Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kilkenny GAA Thread

1570571572573575

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭Village87


    It just seems Waterford, Clare and Cork are well ahead of the bunch. Kk started off with a fantastic goal last night, after that Waterford were miles ahead in every aspect, 10-12 points win would not have flattered them. Im just using them as the barometer, and we were way off it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭Topcat32


    Kilkenny lost by 3 though, deservedly beaten buts lets deal in facts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,163 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    Absolutely, and had enough chances to win the game. Several bad wides in the first half too. Waterford were very good but no doubt the game could have gone either way. To say 10 to 12 points wouldn’t have flattered them is just nonsense to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭hogans heroes


    Agree with above.on the night waterford deserved their win as we didn't perform. But to say their 10-12 pts better is utter nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭jamesbond2022


    Unless Waterford had 12-15 more shots at the posts than us or they had 5-6 clear cut goal chances and should have taken a few of them then there’s no way they were 10-12 pts better than kk

    I find it gas whenever someone comes out with a statement like that that such and such a team is better than another without any type of stats to back it up there basically pulling random numbers out of there h*le 🤣

    It’s always a 5-6 pint breeze in both hurling and football aswell when one team plays with the wind in the first half



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭Billy Ocean


    Offaly basically had the class of 2005 and that's it, backboned a Leinster minor win, 2 Leinster u20 wins, u20 All Ireland and a schools Leinster, they lost to Laois by 31 points in minor this year. They badly need to those lads to push onto Senior, they'd 10 u20s on their Senior panel this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭Sir Chaz


    Again, that's selective horsesh!t to suit your narrative.

    Kilkennny would have been as competitive in Munster as the best of them. Yes they didn't play well last night but were still only beaten by 3 and had 3 good chances to win or draw the game. Remember as well, Kilkenny played against a good breeze last night in 1st half, which died completely in 2nd half and allowed Waterford to score from distance, which we could not do in 1st half due to the elements

    Things fell well for Waterford last night and to their credit they took full advantage. To write Kilkenny off though after 5 convincing wins on the trot, and a single defeat by a puck of a ball, smacks of ignorant opportunism by a lad with an agenda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 njcat


    Message to our minors and u20s on failure from Roger Federer, a great tennis player ( to Dartmouth grads):


    Now, I have a question for you,” Federer said, looking out across a sea of umbrellas at the commencement ceremony for Dartmouth College. “What percentage of points do you think I won in those matches?”

    He paused.

    “Only 54 percent,” he said.

    It was one of those statistics that at first seemed incorrect. Federer was one of the most dominant athletic forces of this century. That guy lost nearly half of his points?

    “When you lose every second point, on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot,” he told the crowd. “You teach yourself to think, ‘OK, I double-faulted. It’s only a point.’ When you’re playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world, and it is. But when it’s behind you, it’s behind you. This mindset is really crucial, because it frees you to fully commit to the next point and the next point after that, with intensity, clarity and focus.”

    So, please focus on each game ahead of you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,239 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    Has nothing to do with performances on the pitch ....

    247469249_2017413731748359_7675802031635703098_n.jpg

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭Village87


    Ah come on, without knocking young players, Waterford coughed up a goal after 30 seconds( a fabulous goal at that), Had a goal disallowed when advantage could easily has been used in the first half, and conceded a goal in injury time through a puck out when no need for a short puck out. There 3, 6, 11 and 14 were completely dominant going man to man in there battles, there midfield were outstanding, and they had some of the finest forwards i have seen in minor in a long time, Spain, Power and Shanahan were top class, we were in big trouble everywhere. Then i see that Waterford team are on a par with Clare and Cork. We are clearly behind Waterford, Clare and Cork at minor level imo, Waterford were better than us in every department Saturday unfortunately, it was similar to the u20, we could not handle the aerial ability or the physicality or the slick inside line of the opposition, we reverted to a running game we are not good at and once Mullen and O'Donovan were tied up were made look average. That is my take on it, maybe i am wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭randd1


    That's the realist take on it. And it should be that take that we focus on to improve things within the county.

    For example, our use of the ball going forward when under no real pressure is poor at every level, our forward movement at every level is one-dimensional and is often too static, we tend to drop our HF line too far back giving the opposition HB line time to pick passes at every level, when closing down we do tend to get too many players sucked into closing leaving too many opposition players free, and quite frankly our first touch under pressure and striking from distance is a good bit off the Munster counties. Tactically, basics-of-the-game and overall-vision wise, we're behind other counties. I don't think we can argue against that, if we're being honest.

