Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1257258260262263437

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,366 ✭✭✭Field east


    Putting out of action the main port pumping stations and bombing the Kirchhoff bridge would be IMO significant game changers. They may goad Putin to ‘up his game’ but is he not doing this all the time - bombing residential areas that are ‘not in the war’ , etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 878 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    Which will be equally as worthless as NATO, if not more so.

    If you were Estonia would you trust a Le Pen government to come to your aid if Russia invaded?

    Would you expect a Reform led UK to stand up to Russia?

    An AfD government in Germany?

    These people idolise Putin.

    Poland would help, that is about it.

    I think we are in the last few years of liberal democracy. There will be a lot of realigning over the next 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    I said nothing about a tail or a bear. To me it's just common sense. It's come from a position where a good friend who has a Ukrainian spouse got radicalised and spend huge amounts of time following telegram and looking at the snuff videos some of which are posted here.

    People here seem to thjink Ukraine are angels when in fact I think neither Russia or Ukraine are angels and have pointed out the corruption in both countries. I wouldn't be as extreme as Orban and think we should be giveing humanitarian help and it is good we have helped many refugess but getting involved in the war, especially in April 2022 has made things drastically worse. I do not know how that is hard to understand. There are onlt three EU countries pushing for peace; Hungary, Slovakia and the Vatican. I think it would be great if we were a fourth country and would benefit the Ukrainian and the Russian people the most.

    Post edited by engineerws on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Indeed, but in my opinion the worry is that populists who gain power in Europe will pull out of this pact. Periphery nations okay, but when it's a core nation like Germany or France then there could be issues.

    Putin's dream of course is a fractured Europe where every country just takes care of itself - so that he can pick off e.g. the Baltics with his 2.0 military.

    So I believe any pact has to be strong and also modular. It has to have the ability to lose a member or two but still keep functioning. Ironically Trump is good in that regard, we are starting to wake up to some facts and realities. We have more than enough resources to easily contain Putin, plus we have Ukraine - it's just a question of putting them all together, and populist-proofing it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,886 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Obviously that would take overwhelming military force which doesn't seem to be available as things stand. Instead we are talking a 'land for peace' act of appeasement that we are hoping will be enough of a win to satisfy Putin for the rest of his time….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I am pretty sure you said it, but I admit I might be wrong. It would have been over a year ago. Must go and look when I have some time. You were posting up lectures + papers by Mearsheimer blaming Ukraine and the US for the entire situation (they poked the bear sums that up I think) + telling us all what a great scholar Mearsheimer was and we were all fools (unlike you) to disagree with his position of authority on the matter!

    It doesn't matter if Ukraine or Ukrainians are "no angels", who is? And so what? It is fairly irrelevant to this situation.

    Who do you think is an "angel" in this world? None of us are saints incl. Ireland, but Russia under Putin is more like Lucifer!

    The fact is Ukraine was a peaceful democracy pretty much minding its own business and Russia attacked it. It's a clear old style "lebensraum" land grab + robbery on international scale, utterly revolting. Arming them is the just the right thing to do (in addition to non military aid).

    Orbán is awful. He's no man of peace. Think he even regularly makes irredentist statements about other countries, similar to Putin. If Hungary was a lot more powerful, he had Putin's level of propaganda machine and control through fear over the country and a strong military, I am not convinced he wouldn't make moves on neighbours as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    The fact is Ukraine was a peaceful democracy pretty much minding its own business and Russia attacked it.

    Many people hold the view that the Maidan revolution was a US backed coup and there's vast evidence to support that argument and its undeniable that Nuland was involved. In the subsequent civil war 14,000 people died and Ukraine became known as the most corrupt nation in Europe. Crimea which was gifted to Ukraine was stolen back 60 years later during the Maiadan revolution. A long time could be spent discussing those events.

    Ukraine has recently become less corrupt according to UK based transparency international but to say it was a peaceful democracy pretty much minding its own business and Russia attacked it is a massive stretch or at least appears that way to me.

