Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1898899901903904907

Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think the danger is if Trump does manage to get some policies in place that bring profits and taxes back to the US, the Dems are unlikely to reverse them in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Barry_Soweto


    The only reason the 'far right' haven't made ground here is because our economy has been making billions and billions it should never have been and our government have been able to essentially throw money out to everyone and keep them happy, or most of them anyways.

    Our health budget was something like 15bn in 2018. In 2025 it's 25bn. 66% increase in 7 years.

    It's wild it's taken so long for another country to try and stop us living off their riches. It's crazy. Our budget increases in spend by billions every year and we're still running surpluses. We basically give money in every area that needs it. There's literally no hard decisions to make for this government.

    Go to literally any other western economy and the idea of a government giving 2-4 months of free electricity for literally every house in the country, or giving 70k grant to put towards a derelict house is completely alien to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If there is any hint that he can achieve what he is planning the Republicans will be in power for the 21st century in America

    Tarrifs are a weapon against waiting it out, those that move first and quickest have competitive advantage and ironically, European companies could be the big winners as ESG and energy crisis in Europe has give them a head start on locating operations to the US. Note the German Dax performance over the past 2 years

    Note also from headlines over the last couple of days relating to the EU exploring retaliating by going after US tech

    A perfect Storm?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Visited Dublin a few times since Covid and to me it seems the damage is already done. Covid lockdown forced the issue for many people I knew.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,076 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It is certainly true that the value of money fron the govt's perspective has perhaps become a little diluted.

    When you have an abundance of something, it is easy to take it's value for granted.

    If the Coporation/Income Tax receipts were to take a huge hit, following the domino effect that unfolded from Tarrif increases into the US and subsequent job losses here, the govt would very quickly need to tighten it's belt.

    I assume that the govt have already war gamed the outcomes, but the threat is very real.

    Ballooning budgets for the HSE and uncapped rent subsidies for housing, the fact that once someone qualifies for HAP, they could be promoted into a 200k a year job and still receive the payment, are all completley unsustainable examples of our care-free govt spending policy.

    The govt have gotten too used to living like a king in a diamond encrusted banquet hall, with a 7 day a week, all you can eat, michelin star buffet, permanently on the menu.

    That menu is about to get downgraded, significantly.

    What is perhaps most frustrating of all is the lack of tangible progress with the nations infrastructure and living standards.

    Crime is high, the city is dirty, services are broken and understaffed, whilst animosity amongst sections of the population, towards other sections of the population, is at fever pitch.

    When we look back at the golden years of tax take and jobs abound, it will remain an eternal headscratcher to try and understand how we were somehow able to regress as a society, at a time when we held all the levers of progress in our hands.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Was pricing solar panels recently and have come to the conclusion that the grant is swallowed in extortionate charges and unnecessary labour and services

    You need a Ber (€250) for the grant, if solar panels are beneficial why a Ber? Every home has an eircode (unique identifier). Create a Ber database and for each qualifying works completed have a check box and adjust Ber automatically. Hence a box ticker job has been automated and a valuable resource can be freed up to add real value elsewhere.

    The panels used are €80 a piece delivered, yet I was informed that each additional panel would cost €300. Very pricey considering this is a 1day labour job

    2 hours of unwanted on site consultancy. I've already made the decision I would like to have them, I've done the research. Again labour that could be freed up to add real value elsewhere.

    We should have a strong independent public awareness campaign and do these housing estate by housing estate. Owner opt in/out. Cost paid by savings on electricity bill. Could be done with no grant at half the cost of the current process and 0 up front cost to the householder



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Same thing happened with the bike-to-work scheme. Prices rose to max out the available cash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 Timeofyourlife


    Even if tariffs are allied to pharm industry in Europe.. how long would it get the production up to speed on the US side ? Trumps time might be up once factory's etc were builth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    Tech transfers alone can take like 3-5 years. Setting up new plants and restructuring your global pipeline, and finding the necessary skilled workers? Probably a decade or more.

    Plus then, due to reciprocal tariffs, a US pharma would be exporting into multiple markets slapping tariffs on their goods. The US is by far the most lucrative market for pharma, currently, but that maths ain't necessarily math-ing for a global MNC



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Intellectual Property can be transferred between jurisdictions as easily as profits. Bulk of our corporation tax derives from IP and other intangible assets being held here. That's the real danger.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Oddly enough same thing happened with HTB too!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Definitely this. Although thankfully this wouldn’t (immediately) lead to less jobs. Just lower the budget surplus.

