Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Local Roads - New Speed Limits

11314151618

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,331 ✭✭✭SeanW


    How so? You're claiming that there's no such thing as a dangerous road, yet … for some reason … changes in road layouts often result in safety improvements?

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,840 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You really need this explained? 🙄

    What happens is that driver behaviour is forced to change with the new layout. You mentioned people crossing a dual carriageway earlier. With a layout change, drivers now can't cross the carriageway without looking properly like they used to!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    'i know a road where the 60km/h limit is stupid' - well, write to the council to tell them as much. ask them did they prepare for the default 60km/h limit by assessing roads like that to be retained at 80km/h.

    for every road you can suggest where the limit is unreasonably low in the new scheme, there are so many more roads where it was unnecessarily high on the old scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,211 ✭✭✭creedp


    Ffs the persecution complex codswallop again. Give it a break will you. In any case if you truly believed it would behove you to try and help me by listening better to what I have to say🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,211 ✭✭✭creedp


    Assumptions are the mother of all fcukups. Have you actually spoken to real people about this or have you just assumed what you want to believe to be the case?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,331 ✭✭✭SeanW


    If you close a median break on a dual carriageway, you're not changing anything about the drivers, you're just blocking off a dangerous junction - usually replaced with something safer like a roundabout, bridge, or grade separated junction.

    The road - inherently - becomes safer.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,887 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Believe me, I'm already on it.

    I have written to the ministers office who relayed my letter to the junior minister responsible. That was just to register my complaint re the introduction of these limits in such a broad manner.

    His response came from his personal secretary explaining the process whereby the local councils have the power to give special limits to roads that meet a standard.

    I have further researched the roads in the county that have been exempted from the 60 limit and am actively looking to get my hands on Engineers reports that must have been prepared to achieve this.

    One of the local roads exempted, I would have concerns over it being left at 80 kmh, not so much that it would be unsafe, more that there may be political force applied as it is significantly inferior to the road I've been referring to in this thread so it will be interesting to see what's what.

    I have qualifications in this area and studied road design to a reasonable level in the past so I intend to study any reports available and query the lack of special limit on the local road referred to here.

    It's possibly due to alignment of one small section but we shall see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Does any/many of the posters on here actually drive on these L roads ? I drive probably 90% of the time on these and the new speed limits have made little to no difference.

    For example from my place into the local town is 5k of L road and the actual default speed is nearer 100 than 60. If you pottered along at 60 you would have a queue behind you all day every day. People have paid little to no attention to these and many unaware of it having changed. The likelihood of these ever being enforced is next to nothing as there is no chance of a speed trap occurring.

    For most its a giant ball of irrelevance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,093 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Am I missing something here? They said people living on or using L roads have been aware of the changes and that the new signage has been in place for months. In that they are perfectly correct. Have you done a real life poll on the awareness of the changes locally? There's not a single person on the network of L roads where I live who didn't know the limit was dropping to 60. As I said, perhaps I'm misreading your point but Beechwoodspark is correct. Also, I have yet to speak to a local who isn't delighted and thankful for the change.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,840 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The road was neither safe nor unsafe - its a piece of feckin tarmac FFS. If was some of the people driving along or across it that made it unsafe through their actions



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,331 ✭✭✭SeanW


    But with a changed layout, all other things being equal, the drivers are exactly the same. Same driving styles, same proclivities, same competency level, same predisposition to making mistakes/misjudgements/rule-breaking etc. In Ireland, drivers didn't get lobotomies when medians were closed on dual carriageways.

    One layout is inherently safer than another. Your claim that it's "a piece of tarmac" falls apart 'when the rubber meets the road' so to speak. Literally.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    That's not my experience at all.Nobody was aware of this or paid any heed to it until the last month or so.No new signage around here that I have seen to date. That said, most people I know thought it just another irrelevant rule that will be forgotten about within a short while.The chances of this being enforced are minimal.

    When was the last time you saw a Garda speed check on an L road ? The Go Safe vans are in known locations and its unlikely any local driver would be unaware of where they might be parked.

    Like I said the road outside my place is a rural L road, now with a 60k limit. I would estimate not a single vehicle bar tractors are going less than that on it.

    People are getting het up about something that will have very little effect in the real world.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    are you willing to name this local road where people drive nearly 100km/h on?

    if not, even though i understand why you might not name it, i'm not going to give your claim any credence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Well I am hardly likely to tell you what road i live on now am I ?

    Not really important either way if you believe me or not as i live on and drive on these roads every day and can see the reality.People drive at whatever speed they feel comfortable at regardless of any change to the posted limit. The chance of having a Garda speed check if so infetesmely small as to be almost non existant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,887 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Yes this is the reality.

    I think some people picture L roads as boreens with grass down the middle. The new limit is fine for the thousands of miles of narrow poorly aligned roads but when you have an L road with good surface, road markings, reasonable alignment etc, the reality is that people are continuing as they were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,211 ✭✭✭creedp


    Small sample I know and obvioualy Im not going to generalise this view to the population but I was talking to 3 different people on Sunday on this issue and 2, while they were all gung go about its a great idea to stop the speeders, didn't know which roads were affected and actually asked if the roads they lived on was an L road and if the speed signs had changed.

