Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Eurovision Song Contest 2025 - Mod warning in the OP

1111112113114116

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,466 ✭✭✭✭2smiggy


    hahahahahahaha, if they are so loved by the rest of Europe, why do they have to play a recorded audience sound when ever they are shown ? the most despised nation on earth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 181 ✭✭Libertine07


    Getting back to the contest...

    Despite being a very unpredictable year, I think the regulars on this thread made some good calls that went against the perceived wisdom of the odds and the fan bubble.

    Many of us thought the risky songs of Finland, Malta and Australia were overhyped, and that Sweden were not nailed on for the win. I also think many of us appreciated Italy which was totally dismissed by the fandom (personally it was one of my favourites all season so I'm really happy with their result). The fan community really has some blind spots.

    I am surprised that Estonia got top 3 as I thought the juries would absolutely hate it, so that's a bit of a head scratcher. It was very entertaining though.

    Austria is a worthy winner and they have relatively recent experience hosting the event, so hopefully we get a good show in Vienna/Graz/Innsbruck. Very likely that Conchita will be one of the hosts.

    Obviously there is a bit of a cloud over the contest right now and I hope the EBU have had a much needed wake up call.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Definitely the poorest year since 2011 I'd say, which was reflected in the scattered results. Austria is the lowest scoring winner for quite some time.

    I'm still shocked about Estonia finishing third, but not surprising it got such a high televote when there wasn't a whole lot for people to vote for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭supereurope


    I remember how toxic this place became last year, so I've stayed away since Friday morning. Ready to dip my toe back in (and I'm relieved to see it's still open for comments.)

    First off, I didn't watch the grand final. Not for protest reasons, but for family reasons. I've known since November that I had a family event on the 17th of May so watching the grand final was never going to happen. I wasn't overly bothered, partly because of last year's mess, but partly because it makes for a nice parallel for me. My cousin got married the day of Eurovision 1989, the previous time Switzerland hosted, so 8-year-old me was at the reception and couldn't watch the contest. I'm a bit older now, but family commitments again kept me away from a Eurovision in Switzerland.

    I will watch the show during the week, all I've seen so far was the results announcements on YouTube. There's lots to unpick even from that, and I think we need to talk about the "girlbop."

    When it comes to fandom, the girlbop seems to be the genre that gets the most attention. The YAS QUEEN SLAY fans tend to make up a disproportionate of fans online, and it doesn't help that Wiwibloggs, the biggest fansite, doesn't seem to care about any song that isn't an pop song sung by a young woman. So this year it was all about Malta and Finland. I've already said plenty about Malta this Eurovision season, and I won't lie, after all their "We're not doing a play on words, we've never heard this "Serving c*nt" phrase of which you speak, we just want to celebrate our language and serve singing"-schtick, it was a little satisfying to see Miriana look crestfallen when she received just eight points from the televote.

    There were plenty of Eurovision fans who still can't accept that "our Queen" Erika Vikman didn't win UMK in 2020, and I remember the horrible abuse Axel received for daring to beat the fan favourite. Erika finally had her moment with "Ich Komme", but voters clearly thought it was nothing amazing and she didn't even make the top 10. if anyone had predicted a finish outside the top 10 for Erika two weeks ago, they likely would have been hounded off social media.

    Because fans make up a bigger proportion of voters during the semis, girlbops have a good record of making the final, but once Saturday comes, their votes are watered down by Mr O'Shea from Tullamore, Mrs Smith in Sevenoaks or Mrs Fischer in Düsseldorf, people who vote in the final but who see Eurovision as a one-night event.

    Last year was similar - the big girlbops from Cyprus, Greece and Austria all finished outside the top 10 in the final.

    TL;DR: as @Libertine07 said above, much of the fandom completely loses the run of itself when it hears a 'girlbop', but the voters don't seem that interested, and the fandom doesn't seem to realise that they're only a small percentage of total voters come May.

    Some other quick thoughts:

    • I would have thought Olly's disappointing result last year might have led to countries avoiding being so overtly sexual. It didn't, with Malta, Australia and Finland all going for smut. It worked for none of them. When it comes to Eurovision, sex doesn't sell.
    • Please, please, please reduce the voting window. I know there many discussions about the voting to come, but this is unrelated to that. There is no need for the voting window to be all contest long plus 40 minutes after that. If you like, say, the fifth song on, but you don't vote for it after 90 minutes, you're not going to vote for it 30 minutes later. I'm old enough to remember when the lines were open for five minutes. Either make the voting window all contest long plus 15 minutes, or open the lines for 20 minutes after the final song. We don't need four intervals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,530 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    I was just reading about the Austrian song...there are three writers on it, one of them is Teya! She competed alongside Salena in 2023 for Austria with the absolute TUNE "who the hell is Edgar?" Poe Poe Poe...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    @supereurope

    At least you got to enjoy the craic here for the Semi Finals.