    Then on the pharma side it’s lower demand due to higher prices from tariffs. The idea that all the pharma plants will close here and re-appear in the US in a parallel shift is just not a real risk in any sort of reasonable timeline.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Unfortunately I think there is a potential job threat if the IP goes.

    In order to max out the schemes for the lowest effective tax rate, MNCs must agree a business plan with revenue. For the business plan to be approved they must be shown to be high value jobs, and there is a presumption that the wage bill for qualifying jobs are a % of the profits booked.

    No doubt there are MNCs - pharma particularly - who are producing stuff here that is reliant on the IP registered here, and as you say it's unlikely they're going anywhere soon because of IP law changes.

    But there is no doubt there is a fair chunk of corporation tax revenue based on fairly fluid IP, and that has to be considered a real risk. Just hoping the 15bn figure attributed to IP related tax revenue, includes the companies that are embedded as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I'm wondering what the story with the IDA tax breaks is now that Intel are closing down their Shannon site.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Everything relating to housing is a circular dysfunctional doom loop. Every interference by government adds cost. Developers operate off a margin, the more the gov add costs, the monetary value of the margin increases

    All the grants on top of that increase both the land and the margin. Easily the greatest way to burn taxpayer money.

    Guaranteed that in any fall in tax revenue this scam will be protected at all costs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Without a doubt the corporate tax take could be gutted in a heartbeat. I think on balance of probabilities it will be.

    I’m more optimistic on the jobs front. Although they definitely came for the tax. Ireland is now a legitimately good location for a tech company to be based given the workforce. Add in the inertia of firing and re-hiring tens of thousands of people plus exiting significant property footprints, it would need to be a seriously compelling argument and likely take many many years.

    US? Salaries are literally double, if not more, in any of the legit tech cities. House prices double or triple dublin. Rents significantly higher.

    Biggest threat would likely be from ‘the next Ireland’ which could be somewhere like Poland. They’re seeing absurd levels of wage growth currently shrinking their competitive advantage fast.
    I just don’t think it’s an quick and easy decision for any company to just vacate Ireland en masse



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Agreed, was chatting on here with somebody who PM'd me about the US threat to corporate tax, and ultimately we agreed that if we do get burnt the government would probably shut schools and hospitals and increase borrowing before they stopped turbocharging the property market!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yep, that's I meant by "embedded", companies who came for the tax but will stay for the workforce. I think we have a solid base of them, so hopefully we can weather the storm. The worst impact of any shock will be because current tax take levels are so high, but it's worth remembering we have a fair bit of headroom.

    I am also optimistic that our dept of Finance/Revenue will not be caught napping on this - this is not their first rodeo and they've come up with even more lucrative solutions after pressure was brought to bear on previous schemes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Agreed on both fronts. We’d probably end up more like a ‘normal’ country. Running a bit of a deficit. Instead of the luxury of setting up sovereign wealth funds.

    Do have some concerns that our only real plays to generate more income will be higher taxes on lower paid workers & property taxes (both horrendously unpopular). We never rolled back the USC on higher paid so any further increases not realistic without decimating competitiveness.

    And the main big fish for reducing expenditure meaningfully would be trimming an absolutely rampant health budget or the state pension (even more unpopular).

    Going from ridiculous excess to tightening the belt buckles in short order would be painful.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I'm hopefully the mitigating measures will be focussed on the big players. We've cutting great deals for these guys for years, and Revenue and govt have very close relationships with the biggest MNCs. I am not saying that as a criticism, quite the opposite - it's one of our biggest strengths. It is something successive governments have done fantastically well, perhaps almost too well!

    There's no doubt that damage limitation talks have been ongoing to try and keep them here, stressing the long term tax benefits etc etc, probably even coming up with new schemes to counter the worst of the expected Trump measures.

    People can whine all day that Apples effective tax rate is only 2%, but it is our 2%, and I'd far rather have that 2% and the jobs that go with it than 15% of the profits on their Irish sales. Govt know the value of that 2% and will fight tooth and nail to defend Apple's right to have a miniscule effective tax rate. We might be about to find out how beneficial it was to take Apple's side in the EU 13bn extra tax fight, and the confidence it will have given all the MNCs.

    I think that will hold true of any future government too, even if SF are involved. No Irish government will kill the golden goose just to get a few more lefty votes.

    As said, my biggest worry is how easy it would be to dismantle the IP schemes, and I do think we'll take a big hit there. I also reckon most people are overly focussed on tariffs and headline tax rates, and don't realise how vulnerable the IP tax take is. If we lose a big chunk of that, it will be gone very quickly and we won't get it back.

