Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1150115021504150615071510

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    No idea how to read that horribly quoted post you dropped in.

    What IRFU have agreed is the case I've been making for years that three provinces have been run poorly and haven't made the most of their pathways. The IRFU answer is to tax Leinster but are rightfully not trusting the other provinces to use the money wisely so are ring fencing and overseeing it.

    No need to continue to discussion, we've both agreed that your initial response to me was completely wrong and there is clearly 'a hit' to Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,612 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    That's a masterclass in selective reading if I've ever seen one.

    You also specifically refer to Humphreys "talking out of his arse" when he says he wants to keep Leinster where they are. Considering Humphreys had to sign off on today's signing, that doesn't really line up does it?

    The only annoyance I have today was from the amount of posters making weird comments about other provinces fans and their imaginary outrage at the signing. It's altogether very strange and screams of insecurity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That's a masterclass in selective reading if I've ever seen one

    We're all in agreement that aloooof's reading is incredibly selective - they even agreed themselves.

    You also specifically refer to Humphreys "talking out of his arse" when he says he wants to keep Leinster where they are. Considering Humphreys had to sign off on today's signing, that doesn't really line up does it?

    If someone wants to keep a side 'where the are' they wouldn't change the rules to remove 500k budget in addition to the previously announced 1.5 million euro reduction.

    Now I am not some kind of tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist who feels the IRFU or Hump do not care about Leinster, are favouring other provinces over them, or are out to get Leinster - no one in their sane mind should feel that way about either IRFU or Hump.

    With that in mind, Hump has given a greenlight to a move that Leinster requested, like he does for all the provinces.

    I've no problem with saying the IRFU gives with one hand and takes with the other for all provinces, including Leinster - again it would be really weird to be unable to accept those facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You’re wasting your time, theVersatile; I’ve clarified my position and it’s pretty clear the guy has no interest in a good-faith discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,837 ✭✭✭✭phog


    It remains to be seen how this CC and player pathways will actually work out and how it improves rugby in Ireland but once thing is clear something had to change and I'm glad that Humphreys is trying to tidy up the mess left by Nucifora.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭niallm77




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In fairness, he did great in his primary role of making Ireland successful, but at the same time player production at Munster and Ulster fell off a cliff during his tenure and while it might not have been his fault, he didn’t seem to be able to fix it.

    This scheme - whatever it ends up being - does at least acknowledge the root cause of all of this as the unacceptable player development in those provinces. Nucifora didn’t seem willing to grasp that nettle, maybe he just didn’t see it as his job, but he should have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I don't see that as being a fair reflection on Nucifora from a Munster production perspective anyway. He is really painted as the bad guy and left holding the bag for the incompetence of the guys that went before him (though handsomely paid so I dont feel bad for him).

    The seeds of Munster's production falling off a cliff were planted well, well before he took the job. The last batch of high quality Munster players (POM, Murray, Zebo, Earls) where all Irish capped, Irish regulars, or even Lions tourists by the time Nucifora took his job.

    Munster's barren period of production can be traced back to terrible mismanagement during the glory years. Nothing Nucifora or anyone could do to click their fingers and recapture that wasted period and start a conveyor belt of players. He was given a written off car to fix when it came to Munster, it was always going to take time.

    If you look at the young non-Irish capped Munster players now versus when Nucifora took the job, they are in a far better state now. I dont think anyone here knows what role he played in getting them to that position versus Munster getting things right themselves but it should be acknowledged.

    People seem bitter he didn't turn water into wine in an instant or blow up the whole Irish system in the hopes of helping their province, despite Ireland going through its greatest ever period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭niallm77


    DN was damned if he did, and damned if he didn't. In the time Nucifora was in situ Munster had a lot of signings in general, but particularly from South Africa and NZ. This was something already happening prior to his arrival for a number of years.

    Munster were given plenty of latitude on that front, including some high profile signings just after the 2019 RWC.

