Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Connacht Team Talk Thread VI - Some like it TOH

1511512514516517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭SqueakyKneecap


    I'll never forget that Bundee tackle on Sexton. I knew from that moment Connacht wouldn't be caught that glorious day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Interesting read on the premiership salary cap and player incomes.

    https://media-cdn.cortextech.io/b64ee24f-dd74-4648-a7a2-47ea3f4c3559.pdf

    No surprise that all the nasty little mouthy hobbits get paid the least 🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I'm actually very surprised by that. Considering how important a position it is I'd have expected them to be much higher up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,027 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    From RugbyPass today.

    Former Ireland centre and Lions tourist Jared Payne, who is an assistant coach with URC rivals the Scarlets, has emerged as the new favourite to take over as Connacht boss.

    New Zealand-born Payne, 39, moved into coaching with Ulster in 2018 after being forced into retirement when he failed to recover from an injury suffered on the 2017 Lions tour to his homeland.

    He spent a year working in France for Clermont Auvergne after leaving Ulster in 2022 and was placed in interim charge when Jono Gibbes left, and he is known to be highly thought of by IRFU performance director David Humphreys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭lavrenti


    Limited Head Coach experience and we saw where that got us with Wilkins. He could surprise us all I guess. Don't like the idea of him getting the job coz he's a mate of Humphreys, who has been a walking disaster in all of his decision making since taking over from Nucifora. We should be breaking the bank to bring Lancaster in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I really like the Scarlets attack and I think he's by all accounts a very good coach and well regarded by the players. Had we not signed Rod Seib and we were signing Jared as our backs coach id be 100% happy no actually id be ecstatic.

    My main issue around the head Coach roles is that it appears we are unable to meet the financial demands of guys who have the necessary experience so we then have to take a small gamble on guys on the way up ( hopefully).

    I would prefer that type of appointment than a guy looking for a coaching life raft.

    Still think Dan Mc would be a good fit but I'd happily get on board with Jared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭briandebum


    Whether or not he turns out to be a good coach (And he could be good, who knows!), if they go for Payne it reeks of a terrible hiring process again. Going for guys familiar with the Irish system as opposed to just looking for the best coaching fit for Connacht rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    We don't really know the extent of the hiring process and are unlikely to ever know. But to assume it's a botched process because we don't know is a little tin hat imo.

    I believe that there are a lot of highly committed people working for both the irfu and Connacht who have far more skin in the game than any of us fans. I think they will do the very best they can to get the best candidate they can afford.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I would like to see it resolved as soon as possible though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Well Scarlets are doing well with a reduced squad and budget. Payne is part of that coaching team. It just might be a good fit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 2025Connacht


    Theres highly committed people working in every job it doesn't mean they are best placed to make important decisions.

    My worry is there's people involved in the decision making process who previously thought that Wilkins on a 3 year deal was good business. By all accounts it didn't seem as though much effort was put into casting the net wide when that decision was made.

    Regardless of how tight our budget was it was pretty obvious to the ordinary fan that Wilkins wasn't going to work out in a head coach role. Giving him the job at all was disappointing. As a stop gap maybe it was understandable but giving him a three year deal was madness.

    For me it looks like there's good work going on identifying under the radar signings and academy prospects in Connacht but until we give these lads a proper structure to realise their potential we will continue to have more frustrating seasons like the one just gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    "Theres highly committed people working in every job it doesn't mean they are best placed to make important decisions."

    Who do you suggest should make the decision so if not the highly committed people who work for the organizations involved?

    There's no guarantee of success in a hiring process. Anyone who has ever hired through any process knows it's a lottery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 2025Connacht


    I suggest that the record of recruiting coaches in recent times has been poor so evaluating who is making the recruitment decisions would be sensible.

    We can't afford to get the next decision wrong. Hopefully Millard coming in is a sign we have learned some lessons and we will have some kind of structure as to how we do our coaching recruitment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,689 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Has Humphreys got an input in who we take on now? It would be ridiculous if he did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭Tipp1991




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    We actually have a reasonable record of recruiting and retaining coaches.

    Lamb, McFarland, Carolan, Duffy and Friend have all been very good appointments.