    But there's no harm in optimism either given these lads are U-17 and playing their first match of top quality all season. They played some good stuff at times, and truth be told as good as Waterford were, and they were excellent, we gave them plenty of help at times and we were pretty good ourselves.

    I counted four occasions when Buggy won the ball, beat his man and then passed poorly directly to a Waterford player, I think it led to two Waterford scores. But he still won the ball and beat his man, it was poor passing technique that let him down. Crisper passing and we had scoring opportunities. And Buggy wasn't the only one.

    Mullen had a few times on the ball and played it into space where there was no-one. He wasn't at his best, and it was just poor delivery on his part. As good as he is, he's inconsistent, but at this level that's not unusual. We need to be able to keep players in focus more, especially our better players.

    There was more than a few times the ball where a Kilkenny forward was running away from goal and the ball played in front of him. Fair enough, get's possession. But then they have to try and turn the defender. This was instead of (as Waterford did) the forward making sideways runs and the ball being delivered in front of his run so he can use his momentum to keep in front of the defender to shoot or take on his man. Poor lateral movement.

    And while Waterford had as many bad wides we did, theirs were from 10-15 yards further out. They were clearly more comfortable shooting from distance, left or right.

    Crisper passing, clearer focus in game, better forward movement and smarter ball forward, and better long-distance shooting, have a slight bit more of them attributes to our game, and as quality as Waterford are, we win on Saturday.

    It's a tough ask to get these things right with underage coaching, but none are particularly too tough to get right either, other counties do it. They're more of a coaching structure issue than a talent issue, and while you'd be hopeful that these things will come to them in time, it does require a bit of harsh critical analysis of our coaching structures and performances and why we seem to repeatedly fall down at these things at every level compared to others, especially the Munster counties. I wouldn't go down the route of blaming individual coaches, especially lads that have the courage to put their hands up and do the job, but we do have to look at why we're not doing things as well as other counties. If that means going cap in hand to the other counties and asking them for help, so be it.

    And while it may be somewhat pessimistic, we need to have the realist view and be able to look at defeats as harshly and critically as possible (without going overboard) to get it right for the next time and every time after that.

    PS - Another thing we need to start working within our development squads is our belief and concentration. A lot of Kilkenny teams no loner take to the pitch with the ball-swinging arrogance of the past, and for some odd reason at every level, we lack that. Granted we don't have the aura of yesteryear, but we still are a top county and never usually not far off the top. We should act realise it a bit more.

    And why do we have periods of 20 minutes where the opposition run up 10 points more than we do in every game? We're not going to win many AI titles at any grade if we repeatedly switch off for 20 minutes in matches, which seems to have become a trait over the past 10-15 years at underage and senior. The last time I saw a Kilkenny team put in a full first-second to last-second full-blast performance (even allowing for teams having purple patches within games) was the 2019 AISF. I can't think of too many games since that we've done that since, and certainly not at underage. It's a regular thing with the Munster counties, and while Leinster isn't at that level, it doesn't mean we can't do it for ourselves. If we are hammering a Leinster side by 10-15 points we let up, and while understandable we shouldn't, we should go absolutely full tilt empty the tank regardless of the scoreline. We've let too many wins, and a few trophies to boot, from sheer lack of full-game concentration.

    Post edited by randd1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 331 ✭✭jimmythesulk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 103 ✭✭JohnCougar


    Very disappointing on Saturday night. Waterford had done their homework on us and they wanted to win the match more and like the U20 match, there was no hunger, passion or fight from the players. Waterford's tackling was excellent and they were much better coached than our team. I think we are all guilty of being arrogant at times and think we are better than everyone else. There was a number of KK people around us on Saturday night before the match talking about the Cork/Clare minor match and going to watch it as if we were going to be in the final. That needs to change.

    We are no longer the superpower we once were and other counties are not afraid of us anymore.

    Michael Fennelly was on CRKC on Saturday and Pat Treacy asked him how were the development squads going and worryingly Michael said that a lot of players coming into to them from their clubs don't have the basic skills. He said a lot don't have the ability to hit on both sides and their first touch is poor and that the development squad coaches are having to do the basic skills in training instead of more high level elite training. He said the clubs need to be doing more on the basics.

