Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Farronshoneen Roundabout

123457

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Active travel, while well intentioned in theory, is not going to work in Waterford at the current rate. There are not enough options or frequencies for it to work in it's current guise. No point closing the stable door when the horse has already bolted. If people are going to use it in Waterford it needs to be far more punctual and have more routes.

    Yes, I frequently use public transport in the city and often end up walking due to lack of service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 Meatball.Martin


    Someone should also look @ the traffic light sequence @ Parnell St/Mall & at the The Bridge. No point in having a light turn green in Parnell Street when you cant move. It usually takes 2/3 changes before you manage to make snaillike progress onto The Quay

    Its quicker to walk into town from Ferrybank than travel by car/bus. Last Thursday morning it took me 30 mins to drive from Rockenham to the traffic lights & Rockshire Road. A total distance of 0.8km. The bus service from Ferrybank to the town is absolutely shocking. JJ Kavanaghs take a bow.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    You realise you cannot improve public transport unl;ess you take space away from cars.
    Its really that simple, to improve things stuff has to change.

    It cannot just all magically change within 24hrs or even 1 year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Yes I realise that, do you use public transport? If so, what is your take on it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Hodger


    Report in the waterford news and star that the apartment blocks near deerwood have being given the go ahead.

    https://www.waterford-news.ie/news/deerpark-residents-disappointed-by-planning-decision_arid-51978.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawJQHRhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHTT4MHPLD_WQTryfY_RZdbNlBVDNydKsxjj3s1m3ZD4lN5DDhu_TLqTh9g_aem_8KmVf13UxjWyFYQT78kTCg

    As such apartments and housing estate planned out near bishops court are planned and both are in the vicinity of the Farronshoneen Roundabout it make the world of common sense to revert back to two lanes to allow for easier flow of traffic; with new housing will come with further people driving out that area.

    Another option for the quay would be a pedestrian bridge by the clock tower such as this Image visualizes.

    birdge%20quay-enhanced.png

    If the traffic lights were replaced with a pedestrian bridge given its presently a one lane traffic system on both sides a pedestrian bridge would be a win for both pedestrians crossing over and for drivers with allowing for an easier flow of traffic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭johnnykilo


    The Tramore Bus and any large trucks might have something to say about that footbridge if it's anything like that mock-up 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    I can hardly think of anything worse or uglier or more out of place than this type of pedestrian bridge in an urban setting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Hodger


    It would obviously be higher / high enough to let double decker bus and trucks through. Couldn't enlarge it in image editing. But two options for Quay regarding traffic either revert back to 4 traffic lanes. Or if keeping the current two lane system replace the traffic lights with a pedestrian bridge to allow a easier constant flow of traffic. At times like others I might wait for a bus some evenings: the lights change a lot . Instead of traffic lights that change a lot a pedestrian bridge might be a good idea so the traffic can constantly flow and the busses would be able to travel faster and better on the Quay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭Bards


    Vehicle Bridge from tower hotel to north quays would be the optimum solution. then make south quays and north quays one way similar to ballybricken..outbound via rice bridge and inbound via new bridge.

    Allow public transport to use dedicated express lanes on both quays



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal



    You posted the April fools a few days early. 😂

    For the bridge idea to work it would have to be over twice the height shown in the photo, that means the ramps upto it would have to be much, much longer and zig zag and perhaps even require a lift for mobility impaired people.

    A zig zag ramp up and down means that crossing would by equal to walking 3-4 times longer then simply crossing the road. While you might try sell it as a win for pedestrians its actually not.

    - Its de-priotitising pedestrians
    - Forcing pedestrians to walk further
    - Is putting blockers in place for those with disabilities
    - Creates a danger for traffic underneath as now items can be dropped on the traffic unless you fully enclose the bridge in a cage.
    - You'd have to surround the road underneath with loads of railings to prevent pedestrians taking the much more logicial and faster route of simply crossing the road.
    - Its bloody ugly as sin
    - It takes away from the character of the clock tower which makes the area worse.
    - I'd strongly suspect that AIB, Grandville etc would object based on it impacting business and making the place so ugly
    - The ramp space and structure supports would take away space from Taxi's and/or bus stops.