    Granted we have a few in the other side of the ledger (ahem Keane) as well but it's unlikely we get it right all the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 2025Connacht


    A lot of those appointments are going back over a decade. McFarland is gone for over a decade. There was lots of success stories around then coaching wise but of late we have at best a mixed record in recruitment and a terrible record in retention of coaches.

    We undoubtedly made some good appointments in more recent times too like Senekal and we brought through coaches from the academy like Mossie Lawlor but they didn't wait around long.

    Some of our coaches are promising given the right setup as shown by Ulster being willing to snap up Mark Sexton but it seems that promising coaches don't feel they can realise their potential at Connacht which is a problem.

    Yet again this summer is a revolving door of coaches as has become the norm of late.

    Teams with continuity within their setup are invariably the teams that are most successful but we enter next season once again in transition hoping that we hit the ground running rather than having any confidence we will.

    Like you say every appointment is a gamble and every team gets some wrong but with every gamble you make you want to reduce the risk of it being a failure as much as you can.

    When the ordinary supporter knows that an appointment is going to be a failure and you give that head coach a 3 year deal, it would be foolish to think that the current recruitment process doesn't needs to be reviewed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,689 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    My club decides whose the coach. Every AIL club decides whose the top man.

    Did the IRFU decide that Leo Cullen would be Leinster's head coach? I don't think so.

    So tell me why the Connacht board shouldn't decide on the coach? Who picked Wilkins? Whoever it was should be sacked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭The Moist Buddha


    The IRFU 100% decided the Cullen would be Leinsters head coach



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭Tipp1991


    Your club isn't owned by the IRFU.

    Leinster would have originally appointed Leo as an assistant coach but the decision to make him head coach would have been an IRFU appointment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,689 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I would be confident that Leinster decided who the head coach was going to be. If you want to believe otherwise you are also entitled to your opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I'm sure that the Connacht board will have plenty of input but the IRFU will be hiring the Connacht head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,689 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    So if we end up with another crap coach us fans demand that Humphreys loses his job?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Look I'm not trying to pick an argument with you but how can I possibly discuss the quality of lack thereof in Connacht Coaches particularly when we are discussing the head coach with out going back a decade? There have only been 4 in a decade.

    Continuity of coaching leads to success you say but that's exactly what was done with the appointment of Wilkins. Continuity. Successful coaches by dint of that success don't move on quickly so that continuity may be a result of the success instead of the cause of the success.

    My only point is that I trust the process to select a suitable candidate, we can then argue the success or failure of that candidate based on results.

    We could get a top coach if we had lots of money but it's pretty unlikely that we would be attractive or the only suitor for a top coach even if we had the money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 2025Connacht


    That's fine we obviously just fundamentally disagree on this which is fair enough. Not trying to be hostile.

    In terms of continuity the point I was making (probably badly) is that we are churning through coaches like there's no tomorrow and we aren't building strong fundamentals as a result as we are tearing up the script every other season. When you look at the 22/23 coaching team if you exclude Eric in the academy all that remains in Tucker. Its a long list of different voices the players have been listening to over the last few seasons but with no real continuity in any area.

    We've been through a world of different coaches since the 5 you listed and that needs to be our focus. 3 of those 5 weren't head coaches.

    What has happened in the short-medium term past is what's relevant to the current team and it's decline / stagnation. The point you make about successes does make sense though. Those coaches were with Connacht for an extended period and we got the benefits of that but I doubt anyone who was involved in upgrading Dan McFarland to assistant is still in a decision making role on the Connacht side of things. Carolan was in coaching in Connacht for years almost since the academy began I think and is a good example of how that continuity helped also. Probably Gerry Kelly and the board at the time brought them in and that's ancient history at this stage.

    There's a world of difference between building continuity as to what we are trying to do as a province like in the examples above and making a decision to hire an unsuitable head coach on a long term deal just because he's cheap and he's in the building already. Even doing that it was clear that to have any chance of even keeping us ticking over that Wilkins needed someone above him who knew the game. This is where I hope in time Millard will begin to put some structure to the chaos and we'll have a long term coaching strategy and a coaching team with defined roles again rather than the piece meal patchwork approach of recent times.

