Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2024-25

1247248250252253368

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭FreshG


    It's bad luck alright for Arsenal alright. Especially when Arsenal are lower on numbers in terms of forwards at the club anyways.

    I listened to a podcast recently with a sport scientist that was talking about using AI to predict and prevent injuries etc. It was an interesting discussion and used alot of Newcastle examples such as one of their players reinjuring himself after coming back from a matatarsel injury by training too much himself away from the club that they were unaware of. He was trying to get fit himself and didn't realise he was being counterproductive. As a result, every single bit of Newcastle players training is tracked and monitored, including sleep. All external fitness work, even jogging, has to be logged so that their official team training workload is managed. Another example was Tyrone Mings ACL injury basically being because he trained too much in a short period of time before his non-contact injury.

    One very interesting aspect of the conversation was the workload amount over a full season for players. Arsenal had a largely excellent record for the last 2 years with injuries. Players like White Gabriel Saliba Rice Odegaard Saka Havertz Martinelli etc basically were fit for every single game, and as a result, they played all of the minutes for 2 full seasons. Their bodies then happened to break down this year as they can't do it for 3 full seasons. The workload caught up with them.

    It's happening Man City this year too. Rodri broke down, all their defenders have been injured at some point and John Stones had the choice of surgery and being out for the season or severely limiting his minutes and availablity, and chose the latter. He'll need that surgery eventually though.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    They should have bought a forward over the past couple of years, so I've no real pity. Zero depth there.

    Everyone knows Arsenal's problem, Arteta just doesn't seem to want to fix it for some absurd reason.

    Might force the issue now though, it's an ill wind....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    arteta wanted a forward player bought in the window. He’s made poor choices with the attackers recruited but it’s incorrect to say he doesn’t want forward players bought in the last window



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Pretty sure i said in the last few years which is a tad different to the last window.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    you also said that arteta didn’t want to fix it which is untrue in the context of the window just past



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Toranaga


    Havertz is a great player to have there when everything is good and you've quality around him. When Saka and a couple of the other options are injured not so much.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    In the last few years he did not fix it - that's a simple fact - that is what I was referring to and if he wanted to fix it, he had several windows to do it. He didn't and his team have come up short as a direct result of that and may do so again this season.

    But in the context on the last window, when his attacking players were injured, what forwards did he buy??

    Actions speak louder than words in my opinion.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Havertz should be scoring more I think. When played up front, he just looks like he is a square peg trying to fit into a round hole. Not sure is it the system or the position but he could be doing better. You always look better when everyone around you is doing well of course but not so much at the moment though, especially when there aren't many options to choose from.

    Arsenal are supposed to be a title challenging team and most folk can see what they are lacking - for a few years - and it simply hasn't been addressed.

    That's on Arteta in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    he could have signed a player if he used his own money.

    Let’s be clear about this: managers at elite clubs dont sign players anymore. That day is long gone. At Arsenal it was Edu who signed players. Not sure who does now. Arteta can tell Edu what he needs and can suggest a player he really wants or edu can suggest to arteta about a player available or suggest a player Edu or Edu’s scouts really rates….but it’s a cooperative process and the nuts and bolts of signing players is not arteta’s job.

    The idea that arteta could have signed a player unilaterally (deciding who to sign, what to bid, what wages to offer) is not consistent with how modern elite football works. So when you say actions speak louder than words, you dont what the words are because the words are going on behind the scenes between a collective.

    Post edited by Did you smash it on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,638 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Havertz is a decent player, but he's a victim of Arteta and Arsenal and how they play. He's left isolated, has to run, harry, press, chase back all of the time, to fill gaps in midfield left by Arsenals deep conservative set up. Of and when the chance falls to him, his legs are ran off and he often misses.

    He's a fine player, not a world class/best in the world player, but certainly good enough if he was used properly and not asked to do the work of several players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    no one seems to have mentioned that arsenals highest paid player is Havertz so I’ll leave that there



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Of course there's more than 'just Arteta'. If you want to proportion blame on Edu or whoever, that's fine. But the manager takes the blame for not sorting out a priblem they've had for years and continue to have - it's that simple.

    Also, another problem Arsenal sorted when they splashed out on Rice - plenty of credit given to Arteta then.

    It works both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,330 ✭✭✭golfball37


    Bidding 40m with add ons up to 60for Watkins wasn’t a serious bid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Ok, youre not really following the point of who controls the money outflows at arsenal or any premier league club but at this stage I can’t help with that or I’d just be repeating myself again.


    as a general point people completely overemphasis the importance of managers like it’s still the naughties or nineties. Transfer decisions are now completely committee based and work on a principle of deciding the value of the player and bidding that value and if the bid isn’t accepted then move on to other targets or wait till the next transfer window to resubmit a bid as the players contract winds down.


    the clubs like Liverpool who got the hang of this era quickly prospered, the clubs like Man Utd who bidded and rebidded till they were breaking transfer records for Harry Maguire didn’t prosper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Ok, that’s not mikel artetas department. He controls the football part and would be informed about budgets but actually submitting bids would be Edu’s (or his replacement) job. So if you are angry at that bid, you are angry at edu.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Ok, you are not really following the point.

