Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mayo GAA Discussion

1289290292294295310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,657 ✭✭✭Blackjack


    that Towey doesn’t have it at this level is not a popular opinion. He has a fan club on a particular podcast which doesn’t hold weight when you look at his record, but empty barrels and all that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,657 ✭✭✭Blackjack


    I’d have him (Boland) ahead of Towey any day. He looks to has developed a bit more strength now than he did under Horans tenure so doesn’t lose the ball as much. I’ve seen Towey being dispossessed far too easily too many times to see him as a starter.

    Post edited by Blackjack on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 575 ✭✭✭eastie17


    well at least mcstay has been nice and amenable to the media during his tenure so he’ ll be able to slot back on that gravy train quiet easy. Not sure how credible his expert opinion could be considered though looking at the hames he’s made of mayo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭BandMember


    That was a hard watch yesterday, but glad to get the points even though I still think we'll end up going down to Division 2. Our sideline was an absolute embarrassment again yesterday, the look of bafflement and confusion on their faces regarding the new rules is nothing short of a disgrace at this point. It's like they never even bothered to read them and learned nothing from the first game to the third game. As other posters have said, it'll be a short summer and McStay will slide off back to his cosy punditry job because the only thing he has done is keep his media buddies happy. He will blame the players, but ultimately he took over a squad that had been in 2 of the previous 3 AI finals and taken them backwards at a rate of knots to leave them nowhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,195 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Remember in 1995 when Mayo were living in Div 3 of the league, and had recently lost to Leitrim in Connacht.

    Remember in 2001 and 2003 when they lost of Westmeath and Fermanagh in qualifiers.

    Remember in 2010 when they lost to Longford.

    In the years after they quickly rose up the ranks and became challengers (not as much in the 2000s, but certainly in 1996 and 1997 and all through the 2010s)

    That's the only thing I can hope for now.

    That, once again a Maughan or Horan type figure comes along and revitalizes this team.

    Because I think we could find themselves as low as the low points mentioned above very soon.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,051 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I had a go at them yesterday as well, but I think their bafflement was proven right. I think we were down a player to a black card and it seems that the rule goes from having to have 3 back to 2 back when there's a black card. The referee overturned the decision in the end to prove them right.

    The whole rule changes do seem to be taking us more time to process than most though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭HBC08


    100%

    People posting screenshots of a puzzled looking McStay on the sideline and having a dig at him are bullsh1t.He was right to be confused as it was called as on 3 on 3 line breach when we were down to 14 men.Thankfully that was overturned after some confusion.

    That was down to officials getting it wrong.

    The free against Mattie Ruane for (incorrectly) trying a solo and go after the mark whilst Tyrone do a carbon copy a few mins later yet no free also.I could go on all day.

    The ref had a total nightmare yesterday.

    I think the management team has legitimate questions to answer on the style of play and what theyre trying to achieve. I dont have a huge amount of confidence in them at this stage but will reserve judgement til after the championship (when i think theyll be gone)

    Theres a certain cohert of Mayo supporters who would be happier if we lost yesterday (snide personal digs,you dont have to look too far up the thread)

    Same pr1cks who wouldn't have been in McHale park yesterday (only 6k in attendance) but would be shouting about not getting an All Ireland ticket and feel they deserve one.

    Post edited by HBC08 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭TsuDhoNimh


    There was another case where there was very legitimate confusion around the new (just this week, wasn't in for R1 or R2) 3/3 breach 'advantage'.

    Given the FRC forgot to inform team management, players or fans of that change (& only 1 noticeable example of it in our game) it'd be fairly justified to be asking questions. Very few people outside of referees were aware of those 4 recent changes, I'd only spotted it from a single tweet by Evan Talty (New directives for 20 second restart threshold, 3/3 breach gives an advantage like reward, stricter enforcement of the 4m before a S&G & pausing the clock if a keeper comes to kick a free).

    It led to Cassidy pulling play back a long time after the infraction as the advantage didn't pan out (& Tyrone didn't know they should have gone for a goal), with the crowd & Mayo management angry as at the time the whistle was blown there was clearly no breach of the rule (though it had happened much earlier).

    Still serious questions around the fact they've introduced a new form of 'advantage' but with zero notification provided by the referee that it's in play at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Barlett


    I think that's a big part of the problem, there clearly must be a gameplan management are trying to get the team to play to…but I think at this stage it's fair to say its not a style that suits us. I think there is just far too much of fitting square pegs into round holes in Mayo football and trying to get our best 15 onto the field regardless of natural position…it just feels so souless at the minute.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Is there any style that suits us though? If Mayo were allowed to pick the rules to suit our squad I don't think it would be the FRC ones. We haven't the size to compete for 50/50 long balls in forward line if the ball was let in long and we have managed only a few 2-pointers so far. I'd prefer to see us play with more abandon and directness but not sure we have the personnell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,519 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    So far, it seems like we haven't really adapted to the new rules particularly well and our general gameplan seems to be overly cautious which makes it a hard watch.

