Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1437438440442443595

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Russia has massed 50,000 troops at the border with the Kharkiv region, — Sky News

    Analysts say that among them are some of the most experienced and elite units, including airborne troops. Reports suggest that Russia has a four-month window to achieve a breakthrough before the weather worsens and Soviet-era equipment stocks run low.

    They also reckon they can keep going similar to this pace for 2 years. There's not a chance Putin will give up any of this summer or next summer for a ceasefire. Probably will attack for summer 2027 as well. In my head I can't see Russia even contemplating end the war until another 3 summers of attacks have been completed. Will that be enough to conquer the rest of Donetsk region? Possibly but that depends on support.

    "EU may buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine" - Bloomberg

    Amid Trump’s reluctance to back Kyiv and Europe’s limited stockpiles, EU leaders are considering purchasing American arms to supply the Ukrainian military.

    Trump probably knows this and wants the EU to sign an arms deal with the US worth a few hundred billion. One positive is with a weaker dollar buying American weapons is cheaper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,596 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    A Russian degenerate bragging to his online followers that there's Ukrainian child girls just waiting to be collected by any Russian man that wants any. This is in the Russian occupied parts of Ukraine. He says the parents need food and money. So he took the girl off their hands.

    In the comments people understand now why American paedophiles now want to travel to Russia in the present time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,267 ✭✭✭ilkhanid




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,168 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Putin's idea of help is flattening the cities, sending the menfolk off to die as cannon fodder and using women and children as slaves.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,562 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think this is the bit that exposes the lie of going in to protect "russians" utterly without any counter being available.

    You don't save people by flattening cities and mining the ground for generations to come.

    It's use as a whataboutism renders the posts of those users worthless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,168 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russian "protection" has been immensely worse for those regions than whatever military and security Ukraine activity was engaged in after 2014. Activity only necessary because of Russia fomenting trouble.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @RoyalCelt

    In my head I can't see Russia even contemplating end the war until another 3 summers of attacks have been completed. Will that be enough to conquer the rest of Donetsk region? Possibly but that depends on support.

    Even asking the question of whether Russia could conquer the rest of the Donetsk region in three Summers of offensives shows what a failure the Russian war effort has been. They had been looking to conquer the whole of Ukraine in a few weeks when they first attacked in 2022. By anyone's reckoning that has to be a serious revision of objectives in the face of unexpectedly tough resistance. And this is with dwindling American support, which was supposed to be the death knell for Ukraine.

    At this point, the reason for Russia continuing to push in Ukraine has nothing much to do with the potential rewards of that reduced victory and more to do with internal Russian politics. Like Netanyahu in Israel, it's a key pillar propping up his position to be a wartime president where meaningful change cannot occur until the conflict has been brought to an end. If it cannot end in victory for Russia, then it cannot end for Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I hope you're right but it won't be much solace to Ukraine if the war ends and Donetsk is conquered. Even after 5 year's of war.

    If the war lasts another 2 years Europe needs to get the finger out now so that Ukraine can have a military edge come 2027. To the point where Russia wants a ceasefire and Ukraine doesn't because they are the ones making gains.

    By then you'll be looking at a 18 more months of trump and the potential for American support to increase after the next election.

    I firmly believe if the future of Ukraine is to be secured then Crimea must lose it's land bridge to Russia.

    What's the point of ending it and then 6 year's later an 80 year old Putin with a rebuilt Russian army comes back for more..

    Edit: In my mind Europe isn't taking this seriously until systems like the Taurus have been handed over. Stop letting them fight with a hand behind their back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,202 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I have heard republicans are wargaming Krasnov being impeached. The midterms might change things considerably.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,870 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Wonder are many of those Republicans who are up for the midterms now realizing the situation they may find themselves in.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭briany


    As the invasion began, the original conversation was 'how long can Ukraine hold out?'. We weren't talking about which bit of Ukraine Russia might be able to take and hold. We were talking about how long it would be until Russian forces could reach Kyiv, lay siege and wrest the entire country under its control.

    With respect to the original war objectives, which seem now to be almost forgotten, who's coming out the better? Which side would have more readily taken the 2025 situation if they'd had a crystal ball? Ukraine, who still have a country (albeit partially occupied), or Russia, who remain bogged down in the east?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Do you not think that Russia are concentrating on that region considering the regions involved?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The objective of Russia in 2022 was to take the entirety of Ukraine. This was clear from the three-pronged attack they launched in February of that year and the beeline they made toward Kyiv.

