Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1879880882884885943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,914 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    It's the location that you're looking in unfortunately. You may have broaden the search area greatly to get something half decent for 400k.

    We paid 385k in Nov for a 2 bed house in Swords.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "Ireland will need to build 93,000 homes a year meet demand between now and 2031, according to a new report by stockbroker Davy.

    Last year there were only 30,000 homes built in Ireland, which fell short of the Government's official target of 33,000 and far below projections by the then Minister for Housing Darragh O'Brien.

    Davy's forecast is based on its estimate that the population will reach six million by 2031.

    The report says the housing shortfall is now 230,000 homes."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2025/0205/1494832-davy-on-housing-market/

    We're just a casual 60,000 odd homes off whats needed, per year, now, and rising rapidly it seems. Hitting one third of whats needed is an utter disaster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    And that's just to keep up with current demand.

    I've little doubt that the population will reach 6 million, of course…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 Bookmarker_n


    I'm sure the buyers of a 2 bed terrace for 550k are sweating it listening to Trump. 😂

    C'mon Trump, tariff the hell out of us to crash this pompous economy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,914 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I'm pretty positive that they are not as prices are expected to rise by a further 10% this year.

    Even with some tariffs it won't crash the economy and it's odd that you'd want the economy to crash as it would negatively affect either yourself or family and friends.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 Bookmarker_n


    Won't impact my family. Siblings sitting on price increases of 40-100%.

    Me? Won't impact me. Unless I lose my job, but at this point why bother working when there's no chance of owning a home? Might as well be on the dole and getting HAP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,914 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Not if the economy collapses, they're not looking at those profits, if they lose jobs it will affect them also.

    If you lose your job it will affect you, unless you're earning minimum wage, you would not be better off on the dole and HAP (not even guaranteed). Inflation wouldn't stop immediately, you'd have less money and cost of living continues to increase so you'd be worse off.

    Even if you and no one you knew weren't negatively affected by it (extremely unlikely), hundred of thousands if not multiples more would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    And exactly that, there is no point in working hard because there is no reward.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is a very good point. If I were a young man and had the choice of either seeing things continue as they are or having it crash, I would probably take option two and take my chances. Things carrying on as they are means working with no hope of a meaningful life, but option two is at least a shake up.

    Before anyone calls me out on this, I'm not wishing for crash. I do, however, fully understand why someone would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Well theres pretty a substantial monetary reward. I know I personally would rather not live on 230euro a week on the dole, it would be a massive downgrade to my life.

    As I'd imagine it would be for almost every working person whos used to a far higher income than that.

    For all the talk of "oh its so much better on the dole, why even work" I guarantee the people saying it have never actually tried living on the dole for long. I graduated into the 2008 recession so got to experience it first hand, and its not fun. You're constantly broke, and constantly having to engage in ridiculous schemes with the department of welfare to get them to keep paying you.

    And the same thing with just giving up and "getting a free house" - waiting lists are 10+ years in most councils these days, so good luck with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A year or two ago I tongue-in-cheek suggested pretty much the same thing. Not because it was a good remedy but because government policy will never actually allow prices to reduce significantly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    it's odd that you'd want the economy to crash as it would negatively affect either yourself or family and friends

    As does prices and rents rising at 3 times the rate of inflation, this can cause an economy to crash or will exacerbate a crash when it arrives.

    We had a link to an article earlier that deducted that voters while showing concern about rising prices were not compelled to do anything about it

    I suspect similar feelings are felt by those not benefiting from economy/work

    Looka across the large pond for examples



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The state will not do anything to arrest house prices and rents. Indeed, it (or rather the people who run it) will do everything to perpetuate growth, consequences be damned.

    Property prices will only fall here when some external situation changes, and the state cannot interfere in the market directly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Agree with this.

    Also revise property tax in very populated areas like towns and cities, reducing tax for number of occupants.

    Might encourage some to downsize or rent out instead of sitting on partially empty property where each square meter is in high demand .

    People won't have to pay more btw just get a reduction if fully occupied .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    There are a sector who the above is very attractive too. I see it all the time where you have "single" mothers in their late twenty's with either two or three children getting their "forever home". With waiting times of ten yrs or so the above would suggest people go on the housing list once they turn 18.

    Why work/better yourself when the benefit system gives you a better standard of living than working/bettering yourself does?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The maximum Jobseekers rate as of this January is 244euro a week. What exact sort of "better standard of living" do you think you would have on that?

    And why aren't you quitting your job to do it tomorrow and live the better life if its so easy to live the high life on it?

    For housing specifically, there was nothing stopping you going on the housing list yourself at age 18, either. Anyone earning under 40k pa is eligible for it, which presumably you were at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If your 2,500pm apartment is paid for via housing subsidies and your dole money is on top of that, plus any other medical cards benefits and so forth; you are afforded a lifestyle that an average single income earner could not afford.

    Ita not a lifestyle I would personally choose, but I sympathise with the unfariness for those working and stuck in their parents box room, with no hope of ever being able to afford to rent their own place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    I am not quitting my job because I am working full-time since I was seventeen and have achieved a degree, masters and professional qualifications all while working full-time.

    I was brought up in a working family were you worked rather than rely on welfare. We took any job we could get as we are workers. Always were and always will be.

    I started working full-time in 1988 when the country did not have a pot to piss in and every family had at least one member of their family emigrated looking for work.

    Our welfare system was not as generous then as it is now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    On the flip side though, if you could get a job, it was easier to get started in life. My parents bought a house in Dublin 3 in 1988 when they were in their mid-20s, and they both had very ordinary jobs at the time. Mom wasn't even working full time. The same house today is 700k or so.