    Arteta has not dealt with the glaring problem at Arsenal - over several years.

    You wouldn't proportion any blame on him - that's fine.

    I most certainly would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    No you’re still not following despite my repetitions, for the latest window I wouldn’t blame Arteta. You would and I deem that unfair.

    For sanctioning and reportedly being fixated on having Havertz as their top earner I would squarely blame arteta.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Despite my repetitions - I'm talking about the last few years.

    You are the only one talking about the last window, read my first post that you quoted. It's quite simple really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    My first reply to you last night


    “Arteta wanted a forward player bought in the window. He’s made poor choices with the attackers recruited but it’s incorrect to say he doesn’t want forward players bought in the last window”


    your last reply to me this morning

    “Arteta has not dealt with the glaring problem at Arsenal - over several years. 

    You wouldn't proportion any blame on him - that's fine.”




    Hence my repetitions. Have a good one.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    You say he made poor choices with the attackers recruited while also sayng he doesn't get to pick them. And only want top focus on one trabsfer window.

    Have a good one indeed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,809 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Havertz could be a very important player for Arsenal. In some ways he’s like Firmino type player. Firmino’s max goals scored in the league was 15 I think. But he was about much more than goals. Havertz is only 25 - I wouldn’t be writing him off yet as a top player for a title winning team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,638 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    People who say the likes of that about Firmino never really saw how he really played. For all his hard running and pressing etc, he had a touch, quality and awareness that few other players possess, and that certainly includes Havertz.

    Firmino at his best was a truly unique player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,638 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    (Critism of the normally excellent TG4 here), TG4 still found time to show full live coverage of a South African club rugby game..... Talk about priorities for a station being subsidized heavily to promote and foster the Irish language and Irish culture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,354 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Brighton are through, and Chelsea are out. Their first FA Cup victory over Chelsea since 1933.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,319 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    While true, they've only drawn against each other twice in that period, 1967 and 1973, and one of those went to a replay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,208 ✭✭✭Talisman


    Havertz's problem is he is too tall for his own good, because he's a giant of a man he gets stuck up front to be a focal point rather than play him in his natural role. He is not a centre forward, he's most productive in a deeper role playing behind a forward or wide on the right. At Leverkusen he played off of Kevin Volland and Lucas Alario. Towards the end of his time there he filled in at centre forward when they weren't available and he scored a few goals.

    Chelsea paid £72M for him because he was a young player making headlines, but as often has been the case they didn't have a plan for fitting him in the team. In Chelsea's unbalanced squad he was squeezed into the centre forward role because he was the least bad fit but he never looked the part in the position and the lack of goals support that.

    In 2023, Arsenal signed him for £65M and have proceeded to do the same thing. They already had Odegaard to play the creative role behind the forward line and Saka had the wide right position sorted.

    For the German national team, he became the centre forward because there was nobody else. Nagelsmann has since found Tim Kleindienst for the role and Havertz has played in the hole behind him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,405 ✭✭✭The Rooster


    Bit of a random one. TG4 have the rights to the URC, a league that includes 4 Irish teams, so there will be some people with interest in how other teams get on in the league. Why not show games if they have the rights? It was on at about 11 or 12 in the morning/afternoon. Hardly peak viewing time and it turned out to be a cracking game. Would you prefer if they just threw on another Hector repeat instead?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,809 ✭✭✭doc_17


    I think you took me up wrong. I’m not saying their skill sets are comparable, I’m saying they have specific talents that fit in what the overall team is doing and they’d tend to score similar amounts of goals. Havertz’s strengths are his height, pressing and stamina, which all fit in well with how Arsenal play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,319 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Is there any truth in rumours that he's done a hamstring in Dubai? I wouldn't trust Arteta or the club to be honest about it so likely nothing or just a minor thing but hopefully Liverpool are ignoring rumours and just concentrating on their own games

    Everton being safe and being on a great run with a new manager now has me thinking that maybe we would have been better off playing this in December. Though we wouldn't have had Konaté or Alisson (I think?) or Jota as an option off the bench so it's good that bar maybe Trent we'll be full strength tonight with a strong bench (Trent still likely to be in the squad at least). And Calvert-Lewin would have played the original fixture and now he's out so that's a plus I think.

    7.30pm kickoff is going to mean Goodison will be hopping - I'm kind of looking forward to that aspect. It's a great ground, a proper throwback, and amazingly both Liverpool and Everton have won 41 games a piece there. So it's incredibly well set up as the last derby there!

    Sad to see the place go - a really special place with a lot of history that is a dying breed these days

    Post edited by 8-10 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,284 ✭✭✭ronjo


    I cant see any world to be honest where Liverpool approach any game differently because Arsenal have either the first 4 attacking players injured or 3 of their first 4 attacking players injured to be fair.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement