Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1703704706708709845

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,638 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Columbus day in the US largely functions as a day for celebrating Italian-American heritage, in the way that St. Patrick's Day does for Irish-Americans and Cinco de Mayo does for Mexican-Americans. Whether it's celebrated, and the enthusiasm with which it's celebrated, from state to state, or from town to town, is largely a function of how strong Italian-American identity is in that place.

    Its a federal holiday, but that just means that federal government offices and agencies mark it. The federal government has no authority to tell state agencies or private businesses whether to close or not, or to grant their workers a holiday. It's not clear what action Trump intends to take; it's already a federal holiday, and he can't make it any more of a federal holiday than it already is.

    It's also not clear whether Italian-Americans will be uniformly thrilled at Trump's attempt to hijack what they regard as their particular holiday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,107 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Trump doesn't intend taking any action. It's more meaningless drivel to deflect from the mess he is creating.

    What always staggers me is that Trump is always taken as telling any form of truth, yet consistently lies.

    Even in the Time interview he admitted that he was lying about solving Ukraine war on Day 1. And yet the interviewer never asked how anyone can take anything he says seriously since he clearly lies so often.

    Why should anyone believe he can MAGA? Is that just another exaggeration? Another lie?

    So instead of asking what Trump will do, the first question is whether this is yet another lie?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,216 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    A few states have cancelled Columbus Day. Apparently he never set foot in the place only made it to the Carribbean where they wiped out half the population with disease and established a slave trade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,133 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Crimea sounds like it's going to be Northern Ireland for Ukraine's treaty negotiations. And honestly that looks the most likely outcome. You'll have Ukranians split in the same way we were post Treaty with the opinions being all-or-nothing v best we could have gotten at the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,638 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I think, in fact, the question MAGA supporters ask themselves is "Is this a lie that I like?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Trump must have been watching the Sopranos over the weekend, and now thinks he's Silvio Dante



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Field east


    ”however they -Russia- kept the military bases” . Is that correct? My understanding is that the whole of Crimea was handed over and that Ukr allowed the use of some bases to the Russians under some long term agreement which is up about now!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭Economics101




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Crimea was part of the Ukrainian SSR since Krushchev handed it over in 1954, having previously been part of the Russian SSR.

    Russia conquered it in 1783 under Catherine the Great, in violation of a 1778 peace treaty with the Ottoman Empire.

    However after World War 1, it also broke away but was reconquered by the Soviet Union and became part of the Russian SSR. It was originally the homeland of the Crimean Tatars and the heartland of the Khanate of Crimea. Stalin deported the Tatars. They only started returning I think after the breakup of the USSR. The return of Russia has led to a return of persecution.

    I've looked at the Census of Tsarist Russia in 1897. Crimea was part of Taurida Governate which included Crimea and Kherson. Ukrainian was the main language at the time. Russification was much more intense under the USSR since Stalin abolished Lenin's policy (known as Korenization) of promoting minority languages in the USSR to gain the minorities' support. Stalin became more concerned with getting ethnic Russian support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,870 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    https://www.newsweek.com/green-card-holder-us-over-30-years-detained-cbp-after-tripfamily-2063647

    Irish woman now detained. 30 years on a green card but 20 year old expunged drug charges are what she's being targeted on. She's not exactly a hardened criminal but sure this is the new norm in the US...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 791 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    can we stop with the rare earths minerals nonsense and conspiracy theories

    Only half a billion a year worth of “rare earths” (they ain’t rare”) are imported into US per year

    Trump already cost us economy 7 trillion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,361 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There is a reason why it is extremely dangerous to go around arresting judges. Judges are not 'above the law' but there is a requirement for the judiciary to be protected from interference from the police because they often come into conflict with law enforcement and need to be independent.

    If a Judge commits a criminal act that is completely independent from their role as a judge, then they should of course, be held accountable the same as anyone else, but when you have a political appointment of the head of the FBI directing their staff to arrest a judge because a different, highly politicised law enforcement function accused her of 'obstructing' them without even getting a 2nd judge to issue the warrant, this is undoubtedly an attack on the legal system at large.

    Judges, in their normal performance of their duties will often do things that could be interpreted as 'obstructing law enforcement' and if Bondi can get away with arresting Judges for interfering with ICE enforcement, then this would be a huge moment on the road to a full on police state.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,604 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Given that the Ukrainian constitution says that Crimea is formerly and legally part of Ukraine and cannot be ceded to another country, he is talking nonsense again. It would be like a Taoiseach offering the UK that they take over Donegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭yagan


    The US actually domestically mines rare earths but then has to ship them to China to be refined.

    Theres probably loads more deposits in the USA but their mentality is very much frontier claim staking, which overlooks the processing phase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    OK ta. I wanted to tie down if Trump has any particular interest in supporting Putin's reason for annexing Crimea. From the replies, it seems to revolve around its military potential as a natural defence against encroachment for Russia.

    I think Trump is close to walking away from day to day political interest in Ukraine and hand that over to Rubio, while holding unto presidential approval in the final call to call it a day in assisting Zelenskyy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    missed donnie vonshitzinpants having a snooze…looks a bit like Homer Simpson…melania looks like she got a wiff of something a bit ripe too…and wearing a fairly bright blue suit and tie…to the Popes funeral??and just on the fashion topic…where did Volodymyr Zelenskyy get the black suit he was wearing? im no into fashion but have to say he looked sharp!!


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Commercially, that sounds insane for both countries if tariffs costs were to be thrown in at both ends, let alone for a supposedly strong independent trading nation like the US to have to export the goods to China for refining. Presumably there would have to be some safeguards against either side using the trade as a weapon against the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭yagan


    Commercially China doesn't need US rare earths, it just takes payment for refining for the USA as if it was any other paying customer.

