Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Civil servants told to spend more time in the office - Irish Times - Mod warning #526

11618202122

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,783 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    Nothing stopping them from joining the civil service rather then forcing them to emigrate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,274 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Some people would have loved the opportunity to work from a cushy office with a safe pensionable job, with lengthy tea breaks, rather than emigrating.

    Here you go, so: https://publicjobs.ie/en/ - we're always hiring!

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 507 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    I did, and many years ago. Great decision, the pension alone for not working is more than many people in the private sector earn for working. Not much point though in you telling everyone to work for the government, there are not millions of jobs in the public sector. Where would the government get the money to pay everyone if everyone was on its payroll. You have not thought that one through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    WFH in the civil service will never become a right, unfortunately. It will always remain a privilege.

    Flexible Working Hours was first introduced to the service in 1982, 43 years later, it's still remains as a privilege only.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 somenergy


    WFH = higher security risks hackers always looking for a way in and we have a mix of old and modern bespoke systems for them to party on.

    Covid is done back to work end of.....

    Post edited by somenergy on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,576 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    You can't seriously expect a department to keep a specific office open just because a union says so

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Not at all riskier, majority of organisations use the same Citrix (or similar system) servers on work PC's and WFH laptops/desktop.

    I take it you can't wfh and are just bitter that some of us can.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Well they are certainly claiming a huge victory on our behalf in the latest bulletin!



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    I'm not even going to respond to the latest post from @itsacoolday - it's clear they have no intention of engaging in this discussion in good faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,576 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    This is bollocks frankly

    Before Covid we didn't have encrypted desktops. Anybody could have broken into an office, steal PCs and just access whatever happened to be saved or cached locally.

    Now everything is encrypted whether inside or outside the office.

    What you are saying is outdated nonsensical thinking which goes back not to pre-covid days but pre-internet days. "We have a silo of information in the office and better not let any of it in or out except on paper" well the world just doesn't look like that anymore. WFH is irrelevant to this. You are not going to get anywhere these days without web applications, Teams access etc. so whether you are working in the office or not, you have internet facing systems.

    As I said, complete bollocks and it's perfectly obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

    Covid is done back to work end of.....

    You mean go back fulltime to the office and get less work done? Nah I'll pass thanks.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭pleh


    Blended working was brought in as part of a union agreement so the union of course has a role



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,707 ✭✭✭Xander10


    They don't seem to be answering phones. Service is shocking these days.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    OK I think stuff is going off topic a bit. At the end of the day WFH in the civil service is not for everyone and those people can go into an office 5 days a week if they like no stopping them. Yes there might be people taking the mick at home, but these people take the mick in the office it's up to their line manager to sort it out and explain that WFH can be resinded for them and they might have to go into the office more or all the time, just like flexi time can be taken from people and they have to do a more 9 to 5 day then. If WFH was taken from us all say in a month's time and we're told to come back into the office people in the Private sector would notice as well. As more cars on the road so longer journey times for people there, more buses packed, trains and darts so will effect all workers there. Also some government buildings closed I.e. Revenue have Mount St and Lansdowne office gone so where do you put all these extra people who are hot desking in say the o'connell st office? I work 2 days in an office with WFH do the same work at home and office, it gets done end of wether there or at home. We have an anchor day out of the 2 wks and we're all in then, most of us work same days in the office. But if you go in other day might be no one in and you do think to yourself what was the point of me being in today as if they contact me it will be on teams and I could of done that at home. Look WFH is great, it's not for everyone and that's fine as they can go in more then one day. Saves people time and money, if work isn't getting done from WFH that's for a line manager to manage and discuss with their staff. But I do think 2 days in the office is enough, more time in would effect people both civil servants and private sector workers at the end of the day with travel times, money in their pocket, renting etc. I do think if we're asked to go in more have a discussion with unions and management like adults just don't be stating your back from so and so. We're not 2 year old and it's not the 1950s. Things like WFH work and it's been shown it has and it works when in the office so just right balance is needed. Also people have to remember I say if staff were told to come back more, some people with a lot of experience and might have only a few years to retire might just leave and say no not for me being in more, so you would lose that as well which could also effect the public.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,522 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Mod:

    I'm seeing a lot of low level trolling with generic comments and sweeping statements portrayed as facts; this is the only warning I'll give to up the quality of the discussion and use of actual linked to facts or cards will be handed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Stop talking sense!

    …Also people have to remember I say if staff were told to come back more, some people with a lot of experience and might have only a few years to retire might just leave and say no not for me being in more, so you would lose that as well which could also effect the public...

    Putting my hand up here, as I would be one of those queuing up to retire. I will never return full time to an office. I spent over 30 years doing it, now my eyes are opened to how much of my life (and time I could have had with my family) was wasted commuting.

    Ultimately, I believe hybrid working is a much healthier lifestyle, both mentally, physically, and for a better work/life balance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Exactly your 100% right. Hybrid is the way to go. Like you say you would retire and a lot of people would as well from across different departments if they were told they were back 5 days a wk. You would lose considerable amount of experience and yes large scale hybrid does work like you say. It's being working since covid happened and is still working. Technology will help it along even more over the years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,707 ✭✭✭Xander10


    I've been trying to contact Revenue and the collector general's office all week.

    Trying the following Dublin numbers, 7383663, 7383636 and 7383630.

    Everytime , I eventually get a message, all our operators are busy, please call back later. Trying from 9.30 am some mornings. Lines close at 1pm.

    Give it a try and see what i mean



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Revenue's phone lines are jammed because they only take calls for half days. If they did full days on the phones it wouldn't be as bad. It's in particular very difficult to get them at this time of the year I'd imagine.

    I find the Revenue Online service much better than the actual call takers mind you. The one time I rang them about an issue the solution they advised me of was not only wildly incorrect but it would have ended up in me paying more tax than I was currently (incorrectly) paying, which was the whole issue I was calling about in the first place😂 My wife's accountant had asked me to tell them something specific, when I did that I was put on hold for a few mins then the call taker told me that was fine and it was adjusted correctly immediately… but anyways I'm rambling.

    Doesn't help with your issue but just explaining the problem, it isn't that they aren't taking calls it's that they aren't a) sufficiently staffed to receive current volume and b) only operating half days on phones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,274 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Ultimately, I believe hybrid working is a much healthier lifestyle, both mentally, physically, and for a better work/life balance.

    100%. That sums it up. Plus, I'm generally more efficient at home, with less distractions! Could lock the thread now, really! 😀

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,707 ✭✭✭Xander10


    I have reason to ring them all year round.

    February is not a peak period for compliance deadlines.

    A few weeks back I would eventually get through if not immediately.

    Something has changed.

    BTW I am trying to follow up on a query that was originally submitted online 8 months ago with no satisfactory response.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Fair enough, I don't know the issues as I don't work for Revenue, I'm public sector alright but a different department entirely. If I was I'd offer to help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    I contacted my own public service union and said that I was concerned about the article in the Irish Times, and that this would be the start of the creep-in of full time back in the office for civil/public service staff. We are in 50% of every month, with two anchor days a week, but kept getting threatened last year with 60%/total rollback.

    My union replied to say that they had been informed by our senior leadership (once they were forced to give a stated position) that they were happy with the way that hybrid was working, and had no intentions of changing it. But the union have at least said if there was any decision to increase time in the office, it will be very strongly resisted.

    I have two colleagues - excellent at what they do - who live in Wexford and Galway. Both are in their thirties, with kids and don't own their own homes. They can't save for a deposit while renting in Dublin, and can't afford to buy anything decent in Dublin anyway. So they are commuting up at 5am on a Tuesday morning, staying overnight two or three nights a week - away from their kids- and getting home on a Wednesday or Thursday at 10pm. Staying up in Dublin overnight costs in the region of €600 a month, on top of their rent for their actual home. They have both said that if there's any increase in time in the office, they will have to hand in their notice. They'll go off to work in a private practice somewhere and the public service will all the worse off from losing two very smart, hardworking people.

    I also know that we get very little applications at a junior level from people outside Dublin. Increasing time in the office will only make that worse, so we'd be missing out on even more excellent candidates. That is to everyone's detriment - to my employer and to the public at large.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    With all due respect, I don't see the relevance of an 8 month ongoing issue of yours to a thread on the civil service WFH.

    The team dealing with your query will be dealing with it whether they are based in the office or WFH that day. Phone lines are all computer based now, not location based. The person answering the phone could be in any part of the country.

    If phone lines are limited to morning times, it is because the staff need uninterrupted time to do actual processing in the afternoons, or, as is more likely the case, the team is understaffed.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,274 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    If phone lines are limited to morning times, it is because the staff need uninterrupted time to do actual processing in the afternoons, or, as is more likely the case, the team is understaffed.

    If they're understaffed, surely they can just recruit more clerical officers?

    Clerical Officer starting salary: €571.04/week. €29,694pa, gross, before tax, PRSI, USC.

    But certain people want Bob CO to work fully in the office. So they need to live near the office. So Dublin rent needs to come off that. The first google result I got for "average bedsit rent in dublin" tells me it's €823/month for a room with a single bed. So Bob CO will pay €9,876 for rent, pa.

    Bob will also need to get to work, because no WFH, because anecdotes! So that'll be another €1,150 (for bus only - but Bob will get some of that back in tax, yay!)

    Bob is now down to 29694 - 9876 - 1150 or €18,668/year, €1,555 (still not counting tax, PRSI, USC - or the tax Bob will save from their annual travel pass).

    €1,555/month isn't bad! All Bob needs to pay for out of it (after the tax, PRSI, USC, obviously) is food, clothing, medical expenses, and basic toiletries! Because he has no WFH, he won't even need to organise broadband, so there's another saving!

    Luxury! I'm sure Public Jobs will have queues out the door for full time office work in Dublin!

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Untitled Image

    My attitude to going back to the office or commuting again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    We've been trying to get COs for a year, replacements for two that moved on by promotion.

    COs are like bloody gold dust!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,274 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    I'm in ICT, where EO is the entry-level grade. They're like gold-dust too, not helped by the really long recruitment process. I currently have EO staff commuting for their 2-days in-office from half-way across the country (they can't afford Dublin rents) - I'm amazed they haven't left yet! I've absolutely no doubt if we removed WFH, they'd be gone in a flash.

    Most SMEs in the ICT sphere are still either fully remote or reliant on blended working, but we never hear about them in the media, just the ones with Nazi CEOs or the ones who kow-tow to Nazis. Amazingly, many of those SMEs have teams 'following the sun' around the globe, and still manage to function perfectly well without all of them being in the same room… 🤔

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    I think this is what they want.

    Get rid off the people with a few years service and good pension and replace with staff on the post 2013 pension or even better with outsourced staff on the cheap.

    Ultimately, it's always about the money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 507 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Less distractions working from home? You must be joking. What about those with babies and toddlers and other kids running around? Those who like posting on social media or who like tv or who have to do stuff around the house, or chat to friends and neighbours? At least that can be controlled when working in a proper office.



Advertisement