Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2024 - Dublin STILL ranked as second worst city in the Europe for traveling by car

12346

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,928 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    There have been many in depth traffic analysis done by the crowd that runs the M50.

    Most traffic that's on it, is on it for approx 2 junctions, and the the final destination and origin of the vehicles is not close by to any given junction (Bar traffic getting off at Red Cow and Ballymount)

    Putting a Bus Lane on M50 would servre little to no one.

    The M50 wasn't "upgraded". Upgraded implies big improvements were made. The only major improvement was removing the barrier tolling so traffic could flow.

    The extra lanes are ok, but the problem is the appalling overpass designs put in, particularly at J7 and J9. There isn't enough length on the slip road for vehicles to build up speed and merge. (Ironically this is where most of the HGV traffic joins the M50 after the tunnel). On top of that there are 2 many slip roads.

    In 2005/2006 there were between 110,000 and 125,000 journeys on it (The M50) daily. 20 years later, that number is up to about 155,000. That's barely a 20% increase in usage and it's still appalling.

    In fact according to DCC canal cordan report, Private vehicle traffic in Dublin has been on the decline for 20 years. Bicycle traffic has been stagnant for 10 years despite millions invested. Bus and Rail Usage is on the up

    But the number of people that enter the city between the hours of 7am and 10am hasnt changed a whole lot in 20 years at roughly 200,000 per day.

    In Nutshell, we've roughly the same amount of vehicles and despite making improvements, things seem to be getting worse… which is very questionable to me given all the public money spent on Infra that doesn't seem to be delivering.

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    When did QBCs become QBRs?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There is no way you can go from North County to South County quicker on a bus than you can in a car on the M50. Its not even close.

    So drive on the M50 - that is what it was built for. I would highly contest the idea that "most" people travel cross city for work and would be curious to see any corroboration of this.

    Ultimately the primary issue with congestion is with travel into and out of the city, which should have 100% bus priority the whole way if at all possible. For those journey, many of them at least, buses can already be significantly faster if on some trunk routes. Convenience is more of a personal preference, but I personally find it a lot more convenient 99% of the time not to have a car with me.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    and many people also drive cause they are lazy.

    The metro is absolutely part of the answer though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    An Underground absolutley is the answer, which is why so many people currently drive.

    QBCs cannot take over the entire road nerwork and they do not serve the M50.

    There is only so much buses can do to support commuters and it clearly isnt enough to give many drivers a viable alternative.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,335 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Yup, a Metro will be a great solution that will help future generations get around without having to purchase a private vehicle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You could put in a congestion charge between the canals, but where would the park and rides be?

    Buses have QBCs already. They are stiil slower than cars unless you are literally on a straight run into town.

    Unless you remove cars completely from within the canals, there simply isnt the road space to give QBCs exclusivley to buses with 100% route coverage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Exactly. I have 7 work colleagues in London, all living in zones 2 and 3. None have a car and they all use the tube to get to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,545 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Copied and pasted from one free article on the Irish Times ...

    "Sensing some cut-through from “the silent majority”, the Lib Dems are proposing a ban on anyone who booms out songs and TV shows on public transport, or at stations or bus stops and plan to enforce it with fines of £1,000 (€1,175).

    It’s hardly an original idea. Three months ago in France, a middle-aged man was on a call with his sister in a quiet area of Nantes station when a railway employee threatened him with a €150 fine if he didn’t turn off the loudspeaker. When he didn’t pay up on the spot the fine soared to €200. Lawyers have been engaged.

    Portugal’s transport authority has just announced fines of between €50 and €250 for passengers making excessive mobile phone noise, also known as an offence against civility."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    What bus routes have uninterrupted QBCs already?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    None. Thats the point. They never will and thats one of the reasons they will never be quicker than cars.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    But that is only because our leaders have allowed the prioritisation of the car over everything else. All it would take is a little forward planning and some backbone to change that prioritisation. The original BusConnnects plans looked in this direction but NIMBY residents and their elected representatives didn't want drivers put out.
    Christ, look at the hostility from them if anyone suggests a cycle path somewhere!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Why won’t they have uninterrupted QBCs plus bus priority where needed?
    Isn’t that the point of the BC infrastructure works?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If every bus on the BC route had 100% road coverage, how would the cars get around?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Cars would be banned from half the road network if every bus had its own dedicated roadway.