    Hopefully we can beat Limerick/Dublin in a few weeks as we all need a lift.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭Deskjockey


    I think that's absolute nonsense to say there was no hunger, passion or fight from the players last Saturday night and a standard over reaction when a team loses. This team have shown all year that they are an excellent team representing their clubs and families and just because they lost to another excellent team on the night it doesn't mean that they were lacking hunger, passion or fight, it just means that on the day they were beaten.

    Yes some players might have wished to play a bit better on the day but that is not unusual with underage players and your comments above are a bit insulting to players who have lived, slept and breathed the dream of winning the all-ireland since they started training before Chrismas last year or whenever. For context both Waterford and Clare have both been beaten at least twice this year already while for both Kilkenny and Cork that was their first loss all season. Were they lacking hunger, passion or fight in those matches they lost, or did they just lose to better teams on the day.

    Sometimes the comments here are from lads who sound like they never played the game and dont understand there has to be a winner and a loser in each game....that's just sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,163 ✭✭✭Charlie69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭therealdonster


    You can be sure they never played or at least at any decent level anyway...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 165 ✭✭Box to box


    If there was no hunger from that crop of players after last year it's all a cod. Yes they're only chaps and I'm not going to criticise chaps but it didn't happen for some of them. Ballooning in high ball to the likes of o donavon was never going to work. Way too slow to make changes.Something I've noticed woodlock and Cummins and joxer last sat night all fired up on the line while our managers stood arms folded looking on. Not the managers fault they were appointed again. They couldnt belive they got appointed after what went on previous years.We've a chairman who's a junior e hurling senior. Way out of his depth. We have herity,mullally,dowling and o hara involved with Dublin. Richie power and Eddie brennan with Wexford and tipp clubs.our senior manager appointed without anyone else going for the position. It's completely wrong from the top and until that changes the trophy cabinet will remain full of flies and cobwebs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 Takeyourpoints


    The main criticism that I have of the match last week is the over-coaching of players. 16-17 year olds should be hurling with freedom. Let them make mistakes and make decisions on the spot. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be some structure in place, of course we need them to have a bit of a game plan but if you're telling players what to do the whole time then they lose the flair and creativity that will bring something different to the game. Rigidity in these systems will be the death of the game.

    Did DJ Carey, Henry, Joe Canning, TJ Reid grow up with these systems? No, they were allowed to express themselves and then they were brought into a system where if something wasn't working they could still grab the game by the scruff of the neck and change it.

    We should just want young lads to be young lads, let them be cocky and let them try something brave. That's just my two cents on it. Frustrated by Saturday but still think there's something in those players



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Nedflanders02


    Obviously disappointing to not get the win on Saturday night but some of the over reaction to that loss on here is ridiculous. At the end of the day we are talking about young lads of 16/17, results and performances with this age group can vary massively from day to day. There's no doubt they didn't play to their potential on the night but I thought they showed great fight to stay in the game and nearly nick a draw at the end. Massive credit should go to Waterford, I seen them in the Munster final and thought they looked very ordinary that night but they were super on Saturday and were well deserving winners and it would be great to see them go on and win the final now. As someone said earlier in the forum both Clare and Waterford seem to have benefited from the extra games and maybe that had a bearing on things also. Success at this age group is not always measured on winning an AI, Galway won 4 (I think) minors in a row and have got very little reward at U20 or senior on the back of it. Even looking back at some of our great players never won minor AI's and I think Tommy, JJ, Jackie, Taggy and David Herrity were on a minor team that didn't even make it out of Leinster. The key thing for these players now is keeping their development going so that they can step up to U19/U20 next year and ultimately down the line for some to step up to senior level. Going into the game on Saturday most people here were of the opinion that this was a very talented team, with some great prospects, one bad result shouldn't define these players or there Kilkenny careers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 Takeyourpoints


    Definitely some overreactions but I hope my message didn't come across as an overreaction or overly critical. I really believe that they are a talented bunch of players but I just want to see them play with a bit of freedom and not restricted to systems. Same with u20s. Gamechangers don't develop from rigid systems because they are often worried that if they make a mistake by taking a risk and going away from the system that they will be subbed, when that shouldn't be the case.

