Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Independent Golfer Ireland

12021222325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,071 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    The OP didn't say the green fee rate for the day was €25.

    They said they were charged €60 for the open, and "visitors were €25". I would take it that €25 was the visitors rate for the open. Most opens have a members rate and a visitors rate... The green fee for the day usually being higher than the open visitors rate.

    We don't know if the €60 they were charged was higher than the green fee rate though. It could be the case that the club is taking their green fee rate and adding something onto it as an admin fee for the open.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,101 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The 25 rate would only have been available to full Golf Ireland members, not Joe Public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,952 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    In essence what it amounts to is:

    OP gets iGolf membership

    OP expects that they should be getting the same discounted rate that other GI club members get for Open comps

    Clubs say, we don't recognise iGolf as being a club. So we're going to charge a standard green fee plus a competition fee for iGolfers to enter our open competitions.

    So for a GI club member it's maybe a breakdown of: 25 = 15 green fee + 10 comp fee

    For iGolfer it's maybe a breakdown of: 60 = 50 green fee + 10 comp fee.

    Whether you claim it's a money-spinner or agreeing reciprocal rates for opens between clubs is kind of irrelevant.

    For right or wrong, ultimately, the clubs want people joining clubs, not taking independent membership and expecting discounted green fees



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,903 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I'm booking various rounds around the country and seeing a norm of full rate for GI members on Open Days and they are not entered into the prizes unless a certain number of GI entrants on the day in which case there is a separate GI prize.

    In other words there is no difference between paying a visitor green fee on say, a Tuesday or playing an Open Day on a Wednesday as from a cost perspective and handicap maintenance there is no difference.

    Obviously easier to get out on an Open day.

    Seems perfectly reasonable to me

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    You have this in reverse. The comp fee was €25. Igolfers got charged the greenfee of €35 on top which is fair enough. Staff wages and upkeep costs don't pay for themselves and unless igolfers get charged the greenfee on top of the comp fee then they won't be contributing to these costs either. Why should a member of a club shoulder these costs while an igolfer just gives Golf Ireland €65 and gets to play that same member's club for just the comp fee?

    Edited to say why didn't this igolfer confirm the rate before travelling to the course?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭JIdontknow


    some clubs are charging the comp fee and also the green fee for IGolfers which I imagine was the case here. Some other clubs have a specific category prize for igolfers subject to a certain number entering, so they aren’t eligible for the main prizes. Not sure what happens if they don’t get an adequate number of igolfer entering the comp to justify the igolfer only prize.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭Toranaga


    Have run into this now this weekend where we'd booked into a team comp, no mention of anything and our group included a full member of another club who'd booked and asked us to play. Came back saying comp fee of 30 which we'd paid plus green fee of 55.

    Now I don't think any of the iGolfers would have minded paying a premium on top of the comp fee but nearly 3 times the initial cost has made us ask for a refund so everyone has lost out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭blue note


    Are any of those igolfers now tempted to join a club?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 351 ✭✭Appletart Upsetter


    I'd imagine if they were tempted, they won't be joining this particular club!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭coillcam


    More a likely that you'd want to not bother with the game.

    That's bad form. Should have been told up front of the different rates. Even so charging a full green fee and full comp fee is excessive. A full green fee would be plenty. What club was it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭Toranaga


    Was County Meath GC. Yeah would have been happy enough with the 55 tbh and everyone wins from it.

    I don't think I play enough to justify even a distance membership this year (don't have a car so at the whims of others) but have been playing and wanting to play more so would potentially join a club in the future as was a member of Deer Park years ago when I'd have been regularly playing.

    Bit of a kick in the teeth as iGolf has been pretty good so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 351 ✭✭Appletart Upsetter


    I'm considering iGolf membership at the moment but there seems to be an undercurrent of hostility towards it.

    I cannot justify full membership of a golf club. If I got to play 6 times a year I'd be lucky, I certainly don't have time to socialise afterwards. I fully intend to join a golf club when the pressures of being a parent ease off. IGolf could be ideal for me in the meantime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭blue note


    It's the real test isn't it? An igolf handicap isn't doing what they hoped. Are they now tempted to join a club or abandon / postpone taking golf more seriously?

    As an aside, when there's an open on (particularly a weekly open, maybe not a scratch cup or the like) I know heaps of clubs would allow non-GUI golfers play for the open rate, just not in the competition. This was certainly the case in Mount Juliet and Baltray when I played them, MJ since the igolf handicaps. Now it seems that if you're igolf that option is possibly not available to you. It's full green fees plus an igolf fee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭Toranaga


    Maybe you're right. Those non GUI ones would surely be less likely to pay club fees than those who've paid, even the relatively low cost for iGolf, if they find themselves playing a club regularly (been playing Silloge with said member quite a bit recently and they're reasonably priced) they would be the low hanging fruit if they are treated well.

    Fully understand charging more for comps but no reason to try gouge or discriminate someone just trying to play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭bobster453


    Clubs dont want igolf, its forced on them by golfireland, therefore they will make it so hard and awkward as possible to nip it in the bud.

    Not saying its right, just dont think its wrong.

    Give it a few years and nobody would pay membership as a new member therefore clubs would close is the fear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 351 ✭✭Appletart Upsetter


    I can't speak for everyone but for me this is a relatively simple decision. If I have the time to play 20 plus times per year, then financially it makes sense to join a club.

    There is one cohort of people who have lots of time to play golf, unfortunately they tend to be the ones most resistant to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭bobster453


    No, they are the ones who have paid their membership for years and are not prepared to see their club go down the swanny to line the pockets of golf ireland.

    For small money you could become a distance member of a club and have no issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    This has been rolled over several times at this point.

    A golf course is a very expensive resource both to have and to maintain. Club members pay for that with their substantial subs.

    There is some sort of thing going between golf clubs where they provide each others members 'open comps' at a reduced rate. Allowing club members to play elsewhere potentially adding revenue without the risk of losing subs. Atm this is a win win for the clubs and the members.

    One can look at that whichever way you like - some say it's a mutual thing between clubs with an actual golf club others say they just want to make extra money - but the fact of the matter is these are entities with an actual resource which their members pay for and they are at liberty to share that resource whichever way they like.

    Now swoops in iGolf thinking they can piggyback on those golf courses for their own benefit without actually providing anything in return. One could call it the gig economy of golf business model. A little bit parasitic one might say.

    It's obvious that for some people this sounds great. Hey I can play only 10 times a year but I get an actual handicap and reduced rates everywhere. No problem with that from the individuals point of view but obviously where someone gets such an advantage someone else feels they may be at a disadvantage.
    And there is a potentially self destructive element here too. If this was truly a small thing that'll bring people closer to golf and eventually make them join a club, great.

    iGolf obviously says it'll grow the game and benefit everyone. But of course they would say that, it's their product. Golf clubs say it may or it may not but if we all ran over to iGolf in larger numbers who'd pay for the golf courses?
    We dont know which way this will pan out yet but golf clubs feel the business risk is all on their side for someone else's benefit and its been imposed on them.

    One can cry all day long about resistance to change but from a clubs point of view it's about the worry to be taken advantage of. So for now they'll eye it with suspicion, I can totally understand that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭JVince


    This post should be sent to every club in the country.

    Far too many "change resistors" who only look at the negatives of something new and then convince themselves and others that everything is bad.

    I have 3 members of a small golf society that have taken iGolf membership. They are at or near retirement. They are starting off in golf or getting back to it after many years out of it and would be very much fair weather players - at the moment.

    The excessive fee for iGolf member in opens is a two finger salute to potential new members. Maybe a small extra fee, but this lark of €25 for a club member and €60 for an iGolf member that I've seen will do the game more harm than good and reinforce the "Elite" rhetoric some would see in golf clubs.

    If you have a visiting group of 4 and one is an iGolfer and you see he/she will be charged €30-€40 extra, you'll tend to look elsewhere. (we already did)

    Pity some golf clubs don't understand the concept and choose to punish those potential customers. If such an policy was brought into a commercial business, it would fail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 406 ✭✭kyleman


    If you are going to play golf 6 times a year max. as this poster says it makes no sense to join a golf club or igolf and would be much cheaper to just pay green fees.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭soverybored1878




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Whether it'll grow the game or just let someone siphon off advantages - who knows? I dont know and you dont know either. You're leaning one way because it suits you personally.

