Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1853854855856857859»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,688 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I`m no fan of either Isreal or Iran at present, and not broken hearted to see Trump caught between a rock and a hard place. I very much doubt Netanyahu`s claim of Iran being weeks away from developing nuclear weapons. I have been hearing that for the past 20 years, but the world would be safer without them having the capability to develope them further. But then with Netanyahu, the world would be safer if he didn`t have them either.

    I would doubt much of a regime change without boots being put on the ground in Iran. if there was regime change due to this bombing it would most likely be a military one, and when it comes to military regimes taking over it is usually the most vicious faction that comes out on top, so perhaps a case of both Isreal and the U.S. being careful what the wish for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,517 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Unfortunately as history has shown, the US a d Israel have no issues destabilizing countries for short term gain.

    Then you have some politicians in Europe spewing out Israel has a right to defend herself etc... while not realizing we could be in for another wave of refugees arriving on European shores.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    its going to be 2 weeks,it will be beautiful,did i tell you how bigglie it will be in 2 weeks?i was just on a phone call with one of my besties bibi,you know bibi dont you?great guy,shame about the combover though,he should use my hair dresser,hes a great guy,clearing gaza for me and bombing iran for me too,build some hotels and a resort there too…talked with my other bestie vlad,you know vlad,great guy,he wrestles bears,did you know that?great guy…he uses alot of iranian stuff you know,he tests it in Ukraine,hes a great tester for iran…so it will be in the next couple of weeks,did i say that?yeah i think i did,2 weeks,it will be all done,be awesome…did you see ive an onion on my belt?yeah i wear it because i can, in 2 weeks…its time for a golf weekend,i play golf,did you know that?im great,i should play in the masters,win it too!,have to get my assistant to change my nappy first,get some sudocream on there to,stings a bit…youll see,in 2 weeks,be bigglie!!


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,866 ✭✭✭Homelander


    A regime change of any kind is a win for Israel, because it cannot get any worse than the current regime from their POV.

    May not be so good for Iran's immediate neighbors at all, granted, but Israel isn't going to care much about that - even a destablised Iran doesn't trouble Israel given the geographic distance.

    Have to remember the broader Iranian people have no real quarrel with Israel, and before the current regime, Iran as a state had no quarrel with Israel whatsoever and enjoyed reasonably good relations, distant as both countries are.

    Unless the hypothetical new regime was another fundamentalist islamic one, and not only that, but was once again obsessed with attacking Israel, which would be incredibly unlikely, Israel would chalk that up as a win.

    There are lots of countries around Israel that absolutely do not like Israel, that it exists, what it does, but they have no interest in attacking Israel.

    A new regime in Iran would probably be that at worst, or completely disinterested in pursuing any further aggression against Israel at best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,688 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Isreal had no problems from Iran prior to this regime because Iran was ran by a U.S. proxy, the Shah. The present regime is a continuation of a populist religious revolution where there was no love for the U.S. because of their proping up the Shah, or for any of their allies either. Decades of sanctions haven`t improved that situation. Neither will, imo, this idea by both Trump and Netanyahu of "taking out" Khamenei. He may be their head of state, but he is also their spiritual leader.

    I don`t see that just wiping out Iran`s nuclear capabilities will result in regime change, but even if it did the most likely new regime would be a military one, and the threats to Isreal have not been nuclear. They have been through proxy factions funded and armed by Iran`s military. If that is the threat that Netanyahu is hoping to eliminate he or Trump are not going to achieve that by bombing. It would require boots on the ground, and while a lot of countries around Isreal may not much like Isreal, they would like them a lot less with Isreali troops in Iran.

    Trump is not going to send troops into Iran. He would be out of the White House quicker than he could wipe his ass, and unlike Iraq, there would be no coalition of the willing either to back Isreal. Netanyahu started this war thinking he could sucker in Trump, but that is not going to happen, so how he gets himself out of it is going to be a problem for him. If Trump sends those bunker busting bombs via U.S. planes, we know Trump well enough to know he will claim them an outstanding success, even if the do not do what they are supposed to. By doing that it will leave Netanyahu twisting in the wind with no excuses to continue bombing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    The EPA reconsidering the ban on asbestos

    What a country 👏👏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    No it's not, because Trump had and will have the last say on the matter, which is what he wanted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Unconnected I'm sure.…

    "Russia is a major exporter of asbestos. In 2023, Russia was the world's largest exporter of asbestos, with exports valued at $279 million"

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Q: Your intelligence community says they have no evidence that Iran is building a nuke

    TRUMP: Then my intelligence community is wrong. Who said that?

