Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

1119120122124125132

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Where does the official website of the government scheme say that 100 percent of all items collected are reused/recycled?

    Genuine question as it's mentioned in press briefings rather interchangeably that return and recycle are they same thing. Which they plainly are not.

    It would be treacherous if, in a few months time a PQ is raised on the scheme and it transpires that return and recycle are in fact not the same........

    Now, I doubt very much you will easily get the actually recycling numbers as they don't make for good reading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,375 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And to re-iterate:

    It is not the official website of the government scheme. It's not an official government website at all.

    It's the website of a private company operating a government scheme, which contains information contradicted by an official website of the European Union.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,701 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Exactly. This whole load of nonsense has little to do with the government, other than the fact that it offloaded the ability for a private business concern to hold people's money to ransom and make bank off of uncollected deposits.

    The entire thing is a bloody farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,370 ✭✭✭jj880


    Its a simple question.

    Which of these is a fact and which is a lie?

    1. The Re-Turn website that states Ireland must achieve "recycling targets"

    Or

    2. The EU Directive that states Ireland must achieve "collection targets"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    Here's what the Directive itself actually says, rather than any summation of it on either the Re-Turn website on any other page on a Europa website:

    image.png

    The single-use plastic products listed in Part F are beverage bottles with a capacity of up to three litres - i.e. the sort of bottles covered by the DRS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,370 ✭✭✭jj880


    No.

    These are collection targets. It even clarifies this in that same Article 9 you include but you conveniently cropped out paragraph 3:

    member_state_collection_targets.JPG

    Search the full directive for "Collection targets" 9 matches all leading to the COLLECTION targets you quote.

    Search the full directive for "Recycling targets" 2 matches both of which lead here

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:1994:365:FULL

    member_state_recycling_targets.JPG

    I would include the rest but the gist is "member states set the recycle targets to keep trade costs low"

    Post edited by jj880 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    Wow. You're a dog with a bone.

    Quite literally, from the extract of the Single Use Plastics Directive that I put up, it clearly states "separate collection for recycling".

    I don't intend to get into a discussion on legal interpretation of what that means when cross-checked against another Directive from 25 years earlier which you reference.

    Point remains that it's a collection target for recycling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,370 ✭✭✭jj880


    Only took a few minutes to find. You left out paragraph 3 on purpose which clearly states the 77% and 90% are collection targets. If you can show me the recycling target % set by Ireland post them up but the target % you have posted are for collection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    which clearly states the 77% and 90% are collection targets

    It clearly states they are collection targets….for recycling.

    To be frank, I'm not sure you understand English, never mind EU legislation.

    Goodnight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,370 ✭✭✭jj880


    Oh you're being frank? Well that changes everything 🤣.

    You tried to leave out the paragraph that states these are collection targets and now you're dying on the hill of "for recycling" which means nothing without the recycling target % to back it up. "For recycling" doesnt magically change collection targets into recycling targets.

    You telling me I dont understand English is laughable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Any chance of some positive discussions here about it instead of the constant going around in circle with the same old argument for months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    In the absence of concrete figures and implementation of once promised enhancements to the scheme what type of positive discussions do you suggest?

    There's very little positive about this scheme for your average citizen but plenty positives for the producers and local government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,370 ✭✭✭jj880


    1 bulk RVM in Tesco was the last positive I can think of. More of these would obviously make things easier for the customer. Positives are unfortunately very thin on the ground with this scheme. Changes have been discussed here several times. The CEO half promised some of them on Newstalk a while back when pressed but no timeframe provided. These include:

    IBAN deposit refund

    Airport / home delivery exemptions

    Bulk drop off facilities

    Australia seem to have no problems doing it:

    https://www.returnit.com.au/vic/faq/

    Screenshot_2025-03-01-09-52-45-935_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg
    Post edited by jj880 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    20250116_075626.jpg

    scammed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 instantfoam


    When did DRS become a government Boady ? we all see conflation there. And it's not a government scheme. It's from the EU. As for the recycling and asking for proof it does not. Did people miss the tag and poolbeg. What made me laugh was the tag damaging the furnace Anyone know what factor sunscreen you need for 550 degrees ? that was dropped in for the stupid so they don't an masse try it. Love the picture going around of the old scheme for items. I'm suer they do take cans. Where do you get the deposit back ? I only ever seen one place with a bloke at one as they had a carpark to. Why are Lies blatant misinformation and falsehoods being allowed.

