Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1114115117119120140

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    I never said they are far right but conservative.!! I think they can be described as sensible immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Duplicate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Mod Edit: Warned for breach of forum charter - no need for the generalisations

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Much easier to just try and insinuate anyone who disagrees with you is a far right lunatic than engaging in the actual nuances of the subject

    A cheap tactic but one that is all too common in public discourse at the moment unfortunately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    So you're continuing to state that the spike in accommodation use that commenced in February 2022 was entirely independent of the Russian invasion of Ukraine that occurred that month, just entirely coincidental?

    And good that you admit your error in stating that billions are spent each year as it's clear guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Not at all. There are plenty people who have concerns about immigration who are not far-right nor racist. There are many people I disagree with that have good contributory views to express here or elsewhere. I myself dislike the Direct Provision system and the delay in assessing asylum claims, but I respect the 1951 convention and the absolute right for people to make claims. If you're not genuine then you're taking a hell of a gamble and spending a lot of cash to risk getting here and having a successful claim. The procedure is strict and you're highly likely to fail.

    In terms of concerns 2.2m voters have assessed the views of parties (and independents) across the board and declined to support those without sympathy and empathy for refugees and asylum seekers. It's a clear an unambiguous result from the people of Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Are they anti-immigration? I stated that no party with views opposed to immigration had achieved success. That is patently clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,355 ✭✭✭ShagNastii


    I think when looking people’s vote and how it was used in the election regarding immigration. I think it is very naive to think people didn’t support overtly right-wing candidates that ran exclusive on an “anti-immigration” because they didn’t believe in things they were saying. IMHO these people didn’t garner any realistic seats/vote was due to their due to their lack of real credibility, proven track record or overall political polish and presentation.

    They are working extremely well in pointing out and highlighting instances where our immigration policy is farcical and not what the people want. But if we play it out beyond the social media videos and shouting behind phones, the only solution the vast majority in this realm have to offer is a “Err err err…..GET THEM OUT!!!!!!”. The electorate are smart enough to see through this. In the short term and the long term, they offer nothing substantial.

    People were very eager to debate and use their vote on immigration. I have no doubt every politician that canvased in the most recent general election were challenged and quizzed on their view of current/future immigration policies.

    People want it sorted and they way they see sorting it is through our current “proven” party system. I’d argue FF/FG held onto much of their vote due to their views on immigration. FG I feel would like to be more right leaning than they are. Nobody wants to touch SF regarding immigration, it has cost them dearly. I heard someone jokingly say SF’s policy on immigration was “Brits out, everyone else in” and I don’t think I’m hyperbolic in saying even their die-hards believe this is the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Not the case. The exit poll showed that housing/homelessness, health, the cost of living and economic stability were far more important for voters. Immigration is important to some people, but not that many. Far far less than you may think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,058 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The problem with this, is that up until very recently but certainly during the election, having an honest debate about immigration wasn't facilitated by the media. Despite many on here, on X etc trying to raise awareness, voters have been gaslit by politicians and the media, that immigration doesn't affect all the issues you mention. When now they are starting to admit it does. Many people have been brainwashed not to join the dots, and if you dared say anything negative about immigration, you'd be demonised as a far right racist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    The rate of immigration does effect housing ,waiting lists for medical care , closing of retirement homes and hotels for asylum seekers and Ukrainians . The fact that people complain changes government policy . The idea immigration is grand and anything negative regarded as misinformation is farce .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yes for the third time we’ve seen a sustained surge in people seeking international protection here from around 2022 onwards.

    Your contention is that people from Nigeria, Algeria and elsewhere are claiming asylum in their tens of thousands here as a result of the Russian invasion is it?
    Or how do you account for the huge increase in the numbers seeking international protection in this period?

    A mere typo, my point was only ever that it was costing us more than a billion annually and that’s consistent going back through all of my comments in this exchange.

    Glad to see you’ve abandoned your hamfisted attempt at pretending that it was only going to be costing us €417m annually going forward, when in truth it will be multiples more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Seems to matter more to you than the voting public. Try persuading them again in 2029.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Are you saying that the electorate are not smart enough to read widely and make their own minds up? That they don't consider immigration an important enough issue means they're not savvy people?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You've still not answered. Tellingly. The largest spike in the last two decades in accommodation use began in the month that Russia invaded Ukraine but there's no correlation. Yep, run that by me again please.

    An average of €417m a year for the last six. Are you disputing the government figures? You've consistently failed to answer that.

    Higher costs last year and will be this year before going down (barring another international war) as asylum claims (and thus procedural costs, accommodation) fall. Excepting inflation it'll not continue to rise but please don't continue to post false figures of billions on here. The true figures are in the public arena.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/social-affairs/2025/01/20/state-spent-143bn-on-accommodation-for-asylum-seekers-and-ukrainian-refugees-in-first-9-months-of-2024/

    The

    State

    spent €1.43 billion on accommodation for asylum seekers and Ukrainian refugees during the first nine months of 2024, according to the latest figures from the Department of Integration

    .