    Golf clubs lean the other way 'cos ist been imposed on them and the business risk for someone else's venture is all on their side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭Toranaga


    It's expensive and yet they are happy to throw away potential business both in the short term and the long term. It's 3 years without a club to be eligible for iGolf. These are not lapsed members of clubs but people who never were members most likely.

    As I said above, a maintenance premium is fair and a reasonable one would be accepted. Charge a full green fee to play the comp, everyone wins.

    They are entitled to do what they want. I'm also entitled to think charging a full green fee and comp fee is an attempted gouge to potentially inexperienced players learning the game. If these people are in societies or even just looking for a round on a random day off during the week they're now less likely to contact your club so everyone loses out from a level of pettiness.

    Either you want to grow the game or you want to gatekeep. Golf Ireland are clearly focussed on the former. Some clubs seemingly the latter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    For whats its worth I think the example you gave is a little excessive myself. My own club charges more than the open rate but less than the full green fee. I think thats quite fair and something everyone can live with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭coillcam


    Golf Ireland won't be lining their pockets with iGolf money. They'll get some extra subs in, but it will be offset significantly with costs. There's extra cloud/IT system costs to run it, and I'm sure they pay the software provider handsomely. Someone in GI has to oversee it, and surely someone on a salary rather than all volunteers.

    The benefit to GI is that it boosts participation numbers and positions the program with sense of inclusivity with less elitism. This is also good optics for grants and government or EU programs - read annual reports from any of the golf unions. Ultimately, it came from the governing body (R&A), they've passed the buck to the regional union (GI) to figure it out. The R&A aren't concerned with how Co Meath or MJ price their open days.

    Personally, I just hope clubs see sense and don't shoot themselves in the foot. Most of them need the green fee income. You'll only attract new members if they feel the door is open. Slamming the door and putting up a sign that says iGolf pay 3x isn't going to help clubs, members or the curious future golfer. It paints a simple message of "you're not wanted here". Most iGolfers won't have a clue about the GI-club arguments over the last months or club member concerns.

    I think almost everyone accepts iGolfers will pay a bit more, including iGolfers. I just hate to see people's first experience of member/club golf as excessively exclusionary with jacked-up fantasy rates. A few tweaks to prizes/comp rules and green free pricing are not too difficult to accomplish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭JVince


    I'm a full club member for several years. But I'm also in business for several decades and the excessive pricing if you have an iGolf card is a very poor business decision by those golf clubs that have implemented such a policy.

    What is interesting is that many of the larger golf clubs that have professional business management are not charging a different fee, whereas smaller clubs run by committees are more likely to charge a premium to iGolf members. Though it does seem it's not a huge number doing this and I suspect it will die out next year

    For those with an iGolf card, there's a huge choice where a premium is not charged and I suspect that's where they'll go.

    The 3 year gap between club membership and iGolf acceptance is a very strong safety net preventing members leaving and in New Zealand and the UK where it has operated for a while, the overall result has been very positive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭bobster453


    Fair points apart from comparing us to New Zealand and Uk, chalk and cheese where number of players, clubs, membership types etc are concerned.

    We are spoilt here with number of good courses, reasonable membership rates..mostly..and clubs here are part of the fabric of local communities, created by locals for locals, again mostly.

    Not so in other jurisdictions mentioned where the need for igolf type of membership makes a big difference.

    Despite the hype from GI about 300k potential members, jury for me is still deliberating on whether this model is even needed here, will it become a new route to club membership or will it deter people thro not paying subs to keep courses open.

    Time will tell i guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,952 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    Devil is in the detail re the 300k I guess.

    They're saying that 300k rounds are played by non members of clubs?

    From my end, I've mates that would be part of that cohort. They play a charity scramble, or something like that, bit have no interest or intention to play regular golf. So I do think that they've overstated the potential



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭Toranaga


    But the solution named is that you get a distance membership to some club in a place that will never see your shadow.

    So I don't see how iGolf should be treated too differently to that? As has been suggested if it leads to better funding and potential government grants would have more benefits.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,932 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Find it hard to believe igolf would be of significance in getting government grants.

    But I'm open ears..



Advertisement