    'girlbop' is a new one for me… did Luxembourg also fall into that category?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Very easy to move a vote over to one entry TBH.

    if just 10% of the people voted Israel, then you have a score of 12, remember this is a competition with 26 acts, if one gets 10% of the vote it automatically goes to the top of the score board.

    Really RTÉ need to release the vote, including the number of voters.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,466 ✭✭✭✭2smiggy


    or a vote for the country that you don't want to win. Let them try to manipulate that vote



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 10,707 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    Now it’s Monday morning and other stuff is in my head, the songs I’m still thinking about are France, which was the standout for me. I think they should have won. Italy, Estonia, Denmark and Finland are again still with me.

    Estonia was great. Funny, entertaining and an ear worm. Austria sounds great on the Eurovision playlist. I think the visuals killed it for me. The last minute or so too is a bit OTT.

    Denmark was an absolute banger. We needed more party songs like that this year. They weren’t going to win with it but it’s an ear worm as well. Finland blew me away on first hearing. I like songs that change direction a bit so I enjoyed it. It has no lasting power though but great performance from Erika and the Fins are always great value for money really. We needed these OTT standouts really.

    Post edited by squonk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There'd have to be a concerted social media campaign co-ordinating a "stop country X from winning" … where it's agreed to back one of the other favourites with your public votes. If people can be mobilised to vote for country X, it might generate that response next time.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭taratee


    Voted for Israel and Luxembourg in the final. Thought the Luxembourg song and performance was excellent, worthy of a top ten finish. Those of us who have the ability to view the contest as a light-hearted song concert will all agree that the Israeli entry deserved to finish in the top two. Yuval was amazing. 

    I've seen lots of lies being written about the reception that the Israeli entry received on the night. Below is a recording of the entry made in the arena. Looking forward to Vienna in 2026 already.

    On a side note, is it time for Ireland to take some time away from the competition? Was listening to people in the music industry here and it is abundantly clear that the financial and logistical demands that comes with hosting the final could prove to be too much for the country.

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,861 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think this would very hard to organize and a great shame if the competition goes in this direction. I dont want pro and anti Israeli campaigns being run every year. I see RTVE, the Spanish public broadcaster has called for an urgent debate on the televote process at the Eurovision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I agree. I wasn't urging anyone to start such a campaign, just mentioning it as a possible consequence.

    It would be better if EBU heeds such calls and looks at the televote process e.g. reduce the device limit of 20 votes, look at whether it makes sense to allow voting all the way through the contest etc.
    I'd prefer to keep the 50-50 jury televote split but something has to give.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,861 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I would agree. I think the pro-israeli campaigns have just been so effective the last two years that they have made the public vote a bit of a farce. If nothing changes it will be the same thing next year. Reducing the votes from devices would be a good idea or changing the weight between jury and public votes. Making the winning about the song.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 181 ✭✭Libertine07


    If you vote through the app it's linked to your payment card, so if you have a regular debit card, and a credit card, and Revolut, you can vote 60 times. The Revolut virtual cards make it even worse. This is how Israel have racked up the points this year and last. Average viewers are only voting a handful of times.

    I think the limit needs to be far lower than 20, or if you keep it at 20 limit how many times someone can vote for the same song.

    Advertising campaigns for any entry need to be banned outright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭supereurope


    I'm old enough to remember the 2000s at Eurovision. It was the era of 100% televoting, when gimmicks, novelty, and bloc and diaspora voting dominated. While viewers in that era mostly got it right when choosing a winner, it was elsewhere on the scoreboard where the problems were. Terrible songs qualifying for the final over better ones or terrible songs finishing in the top 10 giving them automatic passage to the grand final the following year, so they didn't even have to try and make an effort with their songs.

    After the televote winners were denied the overall win in 2023 and 2024, fans have been raising their voices on social media about how the juries are outdated, too conservative, have no idea of modern music and therefore should be abolished in the grand final as well. These fans are mainly younger fans who weren't around or have no memory of the 2000s, but feel there was an injustice that the "people's champion" didn't win two years in a row and have been outspoken that it's time to remove juries from the contest completely.