    Interesting times for sure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Has the sovereign wealth fund gone live? Might be wise to delay, I've a feeling 2025 will be a repeat of 2022 as far as share prices are concerned

    Harris needs to be removed from any diplomatic role, thought we dodged a bullet when Martin got Taoisech for 3 years, but putting Harris in Foreign affairs is a major own goal. Hide him away in education or social welfare



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,577 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    So - where do we think we are?

    I'm seeing a lot of folks on here suggest that the Irish Property Market isn't even subject to cycles, and the only way is up. No matter what potential economic/societal shocks are introduced to the conversation, there seems to be a lot of explaining why they won't make any difference to Irish property prices. I think that points to there being plenty of gas in the tank to fuel a prolonged "Denial" phase, but I don't think we're there yet. I'm going to go with "Euphoria" combined with a touch of "Anxiety".

    I look forward to hearing all the reasons why there's no cycle in Irish property. Thanks in advance. 🙂

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭DataDude


    It’s not that they’re is no cycle or never a drop. It’s just it’s exceedingly rare. House prices have dropped in nominal terms less than 10 years out of the last 100.

    Sure it’ll drop again at some point. It just probably won’t be this year or next. If you bet house prices will drop. You’ll be wrong far more often than you’re right. That’s just the statistical reality.

    And yes there’ll always be plenty of oeople strongly saying this year is definitely different. Brexit, COVID, interest rates, cost of living, trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Barry_Soweto


    There's no bad price to buy a house at according to 'experts' these days as prices will always go up.

    Saw a clip of Eoin Magee the other day saying buy if you're happy to live in the house for 15 years, buy.

    Same commentary and advice is seen anywhere online. The advice essentially boils down to this…"buy at any price because you'll end up in the green anyways"

    The problem with this advice is it misses out all the events and feelings in between the time of buying and a potential drop in house prices. The vast majority of buyers in the last 15 years never experienced a drop in their property price after buying.

    Say there is a drop of 20%, that's not going to happen in a vacuum. It'll likely mean the economy is not good.

    So you've paid 600k for a semi D in Drimnagh. Your property is now worth 480k. You've lost your job and are on the dole. The house next door, identical to your house has just sold for 480k. The economy isn't as good so immigration isn't as strong. The rental demand isn't as high so you can't even rent out a room for as much as you thought.

    Saying 'price doesn't matter' doesn't take into the psychological effect when you do overpay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    Its quite evident that this time the risks are much different than anything Ireland has faced before. Whilst house prices don't fall often, when they do they usually fall of a cliff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    My concern would be that prospective buyers see this spending as a safety net in that the future price of there property could never fall below what they pay because this spending will always prop up the price.

    The reality is that this spending increases the risk in the same way that the multiples of income required to purchase a home did in the noughties.

    Corrections become crashes when the well suddenly runs dry. We were able to tap the banks for some of the cost of the crash in 08. There is no comeback when it's taxpayers money pumping the bubble



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    As always it just comes down to whether you're a Bear or a Bull. Brexit, covid & Trump.

    So far the Bulls have been right. Will Trump be 3rd time lucky for the Bears? Nobody knows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Murt2024


    I just don’t see the prices dropping even with a recession with the the lack of supply. Two partners on minimum wage at 30k a year is 60k with a 24k deposit is 264k which would allow you to buy something fairly decent outside of the likes of Dublin and Cork. Include the various different schemes and potentially could get a new build which are pushing house prices further upwards. Minimum wage is only going to keep going up.

    I remember when I started working 13 years ago my first job out of college I was on 22k which was minimum wage and only allowed 3.5 your salary.


    The supply just isn’t there and who has the bigger deposits win at the end of the day.

    I’m on 65K, hoping to buy around October and will have a 50k deposit as it’s going to be needed.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Agreed, I'd share that concern, but in fairness to prospective buyers that's a fairly rational positional to hold right now as things stand.

    It's not just the government spending, it is also the narrative that provides the safety net.

    That's why I get so incensed about the myths we had a 250k deficit that's probably closer to 300k now, and that vacancy is very low, and that nearly 70% of young adults are living with their parents etc etc.

    If these things were true it would be reasonable to think as long as we cannot get ahead of this supposed deficit, prices will at least be underpinned. We hear exactly that thinking on here all the time.

    Post edited by hometruths on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I suspect most homebuyers do not know or care what the term Bull or Bear means

    There buying a place to live to escape rent and may be completely unaware of the role hyperfinacialisation is playing in making that process so difficult.

    Perfect breeding ground for unrest and political views at the extremes



Advertisement