Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1150115021504150615071836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think it's true that no one thought that having the CCs so heavily weighted to one province was ideal.

    And if that's as mildly as the arguments were put forward, I'd have had no issue with it.

    I don't think a change in funding model was necessarily required, but however they went about it clearly a change in development pathways in the other three provinces was very much needed.

    But if a change in the development pathways was very much needed - and it's reasonable to assume that would require financing to close the gap - how do you finance it without a change in the funding model? It's a zero sum game.

    It's a very welcome change, imo.

    Look, it's entirely possible I'm spiky about this, but that's entirely in reaction to some of the blowback that appeared on here (and, well you've seen the continued misrepresentation for yourself). At a minimum, I can say my thoughts on this have remained consistent since this time last year, and I'm wholly glad the IRFU's thinking that a change was absolutely required, was similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Some good news on coaching role for Sexton and player pathways

    The IRFU is delighted to announce that Johnny Sexton will take up a full time position with the Union from August 1st.

    As part of his expanded coaching role, he will work with the various Men’s and Women’s National Age Grade sides up to Senior level.

    Sexton has been working with the Ireland Men’s squad in a part-time coaching capacity since the 2024 Autumn Nations Series and will step into an Assistant Coach role with this team.

    Johnny Sexton said: “I am excited to join the IRFU on a full time basis and am extremely passionate about the opportunity to work with current and future players. I’ve been extremely fortunate to have great coaches, who nurtured and developed my skills, and I am keen to share my experiences with the next generation and help them achieve their goals. The level of investment and focus on the pathways in Ireland is really encouraging and I believe the future is really bright for Men’s and Women’s rugby in Ireland.”

    He will also join Andy Farrell‘s coaching team for the British and Irish Lions Tour to Australia this summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Ah nice to see you comb through a post to find anything so you can dismiss it!

    But the point was in the last decade of talent that helped a team. Don’t get me wrong- during that period Leinster also had the last few serviceable years of Cronin and also got Henshaw.

    But you simply can’t deny that the other provinces have been given a huge redistribution of talent from Leinster.

    Munster have had the guts of 30 “Leinster” players at various stages of their careers over the last decade being involved there.

    The convenient narrative from elsewhere is that these are all cast offs or whatever, it’s nonsense.

    Munster have also just taken delivery of two Leinster players who will be fine squad players for Munster just as they were for Leinster (injury and coaching permitting).

    If you take Lee Barron, Leinster have been more or less providing the two Hookers to the Irish 23 for the last 3 years. This has given Barron exposure as Leinster have never been able to have a bigger squad than others despite having so many internationals. Indeed outside of Barron, an Academy hooker literally got capped for Ireland this year after the exposure he got from Leinster. There’s a cost to all of this.

    And I have no issue with players moving either. Leinster have benefited from it in the past but now really given the population and them maximising their production, it makes sense to turn some of those players over. But when you are consistently getting 5 to 6 senior squad players from Leinster, how can you seriously be moaning?

    Nucifora and Leinster private schools are a convenient scapegoat for the fact that Munster took their eye off the ball for years.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    This is exactly what player pathway is, it seems that you want Leinster players playing in Leinster or abroad, Munster players playing Munster or abroad and so on for Ulster and Connacht but there's no ire shown to Connacht or Ulster as there's no sport in that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    So you aren’t actually reading my posts then?

    I literally say the opposite in my post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭antfin


    I think everyone will agree that it's not good for anyone to continue down the path of one province supplying such a heavy proportion of the national team and the CC system as it was previously set up would just deepen this hole. Leinster have benefited financially but equally ended up with an entire first team unavailable for most of the regular season. They had the resources to develop a much stronger 2nd and 3rd option in each position using the financial resources that the CC attracted. Regardless of the inability of other provinces to develop international standard players, the financial position would ultimately cause this problem to continue to deteriorate and is already leaking into support for the national team and potential interest by age grade players in taking rugby seriously in other provinces.

    Hopefully the new system goes someway to helping to revitalise the pathways outside of Leinster in the longer term and feeds into growing a deeper playing pool and more successful Irish national team. It still leaves a question over whether the schools system and the financial support from parents in Leinster schools will outweigh any financial support that the IRFU can divert into the other three provinces as that's ultimately where the issue starts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Munster have had the guts of 30 “Leinster” players at various stages of their careers over the last decade being involved there.

    The convenient narrative from elsewhere is that these are all cast offs or whatever, it’s nonsense.

    I'm not so sure tbh; you'd also be hard pushed to argue that Leinster were adversely affected because of it in the last decade, for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    You've a funny way of stating it so but shure on you go, Leinster good, Munster bad, the others don't count as there's no sport in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    You aren’t so sure about what now? I’m not playing the poor mouth here, I am saying Munster have been given a share of that talent pool.

    Are you telling me that being handed the best young 10 in Europe (at the time) wasn’t helpful?

    Are you saying that Beirne being directed south when he came home was a bad thing?

    Conway wasn’t a good international player?

    Even someone like a Keatley, he left Leinster for more opportunity. Connacht nabbed him. You can argue he was a cast off but was he not a good squad player for Munster for years? There is nothing wrong with that.

    IMO Munster need to be producing around 3 players on average a year (players capable of being regular senior squad members over a 3 year horizon, not just players getting a few caps). That gives them the bulk of your senior squad of 42-44 after you have natural attrition for retirements / transfers over career spans of 12-15 years. Filling in the gap will come from Leinster players, overseas players and other sources (project players / other provinces). In terms of the Leinster and overseas players they’ve gotten, I don’t think it’s fair to say they have been wanting in that regard. Where they have been wanting is in home produced players for at least half a decade.

    Objectively I would say “Leinster” have probably produced 5 players a season directly for the last 15 or so years with another small number who went through academies elsewhere. Munster have probably produced something like 2.25. That’s the issue.

    Where the rubber meets the road here is that project players are not going to be a big feature anymore. This puts pressure on all of the provinces, including Leinster. So unless Leinster can increase their output, there will be less that they can hand out themselves to other provinces. This is why the IRFU became stricter, they had to. But when we talk about a lot of these issues we don’t look back 15 years or forward 15 years to reflect on all of the dynamics at play.

    Thankfully the project player thing is really 5 years gone at this stage (with Munster getting hit earlier on it with Stander retiring). Leinster though still have two of them as key players who will need to be replaced through their own stocks. So it’s still working its way through the system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'd agree with most of that in the main.

    My point is, I think it'd be harsh to call those players "cast-offs" but I equally don't think their leaving had any adverse affects on Leinster.

    Much like I don't expect the 40% when it's introduced to have any materially adverse affects on Leinster.

    (Fwiw, I think it's a stretch to suggest Joey was the best young 10 in Europe at the time).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    How can you say that it didn’t have adverse effects on Leinster?

    Of the 23 that won in 2018, 3 of them were at different provinces by the start of the 2019/20 season.

    People bring up the likes of Jack McGrath and him being injured as a wave away point when he went to Ulster. This is nonsense, Leinster were pissed when he signed for Ulster. Ulster were getting a B&I Lion when they signed him. He was still in and around the set up, just that he had been edged by Healy. He subsequently fell away due to the hip but he was very much in business when he signed him.

    In terms of Leinster losing out, they have to manage losing these players. They have the talent to do so, so I’m not complaining. Just making the point that it happens.

    This “negativity” around the country is being stoked by a few Munster social media accounts that went into a strop when the IRFU got strict. The same ones who didn’t give a monkeys about other provinces until they started getting told no for some sugar rushes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Funny way of stating what now? You aren’t reading my posts, you are either picking at a crumb of them or simply making things up.

    The fact that Leinster have the lions share of central contracts now is not the reason why Munster failed to produce enough players from c. 2010 until about the last 5 or 6 years. David Nucifora is also not the reason why Munster failed to produce enough players, in fact his timing coincides with a pick up in played production again in Munster. And it’s his timing that began to see more Leinster talent going elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Because Leinster have remained at the absolute pointy end of every competition they've been in, every season since then. I expect that to remain the case after the 40% comes in.

    It's not "negativity" to have have had entirely legitimate concerns about the effects of the distribution of Central Contracts. The IRFU seem to have agreed there were legitimate concerns, with the introduction of these changes. (And I've no interest in dragging in arguments from other social media platforms onto here; I'd rather just discuss what's being discussed on here….)

    And broadly speaking, these changes seem to have have been received positively.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's not "negativity" to have have had entirely legitimate concerns about the effects of the distribution of Central Contracts.

    One can argue this is semantics, and you'd have a legitimate point to a degree, but the concern should not be around the effects of the distribution of Central Contracts. It just makes it sound like the problem is a central planning issue that somehow Nucifora or now Humphreys can fix immediately. The concern should be around the lack of top level players coming through in 3 out of 4 provinces. The distribution of the CCs is a function of everything else that is happening - it is an outcome, not a driver of the problem.

    I am happy with these changes precisely because they are ringfencing the funding for development pathways as that is clearly where the problem lies and has lied for 10+ years (albeit, I do genuinely think the Munster development pathway seems better than it did a number of years ago)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Where are the concerns for Ulster not having the tax rebate? The FX volatility for Sterling? Cost of living differences around the country? The fact that Leinster have a smaller squad than Munster yet have less of them available week to week (you know there's cost of that?!).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The concern should be around the lack of top level players coming through in 3 out of 4 provinces.