    I think in all these circumstances we need to look at ourselves too. Nobody is arguing Russia is a utopian country and I think it is important to recognise same about Ukraine. The stupid and unnecessary war that is resulting in horrific slaughter of Ukraine and Russian people should be stopped and a peace deal thrashed out imho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 580 ✭✭✭taratee


    A few quick questions on this. Does anyone have any idea what the realistic outcome of the meeting in Paris will be? Do the UK and the EU have the appetite for a decade-plus operation in that part of the world? What role, if any, would Ireland play in it?

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Thanks

    The OCSE report, if you aren't aware, references Putin's proxy invasion of East Ukraine. Russia attacking Ukraine.

    Russia signed up for a "ceasefire" during that invasion, which it broke repeatedly on Ukrainian territory. It did so to provoke a response from Ukraine to validate a long planned full scale invasion that going ahead anyway.

    As for the paywalled article from 7 years earlier. Obama didn't want to help Ukraine defend itself from Russia, because Putin would have possibly used that as a pretext to escalate his localized invasion to a full-scale invasion (which he did anyway)

    At no point has Ukraine ever been a threat to nuclear-armed Russia. Moscow does however produce a lot of bad propaganda to validate their land-grab which you seem to continually fall for.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Many people hold the view that the Maidan revolution was a US backed coup 

    yes, but those people are absolute morons and should not be listened to under any circumstances.

    In the subsequent civil war 14,000 people died and Ukraine became known as the most corrupt nation in Europe.

    Wasn't a civil war, Russia invaded. Also they were the most corrupt nation in Western Europe cause that's what happens when you live under Soviet rule for so long. They have never been as corrupt as Russia itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,283 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski yesterday said having Polish troops on the ground in Ukraine was "not a consideration, because Poland's duty to NATO is to protect the eastern flank, i.e. its own territory"

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/european-countries-will-not-create-one-united-army-says-polands-sikorski-2025-02-16/

    PM Tusk also has this morning confirmed it is not under consideration for Poland. Maybe they have figured out or have been told the reality of how things really are.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 985 ✭✭✭Glenomra


    Are we looking a real time disintegration of our world order. Exaggeration probably but in many decades of reading about world affairs I have never seen an accepted order being overturned so quickly. Peace talks about a conflict in Europe taking place between US and Russia but excluding the country that was invaded and the continent on which it is taking place. Unprecedented. Leaves Britain and the EU completely floundering. I have no idea what happens now. Does anyone. I read that Poland will not supply peacekeepers to Ukraine. Where will the West get up 250, 000 soldiers and who will pay the astronomical cost.... maybe some of our Apple money!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,245 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Russia does not want Europe at the Ukraine talks, do I suppose their MAGA puppets will go along with that:

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-lavrov-why-would-europe-be-ukraine-talks-if-they-want-war-carry-2025-02-17/

    But Trump wants European troops to be prepared to act as a peacekeeping force. What sort of charlatans, clowns and totally untrustworthy people want Euope to commit troops to a big and hazardous operation, when they have been excluded from negotiations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    This like the 3rd or 4th time you've tried this particular piece of old debunked propaganda.

    Ukraine was a democratic country minding it's own business. Putin has attacked it continually, meddling politically, then annexing territory, starting a proxy invasion and now a full on style invasion attempt.

    To justify all that he has to push out propaganda.

    You repeat this propaganda here and despite all these other posters explaining it to you, so far your posts have shown you are impervious to facts.

    Again, none of these replies are for your benefit. They do highlight that propaganda, no matter how absurd, can be potent for some individuals. Even if it's just one person on a forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Firstly, I don't think the US administration is capable of coming up with a peace plan that Europe could agree to, let alone Ukraine. It's going to be; accept this capitulation to Putin's interests, because we are ceasing to help Ukraine in any way.

    So I don't think there is going to be a peace keeping force situation, from Europe's perspective, theres going to be a binary choice between letting Putin have all of Ukraine and accommodate the largest wave of refugees the world has ever seen, or to get militarily involved and defeat Russia.