    also the lad withe arm in a sling I wound is that from signing some contract so fast. Anyone know how to find there declared interests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,633 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Victoria started their scheme in November 2023, and have experienced many problems. Tasmania does not even have a scheme.

    https://www.tec.org.au/victoria_container_refund_scheme_report_card

    Victoria’s Container Refund Scheme – Report Card

    Victoria’s 10cent container refund scheme has been operating for 6 months and the first review of its operations has been released today.

    "Our review acknowledges there are inevitably teething problems in the early stages, but we are very concerned about a systemic issue that has arisen which could harm consumer convenience to refund points and thus the success of the scheme.  This involves reliance on over-the-counter (OTC) return points, especially in the Northern Zone, operated by Visy.  They have a multitude of problems and consumers will be the losers,’’ said Jeff Angel, Executive Director of the Total Environment Centre, which undertook the review.

    ‘’The government and Scheme Operator may wish to focus on gross return point numbers in their media, but this disguises a serious structural problem they should urgently address,” Mr Angel said.   

    OTCs experience many challenges due to:

    • limited opening hours
    • not accepting all types of containers (e.g. only accepting cans, not bottles)
    • rejecting any containers at all on certain days / when at capacity
    • refusal to deal with containers when working on other priorities (e.g. serving customers in service stations or bottleshops)
    • limited signage 

    Further for a number of OTC return points, that appear as active on the VicReturn locations website ( https://cdsvic.org.au/locations ), these:

    • were not operating correctly
    • did not exist
    • showed an incorrect address on the location map
    • were closed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭cheers big ears


    I bought a bottle of freshly squeezed juice from a certain supermarket.

    We weren’t charged the deposit nor does the bottle bear the return logo.

    Should these bottles have the logo and should we have been charged? The bottle is 330 ml.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭cheers big ears


    Photos of above, I’m in the reflection, hence the scribble.

    IMG_7958.jpeg IMG_7957.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Same here. I bought a bottle of fresh orange juice in Supervalu that had no deposit or barcode of any kind. I can't see how these could be excluded from the scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    If it doesn't have the logo then it's not part of the scheme. If it's not part of the scheme, there should be no deposit.

    Ketchup bottles aren't included in the scheme. Come to think of it neither are shampoo bottles. Don't know why.

    As far as I know each vendor has to register their product with DRS, if this is from a small vendor, they maybe didn't bother.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,375 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I've bought 1 litre bottles of chilled Orange Juice in Dunnes and a deposit was charged, returned ok:

    https://www.dunnesstoresgrocery.com/sm/pickup/rsid/231/product/dunnes-stores-simply-better-freshly-squeezed-valencia-orange-juice-with-bits-1-litre-id-100292357

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭cheers big ears


    I understand why condiments, soaps, shampoos and dairy would be exempt, the smell and the mess would be dreadful.

    There’s no clear reason why these aren’t “in-scope”. In saying that, my local cash-only Chinese takeaway (extremely delicious 😋) who doesn’t do receipts 😉 also sells cans from the UK without the R logo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,633 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    How do so many shampoo bottles finish up littering the sides of the road near me? And washing up liquid bottles? Baked bean cans and plastic milk bottles as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭cheers big ears




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I always thought the word flytipping was funny. Especially when you consider cow tipping is a very different practice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭cheers big ears




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭bog master


    Quick now, get onto your County Council as they have been tasked with the policing of this!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Not a hope. I couldn't be bothered. The scheme's enough of a waste of my time without wasting more contacting the council. I was just curious how those bottles weren't included.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    He did not.

    It is easy to recycle glass or aluminium and it is being done for a very long time. However, that is not a case with plastics. They are complicated and expensive to recycle so only a fraction of drink containers are actually recycled and even that can be done only few times. If we focus on plastic which is majority of what return collect then we still talk about collection and not recycling.



Advertisement