    I can tell you first hand, that is the main concern of all my Munster supporting family and friends. Munster fans, more than anyone, want to see Munster players in the Ireland team.

    Money* into development pathways was always an obvious part of a solution. But where does that money come from? Again, the most obvious place to point to was where the most significant imbalance in the system lay. Central Contracts.

    I mean, the 40% from the CC's is literally going straight to those player development pathways in Connacht, Ulster and Munster; it's impossible to separate one from the other.

    It's exactly the point I made to FFF this time last year:

    Me: Where do you think the change is needed?

    FFF: Player development pathways, academy structures, schools/youth coaching & facilities. Pump as much money as we can into that and give oversight to the IRFU.

    There is absolutely no solution here apart from helping the other three provinces produce more indigenous players. Everything else is a sticking plaster, and giving more money to other provinces to sign more NIQs or pay their existing guys more is actually counter-productive.

    Me: I'd entirely agree with that as part of a solution. Now where does that money come from? It's a zero sum game.

    *bearing in mind that some on here argued money wasn't the answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Bingo.

    There have been 12 new outhalfs capped in the last 15 seasons for Ireland.

    Leinster had 8 of them come through their system. 1 is O/S. 3 from the other Provinces. So Leinster by themselves produced nearly 3 times as many as the others combined.

    And yes you can't just pick one position but (1) outhalf is where your better footballers should end up, that you can't product them points to a problem and (2) it is reflected in other positions, maybe not to the same extent, but whereby Leinster are producing a plurality.

    And that issue goes back 15-20 years, not to do with Central Contracts or David Nucifora.

    And for as much as we have to acknowledge that population, schools (although as mentioned, they were criticised years ago) and finances, we also have to acknowledge that things like organisational dysfunction (CEOs, Head Coach and other attrition), poor investment (putting in money towards elite NIQs and stadiums ahead of training facilities, for example) and overall system design plays a role.

    Yet there are scapegoats constantly brought out here. If I was in 2007 as a Leinster supporter and was giving out about the IRFU then I'd be justifiably laughed at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think, broadly speaking, they weren't as significant a concern to Irish Rugby (or as controllable) as the distribution of Central Contracts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Munster players will only get into the ireland team if Munster actually produce players good enough. The problem in the last 10/15/20 years is the endless succession of imports from South Africa mainly and at the time nobody in Munster seemed to see the longer term impact which Is if you aren't producing locally and are using signings to paper the cracks eventually it will create a massive problem.

    Where was the concern in Munster back then? Plater x from South Africa buying into he Munster culture doesn't generate players for the national team.

    If you want to see Munster representation on the national team, then there needs to be actual Munster representation in Munster.

    No players on CC means much reduced financial support from IRFU. Now, the over riding agenda, for want of a better word, is it's the IRFU favouring Leinster which Brought this about completely ignoring the piss poor management of Munster in the noughties when they were the dominant province in terms of CC and had 10-12 players in ireland match day 22s and were winning HCs and getting to SFs consistently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    @niallm77

    Where was the concern in Munster back then? Plater x from South Africa buying into he Munster culture doesn't generate players for the national team.

    You're clearly overlooking project players here which were part of the picture. (e.g. Stander, Marshall, Cloete, Bleyendaal, Knox,…. Kleyn? Lets not open that can of worms again). The point being there was a clear distinction between IQ and NIQ players.

    If you want to see Munster representation on the national team, then there needs to be actual Munster representation in Munster.

    There clearly is Munster representation in Munster. Are you trying to suggest there isn't??

    Now, the over riding agenda, for want of a better word, is it's the IRFU favouring Leinster which Brought this about completely ignoring the piss poor management of Munster in the noughties when they were the dominant province in terms of CC and had 10-12 players in ireland match day 22s and were winning HCs and getting to SFs consistently.

    I've never said the IRFU favoured Leinster. I've said the system, tho unintended, favoured Leinster.

    I've also consistently acknowledged that Munster should've done better when they were the dominant province.

    And also Munster were never as dominant as Leinster are now, where Leinster have 16,17 of the 23 in match day squads.

    Something needed to change when the the distribution was heading to 10:3. Doubly so when the 3 players on CC's were of the age profile of (I think) Aki, Henderson and Beirne.

    It's not an "agenda" to suggest as much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    The issue with Project players is that there is no certainty around how they will fare. Some were success, others weren’t, but when the go to plan is sign another south African, then that means local production isn’t a priority, and guess what, when that happens, and others are producing [Leinster] we end up where we are now. The system didn’t favour Leinster. Leinster favoured Leinster and because others favoured signing south africans, guess how that fared out …. It doesn’t matter if they are NIQ or Project players IMO. If the go to is to sign another Bok/Kiwi etc then there is no real desire to improve the local pathways.