    The main reason Russia now concentrate on the Donbas is because this the region their forces are closest to, making it a logistical no-brainer. I'm sure they would like to try for Odessa and other cities, but they lack the capacity to get their ground forces near them.

    In light of this, Russia now pretends that the Donbas was always the objective, but this is really just a face-saving measure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Ah no it wasnt,there was, never mention of that only in Western media. The "Beeline" towards Kiev was to try push that Kiev to an agreement. Taking the west never made any sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,903 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Jaysus, I've heard it all now. I suppose Hitler didn't really want France and Belgium in 1940 when they made a beeline for Dunkerque, all he wanted was a distraction for the American media so he could take Luxembourg?

    After your earlier claim that the Russians were invited to provide help in Eastern Ukraine, and now this, it's very hard to take anything you say seriously.

    What whopper will you be spouting next? That you aren't a Russian stooge and you just want peace?

    Here's an easy way to achieve it, pack up along with the rest of your Russian comrades and go back to Russia. Then it all stops immediately.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,201 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Moscow is one of the most fascinating Cities that I've been in, for sure. !0 years would not be enough to see all that it has to show. But the Republics are a different matter..chalk and cheese come to mind, and I've spent a lot of time in different Republics, including Chechnya, where there's still ample evidence of Putin's Russki Mir. But not only Russia, how about Afghanistan & Syria to name just 2 other beneficiaries of Russki Mir? It's one thing to be in a city that's being bombed by Russian Bombers, and hear Lavrov, Solovyov, Simonyan, Mardan et al boasting on TV that Russia doesn't attack civilians, while I see with my own eye's what death and destruction Typical Russki Mir has brought. No,Mulbot, we definitely were not experiencing the same Russia. I lived in and saw the real Russia.You obviously didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭briany


    If they wanted an agreement, Kyiv wasn't prepared to give one, and any invading country could say that their actions were really about forcing concessions if the invaded country instantly agrees to their demands. This didn't happen in the case of Ukraine - Russia were beaten back from Hostomel airport, which they were trying to capture as a forward operating base to fly heavy armour into, and they were stopped in the south at Mykolaiv before they could get near Odessa.

    Not every part of a country needs to be taken for a successful invasion. The key things are to take the administrative centres, knock out the leadership and with it the opposition's ability to coordinate and defend against you, which were all objectives at which the Russians failed and which led them to their revising of war aims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Lol. The Russians were just heli dropping elite airborne units at hostamel and sprawling out miles long armored convoy as what? A negotiation tactic? All that spiel from Putin that Ukraines government isn't legit and full of nazis? To get the upper hand in peace talks?

    I don't think I've ever heard such delusion in my life.

    You can't possibly believe that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,751 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Ahh I see we are back to the whole Russia attacking Kyiv was just a feint again

    Do you guys ever change the script?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    So push to Kyiv purely for negotiations benefit, where negotations have previously failed....

    ...negotiations fail again....

    .…retreat from Kyiv at great expense....

    .…profit?

    ….spend the next 3 years in a slow grinding war of attrition....

    .…more profit?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Are you saying that Pushilin and Pasechnik never asked Russia to intervene.? Problem is, you really haven't much of a clue about those areas, you can repeat all this "Michael Clarke" nonsense and try look like you know everything and everyone else is wrong,but when you start this Russian stooge talk, you just come across as uneducated about the subject.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,296 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Why doesn't Ukraine make a beeline for Moscow , it's a short drive, length of UK. Head straight into the lions den, kill em that way .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,296 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    1 hour in a F16, FLY LOW, straight to Moscow, loaded with every thing you've got,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭mulbot


    So Ukraine has the capability to do this? but as we see a few posts up, we're told Russia couldn't do same to Kiev?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,562 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Pushilin and Pasechnik were very much a part of the pro-corruption East looking old guard in Ukraine, had putin not, you know, invaded in 2014, then there might have been compromises reached after Maidan. They oversaw the citizens of their regions be massively displaced (prior to 2022) and later destroyed (2022 onwards).

    Needless to say, Ukrainians West and East now utterly hate russia for what they have done to their country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,296 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭mulbot


    The Minsk agreements were where the compromises were to be honoured.

    Those in the eastern regions that are now under Russian control definitely don't hold that last view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,562 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    russia had already undermined those agreements, leading many to flee the oblasts, how could Ukraine honour them when russia was actively working against them? russia had been setting them up to fail and then used the excuse (and Merkel's weakness) to cause further conflict culminating in a failed invasion of all of Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,296 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Why doesn't Ukraine blow up the 50,000 troops gathering on border waiting to attack



Advertisement