    On the plus side, a good few fringe players are getting decent minutes which will hopefully stand to us later on and in the coming years.

    I'm willing to give the mgmt team the benefit of the doubt for now; with a couple of minor improvements / bit of luck last year, we'd have beaten both Galway & Dublin so I think it's only fair to wait until the summer to judge them.

    At least the 2 points gained gives us a chance of survival in D1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,514 ✭✭✭mayo.mick


    It was a tough day at the office yesterday. I really wasnt bothered about the result, win loose or draw, what type of performance we put in I was more interested in. That first half though, that was hard to watch from the stand. We had one or 2 spurts where we ran and played attacking football, was great to see that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭GBXI


    You seem to have a major issue with Towey. Towey is the best inside forward in the Mayo senior championship for the past few seasons. He is still Mayo's top scorer from play in this year's league despite not scoring yesterday. Ryan, who is supposed to be Mayo's marquee forward, was dropped for yesterday's game. When he came on he received a ball inside the opposition 45', tried to take on his man but lost the ball feebly in contact - something he has done all season and going back to last season too. You better hope they persist with Towey because he has the class to score from anywhere, otherwise Mayo have nothing coming from their inside forwards.

    On Frank Irwin, he took his chances well yesterday but he does nothing in the full-forward line - he's a midfield/11 player taking his scores coming from the half forward line. Honestly don't think he is at inter county standard come championship. Aidan is much more effective at 14.

    Finally, there is some amount of over reaction to these games from Mayo support. Mayo have a lot of average and new players playing, they're not going to be at a Donegal/Galway level. Plus it's the third league game in February in a season where there are a whole host of new rules for everyone to get their heads around. Let's see what happens come summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭TsuDhoNimh


    Hard to fault that approach too much for the first ~20 minutes while the gale blew (it was a ~5-6 point breeze under these rules for that early period). We just never switched on once the wind died down (a combination of fumbles, poor calls & the black card hurt us a lot in that 2nd quarter), and then struggled to really create (Neary the only one I remember standing up his man and beating him in attack) when we had the bit of breeze behind us in the second half.

    Slow, pedestrian and safe would probably the words you'd go for on our transition. Not what you're hoping for in a game. Plenty of room (disappointingly a bit too much of it) for improvement on that, though that room has been there since mid '23 now.

    Physicality better (room for much more), work rate up, more pressing of the arc (more needed - Tyrone's shooting helped a lot there), unlike '24 won a game tight down the finish, a few lads back (Eoin, Jack, Jordan & Aido) and some nice showings for Eoin, Frank & Davitt that'll help build confidence in newer lads. Hard watch, but enough there to pull some positives from if we try.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,657 ✭✭✭Blackjack


    I never said Towey wasn’t a great club player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,973 ✭✭✭Panrich


    I’m going to generous here. I think that management would have been targeting the points yesterday and that was more important than the performance.

    The fact that we have had quite a few young players getting minutes out of necessity is a bonus.
    I’m not sure what Eoin ODonaghue did to blot his copybook with successive management teams but his display yesterday shows what a lot of us thought about him ability-wise. Great bit of physicality there too.

    Neary and Irwin are looking comfortable at this level but we’ve seen this before so it’s just a hope at this stage that they can offer real options come championship.

    Towey didn’t have his best outing but he has the ability so hopefully we stick with him.

    Conor Reid is coming on nicely under the radar and his club mate Cian MacHale will benefit from his runouts as well. Looks like he might solve our left footed free kicks if he can progress.

    Flynn looked very good on his return and Aidan and Carney looked good in the interpros with the new rules as well so we have a few more good options to come. If Paddy can make it back as well he’d be a great man for the 2 pointers.

    So that’s putting a positive spin on what I’ve seen so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭naughto


    A lot of comments have being about the new rules we didn't have the new rules last yr an struggled so I don't see why it should be any different this yr,we have the same management and backroom team but now we have whole load of new rules to get to grip with,what we dont have is the players it makes no dfference how we to play,we couldn't get the most out of them last yr ii don't see it being any different this yt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭muddle84


    I don't think the management are going for the points. I'm hoping that they are concentrating on getting more players game time and to be fair they are doing that. Its great to see Eoin OD back, I always saw him as a natural successor to Chris Barrett. There is many other players getting really valuable game time also. Granted its very hard to watch, but like others have said lets judge them on the Championship. Am I being too lenient to think that this is all part of the bigger plan, use the league to get players game time and have a much broader stronger panel come championship?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭TsuDhoNimh


    I'm all for panel rotation & prioritising minutes for new lads ahead of points. I said last year I was fine with relegation, even more so this year with some of the young lads about to push through and the benefits they'd get from a year in Div 2 to wet their feet. All about building for Championship for me.

