Madeleine McCann

I wont be engaging with you anymore

Anyone who compares what the Mc Canns did leaving three kids alone in an apartment to a parent who lives the tragedy of a cot death is quite shocking

If somebody is unwilling or unable to understand the point I was making about extraordinary circumstances befalling undeserving people then they're equally not worth engaging with from my end, either, so buh-bye. 👋

I disagree with your opinion.

The whole Madeleine McCann case is always dogged by the neglect of her parents that night.

It bothered me that the parents were portrayed in the public as being the innocent victims in a disappearance of their own daughter but having knowingly and willingly contributed to that happening.

This automatically will start the discussion, would somebody else as a parent have done the same, like leaving very small children unsupervised in an unlocked hotel room? Would you leave your passport and other valuables unlocked in a hotel room? - And I trust you've read similar postings like mine.

It seems we will always disagree on this, rather than the focus on solving this crime.

This is most likely down to different opinions. I personally would have reserved feelings towards my parents if I was the surviving child and my sibling is no longer with us because of my parents behaviour.

Apparently they didn't even know if the windows were shut that night or not. I am sure the police have been over this time and time again.

Interstingly at 9.05 Gerry noticed that the door was 45 degrees open whilst it was left ajar to 5 degrees. He puts the door back to 5 degrees.

The same happens at 9.30 Matthew Oldfield checks up on the children. The door is again open, not ajar. He also doesn't see Madeleine directly which even more adds to the lack of supervision.

Not knowing the scene exactly, but I would suggest it was rather a human than the wind from a possible open window that caused the door to be at 45 degrees?

At 10 pm Kate discovers that Madeleine is no longer there. The police was called later on, and arrived at 10.30 pm.

So theoretically Madeleine could have been taken right after Gerry left, at around 9.10 or so and whowever took her had more than one hour in advantage.

The more I learn about Brueckner, the higher he goes in terms of probability as the likely perpetrator of Madeleine's abduction .

Some highly disturbing factoids about Brueckner brought up in this C4 doc - Madeleine McCann: The Unseen Evidence.

He was in the area on the night.

He had form for targeted attacks.

Was/Is a committed paedophile.

Had been writing sick fiction about abducting people.

Had a little hideout up by that reservoir.

An associate claimed that Brueckner told him she 'didn't scream' on the night she was abducted. Brueckner got up and left quickly after realising what he said.

German police seem to be consistently convinced that he did it.

Not that I can say it with certainty that he did it, but everything points to him.

But thats the problem, its rarely the most obvious in these situations….

New Claims

Shocking new Madeleine McCann claim that 'drunk' German wife of British man ran the child over https://mol.im/a/14786711 via https://dailym.ai/android

Sounds like a tv show that was on not too long ago.

I'm going by Occam's Razor where the theory that takes the least assumptions is usually correct.

The McCanns-did-it theory posits that she died in a 2.5 hour window (possibly due to a Calpol overdose), that her parents had the wherewithal to discover that, get themselves together, hide the body, get ready for dinner, play it cool (unless they also swore the Tapas 7 to secrecy) and then took their chances with the body after the alert was raised and police and other people swarming around the apartment.

Or the wandered-off theory which says that Madeleine woke up, got up, exited the apartment, and then didn't navigate the short distance to the pool, where she had spent time, but in some other direction, and managed to get herself in some spot where no-one would ever find her.

To me, that is considerably more assumptions than the Bruckner theory of someone with form for targeted sex attacks on vulnerable individuals, who would stake out victims before striking and who was in the area.

So, while we don't know, the Brueckner theory leads, imo.

I wouldn't get ridiculous here about aliens and so forth.

We still can't rule out an accident and the parents covering things up. We also don't know if she was trafficked somewhere and is still alive. We also don't know why the British police in 2012 thought that Madaleine was still alive. Also remember, we still don't have a body. A body is necessary to prove murder.