    Which is the reason I asked is there an assumption everybody knows about this or have people actually said they are fully up to speed on the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,211 ✭✭✭creedp


    Oh for God's sake the usual linky or it's not true response. Why don't you do a bit of on the road research and see for yourself how many drivers are abiding by this 60kph limit on the many, many kms of L road well capable of being driven safely at 80kph



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the road mentioned is an L road where he claimed 100 was the norm, not 80. so i am curious about which road this might be.

    and if i don't know what road it is, and thus can't respond, the info provided so far is of little use to me. he mentioned the 'default' speed is 100, which is not the same as saying a safe speed. i could just take from that that people drive dangerously on that road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,211 ✭✭✭creedp


    If I said on my L road most cars travel in and around 80kph would you look for video evidence or just shrug your shoulders in disgust at society sliding toward chaos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Right, tried an experiment this morning. Afraid i have no video evidence, internet quotes or references so you will gave to take my word for it.

    Went down the road to collect sheep nuts.Drove along at my normal pace.Looked down at speedo changing from 3rd to 4th and it read an indicated 80k.Thats in a landcruiser with a trailer so not exactly boy racer material.

    Tried going at 60k and it was seriously slow.If i saw a car or van driving around at that it would raise suspicion straightaway with any neighbour

    Its an L road so no markings etc although its straight with a good surface.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    well it's prime to be assessed for an 80km/h limit so? would be worth highlighting to the nearest council office or councillor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's possibly similar to some of the roads I was talking about previously, where the quality of the surface is good and it has long sections of good sightlines. Likely a name between L1000 and L4999? But some sections of the same road could have tight bends or camber or bad sightlines and require the lower limit. Or it might have lots of private entrances. So rather than fixing or signing just the bad section they leave the whole road at 60kmh. It's also possible that the road is a higher number than L5000 and there's no real reason it's been built so well, it's just an anomaly and needs traffic calming measures.

    Here in Cork, they've taken the approach that they'll increase the limit on SOME L roads to 80, but it's not all Local Primaries (L1000-L4999). They've just done a scattergun kind of approach where some Local Primaries are worthy and others are not. If they instead upgraded their preferred handful of roads to Regional ( R ) then these would be standard widths and radii etc. The obvious problem with the Locals is that there's no standard widths, even for the Primaries. And obviously that's why we're stuck with the 60kmh.

    A good compromise for everyone in the thread could be to dictate that some of the Local Primaries should be upgraded to regional. Or that Local Primaries can be above 60 if they meet a minimum spec (maybe the spec of regional?). But again, to restate, the blanket 60kmh is because the L's are a free-for-all in terms of road quality.

    So they've taken the approach that none are suitable for 80 unless specifically checked and approved. And that's got to be the correct approach, rather than the opposite, which would be to assume that all are suitable for 80 unless there's been recorded incidents or near-misses. In safety terms, what they did is the logical and correct thing to do. It might irritate some people, but:

    • It is the correct approach from a safety design perspective
    • Individual roads can be and have been upgraded/reinstated as 80 with minimum fuss where appropriate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Just another weird detail: the Cork scattergun of roads reinstated as 80 include some higher than L5000.

    So they have some lower than L5000 staying at 60 and some higher than L5000 getting some kind of blessing to be 80.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,377 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The old N2 between Clontibret and Castleblayney has been entirely reduced to 60Kmh, because its a "local road".

    So when you come to Annyalla there is no difference in the speed limit in the village and in this section outside. This brings speed limits into disrepute, and reflects a poorly performing council, there should have been general guidance that former national roads should be 80Kmh in most cases.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    There are some sections of the old N2 which have been 60km for years. Not nearly as long as the section you mention, but less than 1km of the stretch south of coolquay is 80; the rest is 60.

    Given that there's a new N2 alongside with higher limits it's not that big a deal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    In fairness, I'd suggest it's a big deal for the people who still regularly use that road.

    70 km/h along a stretch of road like @Charles Babbage shows would hardly be breakneck or dangerous speed. But it would still result in the same fine and same penalty points as 140 km/h along the new N2 that you refer to.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    if you were driving the full length of that road from clontibret to castleblayney, the difference between 60 and 80 would be about two and a half minutes along the ~11km length.

    there's two caveats to that - that's a theoretical max, and does not include having to slow down for Annyalla, which Charles Babbage mentioned (and there may be other zones which could not sustain anything over 50 or 60), and the second caveat is that if you were driving between those two points, the two and a half minutes is moot given you'd use the new road anyway.

    FWIW i'm not saying the road can't sustain say 80km/h along stretches which are probably several km long; my point is that cause for complaint is severely hampered by the provision of a newer, far superior road (with climbing lanes) with a 100km/h limit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    But it's not about saving time by being able to drive at 80km/h rather than 60. Nor is it about people for whom the obvious and logical choice would be to use the new road instead while travelling through the area.

    The point refers to people who live along that road, or any of the side roads off it, or who are regularly in the village for shopping or anything else. An 80-year-old who's never driven at more than 70km/h in their entire life could end up with a €160 fine and three penalty points for doing their customary 70 here while on their way home from Mass.

    By the way, unusual for what was once a N-road to be downgraded all the way to L-road status. Normally it would become an R-road. Anybody know the background?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    But it's not about saving time by being able to drive at 80km/h rather than 60. Nor is it about people for whom the obvious and logical choice would be to use the new road instead while travelling through the area.

    The point refers to people who live along that road, or any of the side roads off it, or who are regularly in the village for shopping or anything else. An 80-year-old who's never driven at more than 70km/h in their entire life could end up with a €160 fine and three penalty points for doing their customary 70 here while on their way home from Mass.

    By the way, unusual for what was once a N-road to be downgraded all the way to L-road status. Normally it would become an R-road. Anybody know the background?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    it's possible the locals (the ones who live on it) actually like the fact that the road is at a lower limit?

    and if we have people - i don't care what age - who cannot adjust from their customary 70 on it, maybe they should not be driving in the first place.



Advertisement