    How would cars even get out of their driveway, if you lived on a bus lane?

    It's never going to happen, which is why an underground is the actual solutuon.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Dublin with its low density sprawl cannot justify the astronomical costs of a full underground metro despite your constant moaning that it is the only solution. Dedicated bus corridors would still be required even if we had a large underground metro network



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    They would use diversions or be allowed pass once the bus has passed uninterrupted ie a bus gate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,354 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Have you ever been to Dublin? I can only assume no, because if you had, and ever had to use public transport during peak hours especially, you would know better than to make such an absurd statement.

    I used to live in Dublin full time before the pandemic and every public transport option in the city was absolutely rammed at peak times, both Luas lines, the DART, many buses and at least some of the Commuter lines.

    The awful, underdeveloped, overcrowded public transport and the housing mess were two inter-related problems that from my memory just kept going to bad to worse. Dublin needed a proper metro system and massive expansions of the DART 20 years ago, to say nothing of today, or 20 years from now.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Dublin is hardly sprawling.

    15km from the airport takes you pretty much anywhere in the city/suburbs.

    Bus corridors are fine, I have no issue with them at all. They just are not the solution to a city that will be pushing 2 million population in less than 15 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You are actually suggesting that every bus route in Dublin has 100% road space assigned to buses only?

    It is never going to happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    100%.

    Its not that we shouldn't encourage bus corridors and cycle lanes; of course we should.

    However, We cant rely on them as the primary solution and those transport modes are already at breaking point.

    The population is going to get a lot bigger, bar an economic disaster.

    If we dont get a metro network started in the near future & actually show the world that we are serious about being an Alpha city, Dublin will gridlock itself and investment will simply go elsewhere, followed quickly by our high paid jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    That is still a huge amount of roadspace. How many linear KMs does that equate to?

    There is zero chance that all of that roadspace is going to be allocated bus only.

    And as long as the road is shared, the buses and the cars will both get delayed, with the buses obviously running slower than the cars, due to the majority of the routes being indirect from the passenger pespective and constant stopping and starting to load/offload passengers.

    Meanwhile, the population increases; which means more cars and more bus passengers, which means slower movement for all, but particularly for buses; as they cant take short cuts or diversions to avoid bottle necks.

    The end result is that the bus capacity maxes out and everyone else drives, with a smaller percentage cycling or walking.

    An underground introduces a completley new transport mode; one which is not inhibited by road traffic of any sort and can carry more people around the city, more quickly and without delay, vs any of the above ground options.

    It also offsets the road congestion for both buses and cars, by removing a significant proportion of commuters from the ground network.

    Therefore, it is the only viable solution when faced with a significant population growth, which will see County Dublin grow larger than the whole of Northern Ireland is today, probably within 15 years; and with a metro population closer to 3 million than 2 million.

    Without the Underground intervention, The bus network will simply grind to a halt and people will be forced back into cars.

    Post edited by BlueSkyDreams on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    That is still a huge amount of roadspace. How many linear KMs does that equate to?

    I’ve no idea but the more road space dedicated to busses the better tbh.

    There is zero chance that all of that roadspace is going to be allocated bus only.

    Why? That’s the plan.

    And as long as the road is shared, the buses and the cars will both get delayed, with the buses obviously running slower than the cars, due to the majority of the routes being indirect from the passaenger pespective and constant stopping and starting to load/offload passengers.

    Agreed that’s why QBCs are needed.

    Meanwhile, the population imcreases; which means more cars and more bus passengers, which means slower movement for all, but paricularly for buses; as they cant tale short cuts or diversions to avoid bottle necks.

    Again that’s why QBCs are a much more efficient way of moving more people as they prioritise busses which carry more people than cars.

    The end result is that the bus capacity maxes out and everyone else drives, with a smaller percentage cycling or walking.

    Which is why there will be more busses operating within a dedicated QBCs when all works are complete.

    An underground introduces a completley new transport mode; one which is not inhibited by road traffic of any sort and can carry more people, more quickly and without delay, vs any of the above ground options.