    Edit to add tariffs may not apply for processing a material that won't be sold in China.

    Post edited by yagan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,210 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's mainly dangerous for the judges that judges are getting arrested in Trump's America. You could argue that it's dangerous for Trump that it may spark a popular uprising against him, but if that hasn't happened by now, it's unlikely to happen in the future.

    You have your really pro-Trump MAGA people, your really anti-Trump people, and then everyone else in the middle who are just trying to get through the working week. So long as the American public stays basically divided into these three camps, Trump will probably keep intimidating the judiciary and consolidating power.

    The main thing that might curtail Trump's agenda is that which has also, ironically, set the stage for Trump's rise in the first place, and that is Big Business. Per that little meeting between Trump and the Walmart guy recently where Trump was told to drop the tariffs lest the shelves run empty, Trump can get smacked down if he messes with too many cash flows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,133 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Not really the same, our constitution says nothing about control of Donegal or territory. Since 1998 the constitution recognises everyone born on the island as being entitled to be part of the Irish Nation.

    We don't have anything about the actual government or control of territory in there. In theory you could give Donegal to the UK without any constitutional changes



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Thanks. It does point out the dangers to the US that it does not have enough of a capable home refining industry that it has to rely on one of its major trading opponent nations to do what it should be capable of doing for itself. Given the present state of play internationally, one has to wonder what form of payment China is accepting for the refining.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭yagan


    They take USD of course and then spend it developing trade infrastructure in poor countries that the west neglect.

    The rise in the price of cocoa for western consumers at the moment is a good example of Chinese investment cutting out the western middlemen. China took its USD surplus, invested in cocoa processing plants in Ivory Coast and Ghana and then takes payment for the loan in refined cocoa for the Chinese market.

    Previously western countries wouldn't lend to these countries whereas China has kept the trade tangible, lending to them to develop their processing which adds enormous value to their exports as refined product can be warehoused longer than raw crop which gives them massive market leverage.

    Western media will of course paint this as some form of Chinese exploitation, but in reality it's the type of development that should have happened decades ago, but western companies made their profit in the processing stage so they were never going to fund domestic processing there.

    China simply applied US dollars to where they should have gone decades ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Ref media outlet sources, I have seen a post on MSN from the Daily Wrap to the effect that the Zelenskyy Administration is planning to use seized Russian assets and to place tariffs on Russian imports into Ukraine [when the war ends] to fund reconstruction there. Now, given how things are occurring presently between the two combatants and the US involvement in the war on two fronts, that would seem to be very far forward planning so I have to ask if the Daily Wrap has any credibility on reporting actual genuine news.

    I've googled on the Daily Wrap and an outlet [the Wrap] popped up several times as a US left-leaning outlet. Are they separate outlets or one and the same outlet AND does it/they have street cred in the media world? Do I push the ignore button when I see the Daily Wrap on the screen?

    Edit: one of the sources quoted [twice] in the D/W story is supposedly Ukraine's PM, Denys Shymal.

    Post edited by aloyisious on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,604 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Article 1 and 5 would surely preclude us from handing Donegal over to the UK, even if they are not directly worded that way. Article 1: The constitution asserts the "inalienable, indefeasible, and sovereign right" of the Irish people to self-determination and Article 5: The state is declared to be "sovereign, independent, and democratic". As Donegal is part of the state and those who live there there are part of "the Irish people", anything that would remove their right to self-determination and to sovereignty and independence (from outside rule) would presumably be unconstitutional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,133 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    I meant more in the case of Donegal being added to the existing 6 counties that already allow the same rights under the existing constitution

    But we're off topic, though I do think as I said earlier that Northern Ireland could be the blueprint for what happens with Crimea in order to the the war



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,604 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    On the point of Ukraine, it appears to be the case that it would be unconstitutional for Zelensky to 'hand over' Crimea to the Russians. This could only done by amending the constitution (which can only be done by Parliament - they don't hold referendums). Hard to see how this can ever come to pass - the Ukrainian parliament will surely never agree to a constitution that says Crimea belongs to Russia, having been illegally invaded by the Russians in 2014.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭yagan


    This case of the Irish green card holder currently being detained in an ICE centre illustrates that abiding by their laws means nothing to Trump and the witch hunt he's unleashed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Rubio, in a "meet the press" event with MSNBC yesterday, said "that of course, everyone should have their day in court" when asked whether all citizens and non-US citizens on US soil are entitled to due process BUT followed that up with this "But let me tell you, on immigration standing, the laws are very specific,' he added, appearing to realize what he had said about a day in court 'If you're in this country unlawfully, you have no right to be here and you must be removed, that's what the law says.'

    This follows on from Trumps statement about how it would take too long to hear each deportation case in court, referring to them as alleged criminals "it would, without exaggeration, take 200 hundred years". SCOTUS has ruled that the deportees must be given the chance to challenge their removal, EDIT; by the Admin under the "Enemy Aliens" act.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    On the Ukraine war front, it's been reported that Putin has declared there will be a 3-day ceasefire next week in Ukraine to coincide with the 80th anniversary of V-E day. Last week, Russia decided not to hold a major military parade in Crimea in connection with the anniversary as it would be too risky for the safety of the participants and on-lookers.

    Putin may be hedging his bets by announcing his latest ceasefire way in advance of the date, unlike his recent ceasefire, so that if anything happens to mar the parade, he can point the finger at Ukraine and Zelenskyy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭Economics101


    If it's as non-existent as his previous (Easter) ceasefire, then no doubt we will see more disinformation about Ukrainian aggression.



Advertisement