    That said, there are ways you're ok losing games in order to be building & ways folks will be left pretty disillusioned even winning them.

    Go out the last day and give Cian at least a good 10 minutes in the 2nd half with the wind. Try some different strategies to create and exploit attacking spaces (funny to see how much of the innovative stuff, other than Galway where Morris/Graham are trying some clever stuff or Donegal doing a nice job of punching through without using a 12th man while remaining solid at the back, is coming from outside D1 - Roscommon, Meath, Offaly or Wicklow all trying real interesting stuff at the weekend, and much of it working). See if we can add to our transition options ("slow, through hands and sometimes backwards" doesn't feel like it'll work 100% of the time). Lose by 4-6 points trying those, while having a decent work rate, I'd be a happy camper.

    Stumbling over the line against a side playing slightly worse than we did, with the same slow transition we've leaned on too long, utterly struggling to try & get two of our best shooters (Paul & Cian) near a shot chance (directly related to the transition choices), with more unforced slips with basics of the new rules (we seemed to forget we needed to go back to 3 up after spending the 10 mins of the Black Card with just 2). Folks won't tend to be celebrating that.

    It's fine. Points will help. A chance for the lads (on grass or the line) to relieve the mounting pressure a little. Enough positives we can pull from it to move forward. Just hard to write it off as "just the league" when so many of the concerns have been ongoing for years now. And all the more fatal if not addressed under these new rules, which reward so many of the things we've been short on.

    A touch of unfair criticism around. A lot of very valid criticism (sometimes constructive), too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Audioslaven


    We are playing the exact same way now as we did last year and with the rules changes this makes no sense. It got us no where last year and with the new rules it will get us the same outcome if not worse. There are positives with newer guys getting game time but I think this was forced to a degree on McStay with guys departing.

    We appear to have nearly two types of supporters on this forum, guys who think everything is "ok" and live in hope and other guys who are overly critical with a lense of what it takes to win an all ireland and maybe a happy medium is required. However, I think everyone is looking for early signs of improvement on the pitch and on the line. It is early days in fairness and they will get better on the pitch as the ground dries up and some seasoned players come back. I cannot say the same for the line based on their tenure todate and it would be hard to justify management having this plan to breed a new cohort of players over the league for championship. Hindsight is great but he should have done that in year 1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭crusd


    The more and more I see, the more and more I am concerned about the impact of Rochfords coaching style. He seemed to lose his way post his original tenure, or maybe his coaches reigned in some of his instincts.

    If you look at Donegal when he was coaching them, their style was very much like we are now. Zombie football. Wedded to a structure that did not work and seemingly unwilling to change. We had a far stronger panel with better young talent coming through most would have said. Yet today Donegal are one of the best teams in the country with virtually the same squad. McGuinness is not a magician, just a coach who knows how to put a team together and instil a common purpose. Where are the coaches in Mayo with that ability? We seem to marginalise coaches who look capable of putting a team together rather than develop them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭GBXI


    In fairness, it's hard to make concrete conclusions after 3 games. I think McGuinness is a more inspirational figure than McStay - I'm fairly sure he is revered in Donegal. His ability to get Murphy back out of retirement versus McStay's inability to convince Keegan, Mullin, and Cillian to part of the Mayo project is telling.

    However, I think Rochford has become under-rated as a coach. Rochford has a great ability to be brave and get his tactics spot on for a particular game and I think that is Mayo's best hope right now. Last year they did everything right except get over the bloody line (v. Galway, Dublin, and Derry) and the year before in Killarney they were excellent (though they made an absolute mess of things v Cork).

    With everyone fit I would give Mayo a 50/50 chance against Donegal or Galway and trust Rochford to have a game plan to give them the best chance. A motivated team like this will be hard bet.

    Reape

    Morahan/Callinan/McHugh McBrien Hession

    McLaughlin Eoin O'D Durcan

    Ruane Carney

    Flynn Boland Conroy

    O'Donoghue O'Shea Towey

    With a strong bench including; Callinan/Morahan/McHugh, Coyne, Coen, Diarmuid, Touhy, Darren McHale, Neary, Reid, Irwin, Loftus, F. McLaughlin (I think Finbarr will make the bench if he stays fit).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭muddle84


    Your post reads like this is McStays first year, its his 3rd and more than likely final year!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭GBXI


    In fairness, Joyce was in what, his fourth year last year with Galway, when they got hammered by Mayo and Derry and drew with Roscommon in their first 4 games of the league. But then went on to have a very strong year. And no one in Galway was saying, 'it's all good - we are playing to a great style and deepening our panel'. Time and time again the league proves to be an irrelevance come championship; see Derry last year and Mayo the year before. Basically, stay up and deepen your panel.

