Are asexuals 'fake oppressed'? **Mod Note in Post #221**

Wait…you're female?

Its not nonesense just because you say it is. Allot of women are uncomfortable and dont like the idea of gender neutral spaces, they feel unsafe and gender neutral spaces have been abused by opportunistic men in the past. Ive already given examples in my previous post, you can disagree but its not anti trans to advocate for women and girls safe spaces.

Men aren't allowed in women's shelters either. Pretty standard. Is that discrimination? Do the people that run domestic abuse shelters for women deserve to burn in hell too?

The big difference is you don't find people defending people who make anonymous comment's like that, while everyone marches out to defend JK Rowling irrespective of what she says because she is "on their side". Their cognitive dissonance means they cannot conceive of a world where two separate views can possibly be held at the same time - that they have a legitimate view that they cannot understand and are uncomfortable with the "trans" issue and that the likes of JK Rowling are cruel and vindictive in their approach. In their minds there are only two scenarios - all in, and all out. Thats why people with moderate liberal views are automatically equated with people who take it to an extreme level like "JK Rowling should burn in hell". To allow for nuance in opinion is to throw a seed of doubt on their own absolutism. The world would be a much better place if people can acknowledge that two views can be held simultaneously. It is possible to not understand aspects of sexuality and still exhibit compassion and empathy to others.

Awareness around something is regressive?

The thread has reached peak crank.

last time I did I stopped when I saw all the women. And they stopped and looked up at me from the sink. I just went "I think I'm in the wrong room" and everyone burst out laughing.