    Whatever mess existed, that process began long before he arrived and by the time he left last year munsters production line is far better now. But its gonna take at least another generation or two yet

    Earls, POM and Murray were all irish regulars by the time DN arrived. A few others like Zebo, Kilcoyne became semi regular internationals in that time but that's been the last crop of Munster players to have do so. Reversing that will take time and that all began to happen while DN was in the job.

    So No, DN did not leave a mess behind. No system is perfect and Humphreys is trying to improve things further. Leinster got their sh1t together 20 years ago and are in this dominant position now as a result. Munster were in that dominant position in the noughties but abject failure at management level in the province left them miles behind and are now playing catch up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Munster were in that dominant position in the noughties

    This often gets mentioned on here but it’s just not accurate; Munster were never in as dominant a position as Leinster are now.

    That’s pretty clear by the make up of the 23, and the distribution of Central Contracts compared to then.

    A 10-3 split of Leinster vs the Rest was clearly not a viable or tenable position; I got a huge amount of blowback last year for suggesting as much, but I’m glad the IRFU seem to have agreed with me.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think anyone thought it was particularly ideal - I suspect most of the disagreements where on how to correct it. "Give more central contracts to other provinces" was never really a viable solution.

    Adapting the funding model and ringfencing the increased payments from Leinster to go towards academy pathways seems like a very good option. It will take years to have an impact though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    And while we wait the moaning about unfairness will continue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Former Former Former



    Nothing Nucifora or anyone could do to click their fingers and recapture that wasted period 

    People seem bitter he didn't turn water into wine in an instant 


    Well, the guy was there ten years. I’m certainly not suggesting he could click his fingers or do anything in an instant. But ten years is a long time to be playing the “it was like that when I got here” card. Ulster are every bit as culpable as Munster btw.

    Maybe he turned things around and that will bear fruit in the next few years, we won’t know that for a while yet, there’s limited evidence so far. Likewise it will be at least ten years before we know if this new “ring fencing” idea has paid off.

    I think Nucifora did a great job overall but it’s reasonable to question if he could have done more on this front. It’s also noticeable that his successor started on it very early in his tenure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    This isn’t true, Podge; the disagreements came up because I suggested a change was required at all. And certainly I never suggested “Give more central contracts to other provinces”.

    (And fwiw I'd suggest "not particularly ideal" is a million miles from the "Stoke up flames of resentment about a huge problem that you claim to exist / magical solution". So it's perfectly clear not everyone was in the "not particularly ideal" camp).

    Even if it does take years to have an impact, it was still the right thing to do. The status-quo just wasn't tenable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I mean, the IRFU have literally changed the Central Contract model; presumably they thought it was "unfair" too, despite the protestations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭niallm77


    But they were in the dominant position. I never said they were as dominant. Pretty much 1-10 in ireland teams were Munster players on CC (albeit there was more CC back then) and there was also a few more Munster players on the bench in 22 man squads. The rest of the 22 man squad was split between Leinster, Ulster and Geordan Murphy/Tommy Bowe.

    The single biggest reasons for Leinster being so dominant in the last 5 years in national 23s are...

    1. LEINSTER got their act together and decisions made 20 years ago are bearing fruit since 2016 onwards.
    2. Munster didn't. Once the golden generation retired they had a handful of players over that 15 years or so who went onto international squads as regulars (Earls Murray, POM). There was no plan for after that and in the intervening years they signed a lot of players to cover for this. It's taken Leinster basic 3 generations to get from 2006 to now. Munster are probably in the first generation now playing catch. That's a monumental gap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    they've changed it now, will the moaning stop? no chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 256 ✭✭darkened_scrum




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭niallm77


    But when he did, he got abused. Pienaar?

    I think Munster were refused signings because they simply weren't trusted IMO. Funnily enough there is some signs of progress in the last 5 years as a result. But it won't be for 10 more years before we know truly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,837 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The IRFU when hiring Nucifora stated in their own press release "This new role in the IRFU’s professional structures will see David responsible for planning and evaluation, the elite player development pathway and succession planning and professional coach development and succession planning.