We also don't know if Bruckner acted alone. Regarding cell phone connection it's not impossible that he gave the phone somebody else that night, - it's not a crime to do so.

I would agree to the rest, that it's strongly likely that it was Bruckner.

It's also my guess that if it was Bruckner, he came planned and prepared. He may have had an accomplice, an unwitting accomplice, somebody the likes of telling him that the McCanns had reserved a table that night, etc… The accomplice may have been a co-worker with whom he did odd jobs around the apartment complex, he may have told the accomplice he wanted to burgle a place but would never tell he was interested in taking and molesting a child. Otherwise the accomplice would never have played along.

Bruckner knew that his thoughts and tendencies were very abnormal, and if he wanted to do this and get away with it he had to plan.

If Bruckner came prepared and had this planned he knew how much time he had. He most likely would have hidden the body at a place the police, not even the German police would ever suspect, somewhere in Portugal or Spain he's never been before, not the fresh water reservoir, not anywhere within a certain radius of where he lived or where the McCanns lived.

He had around 1 hour 30 minutes head start, so if he planned, I think he would have first driven for 1 hour 30 minutes away somewhere molested her in his car, and then killed her and hidden the body. If the police had road blocks he was already 1 hour 30 minutes gone, maybe 2 hours.

The legal situation in Germany is similar to everywhere else in Europe.

Bruckner is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. We all may think that he most likely did it, some even say they're 100% certain, but real evidence and proof, we all don't have. Otherwise the Germans won't be still investigating and digging.

For all this you first need a body, and you would need to match Bruckner's DNA and fingerprints to the victim.

Just owning a USB stick with pictures ( he could argue having gotten from somebody and this somebody denies it out right…) or a cell phone registered to Bruckner connected to a transmitter close to the McCanns also doesn't prove murder. A possible conversation with another convict in jail would most likely be discounted as evidence in a court of law or discredited quickly by the defence. The jail convict in question is from Romania and doesn't even speak German or Engish fluently, so how could he understand what Bruckner was really talking about, apart from the fact that as a convict he isn't credible anyway…..

I would largly believe the German police are acting on the pictures on the USB stick and thus are fairly certain that Madeleine is dead and was murdered.

If Bruckner had molested her, he would have had to kill her later on. He knew that from the beginning. Too many traces to him, too much DNA, too much risk for Bruckner, so killing and hiding where she was never to be found would have been the only choice. And the next other only choice is to have a head start as much as possible.

By the time the police in Portugal set up road blocks Bruckner had already molested Madeleine, had killed her, and hidden the body well. He would also have had time to clean his car.

I would also guess that the police were on to him rather late, thus he'd have more than a head start on this. The police in Portugal first investigated the McCanns an their friends at the restaurant that night.

I'd say the difference is only between "he did it" and my opinion that "he most likely did it".

We also don't know what pictures the Germans do have. Is Bruckner identifiable in these pictures or not? Lot's of information is held back for tactical reasons.

The core question would be how to tie Bruckner to the crime so that it's watertight and a conviction is possible. There is also a strong reason, why they are searching for a body which leads me to believe that the pictures they have are legally not enough.

They need a body only to prove murder, but they don't need a body if they want to prove that Bruckner abducted her. But apparently they can't prove either that Bruckner abducted her?

They know that time is running out as Bruckner is supposed to be released.

I don't know. They should probably castrate him to be on the safe side. As far as I know there is only electronic monitoring if there is some form of early release. I think he wouldn't get far due to lack of own finances. Apparently there is an outstanding fine for him to pay, which he doesn't seem to be able to. Depending upon this payment the release date is either later this year, or if not early next year.

There was word about him going to some 3rd world country and get a face job so nobody would recognize him anymore. The information is from some interview. However nothing is confirmed. Maybe it's somewhere online, I don't know.

As far as I know currently the state attorney in Germany doesn't have enough evidence to have Bruckner indicted. This why they kept looking and digging, in Portugal and in Germany.