purpose from the mid 80s) due to its size, the funky spaceship shape & the mirror-like, blue-tinted glass.

    Rhu3.jpeg Rhu hotel.png

    If the WPK were tyrants interested in power only for egos sake (as repeatedly alleged in the media owned & controlled by a minuscule faction of hyper-rich Western capitalists) the WPK would have prioritised their own prestige and pressed ahead anyway to complete this prominent building by 1994 or 95.

    But since Korea is run by normal, empathic, decent people -they prioritised state resources first on resolving the gravely urgent hunger, food & trade problem in the country (which they did resolve);
    this is the reason they had to leave this comparatively unimportant project paused for 16 years.

    자본주의 사회의 정부는 자본가 계급의 문제를 관리하는 부자들의 위원회에 불과합니다 - James Connolly, 1915


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,024 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    You sound like you're defending a dictatorship?

    I've been to Korea a few times myself, absolutely love the place and the people. But you'd want to have a bit of a screw loose to think what's going on up north is not a dictatorship oppressing people.

    They can't even leave their country. How can you defend that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Ah of course….Kim Il Sung single-handledly founded a resistence movement while simulatianiously rainbows shot around Mt. Paektu and the heavens burst open in a chorus of singing….no wait…that's Kim Jong Ills bullsh*t origin story…but it has a similar ring to it. Silly imagry aside, Kim was certainly a partasan leader against the Japanese. However his profile after the Japanese were removed was very much thanks to the Soviets essentially installing him as their preferred head of state. The US did the same with Syngman Rhee and South Korea, for sure, but the North Koreans ran with their version and love to frame Kim as this single-handed Robin Hood-esque character who did all of it near single-handedly while ignoring the considerable amount of external sponsorship.

    Speaking of external support, lets talk about them liberating Korea from the Japanese…yea….they had a little help there from another bunch in that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria

    By a little I of course mean that the Soviets pretty much did all of it. Again, this is part of the romanic narritive designed to paper over how they were essentially a client state yet again.

    Now onto a matter of discourse…why can't you say "South Korea"? I can say DPRK. It's a stupid name for a totallitarian dictatorship like North Korea, but I will use it sometimes. What's wrong with "South Korea" or "Republic of Korea?" It's what damn near the entire planet uses to specifiy that nation. When you say "Korea" I know you mean North Korea…but not everyone here are versed in the ways of the KFA.

    (Edit: I see you did write ROK in there in your post. That's progress, I like to see it :) )



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Jebus, come for the news and commentary, get a political party broadcast from DPRK 🇰🇵



Advertisement