    He will also oversee national team performance, provincial team performance, national age-grade teams and Women’s team performance, sport science and medical services, elite referee development and National Professional Game Board (NPGB) and policy development."

    Now some here might want to just focus on Ireland winning the 6Ns a few times and beating the 3 southern hemisphere teams and claim all is fine but in reality it's not. In the same press release Nucifora himself said "Irish rugby is in rude health, Ireland are RBS 6 Nations champions and the provinces are performing well in both the domestic and European competitions" Could he, the IRFU or any rugby pundit in the country actually say that now after he Nucifora's departure?

    As already pointed out - if the IRFU were completely happy with the status quo (after Nucifora leaving) around funding to the provinces then why did that have a review and following that review go and made a fundamental change to the funding of the CC model, not once but twice. They KNOW that everything isn't rosy in their garden.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The irony is there was as much moaning about "dragging Leinster back / paying a tax" etc.

    Presumably your in favour of the change?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Yeah I think its fair enough.

    But it wont stop the usual suspects crying and moaning about unfairness etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The IRFU have tweaked the model and funding regularly over the last 20 years for many different things.

    Player development is not down to the fact that Leinster had more central contracts. Central contracts is the result of something seeded long before then.

    There is this weird narrative around the place on provinces and development. On the one hand Leinster are dastardly for improving themselves, but on the other the IRFU are responsible for Munster. Munster were built off a local identity, same with Ulster, yet that appears to stop when it doesn't suit. Interestingly when you take Leinster, there is also this weird narrative on schools as if they just dropped from the sky 15 years ago. But actually if you go back to the 2000s for a long while the newspaper narrative that schools rugby ("Cup rugby") was a hindrance. Now that has suddenly been flipped on its head - now it's Leinster's identity and is a positive.

    Let's look at Munster and Ulster objectively.

    For Munster, the "gap" in player production is the generation between Crowley / Ahern / Casey / Hodnett / Coombes to Zebo / O'Mahoney / Earls / Murray. It's the missing link, those in their late 20s to early 30s now - essentially those who left school from about 2010 to 2015. The quality dropped significantly. Incidentally this is literally the period when Munster should have been harvesting off the back of their success. But the signs were there for anyone who followed age grade rugby in the 2000s. Munster were dropping off quickly in terms of those making age grade.

    Go back to the first game in the Aviva and the issues were obvious;

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/rugby/arid-20126792.html

    Now for Ulster, their issue was different. They HAD that generation of players who would now be in their late 20s to early 30s. But their issue really came down to the organisation imploding over the court case.

    Both Munster and Ulster have had their organisational dysfunction AND some unluckiness along the way. BUT…

    Nucifora actually did work to improve things. You want the IRFU to step in - they did. Nucifora pushed players to move around the provinces. And whilst there are convenient narratives now attached to certain players but Leinster lost a lot of excellent talent like Jordi Murphy, Jack McGrath, Andrew Conway, Joey Carbury…in additional to a lot more younger players and squad players who were given the move. Additionally - returnees like Beirne and Moore were pushed to other provinces (in the previous generation, Leinster benefited from Mike Ross and Ian Reddan doing the same). Both Ulster and Munster were augmented by Leinster talent and in the same period, were able to sign a better quality of NIQ than Leinster could.

    Nucifora joined in 2014 so realistically you are looking at 2017/2018 before any tangible improvements should be seen in players coming into adulthood. I would say Munster were turning the corner by then and we see that now with the batch of players in their mid 20s in the squad. I would say Ulster is more of a failure for Nucifora, but again I would point to the court case. Nucifora did plenty to try and keep them competitive by moving players. You go over the last 10 years and in terms of additional resources being thrown at the other provinces, I don't think it is reasonable to say Munster or Ulster were deprived.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think it's true that no one thought that having the CCs so heavily weighted to one province was ideal. I will admit that plenty of people are less than charitable about the reasoning and solution. I don't think a change in funding model was necessarily required, but however they went about it clearly a change in development pathways in the other three provinces was very much needed.