    Q: You director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard

    TRUMP: She's wrong

    🤡🤡🤡

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    And most of the same fellas who are anti-immigration will cheer on Israel for the purposes of 'owning the libs'.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,866 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I don't disagree with your first point, but my point was that the current regimes motivation is entirely driven by hardcore religious idealogy.

    A new military regime, even if its another form of religious governance, is unlikely to pursue the same action, because inherently Iranian people are not troubled by the existance of Israel.

    I would say the Egyptian population hates Israel in a way that the normal Iranian population never will, but Egypt is not driven purely by religious fundamentalism and has kept peace with Israel for 40+ years.

    Same for Lebanon - another country whose population generally does not like Israel for good reason, but also has no interest in war with Israel, and that fact, combined with Israels actions against it, is why Hezbollah is sitting silent and watching as Israel attacks Iran.

    Israel is surrounded by countries that do not like it. Iran, not even a neighboring country, is the only one left that believes Israel has to be destroyed and acts accordingly.

    Most countries made peace with Israel because it was the sensible thing to do, and the only logical option after all the costly failed wars in the past.

    Iran never had to suffer that before because of the strategy of proxy and missile deterrence, but that's all collapsed.

    Even if there's no regime change, I would find it highly unlikely that even the current regime would continue to pursue naked aggression towards Israel in the years ahead after seeing decades of strategic planning to shield Iran from any blowback collapse in two years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,061 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The gas thing is that some people in the US are [if one is to believe their utterances] convinced that she is a Russian agent which, if one is to take Trump at his spoken word, another example of him flip-flopping when it come to trusting his intelligence people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,688 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I don`t see how bombing Iran is going to make the Iranian population look more kindly on Isreal, or the U.S. if Trump decides to join in, and I cannot see there being any change of regime there other than perhaps a military regime without a full scale invasion which is not going to happen.

    Isteal`s problems from Iran have been the funding and supply of hardcore factions by Iran. Netanyahu looks as if he seized upon another dodgy document similar to the U.S. in the war with Iraq and ran with it hoping the U.S. would back him. But barring the odd bunker buster bomb, that is not going to happen.

    So where does he go from here ? If it remains the same regime in Iran or a military regime, it`s not going to solve Isreal`s problems with being attacked by those hardcore elements. If Netanyahu resorts to indiscriminate bombing as he has threated too, regardless of which regime ends up running the country, it is not going to encourage them to stop funding and supplying those hard core anti Isreal groups due to some ground swell of the Iranian public telling them not too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭junkyarddog


    image.png

    Some very subtle hints being dropped there!

    But so long as the people know…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,784 ✭✭✭✭kowloon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,916 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    A sure you know America are a day ahead of us in their dates lol. Its the new American Trump Calander lol.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,030 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Now let me think who does have a nobel peace prize…. is someone suffering possibly from ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome)…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    This guy was having a rant in front of 2 young women asking them how much tax immigrants pay into the US economy?

    I think he is one of Trump's MAGA voters.

    The irony of this argument was that this guys argument with the two women took place outside an Irish bar in San Francisco; California.

    The guy who is arguing with the two women has an American accent. He is also wearing an old Chelsea FC jersey with Didier Drogba's name on back of it.

    He must be there to see Chelsea play in the Fifa Club World Cup later that evening. Either way that guy's argument is cringe inducing sh1te.

    The two young women that argued with him were probably very lucky that the argument didn't decesend to something that was far worse between them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭Widdensushi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,866 ✭✭✭Homelander


    "It's a wonderful treaty, a tremendous treaty, you won't have seen it before, all our guys have been on it, tremendous work"

    "Mr President, what about Russia and Ukraine, or Israel and Iran?"

    "I don't answer stupid questions, tremendously stupid questions, your organisation has no credibility"

    The ego on trump is one thing. That his followers continue to blindly follow it, is another. The state of politics in American is democracy at its lowest point in world history.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,171 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    So that’s Gabbard under the bus, and Hegseth frozen out.

    This was all predicted, he would never listen or keep those around him for longer than he needed.



Advertisement