    Just so many issues.

    In short, the bridge makes the city more hostile to pedestrians.
    It's an awful idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Yes, it needs improvement.
    While costs for some have come down more often then not it gets stuck in car traffic.

    We should always give priority to a vehicle moving 40-50 people over a vehicle moving on avg 1.5 (car). The city should have dedicated bus lanes on all major routes including the entire outer ring road, along with bus lane cameras to enforce there use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,020 ✭✭✭914


    Where the new apartments are going to be built two lanes are already present.

    The only part of the roundabout that reduced from 2 lanes to 1 was on the grange side, all other approaches still have two lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Yes but all the extra households will need to return go their homes. Some more than likely via Grange side. In short, it was an absolutely horrendous decision by unelected representative Michael Murphy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,020 ✭✭✭914


    They would be best off returning home from the airport road though, as if they return from the grange side, they have to go the whole way down the dual carriageway and back around to access their entrance.

    I do agree the lane should have remained there and the pedestrian crossing moved back to the single lanes, but even if it is returned it's not going to be a game changer, the extra lane will allow an extra 6 cars possibly to enter that lane, when traffic is back as far as St Anne's it's not a huge difference, unless the left lane is used as a filter lane and it gets traffic moving that bit quicker.

    The big issue is the volume of cars in the roads, I also feel a secondary school located on the Williamstown road/ballygunner would go a long way in removing a fair chuck of that traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Agreed on the above, it won't make a massive difference but would assist the huge backlogs now. The school situation is a real issue but unfortunately can't see that changing with Waterpark recently renovated.

    The real issue I have is the consultation process, or lack of, and the attitude that public transport will make the difference. I would be my last euro the Active Travel manager rarely, if ever, uses either public transport around city or the Farranshoneen roundabout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    https://www.waterford-news.ie/news/respect-residents-locals-protest-outside-waterfords-city-hall-over-proposed-road-alterations_arid-67212.html

    More groundbreaking stuff from the Council and their in house experts! See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    not 100% sure of the actual changes but from using those streets fairly regularly a one way system should be welcomed especially if you as a resident park on any of their streets especially Wilkins st…? Plus it’s a trial so if it’s a fiasco then it can be reversed / modified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    also. How how / what is best way to carry out a consultation with the locals. From the article in the news and star on line the locals would be against any change ….?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,020 ✭✭✭914


    I re call one resident complaining since the beginning of time about the traffic due to the school, now a one way system is being put in as a trial and the same person is now giving out.

    Funnily I haven't heard any alternative plans/ideas from the residents.

    Possibly there is a better solution but with such narrow roads in the area I'd imagine only a one way system or some work and ride option so there is no parking near the school



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Consultation with residents was lacking from what a person living there told me. Same as the Farranshoneen Roundabout.

    The people making the ultimate decisions have no interest in the everyday user and their experiences. That is the real problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    There were two rounds of consultation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    furthermore I’ve been informed ( not sure how true though) that under the current legislation local authorities don’t need to carry out any public consultation if they wish to implement one way streets or close or cul de sac existing streets. Sounds unfair but if it is the case can you blame them for not carrying any consultation given the likely opposition there will be. As I said above the streets in question are badly in need of a ‘re-jig’ especially Wilkins st



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    How could you blame them for not consulting with the people who actually live there and are affected by the changes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    Nice bit of sarcasm there. These are hardly ‘life changing’ alterations…? May cause a delay of minute or two if you are looking for parking and might reduce the risk of your parked vehicle getting side swiped 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 Meatball.Martin


    The roads up around Wilkin St & Alphonsus St do need a bit of re-organising but I'd ask anyone to take a look @ what's being proposed before commenting;

    https://waterfordcouncil.ie/wilkin-street-and-passage-road/

    Some of it looks okay, but not being able to turn onto Passage Road from John's Hill side will only cause further problems. You are only gonna cause tailbacks @ lights further on down the road at the top of The Folly.

    More importantly why schedule a 3 month trial just as schools are going back and the evenings are beginning to get darker. Surely this would have made more sense earlier in the year??