    Again, I never said Munster were as dominant as Leinster are now, but Munster were the dominant province in that time, 10-12 of the national 22s at the time compared to Leinsters 5-6. They were HC SF regulars, went to 4 finals, won in 06 and 08, backboned the Grand Slam teams in 09 after being the biggest suppliers to the national team in the entire decade. But all the while, behind the scenes, nothing was happening to cash in on that success in terms of player development. It was almost like the powers that be felt the conveyor belt was just going to keep producing. And when it didn’t …..

    There is Munster representation in Munster, of course there is, but there is also a hell of a lot of non Munster developed players in the squad, off the top of my head about 35-40% of the squad are signings. When the volume of locally developed players is that low, the chances of getting Munster representation in the national team is far diminished. Beirne is an outlier of the current signings realistically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    @niallm77

    It's literally not the go-to plan any more, if it ever was. That argument is, at best, 5 years out of date.

    I absolutely agree that not enough was done behind the scenes at Munster, but I also absolutely agree with this change from the IRFU. Because the system absolutely favoured Leinster. The system has had to be changed because of how lopsided it had become.

    Even if Munster optimise their development pathways to the nth degree, Munster will always have to recruit from outside. Leinster are the outlier here; Leinster are the outlier in world rugby. It can't be the case that Leinster are the elite production line in world rugby and anything short of that line is considered failure.

    For example, no one will convince me that Gavin Coombes shouldn't have more caps for Ireland. But it can't be the case that him not having more caps is somehow indicative of a failure of the Munster production line. 9 of our starting 15, and 15 of our 23 in the URC final win were Muster produced players. That seems about right to me.

    The whole system has to be about more than just representation for Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    sexton being called up to the lions and being made a full time assistant with Ireland is truly bizarre.

    There is plenty of vastly more experienced coaches available but Farrell has decided to pick a mate.
    Truly bizarre stuff.

    Irish rugby is going downhill big time and I would not be surprised if the lions struggle, sexton is not coaching material. Too much arrogance and too little experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    As the "issue" doesn't impact Munster social media accounts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I’ve given you my answer. I don’t see what “Munster social media accounts” has got to do with it.

    Are you really trying to argue that, say, Ulster not having the tax rebate is as significant or as controllable an issue for the IRFU as compared to the Central Contracts imbalance?

    I don’t understand the hang up with Munster social media accounts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    To my point in my post, are the Munster's young players coming through better now or in 2014?

    If you say better in 2014 or try to fudge it, please list the quality non-Irish capped young players that were coming through back then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It is worth €15k for every €100k a player is paid. That is a material number in any player budget.

    As is differences in cost of living (believe it or not), particularly when we are talking about median wages of rugby players.

    Fluctuations in FX can move the dial materially for the IRFU annually (maybe read their annual reports) and also the value of distributions.

    The only reasons these weren't "issues" is because certain people don't have a self interest in promoting them but the IRFU manage them all the time and have to make "changes". They might not feel the need to put out a press release on it because there aren't certain very loud people always giving out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The 'system' may appear to favour Leinster but only because Munster made a complete mess of things back in their glory days and are still dealing with the consequences.

    Munster were the epitome of the Celtic Tiger - they were rolling in money, from a fan base from all over the country that drove gate receipts (packed houses while other provinces had 2 men and a dog), to prize money (so many finals), to sponsorship (Toyota & Adidas), to merchandise (most kids who played rugby had some Munster gear), to the IRFU covering way more central contracts at the time for them. They felt the good times would never end and never realised they'd built on sand.

    Rather than investing their money in their future, in pathways and infrastructure that supports them, they used it on big name NIQs and a stadium that was far too big for their needs 98% of the time. They also spent it on refusing to make tough decisions like moving to a single training base - it took 20 years of professionalism before they were dragged into having the team train in a single location.

    But sure keep pointing the finger at the IRFU and Nucifora for not being able to instantly fix the mess the Munster blazers made.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    ”Fudge it”? Why would I? I think you’re missing my point here.

    Someone can correct me on my dates but around 2014, people were going batsh1t that a young Munster out half was allowed to go to England. I think this was also approximately the time when people were adamant that Dave Foley was the next long-term Irish lock and that Duncan Casey would be throwing to him. I’m sure there were more but it’s ten years ago like.

    I’m not having a go at these players but at the time, people were as utterly convinced of their test credentials as they are now about Coombes, Hodnett or Ahern. Time proved them wrong back then, and we won’t know for a couple of years yet what the real legacy of the Nucifora era is either.

    The root cause of this is absolutely, unquestionably the failure of Munster and Ulster. But Nucifora, as their ultimate boss, cannot be absolved of any blame because the buck only stops with the most senior person.



Advertisement
Advertisement