    Those voices have been very quiet since Saturday night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭supereurope


    My definition of a "girlbop" is: a young woman with big hair and a tight outfit singing an uptempo pop song with lots of dancing, hair-whipping and elaborate staging. The singer will be referred to as a "Queen" by many in the fandom and she won't sing or perform on stage, she will "slay" or "serve c*nt."

    I wouldn't classify Luxembourg as a girlbop.

    I appreciate others will have a different definition :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭thebronze14


    No bias in your voting judging by your signature at the bottom alright🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Totally agree re: advertising and that's a good idea on the limit, shouldn't be 20 for same song for sure.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭taratee


    There isn't. I didn't vote for Israel last year. Didn't like the song, so I didn't vote for it. Liked the song and the Luxembourg song this year, so I voted for both. If no song tickles my fancy next year, I won't vote for any.

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Cheers, ok yeah Luxembourg and Ireland etc wouldn't fall into that category then - pop songs but not enough "bop".
    Poland had "bop" but not "girlbop".
    Spain seems like it might be "girlbop" to me.

    And then France, Switzerland, Greece not pop\bop.
    The UK trio too musically.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 10,707 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    Funny. I was having a conversation with a friend last night and had the opposite opinion, ie that the public had no idea of God music as a bloc and just voted for the silliest act it whatever pet project they were into. The ratio jory to public shoukd be 50:50’atbleast. I’d go 70:30 really negate public voted kill competitions like this. Whatever we agree or disagree with each other in here we’ve all listened to the sins as there were sounded along the way it at least watched the semis. Many just watch the final. I think that’s where the livid vote falls down. Songs like France thst are slow and artistic will suffer and people won’t have a chance to moon below the surface. That’s where the jury’s are useful but it’s no use if the song will still get steamrolled by the public in the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Maybe they should make a bigger deal of presenting a jury award prize.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭supereurope


    Yes, I would categorise Spain as a "girlbop", but certainly not France, Greece, Switzerland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭Put It In H


    Since the introduction of the semi-finals, Ireland has participated in 19 semi finals and qualified from 7 of them (of which 2/7 were Jedward!) That's <37% success rate, and tbh I think most of those NQ's were deserved.

    The only one I would argue strongly should have qualified was Molly Sterling in 2015; she made top ten with jury but was sadly buried by televote.

    I thought Emmy this year was somewhat unlucky, in that neither the song nor the performance was truly awful, but neither was it truly great; it was all just "ok", and that wasn't enough to stand out on the night.

    For other years I thought the song was good enough but the live performance didn't work (Lesley Roy in 2021), whereas other times the performance was good but the song just wasn't good enough (Brooke Scullion 2022, Sinéad Mulvey 2009).

    And then there were the years where neither song nor performance deserved anything (Donna & Joe 2005, Nicky Byrne 2016, Sarah McTernan 2019, Wild Youth 2023). I feel like Wild Youth could have been a decent entrant if they sent something with more of an indie-rock sound but they made the mistake of trying to look like and sound like what they thought Eurovision was, rather than just be themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,642 ✭✭✭✭Welsh Megaman


    If you had said a week ago that Estonia would finish above Sweden, or that Switzerland would receive zero televotes, I would have called you ‘Verrückt’. 😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,582 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Oh God, I'm old enough to remember the 1980s Eurovision 🙈 no public got a say then from what I recall



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Here is the reason why televoting is a screwed up and unfair way of deciding the winner.
    Only 5% of the general viewing public watching Eurovision in a particular country are televoters. The other 95% don't give a crap.
    However, these 5% are a highly motivated group of voters.
    They can necessitate an extreme swing for whoever they are rooting for, or otherwise.
    If you imagine a room of 100 people and 99 of them vote once, and one of them votes 20 times, based on the math's, you could expect the one who voted 20 times to actually win."
    If a lot of Israelis or Armenians in say the UK or Ireland are highly motivated for their country to win Eurovision, they will vote multiple times thus skewing the televoting figures in the country they are phoning from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,530 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Totally agree on these all. Molly Sterling was hard done by and in some ways ahead of it's time.

    Brooke definitely could have done well with a better song, something like the below which she released not too long after for example is a tune.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,582 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    All competition that allows public voting is just a personality/country contest. Just look at the likes of dancing with the stars etc people will, in an awful lot of cases, just vote for who they like, or what country they want to win, rather then on the actual best song etc

    So the question is, do they stop public voting (will never happen, worth too much money) or do they try to 'control' it better?

    One phone number, one vote kind of thing. Also, shortening the amount of time for votes.

    But would there be willingness to do it, how much did they make on the votes anyone know?



Advertisement