    Finally, the major reason all this is taking place is because of the school traffic in the area. Anyone who drives around there during term time will tell you that between 8:30-9:05 its pure chaos & madness, After that its fairly clearm until closing times roll around.

    Another bug bear: why dont kids cycle to school anymore?? I spent 6yrs in DLS and cycled in/out everyday day barring a storm. Without a helmet. Along with probably 75% of the 1,000+ pupils at the time. These days you could count the school cyclists on one hand! The only things using the cycle lanes on Newtown Road [esp the DLS side are SUV's parking in them and on the path waiting for the kids to emerge!]

    Those "Active Travel" guys are losing the run of themselves altogether. Apparently there are causing another resident revolt out in Tramore @ Ard naGroi

    https://www.wlrfm.com/news/dont-cut-us-off-tramore-locals-fight-to-keep-left-turn-in-ard-na-groi-1484620

    I cycle a fair bit. Not many Irish people do. Its not like in the Netherlands or Denmark. Dont think you can shoe horn in cycle lanes on old roads not made for the purpose. Anyone who has cycled down the Quay at any point, despite the cycle lanes, will usually find someone parked in them or reversing out or turning up a street. Its not a comfortable cycle. Esp when you come up the straight by the Bridge Hotel. A few months ago some a*hole started blowing the hrn @ me coz I crossed the road when the green cycle light came on at the Bridge. He though I was breaking the lights FFS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Exactly that, people just assume the planners know what they're doing. I've found that they don't listen to reasonable opinion and just land these ill thought out ideas on the city. There will be absolute mayhem in Newtown and John's Hill/Folly as a result. In fact, there is already and this will only exacerbate the issue. The changes to Farranshoneen roundabout from John's Hill side also show that there is no joined up thinking with various projects.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Was it though?
    Time and time again I see this claim rolled out by people that winge,

    Even locally I saw it with a large town plan, council put it in the paper, social media, it was mentioned by non-council community groups and yet it had a pittiful amount of submissions from people in the area.

    Months later stuff is changed and people claimed they weren't consulted.

    Its not the councils fault if people choose not to read the information they make available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Who is whinging? Do you consider all the traffic initiatives a success?



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Kids don't cycle to school because we've allowed our roads to become more dangerous, more cars, larger cars, faster cars. Roads are outright hostile to kids walking or cycling.

    For somebody that claims to cycle I'm surprised you do not appear to really understand this.
    It can be changed, but it requires massive changes and deprioritising cars so cyclists can feel and be safer.

    Also, as for shoe horning you understand that thats exactly what the likes of Netherlands actually did on narrow roads, changed previously traffic filled streets to one way or removed cars. Plenty of narrow streets and much of the changes that have happened have only done so since the 1980's, 1990s and even continue to happen now. Netherlands wasn't just always magically bike and pedestrian friendly, there was a time where they destroyed towns to build massive roads and give cars access everywhere.

    If you look at Paris you can see massive changes in even the past 7 years, car parking removed, streets only for bikes or people etc. Hell, even parts of Dublin show you can improve a city by giving less priority to cars.

    If you build it, people will use it.

    But you need a joined up well network as well, otherwise by comparison its like building a nice new motorway but all roads connecting to it are single track L roads with overgrown ditches, potholes, tree's blocking half the road in places and tractors driving down them constantly and then giving out that nobody really uses the motorway.

    Cities are for living, not just through ways for cars.

    Screenshot 2025-08-20 at 10.46.00.png



    Before and Ater in Rue de Rivoli, Paris
    This wasn't just a covid thing, its still changed now and so are hundreds of other streets.

    496920896_1271035921693903_6036478629906373219_n.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 855 ✭✭✭Dunmoreroader


    "More importantly why schedule a 3 month trial just as schools are going back and the evenings are beginning to get darker. Surely this would have made more sense earlier in the year??

    Finally, the major reason all this is taking place is because of the school traffic in the area. Anyone who drives around there during term time will tell you that between 8:30-9:05 its pure chaos & madness,"

    Haven't you answered your own question here? What's the point in road-testing a new system to cope with school-term congestion when there isn't any congestion in the summer?

    This will work fine and drivers will learn to modify their routes to accommodate the changes. I'm all for one-way systems where needed and thought through properly.



Advertisement