    Aside from Wilkins, Keane was obviously a very knowledgeable rugby man and had a good CV but if his job interview was anything like the interviews he gave as Connacht coach in particular post Cardiff 2017 you'd have to question who was doing that interview.

    Friend was generally positive but hardly an unqualified success either. Undoubtedly a nice man with great charm who has a good philosophy on the game and indeed life but if we are being pragmatic we definitely didn't have a hard edge under him and that has continued into Wilkins tenure. As examples, the lack of structure from a defensive perspective, the feeling that the players didn't want to have to do the dirty side of the game, the mid game meltdowns etc. are all recurring trends.

    I hope that Millard coming in is an admission from the Connacht hierarchy that what we have been doing hasn't been working and that we need someone with a suitable background overseeing the playing side of things. He'll need time to put a structure to that. In the meantime lets see what the next few weeks throws up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Also not looking for conflict It's only a bit of off season discussion for entetrtainment but I find it difficult to ignore the obvious double speak in your point of view. There's plenty I do agree with in what you say. Eg.Millard,

    You want change but also continuity.

    You want new coaches but complain about coaching churn. Pick a side and we can discuss it, we might even agree.

    I see it as a fairly straightforward situation. We had a coaching failure and now we need to recruit and go again. No one knows how extensive the recruitment process is or isn't and no one knows if the next setup will be a success or not.

    I'm not going to be negative for the sake of it. I'll give whatever setup they put in place support at least until I see how it goes.

    Like I've no idea how Rod Seib will get on but I'm not going to dis the appointment until I get a look at how it goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭Tipp1991


    Decided would be a no. They can make a recommendation but as its an IRFU funded position, the final call rests with them.

    There would be very little point in the IRFU having a High Performance Director who has "ultimate responsibility for the delivery of integrated high-performance systems for the benefit of Irish Rugby, with world-class elite player development pathways, world-class coaching, world-class support, all delivering consistent and sustained performance by the National Teams through excellence and innovation" if he doesn't have a say in who is coaching the playing pool for the Men's XV who are keeping the lights on in the IRFU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 2025Connacht


    Don't think it's double speak at all. If you want to read it that way fair enough. I've probably explained my point badly.

    All businesses need elements of continuity in terms of building systems that work but they also need to change what clearly doesn't work and need an appropriate setup to lead the vision they are looking to get to.

    In terms of having continuity under Wilkins we didn't have much. Wilkins by his own admission was incapable of managing the coaching team while he was also firefighting trying to be involved in areas of the coaching like defence where he shouldn't have had to be getting involved if the coaching setup was working. By his own admission he was trying to do many things and as a result was doing nothing to the level he'd like. A head coach shouldn't feel in a position where they feel alone and without an appropriate person to relay their concerns to and rightly or wrongly that's clearly how Wilkins felt. How we ended up in that position is worrying.

    In terms of continuity with the likes of Senekal, Lawlor, Sexton etc it was clear Connacht could do with keeping these lads but they didn't feel they could progress their careers at Connacht which is a problem. With the likes of Lawlor and Sexton especially they learned a lot on the job with Connacht but someone else is the main beneficiary of the lessons they learned. Keeping those lads is the continuity you want to have.

    In terms of change you change when it's obvious that people are out of their depth e.g. Fardy or that there is nobody suitable in the building to take on the head coach role and lead the coaching setup. To me it was obvious that Wilkins was a completely unsuitable choice as head coach even with a limited budget and if you surveyed supporters at the time I think a large majority would have been similarly circumspect. That's not to say supporters know best as we clearly don't but in that instance it was obviously an unsuitable appointment at best and the three year element was the particularly crazy thing when there were so many question marks hanging over his suitability for the role.

    I'll get behind whoever they appoint now as I think we have taken small steps to rectify the mistakes of the past but i'm just not as positive as you are that the process of finding that person is going to give us the best chance of finding the best candidate for the role.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭Tipp1991


    I do think that a new coach will be announced for Connacht sooner rather than later.

    With the IRFU having appointed McMillan in the past couple of months, they know exactly what coaches are out there and are available



Advertisement