    Now I'm not the type to claim that everything back in the past was better because it wasn't. However we should not presume that everything has improved in the last few decades either. Ireland has certainly become more wealthy, but that has brought with it a plethora of other problems, namely the growing inability of younger people to build a life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    There is no need for any incentives or regulations on offices.

    There is nothing being built for completion beyond 2026 in Dublin in terms of offices per JLL.

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/no-new-office-blocks-schedule-for-completion-beyond-2026-jll-ireland/

    Indeed, given the lead times on new developments of say 36 months or so, a medium sized one in Dublin would likely not be completed until 2028 at this point. It is highly likely we will see a shortage in 2027 as market sentiment again over compensated on the office.

    Notions that the government should stick their oars into commercial like this are misguided and show people have no learned from the residential construction crash where government tinkering in the early 2010s made things worse.

    If the government are to step in with incentives, it should be to be for the conversion of small office spaces into residential (ie returning places like Georgian Dublin to being houses).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It all comes down to housing costs and security.

    Housing costs have distorted things so much. Indeed you can make a fairly cogent argument that someone on €40k (social housing limit) with their social house is more secure than someone on €100k who is in the rental market.

    I do think 98% do want to work (look at the long term unemployment rate and our demographically skewed disability data and participation rates, there is a number who simply do not want to work). There is definitely a few who do not & don’t get punished for it. Arguably that is the price of living in a society so we have to accept it. I do wish it wasn’t denied by so many people on the left of politics. It is perfectly possible to be left wing and want all of the State intervention under the sun and also acknowledge there will be people taking the piss. They have no issue with calling it out at the other end of the spectrum with the rich, but deny this motivation at the other end of the spectrum. It is a bad way to communicate to the majority imo, the most successful social democratic parties in Europe have historically not shied from it. It seems to be a more modern thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,837 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    You missed a critical part of his post: the quotes around the word "single".

    I'm not suggesting it's true of all social welfare tenants but there are a significant number of families where (usually) the mother has a council tenancy, claims full benefits and the father who lives with them uses his parents address for all official correspondence while working or claims jobseekers as an individual (i.e. the full €244 a week instead of the dependent rate of €162).

    Yes, the councils send out rent assessment forms on an annual basis to try and determine who's actually living in the properties but they don't have anywhere near the resources to verify them with house-by-house checks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Free house and other payments for things like household bills like electricity/fuel etc. Those 2 alone rent/ESB would cost a very high % of their after tax wage and then the icing is the 244 a week plus children's allowance. Throw in medical/GP card. So if you have 2/3 kids it actually makes sense not to work as when you work you have expenses like travel, lunch, petrol, car etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Yeah but you need to look at what the average house price was, the average take home wage along with the average cost of the day to day bills was back then and compare to now. People have less disposable cash now in their 20s/early 30s than I did when I was 20 that was back in the late 90s early 00. This is forcing young people to live at home longer and/or to emigrate to a country where they can rent and live without the government fleecing their wage packet to pay for others who get things like housing handed to them for nothing. Our system is very unfair with regards to how much we get taxed and how low a rate our tax bands particular the higher tax bands kick in - Not to mention its not like they are spending it on public services or infrastructure as Ireland as this is way below where we should be when you factor in what the bog standard worker pays into the system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is true.

    Taking my own parents as an example again, the house they bough in '88 was 22k. Using the CSO inflation tool, we can see that this is nowhere near the 700k price of the house today. Obviously the wages were lower too, but it is without question that housing relative to income is higher in 2025 than in the 80s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I think we are grossly exaggerating the situation for those in their 20s. It is actually those who came of age between say 2004 to 2014 that have been most screwed over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The big difference is deposits. Interest rates made affordability narrower in the 1980s. Deposit sizes create a barrier to entry in the 2020s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    This is gibberish. The State intervened with Rent Pressure Zones. Central Bank rules (who impact more than most on house buying) have the most impact on house prices outside of supply / macro demand factors. The CBI for years cheered in their briefing documents that they kept a lid on house prices when recovery was underway, juxtaposing us with international peers in terms of borrowing ability.

    I hate this sort of conspiratorial thinking. I do not think the government want a collapse in prices (and the reasons for that should be obvious, although I note lots would want it) but their key goal is to get more home ownership. That narrows the disaffected vote considerably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,914 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    In 1990 the average price of a house was €60,000. In 1990 a new house cost 4.3 times the average industrial wage. Now median salary is roughly 45k and median house price is €350k, 7.77 times.

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/1990-the-past-is-a-different-country/31278717.html

    Yet some still say that all people have to do is knuckle down, cancel Netflix and don't go for brunch and you can get a house.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    I am not sure you are comparing like with like. The houses nowadays are completed to a much higher standard (as a min) than they were when we purchased our homes. My first home did not have weather glaze windows, did not have a kitchen, did not have insulation, did not have central heating. Could you imagine suggesting this to people now? Remember everything that has to be paid for in the price of a new property.

    I never could afford holidays growing up, could not afford a car etc. Life is about choices very few people are in a position to have enough money to do what they want.

    if you want to purchase a property you have to make sacrifices. I remember when I was saving for a deposit I had to cut back on a lot to save my deposit. I remember friends of mine having similar sacrifices of no holiday, going out maybe once a week and a treat was a takeaway.

    Before you say things are different now both of my nieces purchased properties with their partners in the last 5 yrs and are not in very high paying jobs but made choices to save in order to purchase their properties. They lived at home until they could afford to purchase properties up to their mid 20's so it can be done, people just need to make choices.



Advertisement
Advertisement