    Also, I don't think McStay was in a position to rebuild the team that much, there just wasn't enough talent coming thru the last 3 years. However, the next manager certainly will be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Mc Guinness is probably more revered in Donegal now than he was during his first term. First term he took over a team that was a shambles when nobody else would touch the job with a County Board which was also a shambles doing everthing in their power not to give it to him. When he left in 2014 it was with the reputation of being one of the most astute managers in the game. Risking it all to come back 10 years later to a team that was again becoming a shambles with a County Board that was that was even more so than the 2011 one, and what he achieved in 2024 has him even more revered by Donegal fans that before.

    Donegal fans thought Mayo were nuts to get rid of Rochfort and were delighted to see him joining Donegal under DEclan Bonner, especially after years of the negativity of Rory Gallagher`s management. Bonner, although being well regarded in the county as a great servant to Donegal, would not have been regarded as the most tactically astute of managers and Rochfort was looked on as being a great addition in that regards. Rumbling started pretty early on when Karl Lacey the counties most decorated player with 4 All Star`s and a player of the year who as a defender liked to play on the front foot was sidelined in favour of Rochfort. In fairness to Bonner he had been fielding teams that, unlike Gallagher, were attempting to win games rather than not lose them. With Rochfort on board it was back to the Gallagher play book. Keep possesion, take no risks and players that could shoot from distance, such as Langan and Thompson, out of favour with Michael Murphy being used as a work horse to plug gaps all over the field where even when he moved into the forward line balls would not be played in because it was viewed as being to risky.

    Back then it was a style of play that would not see you being beaten by a high margin, but even then was not going to win you much and had players more concerned with not losing than actually going out to beat the oppostion. Maybe I`m being over harsh on Rochfort, but to me at least, Mayo are now playing very much in the style of Donegal when Rochfort was involved. It didn`t work back then and has even less chance of doing so under the new rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Island Voter


    It genuinely just needed time. The game would not stand still. Jonathan Wilson wrote an article over the weekend in the Guardian talking about how the days of tiki taka are potentially over and teams will likely start going long again. The evolutionary cycle continues. The GAA has robbed itself of that. I agree soccer is more advanced and has far more influences - GAA is inbred by comparison - but they are field sports and the overarching principles of a field sport should apply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Island Voter


    The change of back pass was a rule change similar to the midfield mark rule change in football. I am talking about fundemental material changes which not only completely change the flow of a gaelic football match but which change the manner in which scores are counted in the game. All to battle a tactical trend which, while tiresome, was temporary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭GBXI


    I'm conflicted on this - I was very much in your camp up until the rule changes and I am still confident that the game would have evolved out of its most recent phase and also that the game was totally over demonized.

    However, I love that Jim Gavin has taken this chance to make changes that are objectively a huge improvement in the game and should have been done ages ago.

    • The harsh penalties for cynical play, which were as big a blight on the game as the defensive structures themselves.
    • The vanishing spray will have a big impact on frees scored/missed and be fairer to defenders.
    • And taking the time away from referees will completely end the weekly arguments about added time and make the refs job easier.
    • The solo and go is a huge improvement - I would argue this is more in line with the values of Gaelic football anyway than stopping to take a free which looks very much like something that was just copied from soccer.

    I'm still uncertain about the 3-up rule and the 2-pointer. But let's see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭GBXI


    I understand the argument but I think it is too simplistic. Look at the football Mayo played against Kerry in Killarney and Dublin in Roscommon with Rochford as coach. The issue here is that pre the rule changes, if a team set up defensively against you ala Derry/Galway in recent years there's not much you can do other than mirror them. Donegal still set up very defensively when needed, like against Armagh in the Ulster final. With the new rules, it's still very early to say though I admit Mayo look a bit behind at this stage.

    I think teams under Rochford, when they have had a chance to play football, have been very good - Corofin the year they won the AI - total football in my opinion, Mayo in 2016 v Dublin in the drawn and replayed game, Mayo 2017 v Ross, Kerry, and Dublin in the AI series. Theses teams had a lovely mix of kicking and running football.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Westernview


    How much more time would you have given it though? 6000 people at last week's home game for Mayo against Tyrone illustrates how fans are fed up with things. And Mayo and Tyrone are the 2 teams in division 1 who have been accused of not adapting to the new rules. I'm still not sure about the 3v3 in terms of practicality but I'd find it hard to argue against the other rules. You're worried about the game changing but long range scoring and winning aerial contests should be rewarded under any gaelic football rules. The GAA is slow to change but Croke Park finally realised a significant change was needed.



Advertisement