    Who said anything about it only being the UK? Zelensky's estimate is 100 k troops needed for peace keeping. Every European member state with functional military would need to commit almost half their forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,063 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    If they were going to have to commit that number of troops for very long term peacekeeping ,

    Would they be better off sending troops into Ukraine now , to defend areas away from the front , operating air defense, engage in training and maintenance,logistics and security

    Which would release a sizeable contingent of Ukrainians for service in eastern Ukraine,

    and put far more pressure on Russia now ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,458 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Said before if Europe wants to do it's best to support Ukraine + purchase American weapons down the line nothing is stopping them. The more beneficial this war is to Trump the stronger his hand will be negotiating with Putin.

    On another note did anyone think Ukraine would be holding so much of Kursk come mid February? I'm starting to believe they could be there for a while. In total so far it's redirected a massive amount of Russian firepower from Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    There isn't going to be a peace keeping scenario. Europe either supports Ukraine militarily or it stands back and watches Russia eventually take the whole of Ukraine and accept 20+ million refugees.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭yagan


    The only certainty with any Trump led plan is it's as solid as the wall that he got Mexico to pay for, which essentially means he's all bluster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,560 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    The only positive of any peace talks between Trump and Putin is that the two of them in the same place makes an incredible target for anyone in favour of world peace.

    I know security would be incredibly tight but all it takes is a 21st century Claus von Stauffenberg to be more successful and we could all sleep easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,439 ✭✭✭Dinarius


    Why so much panic about the USA no longer covering Europe's a**?

    Isn't it already the case that Putin's Soviet-era army and weaponry can barely contain a very poorly supported Ukraine?

    If I'm right, wouldn't the combined might of, for example, UK, France, Italy and Germany defeat Putin's collection of forcibly conscripted convicts?

    Yes, Putin has the nuclear option, but no amount of USA protection will help against that.

    In conventional military terms, Russia has no chance against a NATO that doesn't even need the USA, no?

    What am I missing here? Any military experts amongst us?

    D.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,689 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    CFTrump and Putler are playing at their own post-WWII Yalta with this Saudi meeting sh1te. Pathetic, and shows just how clueless Trump and his lackeys are about international affairs. And Vance is just as bad and a heartbeat away.

    Hopefully, as they say here, Ukraine tells them wrt to whatever proposal they belch out, to get up the yard with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Care to explain what you mean by radicalized? Eg it would be pretty fair to say you are in fact radicalised with the views you hold. You can say there are no angels but given the fact Russia did the invasion, Ukraine are in fact the angels in this scenario. Russia are the genocidal regime. Russia are the ones kidnapping children. Russia committed things like the Bucha Massacre. Prior to that Russia literally infiltrated the Ukrainian government with Yanukovych who then refused to represent the electorate. Putin just couldn't even allow Ukraine to have a basic relationship with the EU... So Russia has actively tried to hijack Ukraine's political system to keep them reliant on Russia.

    Also, I find it hysterical that you're using Orban as a reference point. Firstly he is notorious for his human rights record and has domestically tried to replicate domestic policies that Russia have (anti LGBT laws, preventing freedom of expression etc). He's been Putin's eu supporter throughout this war and he's scum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Because if you take for example the Baltic states, 3 countries that Putin almost certainly has machinations for, Russia has already since 2022 taken more landmass in Ukraine than exists in Latvia for example. And utterly flattened most of the areas they've taken. Since it seems to be the only way they can make advances.

    Yes if NATO got involved, even without direct US involvement Russia would probably be routed eventually. But the amount of damage they could do before that could undo any or all of the Baltic states as prosperous EU countries. It would be an absolute calamity that could take decades to recover from, if ever. And should be avoided at all costs.

    And the best way to do that is hand them a definitive loss in Ukraine as a lesson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭yagan


    Another facet is that Trump's plan for Gaza is very unpopular domestically in Saudi Arabia, but he seems oblivious to criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,530 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    Up until last week, Europe didn't want to talk to war criminal Putin.

    Now they are asking for a place at the table.

    We are really between a rock and a hard place here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,245 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Maybe MBS can call up the Khashoggi team for a special military operation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    They are delusional. Excluding EU and Ukraine will make their decisions irrelevant.



Advertisement