    So that for the year would be nearly 2 billion. With increasing numbers it'll be more this year and for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Read back and you'll note that the discussion is regarding IPAS accommodation (some of which was required for Ukrainian refugees from Feb 2022). The cost has been €2.5bn for the past 6 years for asylum seeker accommodation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    What increasing numbers? Asylum claims are down in the first three months of this year

    https://www.thejournal.ie/question-mark-over-use-of-tents-to-house-asylum-seekers-amid-eu-findings-on-providing-basic-needs-6675043-Apr2025/

    The numbers of Ukrainians has also declined.

    Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, around 113,600 Ukrainians have been granted temporary protection in Ireland. Some people have returned home but around 85,000 Ukrainians remain, according to figures from the Central Statistics Office.

    75% or 82,051 of arrivals from Ukraine had administrative activity after 30 June 2024, which suggests they are still actively in the country.

    https://emn.ie/the-latest-cso-arrivals-from-ukraine-series-shows-75-still-in-ireland/

    So, which increasing numbers do you mean?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    New claims might be down but if we're not deporting any significant numbers the total numbers in state accommodation is only going to go up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    It's not that simple. Ukrainians have left themselves. Many AS who are refused their claim, leave the state. And even if they don't they are no longer legally in this country and cannot live in state supplied accomodations. They are no longer costing the state money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    Please stop with this utter nonsense. 2.2 million people voted in the general election without hugely bumping up the far right parties in Ireland - so your assertion is that everybody in this country is really contented with the level of immigration and level of asylum seeker applicants. It's an astonishing conclusion to reach. It is not based in reality whatsoever.

    Actually, you can be pretty sure that if Sinn Fein had pivoted about 2 years ago to a much much tougher stance on immigration (they were never going to do this tbf to them as it goes against a lot of their core ideology), they would most likely be the largest party in Ireland by a distance now. All FG and FF had to do in the 6 months prior to the election was start changing the perception that in the next government there would be a far harder line taken on asylum seeker applicants than the free for all over the previous couple of years. You had rte reporting on bus searches at the NI border, media reporting on passport searches on certain airline routes, removal of countries from the safe list, adding staff to the IPA centre - all done in the run up to the election. That change of perception was enough for FG and FF to just about hang onto power. it was the simplest of politics, they moved into a politic space regards immigration that Sinn Fein in particular could not go to, and just about held onto power for this reason.

    Your lack of understanding regarding politics, general elections etc. is a sight to behold.

    As is your take on asylum seeker applicants who are not genuine. To say regards the asylum seeker application process if you're not genuine that 'the procedure is strict and you're highly likely to fail'. Wow. Just wow.

    Firstly the actual refusal rate for IPA's in previous years was far lower than it currently is. That is a clear sign that the procedure was not strict in the slightest. It was a complete free for all up to very recently. I'm presuming that the additional staff dealing with IPA's claims has helped some bit here. Too little too late, but better than the complete mismanagement that had gone before.

    Also, I presume when you speak of an asylum seeker whose application has failed, you are speaking of just the original application itself. This in real world terms means absolutely nothing. For all of those thousands of failed applicants in recent years, many are still here. Many went through high court challenges, many were given amnesty after just not leaving. That is the actual reality on the ground. Once you're in the system, just don't leave. That is the name of the game.

    It has gotten really tiresome reading some of the stuff on here that flies in the face of what is actually happening on the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Far-right got zero seats from 174 in the November election.

    Far-right parties and individuals got trounced.

    Immigration was the greatest concern for a pitiful 6% of voters as per the exit poll above.

    The message to the racists is unambiguous - You're Not Wanted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    You appear to be suggesting that the electorate are just stupid, that the wool was pulled over their eyes and that a couple of million of them just forgot that immigration was such a big issue for them!

    I'd suggest the electorate is much smarter then you seem to think, they know their own minds and they voted accordingly, in line with the exit polls conducted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    Where did I suggest the electorate are stupid? Can you pinpoint that exactly? More absolute scutter being posted here by the same few day in day out.

    The electorate chose to just about hang onto FG and FF as they were the parties that pivoted on immigration. They were the ones out of the handful of major political parties that gave the perception of a hardening stance on IPA's in particular in future. Sinn Fein lost out hugely by not budging on this huge issue.

    How you and the rest of your ilk can keep claiming that immigration isn't an issue (when it effectively lost Sinn Fein their shot at power) just because some headbanger far right parties didn't pick up 2.2 million votes is just nonsensical garbage.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    when it effectively lost Sinn Fein their shot at power

    Not sure how you claim others are posting nonsensical garbage, when you are literally making things up and reading the minds of over 2 million people!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    The increasing numbers will be the cost of housing ,welfare and services for 85000 Ukrainians and those asylum seekers 33000 many of whom will get status here .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    And all of whom are capable of working and housing themselves. To say otherwise is just pure discrimination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    How do you know how many are capable of working and housing themselves ? How many have the required language skills and education that will allow them to support themselves at a time well educated Irish people have to emigrate to house themselves ? As you say, link please



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010




Advertisement