    Absolutely agree which is why metrolink is a thing and needs to be built.

    Without the Underground intervention, The bus network will simply grind to a halt and people will be forced back into cars.

    Nope.
    QBCs will free up road space for busses and make them more attractive for people to use vs cars.
    The other option is for car users to be stuck in traffic and watch as busses whizz past in their dedicated lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    QBCs are not going to represent 100% of the BC network. For that to be achieved, every metre of roadspace on the entire network needs to be 100% bus only.

    And even if we did somehow manage it, the rest of the much larger Dublin bus network will still be shared road space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    That’s fine.
    The more QBCs and bus priority there is the better, as this will improve speed, frequency and dependability in the bus system.
    This makes the bus more attractive and reliable, which increases the amount of people leaving their cars at home and choosing the bus or cycling, which frees up road space to improve traffic in the areas where there won’t be QBCs.
    It’s an upward spiral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Its an upward spiral with severe limitations.

    I cant think of a single bus route that is 100% bus route only. There is zero chance of the majority of bus routes ever reaching 100% coverage.

    The plan will fail because its scope is inherently limited; before you even start.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Have you ever been to Dublin? I can only assume no, because if you had, and ever had to use public transport during peak hours especially, you would know better than to make such an absurd statement.

    Leaving aside your snide crap, what part of my post was incorrect? That the cost for a metro network will be astronomical and expected to mainly serve low density areas or that QBCs will still be needed?

    I also made the point that it is not the only solution to Dublin's transport problems as is constantly being claimed by BSD

    I used to live in Dublin full time before the pandemic and every public transport option in the city was absolutely rammed at peak times, both Luas lines, the DART, many buses and at least some of the Commuter lines.

    I'm quite aware of what public transport in Dublin is like and how it has been massively underfunded over the decades and is still underfunded for what is required. What exactly has that to do with being critical of my point?
    To prove my point wrong, how much is the currently allocated funding for a metro network and how much of the network will it complete?

    The awful, underdeveloped, overcrowded public transport and the housing mess were two inter-related problems that from my memory just kept going to bad to worse. Dublin needed a proper metro system and massive expansions of the DART 20 years ago, to say nothing of today, or 20 years from now.

    I'm quite aware that Dublin needs a metro network. However, aside from some politicians mouthing off about getting one, there is nothing in place to make it happen. Looking at a proposed metro network map (from metrodublin.net), which are currently going to get built (as in have planning and funding)? Does the planned Airport route even have funding secured?

    image.png

    Now, getting back to my point which you criticised but didn't actually address, which of the above metro routes will not require a corresponding QBC?

    I also made the point that Dublin is largely comprised of low density areas - excluding the city centre, which of the above stops are not low density?

    Dublin is sprawling and it is quite naive to think that it isn't.
    As for your 15km from the airport, many suburbs in Dublin are not included in that radius (check 15KM from home for yourself) including many of the commuting suburbs…

    image.png

    Just to back up my claim that it is naive to think Dublin doesn't suffer from urban sprawl, these popped up on a google search:
    Irish Times: Major growth in urban sprawl around Dublin – The Irish Times
    NASA: Dublin’s Urban Expansion
    (if you actually bother searching, there are loads of articles, presentations and studies on Dublin's urban sprawl - it was even taught when I was in primary school FFS!) - Christ, our entire political approach to urban planning has steered us towards a car dependent population who face long commutes and have an incoherent and de-prioritised public transport system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    From O'Connell Bridge you can be basically anywhere in the suburbs within 15km, same for most places, even from the airport; which is actually very close to the city centre by international standards.

    Dublin might be urban sprawl by irish standards, but it is not a large land area at all. 5km to the east from OCB and you're in the sea FFS!

    An Underground network would not need to be large (by global standards) to provide effective coverage here.

    I agree that we have built planning around the car, but a metro system could still undo that, if the political will to build it can be found.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I read on another forum that a commuter from Sandyford was fed up of the overpacked Luas and now drives into the city centre and rents a parking space by the month.

    When you consider the thousands of apartments that are being built along the Green line, just on the south side, the Luas is going to fail capacity at peak times, possibly even some non-peak times.



Advertisement