    Ultimately as far as I'm concerned the genesis of it all doesn't really matter. Whether Munster were feckless with their resources or just had bad luck, or where unfairly treated or whatever. I agree it was non sustainable. The core problem for the past decade has been that players of sufficient quality have not been coming through across the country. Hopefully that starts to be corrected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    that certainly doesnt suit the narrative pushed by others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,837 ✭✭✭✭phog


    When you include Conway in the conversation/rant and he having already signed for Munster before Nucifora took up his role then you know you're talking through your hoop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,521 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think it's true that no one thought that having the CCs so heavily weighted to one province was ideal.

    And if that's as mildly as the arguments were put forward, I'd have had no issue with it.

    I don't think a change in funding model was necessarily required, but however they went about it clearly a change in development pathways in the other three provinces was very much needed.

    But if a change in the development pathways was very much needed - and it's reasonable to assume that would require financing to close the gap - how do you finance it without a change in the funding model? It's a zero sum game.

    It's a very welcome change, imo.

    Look, it's entirely possible I'm spiky about this, but that's entirely in reaction to some of the blowback that appeared on here (and, well you've seen the continued misrepresentation for yourself). At a minimum, I can say my thoughts on this have remained consistent since this time last year, and I'm wholly glad the IRFU's thinking that a change was absolutely required, was similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,837 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Some good news on coaching role for Sexton and player pathways

    The IRFU is delighted to announce that Johnny Sexton will take up a full time position with the Union from August 1st.

    As part of his expanded coaching role, he will work with the various Men’s and Women’s National Age Grade sides up to Senior level.

    Sexton has been working with the Ireland Men’s squad in a part-time coaching capacity since the 2024 Autumn Nations Series and will step into an Assistant Coach role with this team.

    Johnny Sexton said: “I am excited to join the IRFU on a full time basis and am extremely passionate about the opportunity to work with current and future players. I’ve been extremely fortunate to have great coaches, who nurtured and developed my skills, and I am keen to share my experiences with the next generation and help them achieve their goals. The level of investment and focus on the pathways in Ireland is really encouraging and I believe the future is really bright for Men’s and Women’s rugby in Ireland.”

    He will also join Andy Farrell‘s coaching team for the British and Irish Lions Tour to Australia this summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Ah nice to see you comb through a post to find anything so you can dismiss it!

    But the point was in the last decade of talent that helped a team. Don’t get me wrong- during that period Leinster also had the last few serviceable years of Cronin and also got Henshaw.

    But you simply can’t deny that the other provinces have been given a huge redistribution of talent from Leinster.

    Munster have had the guts of 30 “Leinster” players at various stages of their careers over the last decade being involved there.

    The convenient narrative from elsewhere is that these are all cast offs or whatever, it’s nonsense.

    Munster have also just taken delivery of two Leinster players who will be fine squad players for Munster just as they were for Leinster (injury and coaching permitting).

    If you take Lee Barron, Leinster have been more or less providing the two Hookers to the Irish 23 for the last 3 years. This has given Barron exposure as Leinster have never been able to have a bigger squad than others despite having so many internationals. Indeed outside of Barron, an Academy hooker literally got capped for Ireland this year after the exposure he got from Leinster. There’s a cost to all of this.

    And I have no issue with players moving either. Leinster have benefited from it in the past but now really given the population and them maximising their production, it makes sense to turn some of those players over. But when you are consistently getting 5 to 6 senior squad players from Leinster, how can you seriously be moaning?

    Nucifora and Leinster private schools are a convenient scapegoat for the fact that Munster took their eye off the ball for years.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




Advertisement