    Looking forward to seeing some of these players develop into great hurlers and hopefully we'll see some of their talent during the minor and senior club championships where they might be able to play in a less strict system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Nedflanders02


    No you definitely weren't one of the ones I was talking about with regards to the overreactions! As you say a lot of talent on that team so hopefully they can go back to their clubs and they can kick on. I do think that in the past one of our problems has been players stagnating once they go out of the county set up and I think it's definitely an area the CB and games and development committee need to improve on how players can continue to develop when they go back to their clubs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    That's a great post. I wouldn't like to follow that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 110 ✭✭Hurlingtothebone


    Thats comical Michael Fennelly blaming the clubs. He's been paid to do a job do it and don't blame the club's. If players haven't basic skills they shouldn't be anywhere near development squads. That's Michael Fennelly job to ensure players do have basic skills before they come in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 174 ✭✭neverbet


    Absolute nonsense. We beat Clare after extra time in last years semi final and I am sure both teams have a similar amount of survivors on this years squads. I was at the game and waterford didn't cough up a goal ,it was a brilliantly executed score. The short puckout leading to our second goal was an unforced error on their part but these happened to both sides. Waterford were clearly the better team on the night and they have been nurturing this group from under 14 and good luck to them . The damp conditions and the stronger wind in the first half favoured the much bigger more physical team. We also were without our regular no 4 due to a serious injury and again if you were at the match you will have seen how this affected our defence. Fair play to a brilliant Waterford team but a game lasts 60 plus mintes and we were laying siege to their goal in the final few minutes and on another day who knows. We didn't get the chance to play Cork or Clare this year, so how you come to be certain of their superiority over our boys speaks to your blindspot, love of All things Munster. I have no doubt whatsoever our minor panels of 24/25 will provide us with many seniors of the future who may be none the worse for the couple of setbacks they have suffered. PS waterford also had the advantage of a much bigger and hugely vocal support, much like the Offaly 20s of recent years. That is the saddest part for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,156 ✭✭✭kk.man


    Brilliant post.

    Plus favoritism is massive in kilkenny now more than ever. There could be 10 lads at home better than what's picked on most underage teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭jamesbond2022


    To be fair to m Fennelly the job he’s in is a part time role that should be full time he was interviewed last year or maybe earlier this year and mentioned more than once they needed more bodies involved and there was only so much he could do on his own



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭Sir Chaz


    Well said, that's exactly the point. This group of players aren't defined by one game, and while Waterford were better on Saturday, they weren't too far ahead of us. In fairness to Kilkenny as well, the wind died completely in the 2nd half and it changed the game as it allowed Waterford shoot from distance, they scored a number of points in the 2nd half that wouldn't have reached the 21 in the first half. That had a huge bearing on how the 2nd half played out.
    if there was a failing in the team it was in not delivering the ball inside fast enough, too often they took an extra pass or only hit the ball in when under pressure. The quality of ball inside was poor, and in fairness a lot of that had to do with Waterford, but it has been an issue all year.
    Kilkenny were beaten by a puck of a ball, and as another poster said, Waterford and Clare both seemed to benefit from the extra games.
    Both Kilkenny and Cork appeared flat, whilst Waterford and Clare looked ravenous throughout and really used both their inside lines well. I'd say there are 4 top class Minor teams there and any of them could win a game against the other on a given day.

    We were definitely at a disadvantage as Galway were poorer than normal and Leinster was no test. It's disappointing to lose, but some of the rubbish and overreaction here is very unfair and completely unwarranted. Some of the young fellas had an off day, but most are just 16 and people would do well to remember that and have a bit of perspective.

    Limericks forward line in the 2014 Minor Final had Cian Lynch, Barry Nash, Seamus Flanagan, Peter Casey, Tom Morrissey and Ronan Lynch. They lost the final by 4 points and it did them no harm. I'm not saying we have anything like that quality but it certainly shows that you can fail as a minor team, and still produce plenty hurlers for the future. From what I've seen we'll see a higher than usual share of that team Saturday go on and wear a senior jersey and in the end that's the main goal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    Is that true though? I thought with all the development squads all the way everyone will get a chance.

    Was there anyone obvious not picked for the minor or u20 teams? I'd be very doubtful if every hurler on the panel more or less wasn't the best available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Nedflanders02


    But is he only part time because he didn't want the job full time? The job as advertised was a full time job and he didn't want to give up his other role with one of the colleges, which is understandable too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 110 ✭✭Hurlingtothebone


    Maybe the poster means favouritism in clubs. Who they send into the squads or is it still the case that clubs decide who goes into squads used to be that way when my lads were of that age but that's a while



Advertisement